Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 25 7月, 2022 6 次提交
  3. 16 5月, 2022 10 次提交
  5. 18 4月, 2022 2 次提交
  7. 06 4月, 2022 1 次提交
  9. 25 3月, 2022 1 次提交
    • Q
      btrfs: remove device item and update super block in the same transaction · bbac5869
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      [BUG]
There is a report that a btrfs has a bad super block num devices.

This makes btrfs to reject the fs completely.

  BTRFS error (device sdd3): super_num_devices 3 mismatch with num_devices 2 found here
  BTRFS error (device sdd3): failed to read chunk tree: -22
  BTRFS error (device sdd3): open_ctree failed

[CAUSE]
During btrfs device removal, chunk tree and super block num devs are
updated in two different transactions:

  btrfs_rm_device()
  |- btrfs_rm_dev_item(device)
  |  |- trans = btrfs_start_transaction()
  |  |  Now we got transaction X
  |  |
  |  |- btrfs_del_item()
  |  |  Now device item is removed from chunk tree
  |  |
  |  |- btrfs_commit_transaction()
  |     Transaction X got committed, super num devs untouched,
  |     but device item removed from chunk tree.
  |     (AKA, super num devs is already incorrect)
  |
  |- cur_devices->num_devices--;
  |- cur_devices->total_devices--;
  |- btrfs_set_super_num_devices()
     All those operations are not in transaction X, thus it will
     only be written back to disk in next transaction.

So after the transaction X in btrfs_rm_dev_item() committed, but before
transaction X+1 (which can be minutes away), a power loss happen, then
we got the super num mismatch.

[FIX]
Instead of starting and committing a transaction inside
btrfs_rm_dev_item(), start a transaction in side btrfs_rm_device() and
pass it to btrfs_rm_dev_item().

And only commit the transaction after everything is done.
Reported-by: NLuca Béla Palkovics <luca.bela.palkovics@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CA+8xDSpvdm_U0QLBAnrH=zqDq_cWCOH5TiV46CKmp3igr44okQ@mail.gmail.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      bbac5869
  11. 14 3月, 2022 10 次提交
  13. 07 1月, 2022 3 次提交
    • Q
      btrfs: remove reada infrastructure · f26c9238
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      Currently there is only one user for btrfs metadata readahead, and
that's scrub.

But even for the single user, it's not providing the correct
functionality it needs, as scrub needs reada for commit root, which
current readahead can't provide. (Although it's pretty easy to add such
feature).

Despite this, there are some extra problems related to metadata
readahead:

- Duplicated feature with btrfs_path::reada

- Partly duplicated feature of btrfs_fs_info::buffer_radix
  Btrfs already caches its metadata in buffer_radix, while readahead
  tries to read the tree block no matter if it's already cached.

- Poor layer separation
  Metadata readahead works kinda at device level.
  This is definitely not the correct layer it should be, since metadata
  is at btrfs logical address space, it should not bother device at all.

  This brings extra chance for bugs to sneak in, while brings
  unnecessary complexity.

- Dead code
  In the very beginning of scrub.c we have #undef DEBUG, rendering all
  the debug related code useless and unable to test.

Thus here I purpose to remove the metadata readahead mechanism
completely.

[BENCHMARK]
There is a full benchmark for the scrub performance difference using the
old btrfs_reada_add() and btrfs_path::reada.

For the worst case (no dirty metadata, slow HDD), there could be a 5%
performance drop for scrub.
For other cases (even SATA SSD), there is no distinguishable performance
difference.

The number is reported scrub speed, in MiB/s.
The resolution is limited by the reported duration, which only has a
resolution of 1 second.

	Old		New		Diff
SSD	455.3		466.332		+2.42%
HDD	103.927 	98.012		-5.69%

Comprehensive test methodology is in the cover letter of the patch.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      f26c9238
    • J
      btrfs: zoned: sink zone check into btrfs_repair_one_zone · 554aed7d
      由 Johannes Thumshirn 提交于 
      Sink zone check into btrfs_repair_one_zone() so we don't need to do it
in all callers.

Also as btrfs_repair_one_zone() doesn't return a sensible error, make it
a boolean function and return false in case it got called on a non-zoned
filesystem and true on a zoned filesystem.
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      554aed7d
    • N
      btrfs: introduce exclusive operation BALANCE_PAUSED state · efc0e69c
      由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于 
      Current set of exclusive operation states is not sufficient to handle
all practical use cases. In particular there is a need to be able to add
a device to a filesystem that have paused balance. Currently there is no
way to distinguish between a running and a paused balance. Fix this by
introducing BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE_PAUSED which is going to be set in 2
occasions:

1. When a filesystem is mounted with skip_balance and there is an
   unfinished balance it will now be into BALANCE_PAUSED instead of
   simply BALANCE state.

2. When a running balance is paused.
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      efc0e69c
  15. 03 1月, 2022 6 次提交
    • J
      btrfs: don't use the extent root in btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item · fd51eb2f
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      We're just using the extent_root to set the chunk owner to
root_key->objectid, which is BTRFS_EXTENT_TREE_OBJECTID, so use that
directly instead of using the root.
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      fd51eb2f
    • Q
      btrfs: don't check stripe length if the profile is not stripe based · bf08387f
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      [BUG]
When debugging calc_bio_boundaries(), I found that even for RAID1
metadata, we're following stripe length to calculate stripe boundary.

  # mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 -d raid1 /dev/test/scratch[12]
  # mount /dev/test/scratch /mnt/btrfs
  # xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 64K" /mnt/btrfs/file
  # umount

Above very basic operations will make calc_bio_boundaries() to report
the following result:

  submit_extent_page: r/i=1/1 file_offset=22036480 len_to_stripe_boundary=49152
  submit_extent_page: r/i=1/1 file_offset=30474240 len_to_stripe_boundary=65536
  ...
  submit_extent_page: r/i=1/1 file_offset=30523392 len_to_stripe_boundary=16384
  submit_extent_page: r/i=1/1 file_offset=30457856 len_to_stripe_boundary=16384
  submit_extent_page: r/i=5/257 file_offset=0 len_to_stripe_boundary=65536
  submit_extent_page: r/i=5/257 file_offset=65536 len_to_stripe_boundary=65536
  submit_extent_page: r/i=1/1 file_offset=30490624 len_to_stripe_boundary=49152
  submit_extent_page: r/i=1/1 file_offset=30507008 len_to_stripe_boundary=32768

Where "r/i" is the rootid and inode, 1/1 means they metadata.
The remaining names match the member used in kernel.

Even all data/metadata are using RAID1, we're still following stripe
length.

[CAUSE]
This behavior is caused by a wrong condition in btrfs_get_io_geometry():

	if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) {
		/* Fill using stripe_len */
		len = min_t(u64, em->len - offset, max_len);
	} else {
		len = em->len - offset;
	}

This means, only for SINGLE we will not follow stripe_len.

However for profiles like RAID1*, DUP, they don't need to bother
stripe_len.

This can lead to unnecessary bio split for RAID1*/DUP profiles, and can
even be a blockage for future zoned RAID support.

[FIX]
Introduce one single-use macro, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_STRIPE_MASK, and
change the condition to only calculate the length using stripe length
for stripe based profiles.
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      bf08387f
    • N
      btrfs: zoned: cache reported zone during mount · 16beac87
      由 Naohiro Aota 提交于 
      When mounting a device, we are reporting the zones twice: once for
checking the zone attributes in btrfs_get_dev_zone_info and once for
loading block groups' zone info in
btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info(). With a lot of block groups, that
leads to a lot of REPORT ZONE commands and slows down the mount
process.

This patch introduces a zone info cache in struct
btrfs_zoned_device_info. The cache is populated while in
btrfs_get_dev_zone_info() and used for
btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info() to reduce the number of REPORT ZONE
commands. The zone cache is then released after loading the block
groups, as it will not be much effective during the run time.

Benchmark: Mount an HDD with 57,007 block groups
Before patch: 171.368 seconds
After patch: 64.064 seconds

While it still takes a minute due to the slowness of loading all the
block groups, the patch reduces the mount time by 1/3.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAHQ7scUiLtcTqZOMMY5kbWUBOhGRwKo6J6wYPT5WY+C=cD49nQ@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 5b316468 ("btrfs: get zone information of zoned block devices")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      16beac87
    • A
      btrfs: consolidate device_list_mutex in prepare_sprout to its parent · 849eae5e
      由 Anand Jain 提交于 
      btrfs_prepare_sprout() splices seed devices into its own struct fs_devices,
so that its parent function btrfs_init_new_device() can add the new sprout
device to fs_info->fs_devices.

Both btrfs_prepare_sprout() and btrfs_init_new_device() need
device_list_mutex. But they are holding it separately, thus create a
small race window. Close it and hold device_list_mutex across both
functions btrfs_init_new_device() and btrfs_prepare_sprout().

Split btrfs_prepare_sprout() into btrfs_init_sprout() and
btrfs_setup_sprout(). This split is essential because device_list_mutex
must not be held for allocations in btrfs_init_sprout() but must be held
for btrfs_setup_sprout(). So now a common device_list_mutex can be used
between btrfs_init_new_device() and btrfs_setup_sprout().
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      849eae5e
    • A
      btrfs: switch seeding_dev in init_new_device to bool · fd880809
      由 Anand Jain 提交于 
      Declare int seeding_dev as a bool. Also, move its declaration a line
below to adjust packing.
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      fd880809
    • J
      btrfs: drop the _nr from the item helpers · 3212fa14
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      Now that all call sites are using the slot number to modify item values,
rename the SETGET helpers to raw_item_*(), and then rework the _nr()
helpers to be the btrfs_item_*() btrfs_set_item_*() helpers, and then
rename all of the callers to the new helpers.
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      3212fa14
  17. 16 12月, 2021 1 次提交