Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 15 5月, 2020 1 次提交
  3. 14 5月, 2020 6 次提交
    • Y
      bpf: Change btf_iter func proto prefix to "bpf_iter_" · 21aef70e
      由 Yonghong Song 提交于 
      This is to be consistent with tracing and lsm programs
which have prefix "bpf_trace_" and "bpf_lsm_" respectively.
Suggested-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200513180216.2949387-1-yhs@fb.com
      21aef70e
    • Y
      tools/bpf: selftests : Explain bpf_iter test failures with llvm 10.0.0 · 99aaf53e
      由 Yonghong Song 提交于 
      Commit 6879c042 ("tools/bpf: selftests: Add bpf_iter selftests")
added self tests for bpf_iter feature. But two subtests
ipv6_route and netlink needs llvm latest 10.x release branch
or trunk due to a bug in llvm BPF backend. This patch added
the file README.rst to document these two failures
so people using llvm 10.0.0 can be aware of them.
Suggested-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200513180215.2949237-1-yhs@fb.com
      99aaf53e
    • A
      selftest/bpf: Add BPF triggering benchmark · c5d420c3
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      It is sometimes desirable to be able to trigger BPF program from user-space
with minimal overhead. sys_enter would seem to be a good candidate, yet in
a lot of cases there will be a lot of noise from syscalls triggered by other
processes on the system. So while searching for low-overhead alternative, I've
stumbled upon getpgid() syscall, which seems to be specific enough to not
suffer from accidental syscall by other apps.

This set of benchmarks compares tp, raw_tp w/ filtering by syscall ID, kprobe,
fentry and fmod_ret with returning error (so that syscall would not be
executed), to determine the lowest-overhead way. Here are results on my
machine (using benchs/run_bench_trigger.sh script):

  base      :    9.200 ± 0.319M/s
  tp        :    6.690 ± 0.125M/s
  rawtp     :    8.571 ± 0.214M/s
  kprobe    :    6.431 ± 0.048M/s
  fentry    :    8.955 ± 0.241M/s
  fmodret   :    8.903 ± 0.135M/s

So it seems like fmodret doesn't give much benefit for such lightweight
syscall. Raw tracepoint is pretty decent despite additional filtering logic,
but it will be called for any other syscall in the system, which rules it out.
Fentry, though, seems to be adding the least amoung of overhead and achieves
97.3% of performance of baseline no-BPF-attached syscall.

Using getpgid() seems to be preferable to set_task_comm() approach from
test_overhead, as it's about 2.35x faster in a baseline performance.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200512192445.2351848-5-andriin@fb.com
      c5d420c3
    • A
      selftest/bpf: Fmod_ret prog and implement test_overhead as part of bench · 4eaf0b5c
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Add fmod_ret BPF program to existing test_overhead selftest. Also re-implement
user-space benchmarking part into benchmark runner to compare results. Results
with ./bench are consistently somewhat lower than test_overhead's, but relative
performance of various types of BPF programs stay consisten (e.g., kretprobe is
noticeably slower). This slowdown seems to be coming from the fact that
test_overhead is single-threaded, while benchmark always spins off at least
one thread for producer. This has been confirmed by hacking multi-threaded
test_overhead variant and also single-threaded bench variant. Resutls are
below. run_bench_rename.sh script from benchs/ subdirectory was used to
produce results for ./bench.

Single-threaded implementations
===============================

/* bench: single-threaded, atomics */
base      :    4.622 ± 0.049M/s
kprobe    :    3.673 ± 0.052M/s
kretprobe :    2.625 ± 0.052M/s
rawtp     :    4.369 ± 0.089M/s
fentry    :    4.201 ± 0.558M/s
fexit     :    4.309 ± 0.148M/s
fmodret   :    4.314 ± 0.203M/s

/* selftest: single-threaded, no atomics */
task_rename base        4555K events per sec
task_rename kprobe      3643K events per sec
task_rename kretprobe   2506K events per sec
task_rename raw_tp      4303K events per sec
task_rename fentry      4307K events per sec
task_rename fexit       4010K events per sec
task_rename fmod_ret    3984K events per sec

Multi-threaded implementations
==============================

/* bench: multi-threaded w/ atomics */
base      :    3.910 ± 0.023M/s
kprobe    :    3.048 ± 0.037M/s
kretprobe :    2.300 ± 0.015M/s
rawtp     :    3.687 ± 0.034M/s
fentry    :    3.740 ± 0.087M/s
fexit     :    3.510 ± 0.009M/s
fmodret   :    3.485 ± 0.050M/s

/* selftest: multi-threaded w/ atomics */
task_rename base        3872K events per sec
task_rename kprobe      3068K events per sec
task_rename kretprobe   2350K events per sec
task_rename raw_tp      3731K events per sec
task_rename fentry      3639K events per sec
task_rename fexit       3558K events per sec
task_rename fmod_ret    3511K events per sec

/* selftest: multi-threaded, no atomics */
task_rename base        3945K events per sec
task_rename kprobe      3298K events per sec
task_rename kretprobe   2451K events per sec
task_rename raw_tp      3718K events per sec
task_rename fentry      3782K events per sec
task_rename fexit       3543K events per sec
task_rename fmod_ret    3526K events per sec

Note that the fact that ./bench benchmark always uses atomic increments for
counting, while test_overhead doesn't, doesn't influence test results all that
much.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200512192445.2351848-4-andriin@fb.com
      4eaf0b5c
    • A
      selftests/bpf: Add benchmark runner infrastructure · 8e7c2a02
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      While working on BPF ringbuf implementation, testing, and benchmarking, I've
developed a pretty generic and modular benchmark runner, which seems to be
generically useful, as I've already used it for one more purpose (testing
fastest way to trigger BPF program, to minimize overhead of in-kernel code).

This patch adds generic part of benchmark runner and sets up Makefile for
extending it with more sets of benchmarks.

Benchmarker itself operates by spinning up specified number of producer and
consumer threads, setting up interval timer sending SIGALARM signal to
application once a second. Every second, current snapshot with hits/drops
counters are collected and stored in an array. Drops are useful for
producer/consumer benchmarks in which producer might overwhelm consumers.

Once test finishes after given amount of warm-up and testing seconds, mean and
stddev are calculated (ignoring warm-up results) and is printed out to stdout.
This setup seems to give consistent and accurate results.

To validate behavior, I added two atomic counting tests: global and local.
For global one, all the producer threads are atomically incrementing same
counter as fast as possible. This, of course, leads to huge drop of
performance once there is more than one producer thread due to CPUs fighting
for the same memory location.

Local counting, on the other hand, maintains one counter per each producer
thread, incremented independently. Once per second, all counters are read and
added together to form final "counting throughput" measurement. As expected,
such setup demonstrates linear scalability with number of producers (as long
as there are enough physical CPU cores, of course). See example output below.
Also, this setup can nicely demonstrate disastrous effects of false sharing,
if care is not taken to take those per-producer counters apart into
independent cache lines.

Demo output shows global counter first with 1 producer, then with 4. Both
total and per-producer performance significantly drop. The last run is local
counter with 4 producers, demonstrating near-perfect scalability.

$ ./bench -a -w1 -d2 -p1 count-global
Setting up benchmark 'count-global'...
Benchmark 'count-global' started.
Iter   0 ( 24.822us): hits  148.179M/s (148.179M/prod), drops    0.000M/s
Iter   1 ( 37.939us): hits  149.308M/s (149.308M/prod), drops    0.000M/s
Iter   2 (-10.774us): hits  150.717M/s (150.717M/prod), drops    0.000M/s
Iter   3 (  3.807us): hits  151.435M/s (151.435M/prod), drops    0.000M/s
Summary: hits  150.488 ± 1.079M/s (150.488M/prod), drops    0.000 ± 0.000M/s

$ ./bench -a -w1 -d2 -p4 count-global
Setting up benchmark 'count-global'...
Benchmark 'count-global' started.
Iter   0 ( 60.659us): hits   53.910M/s ( 13.477M/prod), drops    0.000M/s
Iter   1 (-17.658us): hits   53.722M/s ( 13.431M/prod), drops    0.000M/s
Iter   2 (  5.865us): hits   53.495M/s ( 13.374M/prod), drops    0.000M/s
Iter   3 (  0.104us): hits   53.606M/s ( 13.402M/prod), drops    0.000M/s
Summary: hits   53.608 ± 0.113M/s ( 13.402M/prod), drops    0.000 ± 0.000M/s

$ ./bench -a -w1 -d2 -p4 count-local
Setting up benchmark 'count-local'...
Benchmark 'count-local' started.
Iter   0 ( 23.388us): hits  640.450M/s (160.113M/prod), drops    0.000M/s
Iter   1 (  2.291us): hits  605.661M/s (151.415M/prod), drops    0.000M/s
Iter   2 ( -6.415us): hits  607.092M/s (151.773M/prod), drops    0.000M/s
Iter   3 ( -1.361us): hits  601.796M/s (150.449M/prod), drops    0.000M/s
Summary: hits  604.849 ± 2.739M/s (151.212M/prod), drops    0.000 ± 0.000M/s

Benchmark runner supports setting thread affinity for producer and consumer
threads. You can use -a flag for default CPU selection scheme, where first
consumer gets CPU #0, next one gets CPU #1, and so on. Then producer threads
pick up next CPU and increment one-by-one as well. But user can also specify
a set of CPUs independently for producers and consumers with --prod-affinity
1,2-10,15 and --cons-affinity <set-of-cpus>. The latter allows to force
producers and consumers to share same set of CPUs, if necessary.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200512192445.2351848-3-andriin@fb.com
      8e7c2a02
    • A
      selftests/bpf: Extract parse_num_list into generic testing_helpers.c · cd49291c
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Add testing_helpers.c, which will contain generic helpers for test runners and
tests needing some common generic functionality, like parsing a set of
numbers.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200512192445.2351848-2-andriin@fb.com
      cd49291c
  5. 13 5月, 2020 2 次提交
  7. 12 5月, 2020 3 次提交
  9. 11 5月, 2020 1 次提交
    • G
      bpf, libbpf: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array · 385bbf7b
      由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于 
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200507185057.GA13981@embeddedor
      385bbf7b
  11. 10 5月, 2020 11 次提交
    • S
      bpf, runqslower: include proper uapi/bpf.h · b4563fac
      由 Song Liu 提交于 
      runqslower doesn't specify include path for uapi/bpf.h. This causes the
following warning:

In file included from runqslower.c:10:
.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf.h:234:38:
warning: 'enum bpf_stats_type' declared inside parameter list will not
be visible outside of this definition or declaration
  234 | LIBBPF_API int bpf_enable_stats(enum bpf_stats_type type);

Fix this by adding -I tools/includ/uapi to the Makefile.
Reported-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      b4563fac
    • Y
      tools/bpf: selftests: Add bpf_iter selftests · 6879c042
      由 Yonghong Song 提交于 
      The added test includes the following subtests:
  - test verifier change for btf_id_or_null
  - test load/create_iter/read for
    ipv6_route/netlink/bpf_map/task/task_file
  - test anon bpf iterator
  - test anon bpf iterator reading one char at a time
  - test file bpf iterator
  - test overflow (single bpf program output not overflow)
  - test overflow (single bpf program output overflows)
  - test bpf prog returning 1

The ipv6_route tests the following verifier change
  - access fields in the variable length array of the structure.

The netlink load tests the following verifier change
  - put a btf_id ptr value in a stack and accessible to
    tracing/iter programs.

The anon bpf iterator also tests link auto attach through skeleton.

  $ test_progs -n 2
  #2/1 btf_id_or_null:OK
  #2/2 ipv6_route:OK
  #2/3 netlink:OK
  #2/4 bpf_map:OK
  #2/5 task:OK
  #2/6 task_file:OK
  #2/7 anon:OK
  #2/8 anon-read-one-char:OK
  #2/9 file:OK
  #2/10 overflow:OK
  #2/11 overflow-e2big:OK
  #2/12 prog-ret-1:OK
  #2 bpf_iter:OK
  Summary: 1/12 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200509175923.2477637-1-yhs@fb.com
      6879c042
    • Y
      tools/bpf: selftests: Add iter progs for bpf_map/task/task_file · acf61631
      由 Yonghong Song 提交于 
      The implementation is arbitrary, just to show how the bpf programs
can be written for bpf_map/task/task_file. They can be costomized
for specific needs.

For example, for bpf_map, the iterator prints out:
  $ cat /sys/fs/bpf/my_bpf_map
      id   refcnt  usercnt  locked_vm
       3        2        0         20
       6        2        0         20
       9        2        0         20
      12        2        0         20
      13        2        0         20
      16        2        0         20
      19        2        0         20
      %%% END %%%

For task, the iterator prints out:
  $ cat /sys/fs/bpf/my_task
    tgid      gid
       1        1
       2        2
    ....
    1944     1944
    1948     1948
    1949     1949
    1953     1953
    === END ===

For task/file, the iterator prints out:
  $ cat /sys/fs/bpf/my_task_file
    tgid      gid       fd      file
       1        1        0 ffffffff95c97600
       1        1        1 ffffffff95c97600
       1        1        2 ffffffff95c97600
    ....
    1895     1895      255 ffffffff95c8fe00
    1932     1932        0 ffffffff95c8fe00
    1932     1932        1 ffffffff95c8fe00
    1932     1932        2 ffffffff95c8fe00
    1932     1932        3 ffffffff95c185c0

This is able to print out all open files (fd and file->f_op), so user can compare
f_op against a particular kernel file operations to find what it is.
For example, from /proc/kallsyms, we can find
  ffffffff95c185c0 r eventfd_fops
so we will know tgid 1932 fd 3 is an eventfd file descriptor.
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200509175922.2477576-1-yhs@fb.com
      acf61631
    • Y
      tools/bpf: selftests: Add iterator programs for ipv6_route and netlink · 7c128a6b
      由 Yonghong Song 提交于 
      Two bpf programs are added in this patch for netlink and ipv6_route
target. On my VM, I am able to achieve identical
results compared to /proc/net/netlink and /proc/net/ipv6_route.

  $ cat /proc/net/netlink
  sk               Eth Pid        Groups   Rmem     Wmem     Dump  Locks    Drops    Inode
  000000002c42d58b 0   0          00000000 0        0        0     2        0        7
  00000000a4e8b5e1 0   1          00000551 0        0        0     2        0        18719
  00000000e1b1c195 4   0          00000000 0        0        0     2        0        16422
  000000007e6b29f9 6   0          00000000 0        0        0     2        0        16424
  ....
  00000000159a170d 15  1862       00000002 0        0        0     2        0        1886
  000000009aca4bc9 15  3918224839 00000002 0        0        0     2        0        19076
  00000000d0ab31d2 15  1          00000002 0        0        0     2        0        18683
  000000008398fb08 16  0          00000000 0        0        0     2        0        27
  $ cat /sys/fs/bpf/my_netlink
  sk               Eth Pid        Groups   Rmem     Wmem     Dump  Locks    Drops    Inode
  000000002c42d58b 0   0          00000000 0        0        0     2        0        7
  00000000a4e8b5e1 0   1          00000551 0        0        0     2        0        18719
  00000000e1b1c195 4   0          00000000 0        0        0     2        0        16422
  000000007e6b29f9 6   0          00000000 0        0        0     2        0        16424
  ....
  00000000159a170d 15  1862       00000002 0        0        0     2        0        1886
  000000009aca4bc9 15  3918224839 00000002 0        0        0     2        0        19076
  00000000d0ab31d2 15  1          00000002 0        0        0     2        0        18683
  000000008398fb08 16  0          00000000 0        0        0     2        0        27

  $ cat /proc/net/ipv6_route
  fe800000000000000000000000000000 40 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000100 00000001 00000000 00000001     eth0
  00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200       lo
  00000000000000000000000000000001 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000003 00000000 80200001       lo
  fe80000000000000c04b03fffe7827ce 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000002 00000000 80200001     eth0
  ff000000000000000000000000000000 08 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000100 00000003 00000000 00000001     eth0
  00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200       lo
  $ cat /sys/fs/bpf/my_ipv6_route
  fe800000000000000000000000000000 40 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000100 00000001 00000000 00000001     eth0
  00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200       lo
  00000000000000000000000000000001 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000003 00000000 80200001       lo
  fe80000000000000c04b03fffe7827ce 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000002 00000000 80200001     eth0
  ff000000000000000000000000000000 08 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000100 00000003 00000000 00000001     eth0
  00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200       lo
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200509175921.2477493-1-yhs@fb.com
      7c128a6b
    • Y
      tools/bpftool: Add bpf_iter support for bptool · 9406b485
      由 Yonghong Song 提交于 
      Currently, only one command is supported
  bpftool iter pin <bpf_prog.o> <path>

It will pin the trace/iter bpf program in
the object file <bpf_prog.o> to the <path>
where <path> should be on a bpffs mount.

For example,
  $ bpftool iter pin ./bpf_iter_ipv6_route.o \
    /sys/fs/bpf/my_route
User can then do a `cat` to print out the results:
  $ cat /sys/fs/bpf/my_route
    fe800000000000000000000000000000 40 00000000000000000000000000000000 ...
    00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ...
    00000000000000000000000000000001 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 ...
    fe800000000000008c0162fffebdfd57 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 ...
    ff000000000000000000000000000000 08 00000000000000000000000000000000 ...
    00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ...

The implementation for ipv6_route iterator is in one of subsequent
patches.

This patch also added BPF_LINK_TYPE_ITER to link query.

In the future, we may add additional parameters to pin command
by parameterizing the bpf iterator. For example, a map_id or pid
may be added to let bpf program only traverses a single map or task,
similar to kernel seq_file single_open().

We may also add introspection command for targets/iterators by
leveraging the bpf_iter itself.
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200509175920.2477247-1-yhs@fb.com
      9406b485
    • Y
      tools/libpf: Add offsetof/container_of macro in bpf_helpers.h · 5fbc2208
      由 Yonghong Song 提交于 
      These two helpers will be used later in bpf_iter bpf program
bpf_iter_netlink.c. Put them in bpf_helpers.h since they could
be useful in other cases.
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200509175919.2477104-1-yhs@fb.com
      5fbc2208
    • Y
      tools/libbpf: Add bpf_iter support · c09add2f
      由 Yonghong Song 提交于 
      Two new libbpf APIs are added to support bpf_iter:
  - bpf_program__attach_iter
    Given a bpf program and additional parameters, which is
    none now, returns a bpf_link.
  - bpf_iter_create
    syscall level API to create a bpf iterator.

The macro BPF_SEQ_PRINTF are also introduced. The format
looks like:
  BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "task id %d\n", pid);

This macro can help bpf program writers with
nicer bpf_seq_printf syntax similar to the kernel one.
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200509175917.2476936-1-yhs@fb.com
      c09add2f
    • Y
      bpf: Add bpf_seq_printf and bpf_seq_write helpers · 492e639f
      由 Yonghong Song 提交于 
      Two helpers bpf_seq_printf and bpf_seq_write, are added for
writing data to the seq_file buffer.

bpf_seq_printf supports common format string flag/width/type
fields so at least I can get identical results for
netlink and ipv6_route targets.

For bpf_seq_printf and bpf_seq_write, return value -EOVERFLOW
specifically indicates a write failure due to overflow, which
means the object will be repeated in the next bpf invocation
if object collection stays the same. Note that if the object
collection is changed, depending how collection traversal is
done, even if the object still in the collection, it may not
be visited.

For bpf_seq_printf, format %s, %p{i,I}{4,6} needs to
read kernel memory. Reading kernel memory may fail in
the following two cases:
  - invalid kernel address, or
  - valid kernel address but requiring a major fault
If reading kernel memory failed, the %s string will be
an empty string and %p{i,I}{4,6} will be all 0.
Not returning error to bpf program is consistent with
what bpf_trace_printk() does for now.

bpf_seq_printf may return -EBUSY meaning that internal percpu
buffer for memory copy of strings or other pointees is
not available. Bpf program can return 1 to indicate it
wants the same object to be repeated. Right now, this should not
happen on no-RT kernels since migrate_disable(), which guards
bpf prog call, calls preempt_disable().
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200509175914.2476661-1-yhs@fb.com
      492e639f
    • Y
      bpf: Create anonymous bpf iterator · ac51d99b
      由 Yonghong Song 提交于 
      A new bpf command BPF_ITER_CREATE is added.

The anonymous bpf iterator is seq_file based.
The seq_file private data are referenced by targets.
The bpf_iter infrastructure allocated additional space
at seq_file->private before the space used by targets
to store some meta data, e.g.,
  prog:       prog to run
  session_id: an unique id for each opened seq_file
  seq_num:    how many times bpf programs are queried in this session
  done_stop:  an internal state to decide whether bpf program
              should be called in seq_ops->stop() or not

The seq_num will start from 0 for valid objects.
The bpf program may see the same seq_num more than once if
 - seq_file buffer overflow happens and the same object
   is retried by bpf_seq_read(), or
 - the bpf program explicitly requests a retry of the
   same object

Since module is not supported for bpf_iter, all target
registeration happens at __init time, so there is no
need to change bpf_iter_unreg_target() as it is used
mostly in error path of the init function at which time
no bpf iterators have been created yet.
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200509175905.2475770-1-yhs@fb.com
      ac51d99b
    • Y
      bpf: Support bpf tracing/iter programs for BPF_LINK_CREATE · de4e05ca
      由 Yonghong Song 提交于 
      Given a bpf program, the step to create an anonymous bpf iterator is:
  - create a bpf_iter_link, which combines bpf program and the target.
    In the future, there could be more information recorded in the link.
    A link_fd will be returned to the user space.
  - create an anonymous bpf iterator with the given link_fd.

The bpf_iter_link can be pinned to bpffs mount file system to
create a file based bpf iterator as well.

The benefit to use of bpf_iter_link:
  - using bpf link simplifies design and implementation as bpf link
    is used for other tracing bpf programs.
  - for file based bpf iterator, bpf_iter_link provides a standard
    way to replace underlying bpf programs.
  - for both anonymous and free based iterators, bpf link query
    capability can be leveraged.

The patch added support of tracing/iter programs for BPF_LINK_CREATE.
A new link type BPF_LINK_TYPE_ITER is added to facilitate link
querying. Currently, only prog_id is needed, so there is no
additional in-kernel show_fdinfo() and fill_link_info() hook
is needed for BPF_LINK_TYPE_ITER link.
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200509175901.2475084-1-yhs@fb.com
      de4e05ca
    • Y
      bpf: Allow loading of a bpf_iter program · 15d83c4d
      由 Yonghong Song 提交于 
      A bpf_iter program is a tracing program with attach type
BPF_TRACE_ITER. The load attribute
  attach_btf_id
is used by the verifier against a particular kernel function,
which represents a target, e.g., __bpf_iter__bpf_map
for target bpf_map which is implemented later.

The program return value must be 0 or 1 for now.
  0 : successful, except potential seq_file buffer overflow
      which is handled by seq_file reader.
  1 : request to restart the same object

In the future, other return values may be used for filtering or
teminating the iterator.
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200509175900.2474947-1-yhs@fb.com
      15d83c4d
  13. 09 5月, 2020 3 次提交
  15. 03 5月, 2020 1 次提交
  17. 02 5月, 2020 5 次提交
  19. 30 4月, 2020 7 次提交