Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 24 8月, 2022 12 次提交
  3. 27 7月, 2022 2 次提交
  5. 06 7月, 2022 1 次提交
  7. 23 5月, 2022 1 次提交
  9. 21 10月, 2021 2 次提交
  11. 19 10月, 2021 2 次提交
  13. 19 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  15. 09 4月, 2021 1 次提交
    • M
      libbpf: Ignore non function pointer member in struct_ops · c982af9f
      由 Martin KaFai Lau 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.20
commit c8de71a7ae39e5f55b4ef5851387e2661c87f30b
bugzilla: 50608

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit d2836ddd ]

When libbpf initializes the kernel's struct_ops in
"bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops()", it enforces all
pointer types must be a function pointer and rejects
others.  It turns out to be too strict.  For example,
when directly using "struct tcp_congestion_ops" from vmlinux.h,
it has a "struct module *owner" member and it is set to NULL
in a bpf_tcp_cc.o.

Instead, it only needs to ensure the member is a function
pointer if it has been set (relocated) to a bpf-prog.
This patch moves the "btf_is_func_proto(kern_mtype)" check
after the existing "if (!prog) { continue; }".  The original debug
message in "if (!prog) { continue; }" is also removed since it is
no longer valid.  Beside, there is a later debug message to tell
which function pointer is set.

The "btf_is_func_proto(mtype)" has already been guaranteed
in "bpf_object__collect_st_ops_relos()" which has been run
before "bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops()".  Thus, this check
is removed.

v2:
- Remove outdated debug message (Andrii)
  Remove because there is a later debug message to tell
  which function pointer is set.
- Following mtype->type is no longer needed. Remove:
  "skip_mods_and_typedefs(btf, mtype->type, &mtype_id)"
- Do "if (!prog)" test before skip_mods_and_typedefs.

Fixes: 590a0088 ("bpf: libbpf: Add STRUCT_OPS support")
Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210212021030.266932-1-kafai@fb.comSigned-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
      c982af9f
  17. 12 1月, 2021 1 次提交
  19. 10 11月, 2020 1 次提交
  21. 08 10月, 2020 3 次提交
    • A
      libbpf: Allow specifying both ELF and raw BTF for CO-RE BTF override · 2b7d88c2
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Use generalized BTF parsing logic, making it possible to parse BTF both from
ELF file, as well as a raw BTF dump. This makes it easier to write custom
tests with manually generated BTFs.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201008001025.292064-4-andrii@kernel.org
      2b7d88c2
    • A
      libbpf: Support safe subset of load/store instruction resizing with CO-RE · a66345bc
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Add support for patching instructions of the following form:
  - rX = *(T *)(rY + <off>);
  - *(T *)(rX + <off>) = rY;
  - *(T *)(rX + <off>) = <imm>, where T is one of {u8, u16, u32, u64}.

For such instructions, if the actual kernel field recorded in CO-RE relocation
has a different size than the one recorded locally (e.g., from vmlinux.h),
then libbpf will adjust T to an appropriate 1-, 2-, 4-, or 8-byte loads.

In general, such transformation is not always correct and could lead to
invalid final value being loaded or stored. But two classes of cases are
always safe:
  - if both local and target (kernel) types are unsigned integers, but of
  different sizes, then it's OK to adjust load/store instruction according to
  the necessary memory size. Zero-extending nature of such instructions and
  unsignedness make sure that the final value is always correct;
  - pointer size mismatch between BPF target architecture (which is always
  64-bit) and 32-bit host kernel architecture can be similarly resolved
  automatically, because pointer is essentially an unsigned integer. Loading
  32-bit pointer into 64-bit BPF register with zero extension will leave
  correct pointer in the register.

Both cases are necessary to support CO-RE on 32-bit kernels, as `unsigned
long` in vmlinux.h generated from 32-bit kernel is 32-bit, but when compiled
with BPF program for BPF target it will be treated by compiler as 64-bit
integer. Similarly, pointers in vmlinux.h are 32-bit for kernel, but treated
as 64-bit values by compiler for BPF target. Both problems are now resolved by
libbpf for direct memory reads.

But similar transformations are useful in general when kernel fields are
"resized" from, e.g., unsigned int to unsigned long (or vice versa).

Now, similar transformations for signed integers are not safe to perform as
they will result in incorrect sign extension of the value. If such situation
is detected, libbpf will emit helpful message and will poison the instruction.
Not failing immediately means that it's possible to guard the instruction
based on kernel version (or other conditions) and make sure it's not
reachable.

If there is a need to read signed integers that change sizes between different
kernels, it's possible to use BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro, which works both
with bitfields and non-bitfield integers of any signedness and handles
sign-extension properly. Also, bpf_core_read() with proper size and/or use of
bpf_core_field_size() relocation could allow to deal with such complicated
situations explicitly, if not so conventiently as direct memory reads.

Selftests added in a separate patch in progs/test_core_autosize.c demonstrate
both direct memory and probed use cases.

BPF_CORE_READ() is not changed and it won't deal with such situations as
automatically as direct memory reads due to the signedness integer
limitations, which are much harder to detect and control with compiler macro
magic. So it's encouraged to utilize direct memory reads as much as possible.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201008001025.292064-3-andrii@kernel.org
      a66345bc
    • A
      libbpf: Skip CO-RE relocations for not loaded BPF programs · 47f7cf63
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Bypass CO-RE relocations step for BPF programs that are not going to be
loaded. This allows to have BPF programs compiled in and disabled dynamically
if kernel is not supposed to provide enough relocation information. In such
case, there won't be unnecessary warnings about failed relocations.

Fixes: d9297581 ("libbpf: Support disabling auto-loading BPF programs")
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201008001025.292064-2-andrii@kernel.org
      47f7cf63
  23. 07 10月, 2020 3 次提交
  25. 03 10月, 2020 1 次提交
  27. 30 9月, 2020 1 次提交
  29. 25 9月, 2020 1 次提交
  31. 16 9月, 2020 1 次提交
  33. 04 9月, 2020 6 次提交