- 20 9月, 2016 14 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: The fields in the recv_wr do not vary. There is no need to initialize them before each ib_post_recv(). This removes a large-ish data structure from the stack. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: Most of the fields in each send_wr do not vary. There is no need to initialize them before each ib_post_send(). This removes a large-ish data structure from the stack. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up. Since commit fc664485 ("xprtrdma: Split the completion queue"), rpcrdma_ep_post_recv() no longer uses the "ep" argument. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up. The "ia" argument is no longer used. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Currently, each regbuf is allocated and DMA mapped at the same time. This is done during transport creation. When a device driver is unloaded, every DMA-mapped buffer in use by a transport has to be unmapped, and then remapped to the new device if the driver is loaded again. Remapping will have to be done _after_ the connect worker has set up the new device. But there's an ordering problem: call_allocate, which invokes xprt_rdma_allocate which calls rpcrdma_alloc_regbuf to allocate Send buffers, happens _before_ the connect worker can run to set up the new device. Instead, at transport creation, allocate each buffer, but leave it unmapped. Once the RPC carries these buffers into ->send_request, by which time a transport connection should have been established, check to see that the RPC's buffers have been DMA mapped. If not, map them there. When device driver unplug support is added, it will simply unmap all the transport's regbufs, but it doesn't have to deallocate the underlying memory. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The use of DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL is discouraged by DMA-API.txt. Fortunately, xprtrdma now knows which direction I/O is going as soon as it allocates each regbuf. The RPC Call and Reply buffers are no longer the same regbuf. They can each be labeled correctly now. The RPC Reply buffer is never part of either a Send or Receive WR, but it can be part of Reply chunk, which is mapped and registered via ->ro_map . So it is not DMA mapped when it is allocated (DMA_NONE), to avoid a double- mapping. Since Receive buffers are no longer DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL and their contents are never modified by the host CPU, DMA-API-HOWTO.txt suggests that a DMA sync before posting each buffer should be unnecessary. (See my_card_interrupt_handler). Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Commit 94931746 ("xprtrdma: Limit number of RDMA segments in RPC-over-RDMA headers") capped the number of chunks that may appear in RPC-over-RDMA headers. The maximum header size can be estimated and fixed to avoid allocating buffer space that is never used. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
RPC-over-RDMA needs to separate its RPC call and reply buffers. o When an RPC Call is sent, rq_snd_buf is DMA mapped for an RDMA Send operation using DMA_TO_DEVICE o If the client expects a large RPC reply, it DMA maps rq_rcv_buf as part of a Reply chunk using DMA_FROM_DEVICE The two mappings are for data movement in opposite directions. DMA-API.txt suggests that if these mappings share a DMA cacheline, bad things can happen. This could occur in the final bytes of rq_snd_buf and the first bytes of rq_rcv_buf if the two buffers happen to share a DMA cacheline. On x86_64 the cacheline size is typically 8 bytes, and RPC call messages are usually much smaller than the send buffer, so this hasn't been a noticeable problem. But the DMA cacheline size can be larger on other platforms. Also, often rq_rcv_buf starts most of the way into a page, thus an additional RDMA segment is needed to map and register the end of that buffer. Try to avoid that scenario to reduce the cost of registering and invalidating Reply chunks. Instead of carrying a single regbuf that covers both rq_snd_buf and rq_rcv_buf, each struct rpcrdma_req now carries one regbuf for rq_snd_buf and one regbuf for rq_rcv_buf. Some incidental changes worth noting: - To clear out some spaghetti, refactor xprt_rdma_allocate. - The value stored in rg_size is the same as the value stored in the iov.length field, so eliminate rg_size Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Currently there's a hidden and indirect mechanism for finding the rpcrdma_req that goes with an rpc_rqst. It depends on getting from the rq_buffer pointer in struct rpc_rqst to the struct rpcrdma_regbuf that controls that buffer, and then to the struct rpcrdma_req it goes with. This was done back in the day to avoid the need to add a per-rqst pointer or to alter the buf_free API when support for RPC-over-RDMA was introduced. I'm about to change the way regbuf's work to support larger inline thresholds. Now is a good time to replace this indirect mechanism with something that is more straightforward. I guess this should be considered a clean up. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
For xprtrdma, the RPC Call and Reply buffers are involved in real I/O operations. To start with, the DMA direction of the I/O for a Call is opposite that of a Reply. In the current arrangement, the Reply buffer address is on a four-byte alignment just past the call buffer. Would be friendlier on some platforms if that was at a DMA cache alignment instead. Because the current arrangement allocates a single memory region which contains both buffers, the RPC Reply buffer often contains a page boundary in it when the Call buffer is large enough (which is frequent). It would be a little nicer for setting up DMA operations (and possible registration of the Reply buffer) if the two buffers were separated, well-aligned, and contained as few page boundaries as possible. Now, I could just pad out the single memory region used for the pair of buffers. But frequently that would mean a lot of unused space to ensure the Reply buffer did not have a page boundary. Add a separate pointer to rpc_rqst that points right to the RPC Reply buffer. This makes no difference to xprtsock, but it will help xprtrdma in subsequent patches. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
xprtrdma needs to allocate the Call and Reply buffers separately. TBH, the reliance on using a single buffer for the pair of XDR buffers is transport implementation-specific. Instead of passing just the rq_buffer into the buf_free method, pass the task structure and let buf_free take care of freeing both XDR buffers at once. There's a micro-optimization here. In the common case, both xprt_release and the transport's buf_free method were checking if rq_buffer was NULL. Now the check is done only once per RPC. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
xprtrdma needs to allocate the Call and Reply buffers separately. TBH, the reliance on using a single buffer for the pair of XDR buffers is transport implementation-specific. Transports that want to allocate separate Call and Reply buffers will ignore the "size" argument anyway. Don't bother passing it. The buf_alloc method can't return two pointers. Instead, make the method's return value an error code, and set the rq_buffer pointer in the method itself. This gives call_allocate an opportunity to terminate an RPC instead of looping forever when a permanent problem occurs. If a request is just bogus, or the transport is in a state where it can't allocate resources for any request, there needs to be a way to kill the RPC right there and not loop. This immediately fixes a rare problem in the backchannel send path, which loops if the server happens to send a CB request whose call+reply size is larger than a page (which it shouldn't do yet). One more issue: looks like xprt_inject_disconnect was incorrectly placed in the failure path in call_allocate. It needs to be in the success path, as it is for other call-sites. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: there is some XDR initialization logic that is common to the forward channel and backchannel. Move it to an XDR header so it can be shared. rpc_rqst::rq_buffer points to a buffer containing big-endian data. Update its annotation as part of the clean up. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: r_xprt is already available everywhere these macros are invoked, so just dereference that directly. RPCRDMA_INLINE_PAD_VALUE is no longer used, so it can simply be removed. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 07 9月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
An RPC can terminate before its reply arrives, if a credential problem or a soft timeout occurs. After this happens, xprtrdma reports it is out of Receive buffers. A Receive buffer is posted before each RPC is sent, and returned to the buffer pool when a reply is received. If no reply is received for an RPC, that Receive buffer remains posted. But xprtrdma tries to post another when the next RPC is sent. If this happens a few dozen times, there are no receive buffers left to be posted at send time. I don't see a way for a transport connection to recover at that point, and it will spit warnings and unnecessarily delay RPCs on occasion for its remaining lifetime. Commit 1e465fd4 ("xprtrdma: Replace send and receive arrays") removed a little bit of logic to detect this case and not provide a Receive buffer so no more buffers are posted, and then transport operation continues correctly. We didn't understand what that logic did, and it wasn't commented, so it was removed as part of the overhaul to support backchannel requests. Restore it, but be wary of the need to keep extra Receives posted to deal with backchannel requests. Fixes: 1e465fd4 ("xprtrdma: Replace send and receive arrays") Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Receive buffer exhaustion, if it were to actually occur, would be catastrophic. However, when there are no reply buffers to post, that means all of them have already been posted and are waiting for incoming replies. By design, there can never be more RPCs in flight than there are available receive buffers. A receive buffer can be left posted after an RPC exits without a received reply; say, due to a credential problem or a soft timeout. This does not result in fewer posted receive buffers than there are pending RPCs, and there is already logic in xprtrdma to deal appropriately with this case. It also looks like the "+ 2" that was removed was accidentally accommodating the number of extra receive buffers needed for receiving backchannel requests. That will need to be addressed by another patch. Fixes: 3d4cf35b ("xprtrdma: Reply buffer exhaustion can be...") Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 20 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 kbuild test robot 提交于
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c:798:2-3: Unneeded semicolon Remove unneeded semicolon. Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/semicolon.cocci CC: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 12 7月, 2016 22 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Direct data placement is not allowed when using flavors that guarantee integrity or privacy. When such security flavors are in effect, don't allow the use of Read and Write chunks for moving individual data items. All messages larger than the inline threshold are sent via Long Call or Long Reply. On my systems (CX-3 Pro on FDR), for small I/O operations, the use of Long messages adds only around 5 usecs of latency in each direction. Note that when integrity or encryption is used, the host CPU touches every byte in these messages. Even if it could be used, data movement offload doesn't buy much in this case. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
fixup_copy_count should count only the number of bytes copied to the page list. The head and tail are now always handled without a data copy. And the debugging at the end of rpcrdma_inline_fixup() is also no longer necessary, since copy_len will be non-zero when there is reply data in the tail (a normal and valid case). Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Now that rpcrdma_inline_fixup() updates only two fields in rq_rcv_buf, a full memcpy of that structure to rq_private_buf is unwarranted. Updating rq_private_buf fields only where needed also better documents what is going on. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
While trying NFSv4.0/RDMA with sec=krb5p, I noticed small NFS READ operations failed. After the client unwrapped the NFS READ reply message, the NFS READ XDR decoder was not able to decode the reply. The message was "Server cheating in reply", with the reported number of received payload bytes being zero. Applications reported a read(2) that returned -1/EIO. The problem is rpcrdma_inline_fixup() sets the tail.iov_len to zero when the incoming reply fits entirely in the head iovec. The zero tail.iov_len confused xdr_buf_trim(), which then mangled the actual reply data instead of simply removing the trailing GSS checksum. As near as I can tell, RPC transports are not supposed to update the head.iov_len, page_len, or tail.iov_len fields in the receive XDR buffer when handling an incoming RPC reply message. These fields contain the length of each component of the XDR buffer, and hence the maximum number of bytes of reply data that can be stored in each XDR buffer component. I've concluded this because: - This is how xdr_partial_copy_from_skb() appears to behave - rpcrdma_inline_fixup() already does not alter page_len - call_decode() compares rq_private_buf and rq_rcv_buf and WARNs if they are not exactly the same Unfortunately, as soon as I tried the simple fix to just remove the line that sets tail.iov_len to zero, I saw that the logic that appends the implicit Write chunk pad inline depends on inline_fixup setting tail.iov_len to zero. To address this, re-organize the tail iovec handling logic to use the same approach as with the head iovec: simply point tail.iov_base to the correct bytes in the receive buffer. While I remember all this, write down the conclusion in documenting comments. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
When the remaining length of an incoming reply is longer than the XDR buf's page_len, switch over to the tail iovec instead of copying more than page_len bytes into the page list. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Currently, all three chunk list encoders each use a portion of the one rl_segments array in rpcrdma_req. This is because the MWs for each chunk list were preserved in rl_segments so that ro_unmap could find and invalidate them after the RPC was complete. However, now that MWs are placed on a per-req linked list as they are registered, there is no longer any information in rpcrdma_mr_seg that is shared between ro_map and ro_unmap_{sync,safe}, and thus nothing in rl_segments needs to be preserved after rpcrdma_marshal_req is complete. Thus the rl_segments array can be used now just for the needs of each rpcrdma_convert_iovs call. Once each chunk list is encoded, the next chunk list encoder is free to re-use all of rl_segments. This means all three chunk lists in one RPC request can now each encode a full size data payload with no increase in the size of rl_segments. This is a key requirement for Kerberos support, since both the Call and Reply for a single RPC transaction are conveyed via Long messages (RDMA Read/Write). Both can be large. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Instead of placing registered MWs sparsely into the rl_segments array, place these MWs on a per-req list. ro_unmap_{sync,safe} can then simply pull those MWs off the list instead of walking through the array. This change significantly reduces the size of struct rpcrdma_req by removing nsegs and rl_mw from every array element. As an additional clean-up, chunk co-ordinates are returned in the "*mw" output argument so they are no longer needed in every array element. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Instead of leaving orphaned MRs to be released when the transport is destroyed, release them immediately. The MR free list can now be replenished if it becomes exhausted. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Frequent MR list exhaustion can impact I/O throughput, so enough MRs are always created during transport set-up to prevent running out. This means more MRs are created than most workloads need. Commit 94f58c58 ("xprtrdma: Allow Read list and Reply chunk simultaneously") introduced support for sending two chunk lists per RPC, which consumes more MRs per RPC. Instead of trying to provision more MRs, introduce a mechanism for allocating MRs on demand. A few MRs are allocated during transport set-up to kick things off. This significantly reduces the average number of MRs per transport while allowing the MR count to grow for workloads or devices that need more MRs. FRWR with mlx4 allocated almost 400 MRs per transport before this patch. Now it starts with 32. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up, based on code audit: Remove the possibility that the chunk list XDR encoders can return zero, which would be interpreted as a NULL. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Commit c93c6223 ("xprtrdma: Disconnect on registration failure") added a disconnect for some RPC marshaling failures. This is needed only in a handful of cases, but it was triggering for simple stuff like temporary resource shortages. Try to straighten this out. Fix up the lower layers so they don't return -ENOMEM or other error codes that the RPC client's FSM doesn't explicitly recognize. Also fix up the places in the send_request path that do want a disconnect. For example, when ib_post_send or ib_post_recv fail, this is a sign that there is a send or receive queue resource miscalculation. That should be rare, and is a sign of a software bug. But xprtrdma can recover: disconnect to reset the transport and start over. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Not having an rpcrdma_rep at call_allocate time can be a problem. It means that send_request can't post a receive buffer to catch the RPC's reply. Possible consequences are RPC timeouts or even transport deadlock. Instead of allowing an RPC to proceed if an rpcrdma_rep is not available, return NULL to force call_allocate to wait and try again. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: Move device capability detection into memreg-specific source files. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: ALLPHYSICAL is gone and FMR has been converted to use scatterlists. There are no more users of these functions. This patch shrinks the size of struct rpcrdma_req by about 3500 bytes on x86_64. There is one of these structs for each RPC credit (128 credits per transport connection). Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
No HCA or RNIC in the kernel tree requires the use of ALLPHYSICAL. ALLPHYSICAL advertises in the clear on the network fabric an R_key that is good for all of the client's memory. No known exploit exists, but theoretically any user on the server can use that R_key on the client's QP to read or update any part of the client's memory. ALLPHYSICAL exposes the client to server bugs, including: o base/bounds errors causing data outside the i/o buffer to be accessed o RDMA access after reply causing data corruption and/or integrity fail ALLPHYSICAL can't protect application memory regions from server update after a local signal or soft timeout has terminated an RPC. ALLPHYSICAL chunks are no larger than a page. Special cases to handle small chunks and long chunk lists have been a source of implementation complexity and bugs. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Based on code audit. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
I found that commit ead3f26e ("xprtrdma: Add ro_unmap_safe memreg method"), which introduces ro_unmap_safe, never wired up the FMR recovery worker. The FMR and FRWR recovery work queues both do the same thing. Instead of setting up separate individual work queues for this, schedule a delayed worker to deal with them, since recovering MRs is not performance-critical. Fixes: ead3f26e ("xprtrdma: Add ro_unmap_safe memreg method") Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The use of a scatterlist for handling DMA mapping and unmapping was recently introduced in frwr_ops.c in commit 4143f34e ("xprtrdma: Port to new memory registration API"). That commit did not make a similar update to xprtrdma's FMR support because the core ib_map_phys_fmr() and ib_unmap_fmr() APIs have not been changed to take a scatterlist argument. However, FMR still needs to do DMA mapping and unmapping. It appears that RDS, for example, uses a scatterlist for this, then builds the DMA addr array for the ib_map_phys_fmr call separately. I see that SRP also utilizes a scatterlist for DMA mapping. xprtrdma can do something similar. This modernization is used immediately to properly defer DMA unmapping during fmr_unmap_safe (a FIXME). It separates the DMA unmapping coordinates from the rl_segments array. This array, being part of an rpcrdma_req, is always re-used immediately when an RPC exits. A scatterlist is allocated in memory independent of the rl_segments array, so it can be preserved indefinitely (ie, until the MR invalidation and DMA unmapping can actually be done by a worker thread). The FRWR and FMR DMA mapping code are slightly different from each other now, and will diverge further when the "Check for holes" logic can be removed from FRWR (support for SG_GAP MRs). So I chose not to create helpers for the common-looking code. Fixes: ead3f26e ("xprtrdma: Add ro_unmap_safe memreg method") Suggested-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagi@lightbits.io> Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: Use the same naming convention used in other RPC/RDMA-related data structures. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: Moving these helpers in a separate patch makes later patches more readable. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: FMR is about to replace the rpcrdma_map_one code with scatterlists. Move the scatterlist fields out of the FRWR-specific union and into the generic part of rpcrdma_mw. One minor change: -EIO is now returned if FRWR registration fails. The RPC is terminated immediately, since the problem is likely due to a software bug, thus retrying likely won't help. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
ib_unmap_fmr() takes a list of FMRs to unmap. However, it does not remove the FMRs from this list as it processes them. Other ib_unmap_fmr() call sites are careful to remove FMRs from the list after ib_unmap_fmr() returns. Since commit 7c7a5390 ("xprtrdma: Add ro_unmap_sync method for FMR") fmr_op_unmap_sync passes more than one FMR to ib_unmap_fmr(), but it didn't bother to remove the FMRs from that list once the call was complete. I've noticed some instability that could be related to list tangling by the new fmr_op_unmap_sync() logic. In an abundance of caution, add some defensive logic to clean up properly after ib_unmap_fmr(). Fixes: 7c7a5390 ("xprtrdma: Add ro_unmap_sync method for FMR") Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 18 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up. After "xprtrdma: Remove ro_unmap() from all registration modes", there are no longer any sites that take rpcrdma_ia::qplock for read. The one site that takes it for write is always single-threaded. It is safe to remove it. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-