Add arm64_force_sig_mceerr for consistency with arm64_force_sig_fault,
and use it in the one location that can take advantage of it.

This removes the fiddly filling out of siginfo before sending a signal
reporting an memory error to userspace.
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

Wrap force_sig_fault with a helper that calls arm64_show_signal
and call arm64_force_sig_fault where appropraite.
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>

This code is truly common between the signal sending cases so share it.
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>

As this work is truly common between all of the signal sending cases
there is no need to repeat it between the different cases.
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>

Not all of the signals passed to __do_user_fault can be handled
the same way so expand the now tiny __do_user_fault in it's callers
and remove it.
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

It gets easy to confuse what is going on when some code is shared and some not
so stop sharing the trivial bits of signal generation to make future updates
easier to understand.
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

These two cases are practically the same and use siginfo differently
from the other signals sent from do_page_fault.  So consolidate them
to make future changes easier.
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

This pepares for sending signals with something other than
arm64_force_sig_info.
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

Every caller passes in current for tsk so there is no need to pass
tsk.  Instead make tsk a local variable initialized to current.
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

Instead of generating a struct siginfo before calling arm64_notify_die
pass the signal number, tne sicode and the fault address into
arm64_notify_die and have it call force_sig_fault instead of
force_sig_info to let the generic code generate the struct siginfo.

This keeps code passing just the needed information into
siginfo generating code, making it easier to see what
is happening and harder to get wrong.  Further by letting
the generic code handle the generation of struct siginfo
it reduces the number of sites generating struct siginfo
making it possible to review them and verify that all
of the fiddly details for a structure passed to userspace
are handled properly.
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

Use new return type vm_fault_t for fault handler.  For now, this is just
documenting that the function returns a VM_FAULT value rather than an
errno.  Once all instances are converted, vm_fault_t will become a
distinct type.

Ref-> commit 1c8f4220 ("mm: change return type to vm_fault_t")

In this patch all the caller of handle_mm_fault() are changed to return
vm_fault_t type.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180617084810.GA6730@jordon-HP-15-Notebook-PCSigned-off-by: NSouptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
Cc: James E.J. Bottomley <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

In order to remove the additional check before calling the
ghes_notify_sea(), make stub definition when !CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA.

After this cleanup, we can simply call the ghes_notify_sea() to let
APEI driver handle the SEA notification.
Signed-off-by: NDongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Now that we have sysreg_clear_set(), we can consistently use this
instead of config_sctlr_el1().
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NDave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

In do_page_fault(), we handle some kernel faults early, and simply
die() with a message. For faults handled later, we dump the faulting
address, decode the ESR, walk the page tables, and perform a number of
steps to ensure that this data is reported.

Let's unify the handling of fatal kernel faults with a new
die_kernel_fault() helper, handling all of these details. This is
largely the same as the existing logic in __do_kernel_fault(), except
that addresses are consistently padded to 16 hex characters, as would be
expected for a 64-bit address.

The messages currently logged in do_page_fault are adjusted to fit into
the die_kernel_fault() message template.
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

The naming of is_permission_fault() makes it sound like it should return
true for permission faults from EL0, but by design, it only does so for
faults from EL1.

Let's make this clear by dropping el1 in the name, as we do for
is_el1_instruction_abort().
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

If userspace faults on a kernel address, handing them the raw ESR
value on the sigframe as part of the delivered signal can leak data
useful to attackers who are using information about the underlying hardware
fault type (e.g. translation vs permission) as a mechanism to defeat KASLR.

However there are also legitimate uses for the information provided
in the ESR -- notably the GCC and LLVM sanitizers use this to report
whether wild pointer accesses by the application are reads or writes
(since a wild write is a more serious bug than a wild read), so we
don't want to drop the ESR information entirely.

For faulting addresses in the kernel, sanitize the ESR. We choose
to present userspace with the illusion that there is nothing mapped
in the kernel's part of the address space at all, by reporting all
faults as level 0 translation faults taken to EL1.

These fields are safe to pass through to userspace as they depend
only on the instruction that userspace used to provoke the fault:
 EC IL (always)
 ISV CM WNR (for all data aborts)
All the other fields in ESR except DFSC are architecturally RES0
for an L0 translation fault taken to EL1, so can be zeroed out
without confusing userspace.

The illusion is not entirely perfect, as there is a tiny wrinkle
where we will report an alignment fault that was not due to the memory
type (for instance a LDREX to an unaligned address) as a translation
fault, whereas if you do this on real unmapped memory the alignment
fault takes precedence. This is not likely to trip anybody up in
practice, as the only users we know of for the ESR information who
care about the behaviour for kernel addresses only really want to
know about the WnR bit.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Call clear_siginfo to ensure every stack allocated siginfo is properly
initialized before being passed to the signal sending functions.

Note: It is not safe to depend on C initializers to initialize struct
siginfo on the stack because C is allowed to skip holes when
initializing a structure.

The initialization of struct siginfo in tracehook_report_syscall_exit
was moved from the helper user_single_step_siginfo into
tracehook_report_syscall_exit itself, to make it clear that the local
variable siginfo gets fully initialized.

In a few cases the scope of struct siginfo has been reduced to make it
clear that siginfo siginfo is not used on other paths in the function
in which it is declared.

Instances of using memset to initialize siginfo have been replaced
with calls clear_siginfo for clarity.
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

We issue the enable() call back for all CPU hwcaps capabilities
available on the system, on all the CPUs. So far we have ignored
the argument passed to the call back, which had a prototype to
accept a "void *" for use with on_each_cpu() and later with
stop_machine(). However, with commit 0a0d111d
("arm64: cpufeature: Pass capability structure to ->enable callback"),
there are some users of the argument who wants the matching capability
struct pointer where there are multiple matching criteria for a single
capability. Clean up the declaration of the call back to make it clear.

 1) Renamed to cpu_enable(), to imply taking necessary actions on the
    called CPU for the entry.
 2) Pass const pointer to the capability, to allow the call back to
    check the entry. (e.,g to check if any action is needed on the CPU)
 3) We don't care about the result of the call back, turning this to
    a void.

Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Acked-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJulien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
[suzuki: convert more users, rename call back and drop results]
Signed-off-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Currently, as reported by Eric, an invalid si_code value 0 is
passed in many signals delivered to userspace in response to faults
and other kernel errors.  Typically 0 is passed when the fault is
insufficiently diagnosable or when there does not appear to be any
sensible alternative value to choose.

This appears to violate POSIX, and is intuitively wrong for at
least two reasons arising from the fact that 0 == SI_USER:

 1) si_code is a union selector, and SI_USER (and si_code <= 0 in
    general) implies the existence of a different set of fields
    (siginfo._kill) from that which exists for a fault signal
    (siginfo._sigfault).  However, the code raising the signal
    typically writes only the _sigfault fields, and the _kill
    fields make no sense in this case.

    Thus when userspace sees si_code == 0 (SI_USER) it may
    legitimately inspect fields in the inactive union member _kill
    and obtain garbage as a result.

    There appears to be software in the wild relying on this,
    albeit generally only for printing diagnostic messages.

 2) Software that wants to be robust against spurious signals may
    discard signals where si_code == SI_USER (or <= 0), or may
    filter such signals based on the si_uid and si_pid fields of
    siginfo._sigkill.  In the case of fault signals, this means
    that important (and usually fatal) error conditions may be
    silently ignored.

In practice, many of the faults for which arm64 passes si_code == 0
are undiagnosable conditions such as exceptions with syndrome
values in ESR_ELx to which the architecture does not yet assign any
meaning, or conditions indicative of a bug or error in the kernel
or system and thus that are unrecoverable and should never occur in
normal operation.

The approach taken in this patch is to translate all such
undiagnosable or "impossible" synchronous fault conditions to
SIGKILL, since these are at least probably localisable to a single
process.  Some of these conditions should really result in a kernel
panic, but due to the lack of diagnostic information it is
difficult to be certain: this patch does not add any calls to
panic(), but this could change later if justified.

Although si_code will not reach userspace in the case of SIGKILL,
it is still desirable to pass a nonzero value so that the common
siginfo handling code can detect incorrect use of si_code == 0
without false positives.  In this case the si_code dependent
siginfo fields will not be correctly initialised, but since they
are not passed to userspace I deem this not to matter.

A few faults can reasonably occur in realistic userspace scenarios,
and _should_ raise a regular, handleable (but perhaps not
ignorable/blockable) signal: for these, this patch attempts to
choose a suitable standard si_code value for the raised signal in
each case instead of 0.

arm64 was the only arch to define a BUS_FIXME code, so after this
patch nobody defines it.  This patch therefore also removes the
relevant code from siginfo_layout().

Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reported-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Reporting unhandled user pagefaults via arm64_force_sig_info means
that __do_user_fault can be drastically simplified, since it no longer
has to worry about printing the fault information and can consequently
just take the siginfo as a parameter.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

There's no need for callers of arm64_notify_die to print information
about user faults. Instead, they can pass a string to arm64_notify_die
which will be printed subject to show_unhandled_signals.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

In many cases, page tables can be accessed concurrently by either another
CPU (due to things like fast gup) or by the hardware page table walker
itself, which may set access/dirty bits. In such cases, it is important
to use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page table entries so that
entries cannot be torn, merged or subject to apparent loss of coherence
due to compiler transformations.

Whilst there are some scenarios where this cannot happen (e.g. pinned
kernel mappings for the linear region), the overhead of using READ_ONCE
/WRITE_ONCE everywhere is minimal and makes the code an awful lot easier
to reason about. This patch consistently uses these macros in the arch
code, as well as explicitly namespacing pointers to page table entries
from the entries themselves by using adopting a 'p' suffix for the former
(as is sometimes used elsewhere in the kernel source).
Tested-by: NYury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Tested-by: NRichard Ruigrok <rruigrok@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

It is possible to take an IRQ from EL0 following a branch to a kernel
address in such a way that the IRQ is prioritised over the instruction
abort. Whilst an attacker would need to get the stars to align here,
it might be sufficient with enough calibration so perform BP hardening
in the rare case that we see a kernel address in the ELR when handling
an IRQ from EL0.
Reported-by: NDan Hettena <dhettena@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Software-step and PC alignment fault exceptions have higher priority than
instruction abort exceptions, so apply the BP hardening hooks there too
if the user PC appears to reside in kernel space.
Reported-by: NDan Hettena <dhettena@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Currently, USER_DS represents an exclusive limit while KERNEL_DS is
inclusive. In order to do some clever trickery for speculation-safe
masking, we need them both to behave equivalently - there aren't enough
bits to make KERNEL_DS exclusive, so we have precisely one option. This
also happens to correct a longstanding false negative for a range
ending on the very top byte of kernel memory.

Mark Rutland points out that we've actually got the semantics of
addresses vs. segments muddled up in most of the places we need to
amend, so shuffle the {USER,KERNEL}_DS definitions around such that we
can correct those properly instead of just pasting "-1"s everywhere.
Signed-off-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Setting si_code to 0 results in a userspace seeing an si_code of 0.
This is the same si_code as SI_USER.  Posix and common sense requires
that SI_USER not be a signal specific si_code.  As such this use of 0
for the si_code is a pretty horribly broken ABI.

Further use of si_code == 0 guaranteed that copy_siginfo_to_user saw a
value of __SI_KILL and now sees a value of SIL_KILL with the result
that uid and pid fields are copied and which might copying the si_addr
field by accident but certainly not by design.  Making this a very
flakey implementation.

Utilizing FPE_FIXME, BUS_FIXME, TRAP_FIXME siginfo_layout will now return
SIL_FAULT and the appropriate fields will be reliably copied.

But folks this is a new and unique kind of bad.  This is massively
untested code bad.  This is inventing new and unique was to get
siginfo wrong bad.  This is don't even think about Posix or what
siginfo means bad.  This is lots of eyeballs all missing the fact
that the code does the wrong thing bad.  This is getting stuck
and keep making the same mistake bad.

I really hope we can find a non userspace breaking fix for this on a
port as new as arm64.

Possible ABI fixes include:
- Send the signal without siginfo
- Don't generate a signal
- Possibly assign and use an appropriate si_code
- Don't handle cases which can't happen

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Ref: 53631b54 ("arm64: Floating point and SIMD")
Ref: 32015c23 ("arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort")
Ref: 1d18c47c ("arm64: MMU fault handling and page table management")
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

Aliasing attacks against CPU branch predictors can allow an attacker to
redirect speculative control flow on some CPUs and potentially divulge
information from one context to another.

This patch adds initial skeleton code behind a new Kconfig option to
enable implementation-specific mitigations against these attacks for
CPUs that are affected.
Co-developed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

do_sea() calls arm64_notify_die() which will always signal
user-space. It also returns whether APEI claimed the external
abort as a RAS notification. If it returns failure do_mem_abort()
will signal user-space too.

do_mem_abort() wants to know if we handled the error, we always
call arm64_notify_die() so can always return success.
Signed-off-by: NDongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Commit 42dbf54e ("arm64: consistently log ESR and page table")
dumps page table entries for user faults hitting do_bad entries in the
fault handler table. Whilst this shouldn't really happen in practice,
it's not beyond the realms of possibility if e.g. running an old kernel
on a new CPU.

Generally, we want to avoid exposing physical addresses under the control
of userspace (see commit bf396c09 ("arm64: mm: don't print out page
table entries on EL0 faults")), so walk the page tables only on exceptions
from EL1.
Reported-by: NKristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

When we take a fault we can't handle, we try to dump some relevant
information, but we're not consistent about doing so.

In do_mem_abort(), we log the full ESR, but don't dump a page table
walk. In __do_kernel_fault, we dump an attempted decoding of the ESR
(but not the ESR itself) along with a page table walk.

Let's try to make things more consistent by dumping the full ESR in
mem_abort_decode(), and having do_mem_abort dump a page table walk. The
existing dump of the ESR in do_mem_abort() is rendered redundant, and
removed.
Tested-by: NLaura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Based on: ARM Architecture Reference Manual, ARMv8 (DDI 0487B.b).

ARMv8.1 introduces the optional feature ARMv8.1-TTHM which can trigger a
new type of memory abort. This exception is triggered when hardware update
of page table flags is not atomic in regards to other memory accesses.
Replace the corresponding unknown entry with a more accurate one.

Cf: Section D10.2.28 ESR_ELx, Exception Syndrome Register (p D10-2381),
section D4.4.11 Restriction on memory types for hardware updates on page
tables (p D4-2116 - D4-2117).

ARMv8.2 does not add new exception types, however it is worth mentioning
that when obligatory feature RAS (optional for ARMv8.{0,1}) is implemented,
exceptions related to "Synchronous parity or ECC error on memory access,
not on translation table walk" become reserved and should not occur.
Signed-off-by: NJulien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Currently data_abort_decode() dumps the ISS field as a decimal value
with a '0x' prefix, which is somewhat misleading.

Fix it to print as hexadecimal, as was intended.

Fixes: 1f9b8936 ("arm64: Decode information from ESR upon mem faults")
Reviewed-by: NDave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJulien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Fault.c seems to be a magnet for useless and wrong comments, largely
due to its ancestry in other architectures where the code has since
moved on, but the comments have remained intact.

This patch removes both useless and incorrect comments, leaving only
those that say something correct and relevant.
Reported-by: NWenjia Zhou <zhiyuan_zhu@htc.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

We currently route pte translation faults via do_page_fault, which elides
the address check against TASK_SIZE before invoking the mm fault handling
code. However, this can cause issues with the path walking code in
conjunction with our word-at-a-time implementation because
load_unaligned_zeropad can end up faulting in kernel space if it reads
across a page boundary and runs into a page fault (e.g. by attempting to
read from a guard region).

In the case of such a fault, load_unaligned_zeropad has registered a
fixup to shift the valid data and pad with zeroes, however the abort is
reported as a level 3 translation fault and we dispatch it straight to
do_page_fault, despite it being a kernel address. This results in calling
a sleeping function from atomic context:

  BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:313
  in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 10290
  Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
  [...]
  [<ffffff8e016cd0cc>] ___might_sleep+0x134/0x144
  [<ffffff8e016cd158>] __might_sleep+0x7c/0x8c
  [<ffffff8e016977f0>] do_page_fault+0x140/0x330
  [<ffffff8e01681328>] do_mem_abort+0x54/0xb0
  Exception stack(0xfffffffb20247a70 to 0xfffffffb20247ba0)
  [...]
  [<ffffff8e016844fc>] el1_da+0x18/0x78
  [<ffffff8e017f399c>] path_parentat+0x44/0x88
  [<ffffff8e017f4c9c>] filename_parentat+0x5c/0xd8
  [<ffffff8e017f5044>] filename_create+0x4c/0x128
  [<ffffff8e017f59e4>] SyS_mkdirat+0x50/0xc8
  [<ffffff8e01684e30>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28
  Code: 36380080 d5384100 f9400800 9402566d (d4210000)
  ---[ end trace 2d01889f2bca9b9f ]---

Fix this by dispatching all translation faults to do_translation_faults,
which avoids invoking the page fault logic for faults on kernel addresses.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reported-by: NAnkit Jain <ankijain@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

When there's a fatal signal pending, arm64's do_page_fault()
implementation returns 0. The intent is that we'll return to the
faulting userspace instruction, delivering the signal on the way.

However, if we take a fatal signal during fixing up a uaccess, this
results in a return to the faulting kernel instruction, which will be
instantly retried, resulting in the same fault being taken forever. As
the task never reaches userspace, the signal is not delivered, and the
task is left unkillable. While the task is stuck in this state, it can
inhibit the forward progress of the system.

To avoid this, we must ensure that when a fatal signal is pending, we
apply any necessary fixup for a faulting kernel instruction. Thus we
will return to an error path, and it is up to that code to make forward
progress towards delivering the fatal signal.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: NSteve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Tested-by: NSteve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Tested-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Since the pte handling for hardware AF/DBM works even when the hardware
feature is not present, make the pte accessors implementation permanent
and remove the corresponding #ifdefs. The Kconfig option is kept as it
can still be used to disable the feature at the hardware level.
Reviewed-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Currently PTE_RDONLY is treated as a hardware only bit and not handled
by the pte_mkwrite(), pte_wrprotect() or the user PAGE_* definitions.
The set_pte_at() function is responsible for setting this bit based on
the write permission or dirty state. This patch moves the PTE_RDONLY
handling out of set_pte_at into the pte_mkwrite()/pte_wrprotect()
functions. The PAGE_* definitions to need to be updated to explicitly
include PTE_RDONLY when !PTE_WRITE.

The patch also removes the redundant PAGE_COPY(_EXEC) definitions as
they are identical to the corresponding PAGE_READONLY(_EXEC).
Reviewed-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

With the support for hardware updates of the access and dirty states,
the following pte handling functions had to be implemented using
exclusives: __ptep_test_and_clear_young(), ptep_get_and_clear(),
ptep_set_wrprotect() and ptep_set_access_flags(). To take advantage of
the LSE atomic instructions and also make the code cleaner, convert
these pte functions to use the more generic cmpxchg()/xchg().
Reviewed-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: NSteve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

When receiving unhandled faults from the CPU, description is very sparse.
Adding information about faults decoded from ESR.

Added defines to esr.h corresponding ESR fields. Values are based on ARM
Archtecture Reference Manual (DDI 0487B.a), section D7.2.28 ESR_ELx, Exception
Syndrome Register (ELx) (pages D7-2275 to D7-2280).

New output is of the form:
[   77.818059] Mem abort info:
[   77.820826]   Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[   77.826706]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
[   77.829742]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[   77.832849] Data abort info:
[   77.835713]   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000070
[   77.839522]   CM = 0, WnR = 1
Signed-off-by: NJulien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
[catalin.marinas@arm.com: fix "%lu" in a pr_alert() call]
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In a system with DBM (dirty bit management) capable agents there is a
possible race between a CPU executing ptep_set_access_flags() (maybe
non-DBM capable) and a hardware update of the dirty state (clearing of
PTE_RDONLY). The scenario:

a) the pte is writable (PTE_WRITE set), clean (PTE_RDONLY set) and old
   (PTE_AF clear)
b) ptep_set_access_flags() is called as a result of a read access and it
   needs to set the pte to writable, clean and young (PTE_AF set)
c) a DBM-capable agent, as a result of a different write access, is
   marking the entry as young (setting PTE_AF) and dirty (clearing
   PTE_RDONLY)

The current ptep_set_access_flags() implementation would set the
PTE_RDONLY bit in the resulting value overriding the DBM update and
losing the dirty state.

This patch fixes such race by setting PTE_RDONLY to the most permissive
(lowest value) of the current entry and the new one.

Fixes: 66dbd6e6 ("arm64: Implement ptep_set_access_flags() for hardware AF/DBM")
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: NSteve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>