1. 13 2月, 2021 1 次提交
    • V
      net: dsa: act as passthrough for bridge port flags · a8b659e7
      Vladimir Oltean 提交于
      There are multiple ways in which a PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute can be
      expressed by the bridge through switchdev, and not all of them can be
      emulated by DSA mid-layer API at the same time.
      
      One possible configuration is when the bridge offloads the port flags
      using a mask that has a single bit set - therefore only one feature
      should change. However, DSA currently groups together unicast and
      multicast flooding in the .port_egress_floods method, which limits our
      options when we try to add support for turning off broadcast flooding:
      do we extend .port_egress_floods with a third parameter which b53 and
      mv88e6xxx will ignore? But that means that the DSA layer, which
      currently implements the PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute all by itself, will
      see that .port_egress_floods is implemented, and will report that all 3
      types of flooding are supported - not necessarily true.
      
      Another configuration is when the user specifies more than one flag at
      the same time, in the same netlink message. If we were to create one
      individual function per offloadable bridge port flag, we would limit the
      expressiveness of the switch driver of refusing certain combinations of
      flag values. For example, a switch may not have an explicit knob for
      flooding of unknown multicast, just for flooding in general. In that
      case, the only correct thing to do is to allow changes to BR_FLOOD and
      BR_MCAST_FLOOD in tandem, and never allow mismatched values. But having
      a separate .port_set_unicast_flood and .port_set_multicast_flood would
      not allow the driver to possibly reject that.
      
      Also, DSA doesn't consider it necessary to inform the driver that a
      SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_MROUTER attribute was offloaded, because it
      just calls .port_egress_floods for the CPU port. When we'll add support
      for the plain SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_MROUTER, that will become a real
      problem because the flood settings will need to be held statefully in
      the DSA middle layer, otherwise changing the mrouter port attribute will
      impact the flooding attribute. And that's _assuming_ that the underlying
      hardware doesn't have anything else to do when a multicast router
      attaches to a port than flood unknown traffic to it.  If it does, there
      will need to be a dedicated .port_set_mrouter anyway.
      
      So we need to let the DSA drivers see the exact form that the bridge
      passes this switchdev attribute in, otherwise we are standing in the
      way. Therefore we also need to use this form of language when
      communicating to the driver that it needs to configure its initial
      (before bridge join) and final (after bridge leave) port flags.
      
      The b53 and mv88e6xxx drivers are converted to the passthrough API and
      their implementation of .port_egress_floods is split into two: a
      function that configures unicast flooding and another for multicast.
      The mv88e6xxx implementation is quite hairy, and it turns out that
      the implementations of unknown unicast flooding are actually the same
      for 6185 and for 6352:
      
      behind the confusing names actually lie two individual bits:
      NO_UNKNOWN_MC -> FLOOD_UC = 0x4 = BIT(2)
      NO_UNKNOWN_UC -> FLOOD_MC = 0x8 = BIT(3)
      
      so there was no reason to entangle them in the first place.
      
      Whereas the 6185 writes to MV88E6185_PORT_CTL0_FORWARD_UNKNOWN of
      PORT_CTL0, which has the exact same bit index. I have left the
      implementations separate though, for the only reason that the names are
      different enough to confuse me, since I am not able to double-check with
      a user manual. The multicast flooding setting for 6185 is in a different
      register than for 6352 though.
      Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
      Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a8b659e7
  2. 15 1月, 2021 1 次提交
  3. 26 11月, 2020 1 次提交
  4. 16 3月, 2020 2 次提交
  5. 03 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  6. 12 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  7. 10 9月, 2019 1 次提交
  8. 02 9月, 2019 3 次提交
  9. 30 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  10. 28 8月, 2019 4 次提交
  11. 17 8月, 2019 1 次提交
    • M
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: check for mode change in port_setup_mac · 927441ad
      Marek Behún 提交于
      The mv88e6xxx_port_setup_mac checks if the requested MAC settings are
      different from the current ones, and if not, does nothing (since chaning
      them requires putting the link down).
      
      In this check it only looks if the triplet [link, speed, duplex] is
      being changed.
      
      This patch adds support to also check if the mode parameter (of type
      phy_interface_t) is requested to be changed. The current mode is
      computed by the ->port_link_state() method, and if it is different from
      PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA, we check for equality with the requested mode.
      
      In the implementations of the mv88e6250_port_link_state() method we set
      the current mode to PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA - so the code does not check
      for mode change on 6250.
      
      In the mv88e6352_port_link_state() method, we use the cached cmode of
      the port to determine the mode as phy_interface_t (and if it is not
      enough, eg. for RGMII, we also look at the port control register for
      RX/TX timings).
      Signed-off-by: NMarek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
      Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      927441ad
  12. 05 6月, 2019 2 次提交
    • R
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement port_link_state for mv88e6250 · ce91c453
      Rasmus Villemoes 提交于
      The mv88e6250 has a rather different way of reporting the link, speed
      and duplex status. A simple difference is that the link bit is bit 12
      rather than bit 11 of the port status register.
      
      It gets more complicated for speed and duplex, which do not have
      separate fields. Instead, there's a four-bit PortMode field, and
      decoding that depends on whether it's a phy or mii port. For the phy
      ports, only four of the 16 values have defined meaning; the rest are
      called "reserved", so returning {SPEED,DUPLEX}_UNKNOWN seems
      reasonable.
      
      For the mii ports, most possible values are documented (0x3 and 0x5
      are reserved), but I'm unable to make sense of them all. Since the
      bits simply reflect the Px_MODE[3:0] configuration pins, just support
      the subset that I'm certain about. Support for other setups can be
      added later.
      Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ce91c453
    • R
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement port_set_speed for mv88e6250 · a528e5be
      Rasmus Villemoes 提交于
      The data sheet also mentions the possibility of selecting 200 Mbps for
      the MII ports (ports 5 and 6) by setting the ForceSpd field to
      0x2 (aka MV88E6065_PORT_MAC_CTL_SPEED_200). However, there's a note
      that "actual speed is determined by bit 8 above", and flipping back a
      page, one finds that bits 13:8 are reserved...
      
      So without further information on what bit 8 means, let's stick to
      supporting just 10 and 100 Mbps on all ports.
      Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a528e5be
  13. 31 5月, 2019 1 次提交
  14. 28 3月, 2019 1 次提交
    • H
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix few issues in mv88e6390x_port_set_cmode · 5ceaeb99
      Heiner Kallweit 提交于
      This patches fixes few issues in mv88e6390x_port_set_cmode().
      
      1. When entering the function the old cmode may be 0, in this case
         mv88e6390x_serdes_get_lane() returns -ENODEV. As result we bail
         out and have no chance to set a new mode. Therefore deal properly
         with -ENODEV.
      
      2. Once we have disabled power and irq, let's set the cached cmode to 0.
         This reflects the actual status and is cleaner if we bail out with an
         error in the following function calls.
      
      3. The cached cmode is used by mv88e6390x_serdes_get_lane(),
         mv88e6390_serdes_power_lane() and mv88e6390_serdes_irq_enable().
         Currently we set the cached mode to the new one at the very end of
         the function only, means until then we use the old one what may be
         wrong.
      
      4. When calling mv88e6390_serdes_irq_enable() we use the lane value
         belonging to the old cmode. Get the lane belonging to the new cmode
         before calling this function.
      
      It's hard to provide a good "Fixes" tag because quite a few smaller
      changes have been done to the code in question recently.
      
      Fixes: d235c48b ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: power serdes on/off for 10G interfaces on 6390X")
      Signed-off-by: NHeiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5ceaeb99
  15. 09 3月, 2019 1 次提交
  16. 04 3月, 2019 1 次提交
  17. 02 3月, 2019 1 次提交
    • H
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: prevent interrupt storm caused by mv88e6390x_port_set_cmode · ed8fe202
      Heiner Kallweit 提交于
      When debugging another issue I faced an interrupt storm in this
      driver (88E6390, port 9 in SGMII mode), consisting of alternating
      link-up / link-down interrupts. Analysis showed that the driver
      wanted to set a cmode that was set already. But so far
      mv88e6390x_port_set_cmode() doesn't check this and powers down
      SERDES, what causes the link to break, and eventually results in
      the described interrupt storm.
      
      Fix this by checking whether the cmode actually changes. We want
      that the very first call to mv88e6390x_port_set_cmode() always
      configures the registers, therefore initialize port.cmode with
      a value that is different from any supported cmode value.
      We have to take care that we only init the ports cmode once
      chip->info->num_ports is set.
      
      v2:
      - add small helper and init the number of actual ports only
      
      Fixes: 364e9d77 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Power on/off SERDES on cmode change")
      Signed-off-by: NHeiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ed8fe202
  18. 01 3月, 2019 1 次提交
    • M
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: power serdes on/off for 10G interfaces on 6390X · d235c48b
      Maxime Chevallier 提交于
      Upon setting the cmode on 6390 and 6390X, the associated serdes
      interfaces must be powered off/on.
      
      Both 6390X and 6390 share code to do so, but it currently uses the 6390
      specific helper mv88e6390_serdes_power() to disable and enable the
      serdes interface.
      
      This call will fail silently on 6390X when trying so set a 10G interface
      such as XAUI or RXAUI, since mv88e6390_serdes_power() internally grabs
      the lane number based on modes supported by the 6390, and returns 0 when
      getting -ENODEV as a lane number.
      
      Using mv88e6390x_serdes_power() should be safe here, since we explicitly
      rule-out all ports but the 9 and 10, and because modes supported by 6390
      ports 9 and 10 are a subset of those supported on 6390X.
      
      This was tested on 6390X using RXAUI mode.
      
      Fixes: 364e9d77 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Power on/off SERDES on cmode change")
      Signed-off-by: NMaxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
      Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      d235c48b
  19. 26 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  20. 12 11月, 2018 2 次提交
    • A
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Default ports 9/10 6390X CMODE to 1000BaseX · 787799a9
      Andrew Lunn 提交于
      The 6390X family has 8 SERDES interfaces. This allows ports 9 and 10
      to support up to 10Gbps using 4 SERDES interfaces. However, when lower
      speeds are used, which need fewer SERDES interfaces, the unused SERDES
      interfaces can be used by ports 2-8.
      
      The hardware defaults to ports 9 and 10 having all 4 SERDES interfaces
      assigned to them. This only gets changed when the interface is
      configured after what the SFP supports has been determined, or the 10G
      PHY completes auto-neg.
      
      For hardware designs which limit ports 9 and 10 to one or two SERDES
      interfaces, and place SFPs on the lower interfaces, this is too
      late. Those ports with SFP should not wait until ports 9/10 are up in
      order to get access to the SERDES interface. So change the default
      configuration when the driver is initialised. Configure ports 9 and 10
      to 1000BaseX, so they use a single SERDES interface, freeing up the
      others. They can steal them back if they need them.
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      787799a9
    • A
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Differentiate between 6390 and 6390X cmodes · fdc71eea
      Andrew Lunn 提交于
      The X family variants support additional ports modes, for 10G
      operation, which the non-X variants don't have. Add a port_set_cmode()
      for non-X variants to enforce this.
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      fdc71eea
  21. 18 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  22. 10 8月, 2018 5 次提交
  23. 12 5月, 2018 1 次提交
  24. 14 12月, 2017 1 次提交
  25. 02 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  26. 19 7月, 2017 1 次提交
  27. 21 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  28. 13 6月, 2017 1 次提交