drm/i915/gt: execlists->active is serialised by the tasklet

The active/pending execlists is no longer protected by the
engine->active.lock, but is serialised by the tasklet instead. Update
the locking around the debug and stats to follow suit.

v2: local_bh_disable() to prevent recursing into the tasklet in case we
trigger a softirq (Tvrtko)

Fixes: df403069 ("drm/i915/execlists: Lift process_csb() out of the irq-off spinlock")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191009160906.16195-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit c36eebd9)
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h

@@ -136,6 +136,20 @@ execlists_active(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
 	return READ_ONCE(*execlists->active);
 }
 
+static inline void
+execlists_active_lock_bh(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
+{
+	local_bh_disable(); /* prevent local softirq and lock recursion */
+	tasklet_lock(&execlists->tasklet);
+}
+
+static inline void
+execlists_active_unlock_bh(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
+{
+	tasklet_unlock(&execlists->tasklet);
+	local_bh_enable(); /* restore softirq, and kick ksoftirqd! */
+}
+
 struct i915_request *
 execlists_unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists);
 

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c

@@ -1197,9 +1197,7 @@ static void intel_engine_print_registers(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 					 struct drm_printer *m)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = engine->i915;
-	const struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists =
-		&engine->execlists;
-	unsigned long flags;
+	struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
 	u64 addr;
 
 	if (engine->id == RENDER_CLASS && IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, 4, 7))
@@ -1281,7 +1279,7 @@ static void intel_engine_print_registers(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 				   idx, hws[idx * 2], hws[idx * 2 + 1]);
 		}
 
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->active.lock, flags);
+		execlists_active_lock_bh(execlists);
 		for (port = execlists->active; (rq = *port); port++) {
 			char hdr[80];
 			int len;
@@ -1309,7 +1307,7 @@ static void intel_engine_print_registers(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 				 hwsp_seqno(rq));
 			print_request(m, rq, hdr);
 		}
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->active.lock, flags);
+		execlists_active_unlock_bh(execlists);
 	} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) > 6) {
 		drm_printf(m, "\tPP_DIR_BASE: 0x%08x\n",
 			   ENGINE_READ(engine, RING_PP_DIR_BASE));
@@ -1440,8 +1438,8 @@ int intel_enable_engine_stats(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	if (!intel_engine_supports_stats(engine))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->active.lock, flags);
-	write_seqlock(&engine->stats.lock);
+	execlists_active_lock_bh(execlists);
+	write_seqlock_irqsave(&engine->stats.lock, flags);
 
 	if (unlikely(engine->stats.enabled == ~0)) {
 		err = -EBUSY;
@@ -1469,8 +1467,8 @@ int intel_enable_engine_stats(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	}
 
 unlock:
-	write_sequnlock(&engine->stats.lock);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->active.lock, flags);
+	write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&engine->stats.lock, flags);
+	execlists_active_unlock_bh(execlists);
 
 	return err;
 }

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h

@@ -77,6 +77,12 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
 
 #define I915_GEM_IDLE_TIMEOUT (HZ / 5)
 
+static inline void tasklet_lock(struct tasklet_struct *t)
+{
+	while (!tasklet_trylock(t))
+		cpu_relax();
+}
+
 static inline void __tasklet_disable_sync_once(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 {
 	if (!atomic_fetch_inc(&t->count))