- 14 2月, 2013 14 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Switch to keeping track of the object request pointer rather than the osd request used to watch the rbd image header object. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Move the code that unregisters an rbd device's lingering header object watch request into rbd_dev_header_watch_sync(), so it occurs in the same function that originally sets up that request. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Get rid rbd_req_sync_exec() because it is no longer used. That eliminates the last use of rbd_req_sync_op(), so get rid of that too. And finally, that leaves rbd_do_request() unreferenced, so get rid of that. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Reimplement synchronous object method calls using the new request tracking code. Use the name rbd_obj_method_sync() Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
When we receive notification of a change to an rbd image's header object we need to refresh our information about the image (its size and snapshot context). Once we have refreshed our rbd image we need to acknowledge the notification. This acknowledgement was previously done synchronously, but there's really no need to wait for it to complete. Change it so the caller doesn't wait for the notify acknowledgement request to complete. And change the name to reflect it's no longer synchronous. This resolves: http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/3877Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Get rid rbd_req_sync_notify_ack() because it is no longer used. As a result rbd_simple_req_cb() becomes unreferenced, so get rid of that too. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Use the new object request tracking mechanism for handling a notify_ack request. Move the callback function below the definition of this so we don't have to do a pre-declaration. This resolves: http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/3754Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Get rid of rbd_req_sync_watch(), because it is no longer used. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Implement a new function to set up or tear down a watch event for an mapped rbd image header using the new request code. Create a new object request type "nodata" to handle this. And define rbd_osd_trivial_callback() which simply marks a request done. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Delete rbd_req_sync_read() is no longer used, so get rid of it. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Reimplement the synchronous read operation used for reading a version 1 header using the new request tracking code. Name the resulting function rbd_obj_read_sync() to better reflect that it's a full object operation, not an object request. To do this, implement a new OBJ_REQUEST_PAGES object request type. This implements a new mechanism to allow the caller to wait for completion for an rbd_obj_request by calling rbd_obj_request_wait(). This partially resolves: http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/3755Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The two remaining callers of rbd_do_request() always pass a null collection pointer, so the "coll" and "coll_index" parameters are not needed. There is no other use of that data structure, so it can be eliminated. Deleting them means there is no need to allocate a rbd_request structure for the callback function. And since that's the only use of *that* structure, it too can be eliminated. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Now that the request function has been replaced by one using the new request management data structures the old one can go away. Deleting it makes rbd_dev_do_request() no longer needed, and deleting that makes other functions unneeded, and so on. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch fully implements the new request tracking code for rbd I/O requests. Each I/O request to an rbd image will get an rbd_image_request structure allocated to track it. This provides access to all information about the original request, as well as access to the set of one or more object requests that are initiated as a result of the image request. An rbd_obj_request structure defines a request sent to a single osd object (possibly) as part of an rbd image request. An rbd object request refers to a ceph_osd_request structure built up to represent the request; for now it will contain a single osd operation. It also provides space to hold the result status and the version of the object when the osd request completes. An rbd_obj_request structure can also stand on its own. This will be used for reading the version 1 header object, for issuing acknowledgements to event notifications, and for making object method calls. All rbd object requests now complete asynchronously with respect to the osd client--they supply a common callback routine. This resolves: http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/3741Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
- 26 1月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
When an rbd image is initially mapped a watch event is registered so we can do something if the header object changes. The code that does this currently loops if initiating the watch request results in an ERANGE error. The osds will never return ERANGE, so there's no reason to do this loop, so get rid of it. This resolves: http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/3860 Note that the problem this loop was intended to solve is a race between collecting image header information and setting up the watch on the header object. The real fix for that problem is described here: http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/3871Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The return type of rbd_get_num_segments() is int, but the values it operates on are u64. Although it's not likely, there's no guarantee the result won't exceed what can be respresented in an int. The function is already designed to return -ERANGE on error, so just add this possible overflow as another reason to return that. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NDan Mick <dan.mick@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
A few very minor changes to the rbd code: - RBD_MAX_OPT_LEN is unused, so get rid of it - Consolidate rbd options definitions - Make rbd_segment_name() return pointer to const char Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NDan Mick <dan.mick@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
- 18 1月, 2013 23 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The type of the snap_id local variable is defined with the wrong byte order. Fix that. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Both rbd_req_sync_op() and rbd_do_request() have a "linger" parameter, which is the address of a pointer that should refer to the osd request structure used to issue a request to an osd. Only one case ever supplies a non-null "linger" argument: an CEPH_OSD_OP_WATCH start. And in that one case it is assigned &rbd_dev->watch_request. Within rbd_do_request() (where the assignment ultimately gets made) we know the rbd_dev and therefore its watch_request field. We also know whether the op being sent is CEPH_OSD_OP_WATCH start. Stop opaquely passing down the "linger" pointer, and instead just assign the value directly inside rbd_do_request() when it's needed. This makes it unnecessary for rbd_req_sync_watch() to make arrangements to hold a value that's not available until a bit later. This more clearly separates setting up a watch request from submitting it. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The two remaining osd ops used by rbd are CEPH_OSD_OP_WATCH and CEPH_OSD_OP_NOTIFY_ACK. Move the setup of those operations into rbd_osd_req_op_create(), and get rid of rbd_create_rw_op() and rbd_destroy_op(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Move the initialization of the CEPH_OSD_OP_CALL operation into rbd_osd_req_op_create(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Move the assignment of the extent offset and length and payload length out of rbd_req_sync_op() and into its caller in the one spot where a read (and note--no write) operation might be initiated. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
In rbd_do_request() there's a sort of last-minute assignment of the extent offset and length and payload length for read and write operations. Move those assignments into the caller (in those spots that might initiate read or write operations) Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
When rbd_req_sync_notify_ack() calls rbd_do_request() it supplies rbd_simple_req_cb() as its callback function. Because the callback is supplied, an rbd_req structure gets allocated and populated so it can be used by the callback. However rbd_simple_req_cb() is not freeing (or even using) the rbd_req structure, so it's getting leaked. Since rbd_simple_req_cb() has no need for the rbd_req structure, just avoid allocating one for this case. Of the three calls to rbd_do_request(), only the one from rbd_do_op() needs the rbd_req structure, and that call can be distinguished from the other two because it supplies a non-null rbd_collection pointer. So fix this leak by only allocating the rbd_req structure if a non-null "coll" value is provided to rbd_do_request(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
When rbd_do_request() is called it allocates and populates an rbd_req structure to hold information about the osd request to be sent. This is done for the benefit of the callback function (in particular, rbd_req_cb()), which uses this in processing when the request completes. Synchronous requests provide no callback function, in which case rbd_do_request() waits for the request to complete before returning. This case is not handling the needed free of the rbd_req structure like it should, so it is getting leaked. Note however that the synchronous case has no need for the rbd_req structure at all. So rather than simply freeing this structure for synchronous requests, just don't allocate it to begin with. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The rbd_req_sync_watch() and rbd_req_sync_unwatch() functions are nearly identical. Combine them into a single function with a flag indicating whether a watch is to be initiated or torn down. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Each osd message includes a layout structure, and for rbd it is always the same (at least for osd's in a given pool). Initialize a layout structure when an rbd_dev gets created and just copy that into osd requests for the rbd image. Replace an assertion that was done when initializing the layout structures with code that catches and handles anything that would trigger the assertion as soon as it is identified. This precludes that (bad) condition from ever occurring. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
When rbd_do_request() has a request to process it initializes a ceph file layout structure and uses it to compute offsets and limits for the range of the request using ceph_calc_file_object_mapping(). The layout used is fixed, and is based on RBD_MAX_OBJ_ORDER (30). It sets the layout's object size and stripe unit to be 1 GB (2^30), and sets the stripe count to be 1. The job of ceph_calc_file_object_mapping() is to determine which of a sequence of objects will contain data covered by range, and within that object, at what offset the range starts. It also truncates the length of the range at the end of the selected object if necessary. This is needed for ceph fs, but for rbd it really serves no purpose. It does its own blocking of images into objects, echo of which is (1 << obj_order) in size, and as a result it ignores the "bno" value returned by ceph_calc_file_object_mapping(). In addition, by the point a request has reached this function, it is already destined for a single rbd object, and its length will not exceed that object's extent. Because of this, and because the mapping will result in blocking up the range using an integer multiple of the image's object order, ceph_calc_file_object_mapping() will never change the offset or length values defined by the request. In other words, this call is a big no-op for rbd data requests. There is one exception. We read the header object using this function, and in that case we will not have already limited the request size. However, the header is a single object (not a file or rbd image), and should not be broken into pieces anyway. So in fact we should *not* be calling ceph_calc_file_object_mapping() when operating on the header object. So... Don't call ceph_calc_file_object_mapping() in rbd_do_request(), because useless for image data and incorrect to do sofor the image header. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch gets rid of rbd_calc_raw_layout() by simply open coding it in its one caller. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This is the first in a series of patches aimed at eliminating the use of ceph_calc_raw_layout() by rbd. It simply pulls in a copy of that function and renames it rbd_calc_raw_layout(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
We now know that every of rbd_req_sync_op() passes an array of exactly one operation, as evidenced by all callers passing 1 as its num_op argument. So get rid of that argument, assuming a single op. Similarly, we now know that all callers of rbd_do_request() pass 1 as the num_op value, so that parameter can be eliminated as well. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Throughout the rbd code there are spots where it appears we can handle an osd request containing more than one osd request op. But that is only the way it appears. In fact, currently only one operation at a time can be supported, and supporting more than one will require much more than fleshing out the support that's there now. This patch changes names to make it perfectly clear that anywhere we're dealing with a block of ops, we're in fact dealing with exactly one of them. We'll be able to simplify some things as a result. When multiple op support is implemented, we can update things again accordingly. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Both ceph_osdc_alloc_request() and ceph_osdc_build_request() are provided an array of ceph osd request operations. Rather than just passing the number of operations in the array, the caller is required append an additional zeroed operation structure to signal the end of the array. All callers know the number of operations at the time these functions are called, so drop the silly zero entry and supply that number directly. As a result, get_num_ops() is no longer needed. This also means that ceph_osdc_alloc_request() never uses its ops argument, so that can be dropped. Also rbd_create_rw_ops() no longer needs to add one to reserve room for the additional op. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Add a num_op parameter to rbd_do_request() and rbd_req_sync_op() to indicate the number of entries in the array. The callers of these functions always know how many entries are in the array, so just pass that information down. This is in anticipation of eliminating the extra zero-filled entry in these ops arrays. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Only one of the two callers of ceph_osdc_alloc_request() provides page or bio data for its payload. And essentially all that function was doing with those arguments was assigning them to fields in the osd request structure. Simplify ceph_osdc_alloc_request() by having the caller take care of making those assignments Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The only thing ceph_osdc_alloc_request() really does with the flags value it is passed is assign it to the newly-created osd request structure. Do that in the caller instead. Both callers subsequently call ceph_osdc_build_request(), so have that function (instead of ceph_osdc_alloc_request()) issue a warning if a request comes through with neither the read nor write flags set. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The osdc parameter to ceph_calc_raw_layout() is not used, so get rid of it. Consequently, the corresponding parameter in calc_layout() becomes unused, so get rid of that as well. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
A snapshot id must be provided to ceph_calc_raw_layout() even though it is not needed at all for calculating the layout. Where the snapshot id *is* needed is when building the request message for an osd operation. Drop the snapid parameter from ceph_calc_raw_layout() and pass that value instead in ceph_osdc_build_request(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The len argument to ceph_osdc_build_request() is set up to be passed by address, but that function never updates its value so there's no need to do this. Tighten up the interface by passing the length directly. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
For some reason, the snapid field of the osd request header is explicitly set to CEPH_NOSNAP in rbd_do_request(). Just a few lines later--with no code that would access this field in between--a call is made to ceph_calc_raw_layout() passing the snapid provided to rbd_do_request(), which encodes the snapid value it is provided into that field instead. In other words, there is no need to fill in CEPH_NOSNAP, and doing so suggests it might be necessary. Don't do that any more. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-