- 03 5月, 2016 40 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and lose the duplicate IS_DEADDIR() - we'd already checked that. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
It should never return positives; however, with Linux S&M crowd involved, no bogosity is impossible. Results would be unpleasant... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
nobody else needs that transformation. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
make it conditional on *opened & FILE_OPENED; in addition to getting rid of exit_fput: thing, it simplifies atomic_open() cleanup on may_open() failure. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
may_open() will catch it Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Lift IS_DEADDIR handling up into the part common with atomic_open(), remove it from the latter. Collapse permission checks into the call of may_o_create(), getting it closer to atomic_open() case. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
do_last() and lookup_open() simpler that way and so does O_PATH itself. As it bloody well should: we find what the pathname resolves to, same way as in stat() et.al. and associate it with FMODE_PATH struct file. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
no changes needed (XFS isn't simple, but it has the same parallelism in the interesting parts exercised from CXFS). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
no need to lock directory in dcache_dir_lseek(), while we are at it - per-struct file exclusion is enough. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Switch dcache pre-seeding on readdir to d_alloc_parallel(); nothing else is needed. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
make it usable with directory locked shared Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... making it usable with directory locked shared Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
New method: ->iterate_shared(). Same arguments as in ->iterate(), called with the directory locked only shared. Once all filesystems switch, the old one will be gone. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
same as read() on regular files has, and for the same reason. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
ta-da! The main issue is the lack of down_write_killable(), so the places like readdir.c switched to plain inode_lock(); once killable variants of rwsem primitives appear, that'll be dealt with. lockdep side also might need more work Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
If we *do* run into an in-lookup match, we need to wait for it to cease being in-lookup. Fortunately, we do have unused space in in-lookup dentries - d_lru is never looked at until it stops being in-lookup. So we can stash a pointer to wait_queue_head from stack frame of the caller of ->lookup(). Some precautions are needed while waiting, but it's not that hard - we do hold a reference to dentry we are waiting for, so it can't go away. If it's found to be in-lookup the wait_queue_head is still alive and will remain so at least while ->d_lock is held. Moreover, the condition we are waiting for becomes true at the same point where everything on that wq gets woken up, so we can just add ourselves to the queue once. d_alloc_parallel() gets a pointer to wait_queue_head_t from its caller; lookup_slow() adjusted, d_add_ci() taught to use d_alloc_parallel() if the dentry passed to it happens to be in-lookup one (i.e. if it's been called from the parallel lookup). That's pretty much it - all that remains is to switch ->i_mutex to rwsem and have lookup_slow() take it shared. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
We will need to be able to check if there is an in-lookup dentry with matching parent/name. Right now it's impossible, but as soon as start locking directories shared such beasts will appear. Add a secondary hash for locating those. Hash chains go through the same space where d_alias will be once it's not in-lookup anymore. Search is done under the same bitlock we use for modifications - with the primary hash we can rely on d_rehash() into the wrong chain being the worst that could happen, but here the pointers are buggered once it's removed from the chain. On the other hand, the chains are not going to be long and normally we'll end up adding to the chain anyway. That allows us to avoid bothering with ->d_lock when doing the comparisons - everything is stable until removed from chain. New helper: d_alloc_parallel(). Right now it allocates, verifies that no hashed and in-lookup matches exist and adds to in-lookup hash. Returns ERR_PTR() for error, hashed match (in the unlikely case it's been found) or new dentry. In-lookup matches trigger BUG() for now; that will change in the next commit when we introduce waiting for ongoing lookup to finish. Note that in-lookup matches won't be possible until we actually go for shared locking. lookup_slow() switched to use of d_alloc_parallel(). Again, these commits are separated only for making it easier to review. All this machinery will start doing something useful only when we go for shared locking; it's just that the combination is too large for my taste. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
We'll need to verify that there's neither a hashed nor in-lookup dentry with desired parent/name before adding to in-lookup set. One possible solution would be to hold the parent's ->d_lock through both checks, but while the in-lookup set is relatively small at any time, dcache is not. And holding the parent's ->d_lock through something like __d_lookup_rcu() would suck too badly. So we leave the parent's ->d_lock alone, which means that we watch out for the following scenario: * we verify that there's no hashed match * existing in-lookup match gets hashed by another process * we verify that there's no in-lookup matches and decide that everything's fine. Solution: per-directory kinda-sorta seqlock, bumped around the times we hash something that used to be in-lookup or move (and hash) something in place of in-lookup. Then the above would turn into * read the counter * do dcache lookup * if no matches found, check for in-lookup matches * if there had been none of those either, check if the counter has changed; repeat if it has. The "kinda-sorta" part is due to the fact that we don't have much spare space in inode. There is a spare word (shared with i_bdev/i_cdev/i_pipe), so the counter part is not a problem, but spinlock is a different story. We could use the parent's ->d_lock, and it would be less painful in terms of contention, for __d_add() it would be rather inconvenient to grab; we could do that (using lock_parent()), but... Fortunately, we can get serialization on the counter itself, and it might be a good idea in general; we can use cmpxchg() in a loop to get from even to odd and smp_store_release() from odd to even. This commit adds the counter and updating logics; the readers will be added in the next commit. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
marked as such when (would be) parallel lookup is about to pass them to actual ->lookup(); unmarked when * __d_add() is about to make it hashed, positive or not. * __d_move() (from d_splice_alias(), directly or via __d_unalias()) puts a preexisting dentry in its place * in caller of ->lookup() if it has escaped all of the above. Bug (WARN_ON, actually) if it reaches the final dput() or d_instantiate() while still marked such. As the result, we are guaranteed that for as long as the flag is set, dentry will * remain negative unhashed with positive refcount * never have its ->d_alias looked at * never have its ->d_lru looked at * never have its ->d_parent and ->d_name changed Right now we have at most one such for any given parent directory. With parallel lookups that restriction will weaken to * only exist when parent is locked shared * at most one with given (parent,name) pair (comparison of names is according to ->d_compare()) * only exist when there's no hashed dentry with the same (parent,name) Transition will take the next several commits; unfortunately, we'll only be able to switch to rwsem at the end of this series. The reason for not making it a single patch is to simplify review. New primitives: d_in_lookup() (a predicate checking if dentry is in the in-lookup state) and d_lookup_done() (tells the system that we are done with lookup and if it's still marked as in-lookup, it should cease to be such). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
will be needed as soon as lookups are not serialized by ->i_mutex Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Right now ext2_get_page() (and its analogues in a bunch of other filesystems) relies upon the directory being locked - the way it sets and tests Checked and Error bits would be racy without that. Switch to a slightly different scheme, _not_ setting Checked in case of failure. That way the logics becomes if Checked => OK else if Error => fail else if !validate => fail else => OK with validation setting Checked or Error on success and failure resp. and returning which one had happened. Equivalent to the current logics, but unlike the current logics not sensitive to the order of set_bit, test_bit getting reordered by CPU, etc. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and explain the non-obvious logics in case when lookup yields a different dentry. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and have it use inode_lock() Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
grab a reference to dentry we'd got the sucker from, and return that dentry via *wait, rather than just returning the address of ->i_mutex. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-