Add support to enable/disable active discharge of regulator via
machine constraints. This configuration is done when setting
machine constraint during regulator register and if regulator
driver implemented the callback ops.
Signed-off-by: NLaxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Add support to enable/disable active discharge of regulator via
machine constraints. This configuration is done when setting
machine constraint during regulator register and if regulator
driver implemented the callback ops.
Signed-off-by: NLaxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Originally queue_delayed_work() used to negative error codes or 0 and 1
on success depending if the work was queued or not.  It caused a lot of
bugs where people treated all non-zero returns as failures so we changed
it to return bool instead in d4283e93 ('workqueue: make queueing
functions return bool').  Now it never returns failure.

Checking for negative values causes a static checker warning since it is
impossible based on the bool type.
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Use dev_to_rdev() instead of open-coding it.
Signed-off-by: NGeliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Commit fa731ac7 ("regulator: core: avoid unused variable warning")
introduced a subtle change in how supplies are locked. Where previously
code was always locking the regulator of the current iteration, the new
implementation only locks the regulator if it has a supply. For any
given power tree that means that the root will never get locked.

On the other hand the regulator_unlock_supply() will still release all
the locks, which in turn causes the lock debugging code to warn about a
mutex being unlocked which wasn't locked.

Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: Fixes: fa731ac7 ("regulator: core: avoid unused variable warning")
Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The latest workaround for the lockdep interface's not using the second
argument of mutex_lock_nested() changed the loop missed locking the last
regulator due to a thinko with the loop termination condition exiting
one regulator too soon.
Reported-by: NTyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

As noticed by Geert Uytterhoeven, my patch to avoid a harmless build warning
in regulator_lock_supply() was total crap and introduced a real bug:

> [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
> kworker/u4:0/6 is trying to release lock (&rdev->mutex) at:
> [<c0247b84>] regulator_set_voltage+0x38/0x50

we still lock the regulator supplies, but not the actual regulators,
so we are missing a lock, and the unlock is unbalanced.

This rectifies it by first locking the regulator device itself before
using the same loop as before to lock its supplies.
Reported-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 716fec9d1965 ("[SUBMITTED] regulator: core: avoid unused variable warning")
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The second argument of the mutex_lock_nested() helper is only
evaluated if CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is set. Otherwise we
get this build warning for the new regulator_lock_supply
function:

drivers/regulator/core.c: In function 'regulator_lock_supply':
drivers/regulator/core.c:142:6: warning: unused variable 'i' [-Wunused-variable]

To avoid the warning, this restructures the code to make it
both simpler and to move the 'i++' outside of the mutex_lock_nested
call, where it is now always used and the variable is not
flagged as unused.

We had some discussion about changing mutex_lock_nested to an
inline function, which would make the code do the right thing here,
but in the end decided against it, in order to guarantee that
mutex_lock_nested() does not introduced overhead without
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 9f01cd4a ("regulator: core: introduce function to lock regulators and its supplies")
Link: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2068900Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Make it possible to use the bulk API with optional supplies, by allowing
the consumer to marking supplies as optional in the regulator_bulk_data.
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Since we need to read voltages of parents as part of setting supply
voltages we need to be able to do get_voltage() internally without
taking locks so reorganize the locking to take locks on the full tree on
entry rather than as we recurse when called externally.
Reported-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Until now changing the voltage of a regulator only ever effected the
regulator itself, but never its supplies. It's a common pattern though
to put LDO regulators behind switching regulators. The switching
regulators efficiently drop the input voltage but have a high ripple on
their output. The output is then cleaned up by the LDOs. For higher
energy efficiency the voltage drop at the LDOs should be minimized. For
this scenario we need to propagate the voltage change to the supply
regulators. Another scenario where voltage propagation is desired is
a regulator which only consists of a switch and thus cannot regulate
voltages itself. In this case we can pass setting voltages to the
supply.

This patch adds support for voltage propagation. We do voltage
propagation when the current regulator has a minimum dropout voltage
specified or if the current regulator lacks a get_voltage operation
(indicating it's a switch and not a regulator).

Changing the supply voltage must be done carefully. When we are
increasing the current regulators output we must first increase the
supply voltage and then the regulator itself. When we are decreasing the
current regulators voltage we must decrease the supply voltage after
changing the current regulators voltage.
Signed-off-by: NSascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

_regulator_call_set_voltage has code to translate a minimum/maximum
voltage pair into a selector. This code is useful for others aswell,
so create a regulator_map_voltage function.
Signed-off-by: NSascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The unlocked version will be needed when we start propagating voltage
changes to the supply regulators.
Signed-off-by: NSascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The unlocked version will be needed when we start propagating voltage
changes to the supply regulators.
Signed-off-by: NSascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Each regulator_dev is locked with its own mutex. This is fine as long
as only one regulator_dev is locked, but makes lockdep unhappy when we
have to walk up the supply chain like it can happen in
regulator_get_voltage:

regulator_get_voltage ->
 mutex_lock(&regulator->rdev->mutex) ->
_regulator_get_voltage(regulator->rdev) ->
regulator_get_voltage(rdev->supply) ->
mutex_lock(&regulator->rdev->mutex);

This causes lockdep to issue a possible deadlock warning.

There are at least two ways to work around this:

- We can always lock the whole supply chain using the functions
  introduced with this patch.
- We could store the current voltage in struct regulator_rdev so
  that we do not have to walk up the supply chain for the
  _regulator_get_voltage case.

Anyway, regulator_lock_supply/regulator_unlock_supply will be needed
once we allow regulator_set_voltage to optimize the supply voltages.
Signed-off-by: NSascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

When resolving regulator-regulator supplies we ignore probe deferral
returns from regulator_dev_lookup() (such as are generated for DT when
we can see a supply is registered) and just fall back to the dummy
regulator if there are full constraints (as is the case for DT).  This
means that probe deferral is broken for DT systems, fix that by paying
attention to -EPROBE_DEFER return codes like we do -ENODEV.

A further patch will simplify this further, this is a minimal fix for
the specific issue.

Fixes: 9f7e25ed (regulator: core: Handle full constraints systems when resolving supplies)
Reported-by: NSascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Tested-by: NSascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonnie@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

As we are already registering a device with regulator_class for each
regulator device, regulator_list is redundant and can be replaced with
calls to class_find_device() and class_for_each_device().
Signed-off-by: NTomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The ret pointer passed to regulator_dev_lookup is only filled with a
valid error code if regulator_dev_lookup returned NULL. Currently
regulator_resolve_supply checks this ret value before it checks if a
regulator was returned, this can result in valid regulator lookups being
ignored.

Fixes: 6261b06d ("regulator: Defer lookup of supply to regulator_get")
Signed-off-by: NCharles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

The same error print exists 4 times in the regulator core

	<rdev>: operation not allowed

Unfortunately, seeing this in the dmesg is not very informative.
Add what type of operation is not allowed to the message so that
these errors are unique, hopefully pointing developers in the
right direction

	<rdev>: drms operation not allowed
	<rdev>: voltage operation not allowed
	<rdev>: current operation not allowed
	<rdev>: mode operation not allowed
Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

We were checking rdev->supply for NULL after dereferencing it. Lets
check for rdev->supply along with _regulator_is_enabled() and call
regulator_enable() only if rdev->supply is not NULL.
Signed-off-by: NSudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

When calling regulator_set_load, regulator_check_drms prints and returns
an error if the regulator device's flag REGULATOR_CHANGE_DRMS isn't set.
drms_uA_update, however, bails out without reporting an error.

Replace the error print with a debug level print so that we don't get
such prints when the underlying regulator doesn't support DRMS.
Signed-off-by: NArchit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() rather than open coding it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Failure to create a debugfs node is not an error, but we print a
warning upon failure to create the node. Downgrade this to a
debug printk so that we're quiet here. This allows multiple
drivers to request a CPU's regulator so that CPUfreq and AVSish
drivers can coexist.

The downside of this approach is that whoever gets to debugfs first
the others who come later to not have any debugfs attributes associated
with them.
Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Trivial spell fix, s/succesfully/successfully.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The regulator_list has exactly the same contents as the list that the
driver core maintains of regulator_class members so is redundant. As a
first step in converting over to use the class device list convert our
iteration in late_initcall() to use the class device iterator.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

We really ought to be using the class dvice lifetime management features
more than we are rather than open coding them so take a step towards that
by moving some of the simplest deallocations to the dev_release() function.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

When we release a regulator we need to remove references to it from the
rdev which means locking the rdev.  Currently we also free resources
associated with the regulator inside the rdev lock but there is no need
to do this, we can reduce the region the lock is held by restricting it
to just actions that affect the rdev.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

When removing a regulator we hold regulator_list_mutex in order to
ensure the regualtor doesn't become removed again.  However we only need
to protect the list until we remove the regulator from the list so move
the unlock earlier to reduce the locked region.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Some regulators can automatically shut down when they detect an
over current event. Add an op (set_over_current_protection) and a
DT property + constraint to support this capability.
Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The regulator_resolve_supply() function calls set_supply() which in turn
calls create_regulator() to allocate a supply regulator.

If an error occurs after set_supply() succeeded, the allocated regulator
has to be freed before propagating the error code.
Signed-off-by: NJavier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

When a regulator is unregistered with regulator_unregister(), a call to
regulator_put() is made for its input supply if there is one. This does
a module_put() to decrement the refcount of the module that owns the
supply but there isn't a corresponding try_module_get() in set_supply()
to make the calls balanced.
Signed-off-by: NJavier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

When resolving device supplies if we fail to look up the regulator we
substitute in the dummy supply instead if the system has fully specified
constraints. When resolving supplies for regulators we do not have the
equivalent code and instead just directly use the regulator_dev_lookup()
result causing spurious failures.

This does not affect DT systems since we are able to detect missing
mappings directly as part of regulator_dev_lookup() and so have appropriate
handling in the DT specific code.
Reported-by: NChristian Hartmann <cornogle@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Add lockdep_assert_held_once() to functions explicitly mentioning that
rdev or regulator_list mutex must be held. Using WARN_ONCE shouldn't
pollute the dmesg to much.

The patch (if CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled) will show warnings in certain
regulators calling regulator_notifier_call_chain() without rdev->mutex
held.
Signed-off-by: NKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Some regulators can limit their input current (typically annotated
as ilim). Add an op (set_input_current_limit) and a DT property +
constraint to support this.
Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Some regulators support a "soft start" feature where the voltage
ramps up slowly when the regulator is enabled. Add an op
(set_soft_start) and a DT property + constraint to support this.
Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Some regulators need to be configured to pull down a resistor
when the regulator is disabled. Add an op (set_pull_down) and a
DT property + constraint to support this.
Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Some regulators have a fixed load that isn't captured by
consumers that the kernel knows about. Add a constraint to
support this.
Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

In order to avoid potential overflows in print_constraints we
better replace sprintf() with scnprintf().
Signed-off-by: NStefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The buffer for condtraints debug isn't big enough to hold the output
in all cases. So fix this issue by increasing the buffer.
Signed-off-by: NStefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>

We weren't taking into account the already used buffer when telling
sprintf() where to print to.
Reported-by: NStefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>