1. 03 5月, 2016 19 次提交
  2. 01 5月, 2016 1 次提交
    • A
      atomic_open(): fix the handling of create_error · 10c64cea
      Al Viro 提交于
      * if we have a hashed negative dentry and either CREAT|EXCL on
      r/o filesystem, or CREAT|TRUNC on r/o filesystem, or CREAT|EXCL
      with failing may_o_create(), we should fail with EROFS or the
      error may_o_create() has returned, but not ENOENT.  Which is what
      the current code ends up returning.
      
      * if we have CREAT|TRUNC hitting a regular file on a read-only
      filesystem, we can't fail with EROFS here.  At the very least,
      not until we'd done follow_managed() - we might have a writable
      file (or a device, for that matter) bound on top of that one.
      Moreover, the code downstream will see that O_TRUNC and attempt
      to grab the write access (*after* following possible mount), so
      if we really should fail with EROFS, it will happen.  No need
      to do that inside atomic_open().
      
      The real logics is much simpler than what the current code is
      trying to do - if we decided to go for simple lookup, ended
      up with a negative dentry *and* had create_error set, fail with
      create_error.  No matter whether we'd got that negative dentry
      from lookup_real() or had found it in dcache.
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.6+
      Acked-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      10c64cea
  3. 11 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  4. 31 3月, 2016 2 次提交
  5. 14 3月, 2016 7 次提交
  6. 06 3月, 2016 2 次提交
  7. 28 2月, 2016 4 次提交
  8. 23 1月, 2016 1 次提交
    • A
      wrappers for ->i_mutex access · 5955102c
      Al Viro 提交于
      parallel to mutex_{lock,unlock,trylock,is_locked,lock_nested},
      inode_foo(inode) being mutex_foo(&inode->i_mutex).
      
      Please, use those for access to ->i_mutex; over the coming cycle
      ->i_mutex will become rwsem, with ->lookup() done with it held
      only shared.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      5955102c
  9. 09 1月, 2016 1 次提交
    • N
      nfsd: don't hold i_mutex over userspace upcalls · bbddca8e
      NeilBrown 提交于
      We need information about exports when crossing mountpoints during
      lookup or NFSv4 readdir.  If we don't already have that information
      cached, we may have to ask (and wait for) rpc.mountd.
      
      In both cases we currently hold the i_mutex on the parent of the
      directory we're asking rpc.mountd about.  We've seen situations where
      rpc.mountd performs some operation on that directory that tries to take
      the i_mutex again, resulting in deadlock.
      
      With some care, we may be able to avoid that in rpc.mountd.  But it
      seems better just to avoid holding a mutex while waiting on userspace.
      
      It appears that lookup_one_len is pretty much the only operation that
      needs the i_mutex.  So we could just drop the i_mutex elsewhere and do
      something like
      
      	mutex_lock()
      	lookup_one_len()
      	mutex_unlock()
      
      In many cases though the lookup would have been cached and not required
      the i_mutex, so it's more efficient to create a lookup_one_len() variant
      that only takes the i_mutex when necessary.
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      bbddca8e
  10. 04 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 31 12月, 2015 1 次提交