1. 31 8月, 2008 9 次提交
    • A
      UBIFS: fill f_fsid · b3385c27
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      UBIFS stores 16-bit UUID in the superblock, and it is a good
      idea to return part of it in 'f_fsid' filed of kstatfs structure.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      b3385c27
    • A
      UBIFS: improve statfs reporting even more · 7dad181b
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      Since free space we report in statfs is file size which should
      fit to the FS - change the way we calculate free space and use
      leb_overhead instead of dark_wm in calculations.
      
      Results of "freespace" test (120MiB volume, 16KiB LEB size,
      512 bytes page size). Before the change:
      
      freespace: Test 1: fill the space we have 3 times
      freespace: was free: 85204992 bytes 81.3 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 11284480 bytes 10.8 MiB, wrote 13.2% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 83554304 bytes 79.7 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 12935168 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 15.5% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 83554304 bytes 79.7 MiB, wrote: 96493568 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 12939264 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 15.5% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 1 finished
      
      freespace: Test 2: gradually lessen amount of free space and fill the FS
      freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 7596218 bytes 7.2 MiB each time
      freespace: was free: 78675968 bytes 75.0 MiB, wrote: 88903680 bytes 84.8 MiB, delta: 10227712 bytes 9.8 MiB, wrote 13.0% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 72015872 bytes 68.7 MiB, wrote: 81514496 bytes 77.7 MiB, delta: 9498624 bytes 9.1 MiB, wrote 13.2% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 63938560 bytes 61.0 MiB, wrote: 72589312 bytes 69.2 MiB, delta: 8650752 bytes 8.2 MiB, wrote 13.5% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 56127488 bytes 53.5 MiB, wrote: 63762432 bytes 60.8 MiB, delta: 7634944 bytes 7.3 MiB, wrote 13.6% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 48336896 bytes 46.1 MiB, wrote: 54935552 bytes 52.4 MiB, delta: 6598656 bytes 6.3 MiB, wrote 13.7% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 40587264 bytes 38.7 MiB, wrote: 46157824 bytes 44.0 MiB, delta: 5570560 bytes 5.3 MiB, wrote 13.7% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 32841728 bytes 31.3 MiB, wrote: 37384192 bytes 35.7 MiB, delta: 4542464 bytes 4.3 MiB, wrote 13.8% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 25100288 bytes 23.9 MiB, wrote: 28618752 bytes 27.3 MiB, delta: 3518464 bytes 3.4 MiB, wrote 14.0% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 17342464 bytes 16.5 MiB, wrote: 19841024 bytes 18.9 MiB, delta: 2498560 bytes 2.4 MiB, wrote 14.4% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 9605120 bytes 9.2 MiB, wrote: 11063296 bytes 10.6 MiB, delta: 1458176 bytes 1.4 MiB, wrote 15.2% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 2 finished
      
      freespace: Test 3: gradually lessen amount of free space by trashing and fill the FS
      freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 7606272 bytes 7.3 MiB each time
      freespace: trashing: was free: 83668992 bytes 79.8 MiB, need free: 7606272 bytes 7.3 MiB, files created: 248297, delete 225724 (90.9% of them)
      freespace: was free: 70803456 bytes 67.5 MiB, wrote: 82485248 bytes 78.7 MiB, delta: 11681792 bytes 11.1 MiB, wrote 16.5% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 81080320 bytes 77.3 MiB, need free: 15212544 bytes 14.5 MiB, files created: 248711, delete 202047 (81.2% of them)
      freespace: was free: 59867136 bytes 57.1 MiB, wrote: 71897088 bytes 68.6 MiB, delta: 12029952 bytes 11.5 MiB, wrote 20.1% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 82243584 bytes 78.4 MiB, need free: 22818816 bytes 21.8 MiB, files created: 248866, delete 179817 (72.3% of them)
      freespace: was free: 50905088 bytes 48.5 MiB, wrote: 63168512 bytes 60.2 MiB, delta: 12263424 bytes 11.7 MiB, wrote 24.1% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 83402752 bytes 79.5 MiB, need free: 30425088 bytes 29.0 MiB, files created: 248920, delete 158114 (63.5% of them)
      freespace: was free: 42651648 bytes 40.7 MiB, wrote: 55406592 bytes 52.8 MiB, delta: 12754944 bytes 12.2 MiB, wrote 29.9% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 84402176 bytes 80.5 MiB, need free: 38031360 bytes 36.3 MiB, files created: 248709, delete 136641 (54.9% of them)
      freespace: was free: 35233792 bytes 33.6 MiB, wrote: 48250880 bytes 46.0 MiB, delta: 13017088 bytes 12.4 MiB, wrote 36.9% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 82530304 bytes 78.7 MiB, need free: 45637632 bytes 43.5 MiB, files created: 248778, delete 111208 (44.7% of them)
      freespace: was free: 27287552 bytes 26.0 MiB, wrote: 40267776 bytes 38.4 MiB, delta: 12980224 bytes 12.4 MiB, wrote 47.6% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 85114880 bytes 81.2 MiB, need free: 53243904 bytes 50.8 MiB, files created: 248508, delete 93052 (37.4% of them)
      freespace: was free: 22437888 bytes 21.4 MiB, wrote: 35328000 bytes 33.7 MiB, delta: 12890112 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 57.4% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 84103168 bytes 80.2 MiB, need free: 60850176 bytes 58.0 MiB, files created: 248637, delete 68743 (27.6% of them)
      freespace: was free: 15536128 bytes 14.8 MiB, wrote: 28319744 bytes 27.0 MiB, delta: 12783616 bytes 12.2 MiB, wrote 82.3% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 84357120 bytes 80.4 MiB, need free: 68456448 bytes 65.3 MiB, files created: 248567, delete 46852 (18.8% of them)
      freespace: was free: 9015296 bytes 8.6 MiB, wrote: 22044672 bytes 21.0 MiB, delta: 13029376 bytes 12.4 MiB, wrote 144.5% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 84942848 bytes 81.0 MiB, need free: 76062720 bytes 72.5 MiB, files created: 248636, delete 25993 (10.5% of them)
      freespace: was free: 6086656 bytes 5.8 MiB, wrote: 8331264 bytes 7.9 MiB, delta: 2244608 bytes 2.1 MiB, wrote 36.9% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 3 finished
      
      freespace: finished successfully
      
      After the change:
      
      freespace: Test 1: fill the space we have 3 times
      freespace: was free: 94048256 bytes 89.7 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 2441216 bytes 2.3 MiB, wrote 2.6% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 92246016 bytes 88.0 MiB, wrote: 96493568 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 4247552 bytes 4.1 MiB, wrote 4.6% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 92254208 bytes 88.0 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 4235264 bytes 4.0 MiB, wrote 4.6% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 1 finished
      
      freespace: Test 2: gradually lessen amount of free space and fill the FS
      freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 8386001 bytes 8.0 MiB each time
      freespace: was free: 86605824 bytes 82.6 MiB, wrote: 88252416 bytes 84.2 MiB, delta: 1646592 bytes 1.6 MiB, wrote 1.9% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 78667776 bytes 75.0 MiB, wrote: 80715776 bytes 77.0 MiB, delta: 2048000 bytes 2.0 MiB, wrote 2.6% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 69615616 bytes 66.4 MiB, wrote: 71630848 bytes 68.3 MiB, delta: 2015232 bytes 1.9 MiB, wrote 2.9% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 61018112 bytes 58.2 MiB, wrote: 62783488 bytes 59.9 MiB, delta: 1765376 bytes 1.7 MiB, wrote 2.9% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 52424704 bytes 50.0 MiB, wrote: 53968896 bytes 51.5 MiB, delta: 1544192 bytes 1.5 MiB, wrote 2.9% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 43880448 bytes 41.8 MiB, wrote: 45199360 bytes 43.1 MiB, delta: 1318912 bytes 1.3 MiB, wrote 3.0% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 35332096 bytes 33.7 MiB, wrote: 36425728 bytes 34.7 MiB, delta: 1093632 bytes 1.0 MiB, wrote 3.1% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 26771456 bytes 25.5 MiB, wrote: 27643904 bytes 26.4 MiB, delta: 872448 bytes 852.0 KiB, wrote 3.3% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 18231296 bytes 17.4 MiB, wrote: 18878464 bytes 18.0 MiB, delta: 647168 bytes 632.0 KiB, wrote 3.5% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 9674752 bytes 9.2 MiB, wrote: 10088448 bytes 9.6 MiB, delta: 413696 bytes 404.0 KiB, wrote 4.3% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 2 finished
      
      freespace: Test 3: gradually lessen amount of free space by trashing and fill the FS
      freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 8397544 bytes 8.0 MiB each time
      freespace: trashing: was free: 92372992 bytes 88.1 MiB, need free: 8397552 bytes 8.0 MiB, files created: 248296, delete 225723 (90.9% of them)
      freespace: was free: 71909376 bytes 68.6 MiB, wrote: 82472960 bytes 78.7 MiB, delta: 10563584 bytes 10.1 MiB, wrote 14.7% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 88989696 bytes 84.9 MiB, need free: 16795096 bytes 16.0 MiB, files created: 248794, delete 201838 (81.1% of them)
      freespace: was free: 60354560 bytes 57.6 MiB, wrote: 71782400 bytes 68.5 MiB, delta: 11427840 bytes 10.9 MiB, wrote 18.9% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 90304512 bytes 86.1 MiB, need free: 25192640 bytes 24.0 MiB, files created: 248733, delete 179342 (72.1% of them)
      freespace: was free: 51187712 bytes 48.8 MiB, wrote: 62943232 bytes 60.0 MiB, delta: 11755520 bytes 11.2 MiB, wrote 23.0% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 91209728 bytes 87.0 MiB, need free: 33590184 bytes 32.0 MiB, files created: 248779, delete 157160 (63.2% of them)
      freespace: was free: 42704896 bytes 40.7 MiB, wrote: 55050240 bytes 52.5 MiB, delta: 12345344 bytes 11.8 MiB, wrote 28.9% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 92700672 bytes 88.4 MiB, need free: 41987728 bytes 40.0 MiB, files created: 248848, delete 136135 (54.7% of them)
      freespace: was free: 35250176 bytes 33.6 MiB, wrote: 48115712 bytes 45.9 MiB, delta: 12865536 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 36.5% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 93986816 bytes 89.6 MiB, need free: 50385272 bytes 48.1 MiB, files created: 248723, delete 115385 (46.4% of them)
      freespace: was free: 29995008 bytes 28.6 MiB, wrote: 41582592 bytes 39.7 MiB, delta: 11587584 bytes 11.1 MiB, wrote 38.6% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 91881472 bytes 87.6 MiB, need free: 58782816 bytes 56.1 MiB, files created: 248645, delete 89569 (36.0% of them)
      freespace: was free: 22511616 bytes 21.5 MiB, wrote: 34705408 bytes 33.1 MiB, delta: 12193792 bytes 11.6 MiB, wrote 54.2% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 91774976 bytes 87.5 MiB, need free: 67180360 bytes 64.1 MiB, files created: 248580, delete 66616 (26.8% of them)
      freespace: was free: 16908288 bytes 16.1 MiB, wrote: 26898432 bytes 25.7 MiB, delta: 9990144 bytes 9.5 MiB, wrote 59.1% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 92450816 bytes 88.2 MiB, need free: 75577904 bytes 72.1 MiB, files created: 248654, delete 45381 (18.3% of them)
      freespace: was free: 10170368 bytes 9.7 MiB, wrote: 19111936 bytes 18.2 MiB, delta: 8941568 bytes 8.5 MiB, wrote 87.9% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 93282304 bytes 89.0 MiB, need free: 83975448 bytes 80.1 MiB, files created: 248513, delete 24794 (10.0% of them)
      freespace: was free: 3911680 bytes 3.7 MiB, wrote: 7872512 bytes 7.5 MiB, delta: 3960832 bytes 3.8 MiB, wrote 101.3% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 3 finished
      
      freespace: finished successfully
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      7dad181b
    • A
      UBIFS: introduce LEB overhead · 9bbb5726
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      This is a preparational patch for the following statfs()
      report fix.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      9bbb5726
    • A
      UBIFS: add forgotten gc_idx_lebs component · 131130b9
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      We add this component at other similar places, but not in this
      one.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      131130b9
    • A
      UBIFS: fix assertion · ad507653
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      The assertion was incorrect, because it did not take into
      account free space.
      
      This patch also amends the comments correspondingly, and
      cleans them up a little.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      ad507653
    • A
      UBIFS: improve statfs reporting · 4b5f2762
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      Make free space calculation less pessimistic and more realistic,
      which in turn improves 'statfs()' reports. Now it lies by 10%-20%,
      instead of 20%-30% (10% more honest).
      
      Results of "freespace" test (120MiB volume, 16KiB LEB size,
      512 bytes page size). Before the change:
      
      freespace: Test 1: fill the space we have 3 times
      freespace: was free: 78274560 bytes 74.6 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 18214912 bytes 17.4 MiB, wrote 23.3% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 76754944 bytes 73.2 MiB, wrote: 96493568 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 19738624 bytes 18.8 MiB, wrote 25.7% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 76759040 bytes 73.2 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 19730432 bytes 18.8 MiB, wrote 25.7% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 1 finished
      
      freespace: Test 2: gradually lessen amount of free space and fill the FS
      freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 6977722 bytes 6.7 MiB each time
      freespace: was free: 72273920 bytes 68.9 MiB, wrote: 88891392 bytes 84.8 MiB, delta: 16617472 bytes 15.8 MiB, wrote 23.0% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 66154496 bytes 63.1 MiB, wrote: 81506304 bytes 77.7 MiB, delta: 15351808 bytes 14.6 MiB, wrote 23.2% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 58732544 bytes 56.0 MiB, wrote: 72572928 bytes 69.2 MiB, delta: 13840384 bytes 13.2 MiB, wrote 23.6% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 51552256 bytes 49.2 MiB, wrote: 63754240 bytes 60.8 MiB, delta: 12201984 bytes 11.6 MiB, wrote 23.7% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 44404736 bytes 42.3 MiB, wrote: 54943744 bytes 52.4 MiB, delta: 10539008 bytes 10.1 MiB, wrote 23.7% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 37285888 bytes 35.6 MiB, wrote: 46161920 bytes 44.0 MiB, delta: 8876032 bytes 8.5 MiB, wrote 23.8% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 30171136 bytes 28.8 MiB, wrote: 37384192 bytes 35.7 MiB, delta: 7213056 bytes 6.9 MiB, wrote 23.9% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 23048192 bytes 22.0 MiB, wrote: 28606464 bytes 27.3 MiB, delta: 5558272 bytes 5.3 MiB, wrote 24.1% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 15941632 bytes 15.2 MiB, wrote: 19828736 bytes 18.9 MiB, delta: 3887104 bytes 3.7 MiB, wrote 24.4% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 8830976 bytes 8.4 MiB, wrote: 11063296 bytes 10.6 MiB, delta: 2232320 bytes 2.1 MiB, wrote 25.3% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 2 finished
      
      freespace: Test 3: gradually lessen amount of free space by trashing and fill the FS
      freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 6985541 bytes 6.7 MiB each time
      freespace: trashing: was free: 76840960 bytes 73.3 MiB, need free: 6985550 bytes 6.7 MiB, files created: 248311, delete 225737 (90.9% of them)
      freespace: was free: 65228800 bytes 62.2 MiB, wrote: 82530304 bytes 78.7 MiB, delta: 17301504 bytes 16.5 MiB, wrote 26.5% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 74485760 bytes 71.0 MiB, need free: 13971091 bytes 13.3 MiB, files created: 248712, delete 202061 (81.2% of them)
      freespace: was free: 55025664 bytes 52.5 MiB, wrote: 71925760 bytes 68.6 MiB, delta: 16900096 bytes 16.1 MiB, wrote 30.7% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 75550720 bytes 72.1 MiB, need free: 20956632 bytes 20.0 MiB, files created: 248849, delete 179822 (72.3% of them)
      freespace: was free: 46669824 bytes 44.5 MiB, wrote: 63197184 bytes 60.3 MiB, delta: 16527360 bytes 15.8 MiB, wrote 35.4% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 76214272 bytes 72.7 MiB, need free: 27942173 bytes 26.6 MiB, files created: 248789, delete 157576 (63.3% of them)
      freespace: was free: 39129088 bytes 37.3 MiB, wrote: 55164928 bytes 52.6 MiB, delta: 16035840 bytes 15.3 MiB, wrote 41.0% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 77398016 bytes 73.8 MiB, need free: 34927714 bytes 33.3 MiB, files created: 248711, delete 136474 (54.9% of them)
      freespace: was free: 32325632 bytes 30.8 MiB, wrote: 48234496 bytes 46.0 MiB, delta: 15908864 bytes 15.2 MiB, wrote 49.2% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 75796480 bytes 72.3 MiB, need free: 41913255 bytes 40.0 MiB, files created: 248674, delete 111164 (44.7% of them)
      freespace: was free: 25079808 bytes 23.9 MiB, wrote: 40775680 bytes 38.9 MiB, delta: 15695872 bytes 15.0 MiB, wrote 62.6% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 78209024 bytes 74.6 MiB, need free: 48898796 bytes 46.6 MiB, files created: 248708, delete 93207 (37.5% of them)
      freespace: was free: 20582400 bytes 19.6 MiB, wrote: 34844672 bytes 33.2 MiB, delta: 14262272 bytes 13.6 MiB, wrote 69.3% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 77328384 bytes 73.7 MiB, need free: 55884337 bytes 53.3 MiB, files created: 248644, delete 68951 (27.7% of them)
      freespace: was free: 14368768 bytes 13.7 MiB, wrote: 28278784 bytes 27.0 MiB, delta: 13910016 bytes 13.3 MiB, wrote 96.8% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 77434880 bytes 73.8 MiB, need free: 62869878 bytes 60.0 MiB, files created: 248640, delete 46767 (18.8% of them)
      freespace: was free: 8286208 bytes 7.9 MiB, wrote: 21811200 bytes 20.8 MiB, delta: 13524992 bytes 12.9 MiB, wrote 163.2% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 77856768 bytes 74.2 MiB, need free: 69855419 bytes 66.6 MiB, files created: 248576, delete 25546 (10.3% of them)
      freespace: was free: 5570560 bytes 5.3 MiB, wrote: 8187904 bytes 7.8 MiB, delta: 2617344 bytes 2.5 MiB, wrote 47.0% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 3 finished
      
      freespace: finished successfully
      
      After the change:
      
      freespace: Test 1: fill the space we have 3 times
      freespace: was free: 85204992 bytes 81.3 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 11284480 bytes 10.8 MiB, wrote 13.2% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 83554304 bytes 79.7 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 12935168 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 15.5% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 83554304 bytes 79.7 MiB, wrote: 96493568 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 12939264 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 15.5% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 1 finished
      
      freespace: Test 2: gradually lessen amount of free space and fill the FS
      freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 7596218 bytes 7.2 MiB each time
      freespace: was free: 78675968 bytes 75.0 MiB, wrote: 88903680 bytes 84.8 MiB, delta: 10227712 bytes 9.8 MiB, wrote 13.0% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 72015872 bytes 68.7 MiB, wrote: 81514496 bytes 77.7 MiB, delta: 9498624 bytes 9.1 MiB, wrote 13.2% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 63938560 bytes 61.0 MiB, wrote: 72589312 bytes 69.2 MiB, delta: 8650752 bytes 8.2 MiB, wrote 13.5% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 56127488 bytes 53.5 MiB, wrote: 63762432 bytes 60.8 MiB, delta: 7634944 bytes 7.3 MiB, wrote 13.6% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 48336896 bytes 46.1 MiB, wrote: 54935552 bytes 52.4 MiB, delta: 6598656 bytes 6.3 MiB, wrote 13.7% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 40587264 bytes 38.7 MiB, wrote: 46157824 bytes 44.0 MiB, delta: 5570560 bytes 5.3 MiB, wrote 13.7% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 32841728 bytes 31.3 MiB, wrote: 37384192 bytes 35.7 MiB, delta: 4542464 bytes 4.3 MiB, wrote 13.8% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 25100288 bytes 23.9 MiB, wrote: 28618752 bytes 27.3 MiB, delta: 3518464 bytes 3.4 MiB, wrote 14.0% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 17342464 bytes 16.5 MiB, wrote: 19841024 bytes 18.9 MiB, delta: 2498560 bytes 2.4 MiB, wrote 14.4% more than predicted
      freespace: was free: 9605120 bytes 9.2 MiB, wrote: 11063296 bytes 10.6 MiB, delta: 1458176 bytes 1.4 MiB, wrote 15.2% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 2 finished
      
      freespace: Test 3: gradually lessen amount of free space by trashing and fill the FS
      freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 7606272 bytes 7.3 MiB each time
      freespace: trashing: was free: 83668992 bytes 79.8 MiB, need free: 7606272 bytes 7.3 MiB, files created: 248297, delete 225724 (90.9% of them)
      freespace: was free: 70803456 bytes 67.5 MiB, wrote: 82485248 bytes 78.7 MiB, delta: 11681792 bytes 11.1 MiB, wrote 16.5% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 81080320 bytes 77.3 MiB, need free: 15212544 bytes 14.5 MiB, files created: 248711, delete 202047 (81.2% of them)
      freespace: was free: 59867136 bytes 57.1 MiB, wrote: 71897088 bytes 68.6 MiB, delta: 12029952 bytes 11.5 MiB, wrote 20.1% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 82243584 bytes 78.4 MiB, need free: 22818816 bytes 21.8 MiB, files created: 248866, delete 179817 (72.3% of them)
      freespace: was free: 50905088 bytes 48.5 MiB, wrote: 63168512 bytes 60.2 MiB, delta: 12263424 bytes 11.7 MiB, wrote 24.1% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 83402752 bytes 79.5 MiB, need free: 30425088 bytes 29.0 MiB, files created: 248920, delete 158114 (63.5% of them)
      freespace: was free: 42651648 bytes 40.7 MiB, wrote: 55406592 bytes 52.8 MiB, delta: 12754944 bytes 12.2 MiB, wrote 29.9% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 84402176 bytes 80.5 MiB, need free: 38031360 bytes 36.3 MiB, files created: 248709, delete 136641 (54.9% of them)
      freespace: was free: 35233792 bytes 33.6 MiB, wrote: 48250880 bytes 46.0 MiB, delta: 13017088 bytes 12.4 MiB, wrote 36.9% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 82530304 bytes 78.7 MiB, need free: 45637632 bytes 43.5 MiB, files created: 248778, delete 111208 (44.7% of them)
      freespace: was free: 27287552 bytes 26.0 MiB, wrote: 40267776 bytes 38.4 MiB, delta: 12980224 bytes 12.4 MiB, wrote 47.6% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 85114880 bytes 81.2 MiB, need free: 53243904 bytes 50.8 MiB, files created: 248508, delete 93052 (37.4% of them)
      freespace: was free: 22437888 bytes 21.4 MiB, wrote: 35328000 bytes 33.7 MiB, delta: 12890112 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 57.4% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 84103168 bytes 80.2 MiB, need free: 60850176 bytes 58.0 MiB, files created: 248637, delete 68743 (27.6% of them)
      freespace: was free: 15536128 bytes 14.8 MiB, wrote: 28319744 bytes 27.0 MiB, delta: 12783616 bytes 12.2 MiB, wrote 82.3% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 84357120 bytes 80.4 MiB, need free: 68456448 bytes 65.3 MiB, files created: 248567, delete 46852 (18.8% of them)
      freespace: was free: 9015296 bytes 8.6 MiB, wrote: 22044672 bytes 21.0 MiB, delta: 13029376 bytes 12.4 MiB, wrote 144.5% more than predicted
      freespace: trashing: was free: 84942848 bytes 81.0 MiB, need free: 76062720 bytes 72.5 MiB, files created: 248636, delete 25993 (10.5% of them)
      freespace: was free: 6086656 bytes 5.8 MiB, wrote: 8331264 bytes 7.9 MiB, delta: 2244608 bytes 2.1 MiB, wrote 36.9% more than predicted
      freespace: Test 3 finished
      
      freespace: finished successfully
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      4b5f2762
    • A
      UBIFS: remove incorrect index space check · 8aabb750
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      When we report free space to user-space, we should not report
      0 if the amount of empty LEBs is too low, because they would
      be produced by GC when needed. Thus, just call
      'ubifs_calc_available()' straight away which would take
      'min_idx_lebs' into account anyway.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      8aabb750
    • A
      UBIFS: push empty flash hack down · 9e5de354
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      We have a hack which forces the amount of flash space to be
      equivalent to 'c->blocks_cnt' in case of empty FS. This is
      to make users happy and see '%0' used in 'df' when they
      mount an empty FS. This hack is not needed in
      'ubifs_calc_available()', but it is only needed the caller,
      in 'ubifs_budg_get_free_space()'. So push it down there.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      9e5de354
    • A
      UBIFS: do not update min_idx_lebs in stafs · 8191e1fa
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      This is bad because the rest of the code should not depend on it,
      and this may hide bugss, instead of revealing them.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      8191e1fa
  2. 25 8月, 2008 2 次提交
  3. 21 8月, 2008 5 次提交
    • A
      UBIFS: fix zero-length truncations · 04da11bf
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      Always allow truncations to zero, even if budgeting thinks there
      is no space. UBIFS reserves some space for deletions anyway.
      
      Otherwise, the following happans:
      1. create a file, and write as much as possible there, until ENOSPC
      2. truncate the file, which fails with ENOSPC, which is not good.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      04da11bf
    • A
      cramfs: fix named-pipe handling · 82d63fc9
      Al Viro 提交于
      After commit a97c9bf3 (fix cramfs
      making duplicate entries in inode cache) in kernel 2.6.14, named-pipe
      on cramfs does not work properly.
      
      It seems the commit make all named-pipe on cramfs share their inode
      (and named-pipe buffer).
      
      Make ..._test() refuse to merge inodes with ->i_ino == 1, take inode setup
      back to get_cramfs_inode() and make ->drop_inode() evict ones with ->i_ino
      == 1 immediately.
      Reported-by: NAtsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: <stable@kernel.org>		[2.6.14 and later]
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      82d63fc9
    • K
      fix setpriority(PRIO_PGRP) thread iterator breakage · 2d70b68d
      Ken Chen 提交于
      When user calls sys_setpriority(PRIO_PGRP ...) on a NPTL style multi-LWP
      process, only the task leader of the process is affected, all other
      sibling LWP threads didn't receive the setting.  The problem was that the
      iterator used in sys_setpriority() only iteartes over one task for each
      process, ignoring all other sibling thread.
      
      Introduce a new macro do_each_pid_thread / while_each_pid_thread to walk
      each thread of a process.  Convert 4 call sites in {set/get}priority and
      ioprio_{set/get}.
      Signed-off-by: NKen Chen <kenchen@google.com>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
      Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      2d70b68d
    • P
      binfmt_misc: fix false -ENOEXEC when coupled with other binary handlers · ff9bc512
      Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
      In case the binfmt_misc binary handler is registered *before* the e.g.
      script one (when for example being compiled as a module) the following
      situation may occur:
      
      1. user launches a script, whose interpreter is a misc binary;
      2. the load_misc_binary sets the misc_bang and returns -ENOEVEC,
         since the binary is a script;
      3. the load_script_binary loads one and calls for search_binary_hander
         to run the interpreter;
      4. the load_misc_binary is called again, but refuses to load the
         binary due to misc_bang bit set.
      
      The fix is to move the misc_bang setting lower - prior to the actual
      call to the search_binary_handler.
      
      Caused by the commit 3a2e7f47 (binfmt_misc.c: avoid potential kernel
      stack overflow)
      Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
      Reported-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
      Tested-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
      Cc: <stable@kernel.org>		[2.6.26.x]
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      ff9bc512
    • C
      /proc/self/maps doesn't display the real file offset · 1804dc6e
      Clement Calmels 提交于
      This addresses
      
      	http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11318
      
      In function show_map (file: fs/proc/task_mmu.c), if vma->vm_pgoff > 2^20
      than (vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SIZE) is greater than 2^32 (with PAGE_SIZE
      equal to 4096 (i.e.  2^12).  The next seq_printf use an unsigned long for
      the conversion of (vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SIZE), as a result the offset
      value displayed in /proc/self/maps is truncated if the page offset is
      greater than 2^20.
      
      A test that shows this issue:
      
      #define _GNU_SOURCE
      #include <sys/types.h>
      #include <sys/stat.h>
      #include <sys/mman.h>
      #include <stdlib.h>
      #include <stdio.h>
      #include <fcntl.h>
      #include <unistd.h>
      #include <string.h>
      
      #define PAGE_SIZE (getpagesize())
      
      #if __i386__
      #   define U64_STR "%llx"
      #elif __x86_64
      #   define U64_STR "%lx"
      #else
      #   error "Architecture Unsupported"
      #endif
      
      int main(int argc, char *argv[])
      {
      	int fd;
      	char *addr;
      	off64_t offset = 0x10000000;
      	char *filename = "/dev/zero";
      
      	fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY);
      	if (fd < 0) {
      		perror("open");
      		return 1;
      	}
      
      	offset *= 0x10;
      	printf("offset = " U64_STR "\n", offset);
      
      	addr = (char*)mmap64(NULL, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, fd,
      			     offset);
      	if ((void*)addr == MAP_FAILED) {
      		perror("mmap64");
      		return 1;
      	}
      
      	{
      		FILE *fmaps;
      		char *line = NULL;
      		size_t len = 0;
      		ssize_t read;
      		size_t filename_len = strlen(filename);
      
      		fmaps = fopen("/proc/self/maps", "r");
      		if (!fmaps) {
      			perror("fopen");
      			return 1;
      		}
      		while ((read = getline(&line, &len, fmaps)) != -1) {
      			if ((read > filename_len + 1)
      			    && (strncmp(&line[read - filename_len - 1], filename, filename_len) == 0))
      				printf("%s", line);
      		}
      
      		if (line)
      			free(line);
      
      		fclose(fmaps);
      	}
      
      	close(fd);
      	return 0;
      }
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
      Signed-off-by: NClement Calmels <cboulte@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      1804dc6e
  4. 20 8月, 2008 1 次提交
    • L
      vfat: fix 'sync' mount deadlock due to BKL->lock_super conversion · 5f22ca9b
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      There was another FAT BKL conversion deadlock reported by Bart
      Trojanowski due to the BKL being used as a recursive lock by FAT, which
      was missed because it only triggers with 'sync' (or 'dirsync') mounts.
      
      The recursion worked for the BKL, but after the conversion to lock_super
      (which uses a mutex), it just deadlocks.
      
      Thanks to Bart for debugging this and testing the fix.  The lock
      debugging information from the original report:
      
        =============================================
        [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
        2.6.27-rc3-bisect-00448-ga7f5aaf3 #16
        ---------------------------------------------
        mv/4020 is trying to acquire lock:
         (&type->s_lock_key#9){--..}, at: [<c01a90fe>] lock_super+0x1e/0x20
      
        but task is already holding lock:
         (&type->s_lock_key#9){--..}, at: [<c01a90fe>] lock_super+0x1e/0x20
      
        other info that might help us debug this:
        3 locks held by mv/4020:
         #0:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#9/1){--..}, at: [<c01b2336>] do_unlinkat+0x66/0x140
         #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#9){--..}, at: [<c01b0954>] vfs_unlink+0x84/0x110
         #2:  (&type->s_lock_key#9){--..}, at: [<c01a90fe>] lock_super+0x1e/0x20
      
        stack backtrace:
        Pid: 4020, comm: mv Not tainted 2.6.27-rc3-bisect-00448-ga7f5aaf3 #16
         [<c014e694>] validate_chain+0x984/0xea0
         [<c0108d70>] ? native_sched_clock+0x0/0xf0
         [<c014ee9c>] __lock_acquire+0x2ec/0x9b0
         [<c014f5cf>] lock_acquire+0x6f/0x90
         [<c01a90fe>] ? lock_super+0x1e/0x20
         [<c044e5fd>] mutex_lock_nested+0xad/0x300
         [<c01a90fe>] ? lock_super+0x1e/0x20
         [<c01a90fe>] ? lock_super+0x1e/0x20
         [<c01a90fe>] lock_super+0x1e/0x20
         [<f8b3a700>] fat_write_inode+0x60/0x2b0 [fat]
         [<c0450878>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x48/0x80
         [<f8b3a953>] ? fat_sync_inode+0x3/0x20 [fat]
         [<f8b3a962>] fat_sync_inode+0x12/0x20 [fat]
         [<f8b37c7e>] fat_remove_entries+0xbe/0x120 [fat]
         [<f8b422ef>] vfat_unlink+0x5f/0x90 [vfat]
         [<f8b42290>] ? vfat_unlink+0x0/0x90 [vfat]
         [<c01b0968>] vfs_unlink+0x98/0x110
         [<c01b2400>] do_unlinkat+0x130/0x140
         [<c016a8f5>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x105/0x150
         [<c01b253b>] sys_unlinkat+0x3b/0x40
         [<c01040d3>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x3f
         =======================
      
      where the deadlock is due to the nesting of lock_super from vfat_unlink
      to fat_write_inode:
      
       - do_unlinkat
         - vfs_unlink
           - vfat_unlink
             * lock_super
             - fat_remove_entries
               - fat_sync_inode
                 - fat_write_inode
                   * lock_super
      
      and the fix is to simply remove the use of lock_super() in fat_write_inode.
      
      The lock_super() there had been just an automatic conversion of the
      kernel lock to the superblock lock, but no locking was actually needed
      there, since the code in fat_write_inode already protected all relevant
      accesses with a spinlock (sbi->inode_hash_lock to be exact).  The only
      code inside the BKL (and thus the superblock lock) was accesses tp local
      variables or calls to functions that have long been SMP-safe (i.e.
      sb_bread, mark_buffe_dirty and brlese).
      
      Bart reports:
       "Looks good.  I ran 10 parallel processes creating 1M files truncating
        them, writing to them again and then deleting them.  This patch fixes
        the issue I ran into.
      
        Signed-off-by: Bart Trojanowski <bart@jukie.net>"
      Reported-and-tested-by: NBart Trojanowski <bart@jukie.net>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      5f22ca9b
  5. 15 8月, 2008 3 次提交
    • B
      omfs: fix oops when file metadata is corrupted · 9419fc1c
      Bob Copeland 提交于
      A fuzzed fileystem image failed with OMFS when the extent count was
      used in a loop without being checked against the max number of extents.
      It also provoked a signed division for an array index that was checked
      as if unsigned, leading to index by -1.
      
      omfsck will be updated to fix these cases, in the meantime bail out
      gracefully.
      Reported-by: NEric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de>
      Signed-off-by: NBob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9419fc1c
    • B
      omfs: fix potential oops when directory size is corrupted · c963343a
      Bob Copeland 提交于
      Testing with a modified fsfuzzer reveals a couple of locations in omfs
      where filesystem variables are ultimately used as loop counters with
      insufficient sanity checking.  In this case, dir->i_size is used to
      compute the number of buckets in the directory hash.  If too large,
      readdir will overrun a buffer.
      
      Since it's an invariant that dir->i_size is equal to the sysblock
      size, and we already sanity check that, just use that value instead.
      This fixes the following oops:
      
      BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at c978e004
      IP: [<c032298e>] omfs_readdir+0x18e/0x32f
      Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
      Modules linked in:
      
      Pid: 4796, comm: ls Not tainted (2.6.27-rc2 #12)
      EIP: 0060:[<c032298e>] EFLAGS: 00010287 CPU: 0
      EIP is at omfs_readdir+0x18e/0x32f
      EAX: c978d000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: cbfcfaf8 EDX: cb2cf100
      ESI: 00001000 EDI: 00000800 EBP: cb2d3f68 ESP: cb2d3f0c
       DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
      Process ls (pid: 4796, ti=cb2d3000 task=cb175f40 task.ti=cb2d3000)
      Stack: 00000002 00000000 00000000 c018a820 cb2d3f94 cb2cf100 cbfb0000 ffffff10
             cbfb3b80 cbfcfaf8 000001c9 00000a09 00000000 00000000 00000000 cbfcfbc8
             c9697000 cbfb3b80 22222222 00001000 c08e6cd0 cb2cf100 cbfb3b80 cb2d3f88
      Call Trace:
       [<c018a820>] ? filldir64+0x0/0xcd
       [<c018a9f2>] ? vfs_readdir+0x56/0x82
       [<c018a820>] ? filldir64+0x0/0xcd
       [<c018aa7c>] ? sys_getdents64+0x5e/0xa0
       [<c01038bd>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31
       =======================
      Code: 00 89 f0 89 f3 0f ac f8 14 81 e3 ff ff 0f 00 48 8d
      14 c5 b8 01 00 00 89 45 cc 89 55 f0 e9 8c 01 00 00 8b 4d c8 8b 75 f0 8b
      41 18 <8b> 54 30 04 8b 04 30 31 f6 89 5d dc 89 d1 8b 55 b8 0f c8 0f c9
      Reported-by: NEric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de>
      Signed-off-by: NBob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c963343a
    • C
      fs/inode.c: properly init address_space->writeback_index · 7d455e00
      Chris Mason 提交于
      write_cache_pages() uses i_mapping->writeback_index to pick up where it
      left off the last time a given inode was found by pdflush or
      balance_dirty_pages (or anyone else who sets wbc->range_cyclic)
      
      alloc_inode() should set it to a sane value so that writeback doesn't
      start in the middle of a file.  It is somewhat difficult to notice the bug
      since write_cache_pages will loop around to the start of the file and the
      elevator helps hide the resulting seeks.
      
      For whatever reason, Btrfs hits this often.  Unpatched, untarring 30
      copies of the linux kernel in series runs at 47MB/s on a single sata
      drive.  With this fix, it jumps to 62MB/s.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      7d455e00
  6. 14 8月, 2008 5 次提交
    • A
      UBIFS: xattr bugfixes · c78c7e35
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      Xattr code has not been tested for a while and there were
      serveral bugs. One of them is using wrong inode in
      'ubifs_jnl_change_xattr()'. The other is a deadlock in
      'ubifs_setxattr()': the i_mutex is locked in
      'cap_inode_need_killpriv()' path, so deadlock happens when
      'ubifs_setxattr()' tries to lock it again.
      
      Thanks to Zoltan Sogor for finding these bugs.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      c78c7e35
    • S
      [CIFS] mount of IPC$ breaks with iget patch · ad661334
      Steve French 提交于
      In looking at network named pipe support on cifs, I noticed that
      Dave Howell's iget patch:
      
          iget: stop CIFS from using iget() and read_inode()
      
      broke mounts to IPC$ (the interprocess communication share), and don't
      handle the error case (when getting info on the root inode fails).
      
      Thanks to Gunter who noted a typo in a debug line in the original
      version of this patch.
      
      CC: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      CC: Gunter Kukkukk <linux@kukkukk.com>
      CC: Stable Kernel <stable@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
      ad661334
    • D
      CRED: Introduce credential access wrappers · 9e2b2dc4
      David Howells 提交于
      The patches that are intended to introduce copy-on-write credentials for 2.6.28
      require abstraction of access to some fields of the task structure,
      particularly for the case of one task accessing another's credentials where RCU
      will have to be observed.
      
      Introduced here are trivial no-op versions of the desired accessors for current
      and other tasks so that other subsystems can start to be converted over more
      easily.
      
      Wrappers are introduced into a new header (linux/cred.h) for UID/GID,
      EUID/EGID, SUID/SGID, FSUID/FSGID, cap_effective and current's subscribed
      user_struct.  These wrappers are macros because the ordering between header
      files mitigates against making them inline functions.
      
      linux/cred.h is #included from linux/sched.h.
      
      Further, XFS is modified such that it no longer defines and uses parameterised
      versions of current_fs[ug]id(), thus getting rid of the namespace collision
      otherwise incurred.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
      9e2b2dc4
    • D
      dlm: rename structs · 51409340
      David Teigland 提交于
      Add a dlm_ prefix to the struct names in config.c.  This resolves a
      conflict with struct node in particular, when include/linux/node.h
      happens to be included.
      Reported-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
      51409340
    • D
      dlm: add missing kfrees · cb980d9a
      David Teigland 提交于
      A couple of unlikely error conditions were missing a kfree on the error
      exit path.
      Reported-by: NJuha Leppanen <juha_motorsportcom@luukku.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
      cb980d9a
  7. 13 8月, 2008 15 次提交