1. 04 4月, 2020 1 次提交
  2. 10 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  3. 11 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  4. 01 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  5. 10 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  6. 24 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  7. 22 12月, 2019 3 次提交
  8. 19 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  9. 14 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  10. 06 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  11. 25 11月, 2019 2 次提交
  12. 30 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  13. 25 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  14. 24 10月, 2019 3 次提交
  15. 22 10月, 2019 4 次提交
  16. 10 10月, 2019 2 次提交
  17. 08 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  18. 27 9月, 2019 1 次提交
  19. 13 8月, 2019 2 次提交
  20. 10 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  21. 06 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  22. 04 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  23. 13 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  24. 04 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  25. 21 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  26. 20 6月, 2019 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy · 22b7a426
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      When using a global seqno, we required a precise stop-the-workd event to
      handle preemption and unwind the global seqno counter. To accomplish
      this, we would preempt to a special out-of-band context and wait for the
      machine to report that it was idle. Given an idle machine, we could very
      precisely see which requests had completed and which we needed to feed
      back into the run queue.
      
      However, now that we have scrapped the global seqno, we no longer need
      to precisely unwind the global counter and only track requests by their
      per-context seqno. This allows us to loosely unwind inflight requests
      while scheduling a preemption, with the enormous caveat that the
      requests we put back on the run queue are still _inflight_ (until the
      preemption request is complete). This makes request tracking much more
      messy, as at any point then we can see a completed request that we
      believe is not currently scheduled for execution. We also have to be
      careful not to rewind RING_TAIL past RING_HEAD on preempting to the
      running context, and for this we use a semaphore to prevent completion
      of the request before continuing.
      
      To accomplish this feat, we change how we track requests scheduled to
      the HW. Instead of appending our requests onto a single list as we
      submit, we track each submission to ELSP as its own block. Then upon
      receiving the CS preemption event, we promote the pending block to the
      inflight block (discarding what was previously being tracked). As normal
      CS completion events arrive, we then remove stale entries from the
      inflight tracker.
      
      v2: Be a tinge paranoid and ensure we flush the write into the HWS page
      for the GPU semaphore to pick in a timely fashion.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190620142052.19311-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      22b7a426
  27. 15 6月, 2019 2 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Replace engine->timeline with a plain list · 422d7df4
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      To continue the onslaught of removing the assumption of a global
      execution ordering, another casualty is the engine->timeline. Without an
      actual timeline to track, it is overkill and we can replace it with a
      much less grand plain list. We still need a list of requests inflight,
      for the simple purpose of finding inflight requests (for retiring,
      resetting, preemption etc).
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190614164606.15633-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      422d7df4
    • C
      drm/i915: Keep contexts pinned until after the next kernel context switch · ce476c80
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      We need to keep the context image pinned in memory until after the GPU
      has finished writing into it. Since it continues to write as we signal
      the final breadcrumb, we need to keep it pinned until the request after
      it is complete. Currently we know the order in which requests execute on
      each engine, and so to remove that presumption we need to identify a
      request/context-switch we know must occur after our completion. Any
      request queued after the signal must imply a context switch, for
      simplicity we use a fresh request from the kernel context.
      
      The sequence of operations for keeping the context pinned until saved is:
      
       - On context activation, we preallocate a node for each physical engine
         the context may operate on. This is to avoid allocations during
         unpinning, which may be from inside FS_RECLAIM context (aka the
         shrinker)
      
       - On context deactivation on retirement of the last active request (which
         is before we know the context has been saved), we add the
         preallocated node onto a barrier list on each engine
      
       - On engine idling, we emit a switch to kernel context. When this
         switch completes, we know that all previous contexts must have been
         saved, and so on retiring this request we can finally unpin all the
         contexts that were marked as deactivated prior to the switch.
      
      We can enhance this in future by flushing all the idle contexts on a
      regular heartbeat pulse of a switch to kernel context, which will also
      be used to check for hung engines.
      
      v2: intel_context_active_acquire/_release
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190614164606.15633-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      ce476c80
  28. 12 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  29. 07 6月, 2019 1 次提交