- 06 8月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
The Multi Innotechnology is a 10.1" 1280x800 panel. The datasheet did not specify specific values for sync, back, front porch. The values are a best guess based on values for similar panels. Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Co-developed-by: NUlrich Ölmann <u.oelmann@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NUlrich Ölmann <u.oelmann@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NOleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NAhmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210805111944.13533-2-o.rempel@pengutronix.de
-
- 05 8月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Artjom Vejsel 提交于
The Gopher 2b LCD panel is used in Gopher 2b handhelds. It's simple panel with NewVision NV3047 driver, but SPI lines are not connected. It has no specific name, since it's unique to that handheld. lot name at AliExpress: 4.3 inch 40PIN TFT LCD Screen COG NV3047 Drive IC 480(RGB)*272 No Touch 24Bit RGB Interface Signed-off-by: NArtjom Vejsel <akawolf0@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210804002353.76385-4-akawolf0@gmail.com
-
- 01 8月, 2021 3 次提交
-
-
由 Alistair Francis 提交于
Add support for the 10.3" E Ink panel described at: https://www.eink.com/product.html?type=productdetail&id=7Signed-off-by: NAlistair Francis <alistair@alistair23.me> Acked-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210801004701.831-1-alistair@alistair23.me
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
This reverts commit 18a1488b. Those delays were added to support the Samsung ATNA33XC20 panel. However, we've moving that to its own panel driver and out of panel-simple. That means we don't need the ability to specify this delay. NOTE: it's unlikely we want to keep this delay "just in case" some other panel needs it. The enable-gpio and the power supply are really supposed to be different ways to specify the same thing: the main enable of the panel. Supporting a delay between them doesn't really make sense. Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NSean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210730084534.v2.5.Ie44e3e5b7a926392541d575ca84c56931596513f@changeid
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
This reverts commit 4bfe6c8f. This panel's power sequencing really can't be handled properly by panel-simple because of the special sequencing needed for the EL_ON3 GPIO. The only way it was sorta working in the past was by trying to jam that signal into the "enable-gpio", but that really wasn't a good fit. We'll add a custom panel driver for this panel to do it right. Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NSean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210730084534.v2.4.Id9f076ec5f35633f8ce931051af268a04c45c075@changeid
-
- 27 7月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Nicolas Boichat 提交于
Many of the DSI flags have names opposite to their actual effects, e.g. MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET means that EoT packets will actually be disabled. Fix this by including _NO_ in the flag names, e.g. MIPI_DSI_MODE_NO_EOT_PACKET. Signed-off-by: NNicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NRobert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Xin Ji <xji@analogixsemi.com> # anx7625.c Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org> # msm/dsi Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210727094435.v3.1.I629b2366a6591410359c7fcf6d385b474b705ca2@changeid
-
由 Bjorn Andersson 提交于
Add definition of the AUO B133HAN05.4 13.3" FHD panel and the B140HAN06.4 14.0" FHD panel. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210726173300.432039-2-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org
-
- 15 7月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
When I tried booting up a device that needed the DP AUX backlight, I found an error in the logs: panel-simple-dp-aux: probe of aux-ti_sn65dsi86.aux.0 failed with error -110 The aux transfers were failing because the panel wasn't powered. Just like when reading the EDID we need to power the panel when trying to talk to it. Add the needed pm_runtime calls. After I do this I can successfully probe the panel and adjust the backlight on my board. Fixes: bfd45140 ("drm/panel-simple: Support DP AUX backlight") Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210714093334.1.Idb41f87e5abae4aee0705db7458b0097fc50e7ab@changeid
-
- 10 7月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Stefan Riedmueller 提交于
This patch adds support for the EDT ETM0350G0DH6 3.5" (320x240) lcd panel to DRM simple panel driver. Signed-off-by: NStefan Riedmueller <s.riedmueller@phytec.de> Signed-off-by: NYunus Bas <y.bas@phytec.de> Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210709200349.2665205-2-y.bas@phytec.de
-
由 Stefan Riedmueller 提交于
This patch adds support for the EDT ETMV570G2DHU 5.7" (640x480) lcd panel to DRM simple panel driver. Signed-off-by: NStefan Riedmueller <s.riedmueller@phytec.de> Signed-off-by: NYunus Bas <y.bas@phytec.de> Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210709200349.2665205-1-y.bas@phytec.de
-
- 09 7月, 2021 4 次提交
-
-
由 Rajeev Nandan 提交于
Add Samsung 13.3" FHD eDP AMOLED panel. Signed-off-by: NRajeev Nandan <rajeevny@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1624726268-14869-7-git-send-email-rajeevny@codeaurora.org
-
由 Rajeev Nandan 提交于
Do not give a warning for the eDP panels if the "bus_format" is not specified, since most eDP panels can support more than one bus formats and this can be auto-detected. Also, update the check to include bpc=10 for the eDP panel. Signed-off-by: NRajeev Nandan <rajeevny@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1624726268-14869-5-git-send-email-rajeevny@codeaurora.org
-
由 Rajeev Nandan 提交于
Some panels datasheets may specify a delay between the enable GPIO and the regulator. Support this in panel-simple. Signed-off-by: NRajeev Nandan <rajeevny@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1624726268-14869-4-git-send-email-rajeevny@codeaurora.org
-
由 Rajeev Nandan 提交于
If there is no backlight specified in the device tree and the panel has access to the DP AUX channel then create a DP AUX backlight if supported by the panel. Signed-off-by: NRajeev Nandan <rajeevny@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1624726268-14869-3-git-send-email-rajeevny@codeaurora.org
-
- 22 6月, 2021 3 次提交
-
-
由 Stefan Riedmueller 提交于
Add corresponding bus_format and bus_flags for the EDT ETM0430G0DH6 display. Signed-off-by: NStefan Riedmueller <s.riedmueller@phytec.de> Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210621150930.86617-3-s.riedmueller@phytec.de
-
由 Stefan Riedmueller 提交于
The connector_type for following two EDT displays is missing: - EDT ETM0430G0DH6 - EDT ETM0700G0BDH6 Both are parallel displays thus add the corresponding connector_type. Signed-off-by: NStefan Riedmueller <s.riedmueller@phytec.de> Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210621150930.86617-2-s.riedmueller@phytec.de
-
由 Stefan Riedmueller 提交于
The AUO G104SN02 V2 is an LVDS display which supports 6 and 8 bpc PSWG. Add the corresponding connector type and 8 bpc as default bus_format. Signed-off-by: NStefan Riedmueller <s.riedmueller@phytec.de> Reviewed-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210621150930.86617-1-s.riedmueller@phytec.de
-
- 12 6月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
If panel-simple is instantiated as a DP AUX bus endpoint then we have access to the DP AUX bus. Let's stash it in the panel-simple structure, leaving it NULL for the cases where the panel is instantiated in other ways. If we happen to have access to the DP AUX bus and we weren't provided the ddc-i2c-bus in some other manner, let's use the DP AUX bus for it. Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.6.I18e60221f6d048d14d6c50a770b15f356fa75092@changeid
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
The panel-simple driver can already have devices instantiated as platform devices or MIPI DSI devices. Let's add a 3rd way to instantiate it: as DP AUX endpoint devices. At the moment there is no benefit to instantiating it in this way, but: - In the next patch we'll give it access to the DDC channel via the DP AUX bus. - Possibly in the future we may use this channel to configure the backlight. Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.5.Iada41f76a7342354bae929d0bb3ceba40f27f0ea@changeid
-
- 25 5月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
The PM Runtime docs specifically call out the need to call pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() in the remove() callback if pm_runtime_use_autosuspend() was called in probe(): > Drivers in ->remove() callback should undo the runtime PM changes done > in ->probe(). Usually this means calling pm_runtime_disable(), > pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() etc. We should do this. This fixes a warning splat that I saw when I was testing out the panel-simple's remove(). Fixes: 3235b0f2 ("drm/panel: panel-simple: Use runtime pm to avoid excessive unprepare / prepare") Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210517130450.v7.1.I9e947183e95c9bd067c9c1d51208ac6a96385139@changeid
-
- 04 5月, 2021 4 次提交
-
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
It doesn't make sense to go out to the bus and read the EDID over and over again. Let's cache it and throw away the cache when we turn power off from the panel. Autosuspend means that even if there are several calls to read the EDID before we officially turn the power on then we should get good use out of this cache. Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NSean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210423095743.v5.18.If050957eaa85cf45b10bcf61e6f7fa61c9750ebf@changeid
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
I don't believe that it ever makes sense to read the EDID when a panel is not powered and the powering on of the panel is the job of prepare(). Let's make sure that this happens before we try to read the EDID. We use the pm_runtime functions directly rather than directly calling the normal prepare() function because the pm_runtime functions are definitely refcounted whereas it's less clear if the prepare() one is. NOTE: I'm not 100% sure how EDID reading was working for folks in the past, but I can only assume that it was failing on the initial attempt and then working only later. This patch, presumably, will fix that. If some panel out there really can read the EDID without powering up and it's a big advantage to preserve the old behavior we can add a per-panel flag. It appears that providing the DDC bus to the panel in the past was somewhat uncommon in any case. Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NSean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210423095743.v5.17.Ibd31b8f7c73255d68c5c9f5b611b4bfaa036f727@changeid
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
As of commit 5186421c ("drm: Introduce epoch counter to drm_connector") the drm_get_edid() function calls drm_connector_update_edid_property() for us. There's no reason for us to call it again. Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NSean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210423095743.v5.16.Icb581b0273d95cc33ca38676c61ae6d7d2e75357@changeid
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
When I added support for the hpd-gpio to simple-panel in commit 48834e60 ("drm/panel-simple: Support hpd-gpios for delaying prepare()"), I added a special case to handle a circular dependency I was running into on the ti-sn65dsi86 bridge chip. On my board the hpd-gpio is actually provided by the bridge chip. That was causing some circular dependency problems that I had to work around by getting the hpd-gpio late. I've now reorganized the ti-sn65dsi86 bridge chip driver to be a collection of sub-drivers. Now the GPIO part can probe separately and that breaks the chain. Let's get rid of the old code to clean things up. Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NSean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210423095743.v5.10.I40eeedc23459d1e3fc96fa6cdad775d88c6e706c@changeid
-
- 01 5月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
In commit 3235b0f2 ("drm/panel: panel-simple: Use runtime pm to avoid excessive unprepare / prepare") we started using pm_runtime, but my patch neglected to add the proper pm_runtime_disable(). Doh! Add them now. Fixes: 3235b0f2 ("drm/panel: panel-simple: Use runtime pm to avoid excessive unprepare / prepare") Reported-by: NBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NSean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210423095743.v5.1.I9e6af2529d6c61e5daf86a15a1211121c5223b9a@changeid
-
- 21 4月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
Unpreparing and re-preparing a panel can be a really heavy operation. Panels datasheets often specify something on the order of 500ms as the delay you should insert after turning off the panel before turning it on again. In addition, turning on a panel can have delays on the order of 100ms - 200ms before the panel will assert HPD (AKA "panel ready"). The above means that we should avoid turning a panel off if we're going to turn it on again shortly. The above becomes a problem when we want to read the EDID of a panel. The way that ordering works is that userspace wants to read the EDID of the panel _before_ fully enabling it so that it can set the initial mode correctly. However, we can't read the EDID until we power it up. This leads to code that does this dance (like ps8640_bridge_get_edid()): 1. When userspace requests EDID / the panel modes (through an ioctl), we power on the panel just enough to read the EDID and then power it off. 2. Userspace then turns the panel on. There's likely not much time between step #1 and #2 and so we want to avoid powering the panel off and on again between those two steps. Let's use Runtime PM to help us. We'll move the existing prepare() and unprepare() to be runtime resume() and runtime suspend(). Now when we want to prepare() or unprepare() we just increment or decrement the refcount. We'll default to a 1 second autosuspend delay which seems sane given the typical delays we see for panels. A few notes: - It seems the existing unprepare() and prepare() are defined to be no-ops if called extra times. We'll preserve that behavior but may try to remove it in a future patch. - This is a slight change in the ABI of simple panel. If something was absolutely relying on the unprepare() to happen instantly that simply won't be the case anymore. I'm not aware of anyone relying on that behavior, but if there is someone then we'll need to figure out how to enable (or disable) this new delayed behavior selectively. - In order for this to work we now have a hard dependency on "PM". From memory this is a legit thing to assume these days and we don't have to find some fallback to keep working if someone wants to build their system without "PM". Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210416153909.v4.7.I9e8bd33b49c496745bfac58ea9ab418bd3b6f5ce@changeid
-
- 12 3月, 2021 5 次提交
-
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
Panel power sequence says timing T8 (time from link idle to turn on the backlight) should be at least 50 ms. This is what the .enable delay in simple-panel is for, so set it. NOTE: this overlaps with the 80 ms .prepare_to_enable delay on purpose. The data sheet says that at least 80 ms needs to pass between HPD going high and turning on the backlight and that at least 50 ms needs to pass between the link idle and the backlight going on. Thus it works like this on the system in front of me: * In bridge chip pre_enable call drm_panel_prepare() * drm_panel_prepare() -> panel_simple_prepare() * Wait for HPD GPIO to go high. * Start counting for 80 ms (store in prepared_time) * In bridge chip enable, train link then call drm_panel_enable() * drm_panel_enable() -> panel_simple_enable() * panel_simple_enable() does hardcoded 50 ms delay then enforces 80 ms from HPD going high (in case the bridge took less than 30 ms to enable / link train). * drm_panel_enable() -> backlight_enable(). Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210222081716.1.I1a45aece5d2ac6a2e73bbec50da2086e43e0862b@changeid
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
This panel is quite similar to the similarly named N116BGE panel (the nominal timings are, in fact identical). However, let's add a new entry because the full range of clocks listed for N116BGE aren't supported for N116BCA-EA1, at least according to the datasheet. Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210115144345.v2.5.I3c01f3aab8335cb509da7009d8938c1a27a266dc@changeid
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
On an Innolux N116BCA panel that I have in front of me, sometimes HPD simply doesn't assert no matter how long you wait for it. As per the very wise advice of The IT Crowd ("Have you tried turning it off and on again?") it appears that power cycling is enough to kick this panel back into a sane state. >From tests on this panel, it appears that leaving it powered off for a while stimulates the problem. Adding a 6 second sleep at the start of panel_simple_prepare_once() makes it happen fairly reliably and, with this delay, I saw up to 3 retries needed sometimes. Without the 6 second sleep, however, the panel came up much more reliably the first time or after only 1 retry. While it's unknown what the problems are with this panel (and probably the hardware should be debugged), adding a few retries to the power on routine doesn't seem insane. Even if this panel's problems are attributed to the fact that it's pre-production and/or can be fixed, retries clearly can help in some cases and really don't hurt. Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210115144345.v2.3.I6916959daa7c5c915e889442268d23338de17923@changeid
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
If a panel has an hpd_absent_delay specified then we know exactly how long the maximum time is before HPD must be asserted. That means we can use it as a timeout for polling the HPD pin instead of using an arbitrary timeout. This is especially useful for dealing with panels that periodically fail to power on and need to be retried. We can detect the problem sooner. Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210115144345.v2.2.I183b1817610d7a82fdd3bc852e96d2985df9623f@changeid
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
If the HPD signal never asserts in panel_simple_prepare() and we return an error, we should unset the enable GPIO and disable the regulator to make it consistent for the caller. At the moment I have some hardware where HPD sometimes doesn't assert. Obviously that needs to be debugged, but this patch makes it so that if I add a retry that I can make things work. Fixes: 48834e60 ("drm/panel-simple: Support hpd-gpios for delaying prepare()") Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210115144345.v2.1.I33fcbd64ab409cfe4f9491bf449f51925a4d3281@changeid
-
- 10 2月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Use getter and setter functions, for platform_device structures and a mipi_dsi_device structure. Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209211304.1261740-1-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr
-
- 18 1月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heiko Stuebner 提交于
The Innolux n116bge panel has an eDP connector and 3*6 bits bus format. Signed-off-by: NHeiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com> Reviewed-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210109130951.3448435-1-heiko@sntech.de
-
- 06 12月, 2020 2 次提交
-
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
I forgot to add these when posting up the support for BOE NV110WTM-N61. Add them now. Fixes: a96ee0f6 ("drm: panel: simple: Add BOE NV110WTM-N61") Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201201125554.v2.1.I8a7bfc0966e803ab91001c9e6d01a736950c4981@changeid
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
In commit 131f909a ("drm: panel: simple: Fixup the struct panel_desc kernel doc") I transitioned the more deeply nested kerneldoc comments into the inline style. Apparently it is desirable to continue the job and move _everything_ in this struct to inline. Let's do it. While doing this, we also add a short summary for the whole struct to fix a warning when we run with extra warnings, AKA: scripts/kernel-doc -v -rst drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c The warning was: drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c:42: warning: missing initial short description on line: * struct panel_desc Suggested-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201201125822.1.I3c4191336014bd57364309439e56f600c94bb12b@changeid
-
- 30 11月, 2020 4 次提交
-
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
Add support for the BOE NV110WTM-N61 panel. The EDID lists two modes (one for 60 Hz refresh rate and one for 40 Hz), so we'll list both of them here. Note that the panel datasheet requires 80 ms between HPD asserting and the backlight power being turned on. We'll use the new timing constraints structure to do this cleanly. This assumes that the backlight will be enabled _after_ the panel enable finishes. This is how it works today and seems a sane assumption. Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201109170018.v4.4.I71b2118dfc00fd7b43b02d28e7b890081c2acfa2@changeid
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
On the panel I'm looking at, there's an 80 ms minimum time between HPD being asserted by the panel and setting the backlight enable GPIO. While we could just add an 80 ms "enable" delay, this is not ideal. Link training is allowed to happen in parallel with this delay so the fixed 80 ms delay over-delays. We'll support this by logging the time at the end of prepare and then delaying in enable if enough time hasn't passed. Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201109170018.v4.3.Ib9ce3c6482f464bf594161581521ced46bbd54ed@changeid
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
It is believed that all of the current users of the "unprepare" delay don't actually need to wait the amount of time specified directly in the unprepare phase. The purpose of the delay that's specified is to allow the panel to fully power off so that we don't try to power it back on before it's managed to full power down. Let's use this observation to avoid the fixed delay that we currently have. Instead of delaying, we'll note the current time when the unprepare happens. If someone then tries to prepare the panel later and not enough time has passed, we'll do the delay before starting the prepare phase. Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201109170018.v4.2.I06a95d83e7fa1bd919c8edd63dacacb5436e495a@changeid
-
由 Douglas Anderson 提交于
When I run: scripts/kernel-doc -rst drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c I see that several of the kernel-doc entries aren't showing up because they don't specify the full path down the hierarchy. Let's fix that and also move to inline kernel docs. Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201109170018.v4.1.Icaa86f0a4ca45a9a7184da4bc63386b29792d613@changeid
-
- 25 11月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lukas F. Hartmann 提交于
The Innolux N125HCE-GN1 display is used in the MNT Reform 2.0 laptop, attached via eDP to a SN65DSI86 MIPI-DSI to eDP bridge. Signed-off-by: NLukas F. Hartmann <lukas@mntre.com> Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201124172604.981746-1-lukas@mntre.com
-