提交 82d63fc9 编写于 作者: A Al Viro 提交者: Linus Torvalds

cramfs: fix named-pipe handling

After commit a97c9bf3 (fix cramfs
making duplicate entries in inode cache) in kernel 2.6.14, named-pipe
on cramfs does not work properly.

It seems the commit make all named-pipe on cramfs share their inode
(and named-pipe buffer).

Make ..._test() refuse to merge inodes with ->i_ino == 1, take inode setup
back to get_cramfs_inode() and make ->drop_inode() evict ones with ->i_ino
== 1 immediately.
Reported-by: NAtsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>		[2.6.14 and later]
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 d847471d
......@@ -43,58 +43,13 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(read_mutex);
static int cramfs_iget5_test(struct inode *inode, void *opaque)
{
struct cramfs_inode *cramfs_inode = opaque;
if (inode->i_ino != CRAMINO(cramfs_inode))
return 0; /* does not match */
if (inode->i_ino != 1)
return 1;
/* all empty directories, char, block, pipe, and sock, share inode #1 */
if ((inode->i_mode != cramfs_inode->mode) ||
(inode->i_gid != cramfs_inode->gid) ||
(inode->i_uid != cramfs_inode->uid))
return 0; /* does not match */
if ((S_ISCHR(inode->i_mode) || S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) &&
(inode->i_rdev != old_decode_dev(cramfs_inode->size)))
return 0; /* does not match */
return 1; /* matches */
return inode->i_ino == CRAMINO(cramfs_inode) && inode->i_ino != 1;
}
static int cramfs_iget5_set(struct inode *inode, void *opaque)
{
static struct timespec zerotime;
struct cramfs_inode *cramfs_inode = opaque;
inode->i_mode = cramfs_inode->mode;
inode->i_uid = cramfs_inode->uid;
inode->i_size = cramfs_inode->size;
inode->i_blocks = (cramfs_inode->size - 1) / 512 + 1;
inode->i_gid = cramfs_inode->gid;
/* Struct copy intentional */
inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = zerotime;
inode->i_ino = CRAMINO(cramfs_inode);
/* inode->i_nlink is left 1 - arguably wrong for directories,
but it's the best we can do without reading the directory
contents. 1 yields the right result in GNU find, even
without -noleaf option. */
if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) {
inode->i_fop = &generic_ro_fops;
inode->i_data.a_ops = &cramfs_aops;
} else if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
inode->i_op = &cramfs_dir_inode_operations;
inode->i_fop = &cramfs_directory_operations;
} else if (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)) {
inode->i_op = &page_symlink_inode_operations;
inode->i_data.a_ops = &cramfs_aops;
} else {
inode->i_size = 0;
inode->i_blocks = 0;
init_special_inode(inode, inode->i_mode,
old_decode_dev(cramfs_inode->size));
}
return 0;
}
......@@ -104,12 +59,48 @@ static struct inode *get_cramfs_inode(struct super_block *sb,
struct inode *inode = iget5_locked(sb, CRAMINO(cramfs_inode),
cramfs_iget5_test, cramfs_iget5_set,
cramfs_inode);
static struct timespec zerotime;
if (inode && (inode->i_state & I_NEW)) {
inode->i_mode = cramfs_inode->mode;
inode->i_uid = cramfs_inode->uid;
inode->i_size = cramfs_inode->size;
inode->i_blocks = (cramfs_inode->size - 1) / 512 + 1;
inode->i_gid = cramfs_inode->gid;
/* Struct copy intentional */
inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = zerotime;
/* inode->i_nlink is left 1 - arguably wrong for directories,
but it's the best we can do without reading the directory
contents. 1 yields the right result in GNU find, even
without -noleaf option. */
if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) {
inode->i_fop = &generic_ro_fops;
inode->i_data.a_ops = &cramfs_aops;
} else if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
inode->i_op = &cramfs_dir_inode_operations;
inode->i_fop = &cramfs_directory_operations;
} else if (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)) {
inode->i_op = &page_symlink_inode_operations;
inode->i_data.a_ops = &cramfs_aops;
} else {
inode->i_size = 0;
inode->i_blocks = 0;
init_special_inode(inode, inode->i_mode,
old_decode_dev(cramfs_inode->size));
}
unlock_new_inode(inode);
}
return inode;
}
static void cramfs_drop_inode(struct inode *inode)
{
if (inode->i_ino == 1)
generic_delete_inode(inode);
else
generic_drop_inode(inode);
}
/*
* We have our own block cache: don't fill up the buffer cache
* with the rom-image, because the way the filesystem is set
......@@ -534,6 +525,7 @@ static const struct super_operations cramfs_ops = {
.put_super = cramfs_put_super,
.remount_fs = cramfs_remount,
.statfs = cramfs_statfs,
.drop_inode = cramfs_drop_inode,
};
static int cramfs_get_sb(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册