Clean up: The fields in the recv_wr do not vary. There is no need to
initialize them before each ib_post_recv(). This removes a large-ish
data structure from the stack.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Clean up: Most of the fields in each send_wr do not vary. There is
no need to initialize them before each ib_post_send(). This removes
a large-ish data structure from the stack.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Clean up.

Since commit fc664485 ("xprtrdma: Split the completion queue"),
rpcrdma_ep_post_recv() no longer uses the "ep" argument.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Clean up. The "ia" argument is no longer used.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Currently, each regbuf is allocated and DMA mapped at the same time.
This is done during transport creation.

When a device driver is unloaded, every DMA-mapped buffer in use by
a transport has to be unmapped, and then remapped to the new
device if the driver is loaded again. Remapping will have to be done
_after_ the connect worker has set up the new device.

But there's an ordering problem:

call_allocate, which invokes xprt_rdma_allocate which calls
rpcrdma_alloc_regbuf to allocate Send buffers, happens _before_
the connect worker can run to set up the new device.

Instead, at transport creation, allocate each buffer, but leave it
unmapped. Once the RPC carries these buffers into ->send_request, by
which time a transport connection should have been established,
check to see that the RPC's buffers have been DMA mapped. If not,
map them there.

When device driver unplug support is added, it will simply unmap all
the transport's regbufs, but it doesn't have to deallocate the
underlying memory.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

The use of DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL is discouraged by DMA-API.txt.
Fortunately, xprtrdma now knows which direction I/O is going as
soon as it allocates each regbuf.

The RPC Call and Reply buffers are no longer the same regbuf. They
can each be labeled correctly now. The RPC Reply buffer is never
part of either a Send or Receive WR, but it can be part of Reply
chunk, which is mapped and registered via ->ro_map . So it is not
DMA mapped when it is allocated (DMA_NONE), to avoid a double-
mapping.

Since Receive buffers are no longer DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL and their
contents are never modified by the host CPU, DMA-API-HOWTO.txt
suggests that a DMA sync before posting each buffer should be
unnecessary. (See my_card_interrupt_handler).
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Commit 94931746 ("xprtrdma: Limit number of RDMA segments in
RPC-over-RDMA headers") capped the number of chunks that may appear
in RPC-over-RDMA headers. The maximum header size can be estimated
and fixed to avoid allocating buffer space that is never used.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

RPC-over-RDMA needs to separate its RPC call and reply buffers.

 o When an RPC Call is sent, rq_snd_buf is DMA mapped for an RDMA
   Send operation using DMA_TO_DEVICE

 o If the client expects a large RPC reply, it DMA maps rq_rcv_buf
   as part of a Reply chunk using DMA_FROM_DEVICE

The two mappings are for data movement in opposite directions.

DMA-API.txt suggests that if these mappings share a DMA cacheline,
bad things can happen. This could occur in the final bytes of
rq_snd_buf and the first bytes of rq_rcv_buf if the two buffers
happen to share a DMA cacheline.

On x86_64 the cacheline size is typically 8 bytes, and RPC call
messages are usually much smaller than the send buffer, so this
hasn't been a noticeable problem. But the DMA cacheline size can be
larger on other platforms.

Also, often rq_rcv_buf starts most of the way into a page, thus
an additional RDMA segment is needed to map and register the end of
that buffer. Try to avoid that scenario to reduce the cost of
registering and invalidating Reply chunks.

Instead of carrying a single regbuf that covers both rq_snd_buf and
rq_rcv_buf, each struct rpcrdma_req now carries one regbuf for
rq_snd_buf and one regbuf for rq_rcv_buf.

Some incidental changes worth noting:

- To clear out some spaghetti, refactor xprt_rdma_allocate.
- The value stored in rg_size is the same as the value stored in
  the iov.length field, so eliminate rg_size
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Currently there's a hidden and indirect mechanism for finding the
rpcrdma_req that goes with an rpc_rqst. It depends on getting from
the rq_buffer pointer in struct rpc_rqst to the struct
rpcrdma_regbuf that controls that buffer, and then to the struct
rpcrdma_req it goes with.

This was done back in the day to avoid the need to add a per-rqst
pointer or to alter the buf_free API when support for RPC-over-RDMA
was introduced.

I'm about to change the way regbuf's work to support larger inline
thresholds. Now is a good time to replace this indirect mechanism
with something that is more straightforward. I guess this should be
considered a clean up.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

For xprtrdma, the RPC Call and Reply buffers are involved in real
I/O operations.

To start with, the DMA direction of the I/O for a Call is opposite
that of a Reply.

In the current arrangement, the Reply buffer address is on a
four-byte alignment just past the call buffer. Would be friendlier
on some platforms if that was at a DMA cache alignment instead.

Because the current arrangement allocates a single memory region
which contains both buffers, the RPC Reply buffer often contains a
page boundary in it when the Call buffer is large enough (which is
frequent).

It would be a little nicer for setting up DMA operations (and
possible registration of the Reply buffer) if the two buffers were
separated, well-aligned, and contained as few page boundaries as
possible.

Now, I could just pad out the single memory region used for the pair
of buffers. But frequently that would mean a lot of unused space to
ensure the Reply buffer did not have a page boundary.

Add a separate pointer to rpc_rqst that points right to the RPC
Reply buffer. This makes no difference to xprtsock, but it will help
xprtrdma in subsequent patches.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

xprtrdma needs to allocate the Call and Reply buffers separately.
TBH, the reliance on using a single buffer for the pair of XDR
buffers is transport implementation-specific.

Instead of passing just the rq_buffer into the buf_free method, pass
the task structure and let buf_free take care of freeing both
XDR buffers at once.

There's a micro-optimization here. In the common case, both
xprt_release and the transport's buf_free method were checking if
rq_buffer was NULL. Now the check is done only once per RPC.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

xprtrdma needs to allocate the Call and Reply buffers separately.
TBH, the reliance on using a single buffer for the pair of XDR
buffers is transport implementation-specific.

Transports that want to allocate separate Call and Reply buffers
will ignore the "size" argument anyway.  Don't bother passing it.

The buf_alloc method can't return two pointers. Instead, make the
method's return value an error code, and set the rq_buffer pointer
in the method itself.

This gives call_allocate an opportunity to terminate an RPC instead
of looping forever when a permanent problem occurs. If a request is
just bogus, or the transport is in a state where it can't allocate
resources for any request, there needs to be a way to kill the RPC
right there and not loop.

This immediately fixes a rare problem in the backchannel send path,
which loops if the server happens to send a CB request whose
call+reply size is larger than a page (which it shouldn't do yet).

One more issue: looks like xprt_inject_disconnect was incorrectly
placed in the failure path in call_allocate. It needs to be in the
success path, as it is for other call-sites.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Clean up: there is some XDR initialization logic that is common
to the forward channel and backchannel. Move it to an XDR header
so it can be shared.

rpc_rqst::rq_buffer points to a buffer containing big-endian data.
Update its annotation as part of the clean up.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Clean up: r_xprt is already available everywhere these macros are
invoked, so just dereference that directly.

RPCRDMA_INLINE_PAD_VALUE is no longer used, so it can simply be
removed.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Use a setup function to call into the NFS layer to test an rpc_xprt
for session trunking so as to not leak the rpc_xprt_switch into
the nfs layer.

Search for the address in the rpc_xprt_switch first so as not to
put an unnecessary EXCHANGE_ID on the wire.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Give the NFS layer access to the rpc_xprt_switch_add_xprt function
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Give the NFS layer access to the xprt_switch_put function
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

rpc_task_set_client is only called from rpc_run_task after
rpc_new_task and rpc_task_release_client is not needed as the
task is new.

When called from rpc_new_task, rpc_task_set_client also removed the
assigned rpc_xprt which is not desired.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Clean up.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

The variable `err` is not used anywhere and just returns the
predefined value `0` at the end of the function. Hence, remove the
variable and return 0 explicitly.
Signed-off-by: NAmitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

rsc_lookup steals the passed-in memory to avoid doing an allocation of
its own, so we can't just pass in a pointer to memory that someone else
is using.

If we really want to avoid allocation there then maybe we should
preallocate somwhere, or reference count these handles.

For now we should revert.

On occasion I see this on my server:

kernel: kernel BUG at /home/cel/src/linux/linux-2.6/mm/slub.c:3851!
kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
kernel: Modules linked in: cts rpcsec_gss_krb5 sb_edac edac_core x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp kvm_intel kvm irqbypass crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel lrw gf128mul glue_helper ablk_helper cryptd btrfs xor iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support raid6_pq pcspkr i2c_i801 i2c_smbus lpc_ich mfd_core mei_me sg mei shpchp wmi ioatdma ipmi_si ipmi_msghandler acpi_pad acpi_power_meter rpcrdma ib_ipoib rdma_ucm ib_ucm ib_uverbs ib_umad rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm nfsd nfs_acl lockd grace auth_rpcgss sunrpc ip_tables xfs libcrc32c mlx4_ib mlx4_en ib_core sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ast drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops ttm drm crc32c_intel igb mlx4_core ahci libahci libata ptp pps_core dca i2c_algo_bit i2c_core dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
kernel: CPU: 7 PID: 145 Comm: kworker/7:2 Not tainted 4.8.0-rc4-00006-g9d06b0b #15
kernel: Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X10SRL-F, BIOS 1.0c 09/09/2015
kernel: Workqueue: events do_cache_clean [sunrpc]
kernel: task: ffff8808541d8000 task.stack: ffff880854344000
kernel: RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff811e7075>]  [<ffffffff811e7075>] kfree+0x155/0x180
kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff880854347d70  EFLAGS: 00010246
kernel: RAX: ffffea0020fe7660 RBX: ffff88083f9db064 RCX: 146ff0f9d5ec5600
kernel: RDX: 000077ff80000000 RSI: ffff880853f01500 RDI: ffff88083f9db064
kernel: RBP: ffff880854347d88 R08: ffff8808594ee000 R09: ffff88087fdd8780
kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffea0020fe76c0 R12: ffff880853f01500
kernel: R13: ffffffffa013cf76 R14: ffffffffa013cff0 R15: ffffffffa04253a0
kernel: FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88087fdc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
kernel: CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
kernel: CR2: 00007fed60b020c3 CR3: 0000000001c06000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
kernel: Stack:
kernel: ffff8808589f2f00 ffff880853f01500 0000000000000001 ffff880854347da0
kernel: ffffffffa013cf76 ffff8808589f2f00 ffff880854347db8 ffffffffa013d006
kernel: ffff8808589f2f20 ffff880854347e00 ffffffffa0406f60 0000000057c7044f
kernel: Call Trace:
kernel: [<ffffffffa013cf76>] rsc_free+0x16/0x90 [auth_rpcgss]
kernel: [<ffffffffa013d006>] rsc_put+0x16/0x30 [auth_rpcgss]
kernel: [<ffffffffa0406f60>] cache_clean+0x2e0/0x300 [sunrpc]
kernel: [<ffffffffa04073ee>] do_cache_clean+0xe/0x70 [sunrpc]
kernel: [<ffffffff8109a70f>] process_one_work+0x1ff/0x3b0
kernel: [<ffffffff8109b15c>] worker_thread+0x2bc/0x4a0
kernel: [<ffffffff8109aea0>] ? rescuer_thread+0x3a0/0x3a0
kernel: [<ffffffff810a0ba4>] kthread+0xe4/0xf0
kernel: [<ffffffff8169c47f>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
kernel: [<ffffffff810a0ac0>] ? kthread_stop+0x110/0x110
kernel: Code: f7 ff ff eb 3b 65 8b 05 da 30 e2 7e 89 c0 48 0f a3 05 a0 38 b8 00 0f 92 c0 84 c0 0f 85 d1 fe ff ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 e9 f5 fe ff ff <0f> 0b 49 8b 03 31 f6 f6 c4 40 0f 85 62 ff ff ff e9 61 ff ff ff
kernel: RIP  [<ffffffff811e7075>] kfree+0x155/0x180
kernel: RSP <ffff880854347d70>
kernel: ---[ end trace 3fdec044969def26 ]---

It seems to be most common after a server reboot where a client has been
using a Kerberos mount, and reconnects to continue its workload.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

An RPC can terminate before its reply arrives, if a credential
problem or a soft timeout occurs. After this happens, xprtrdma
reports it is out of Receive buffers.

A Receive buffer is posted before each RPC is sent, and returned to
the buffer pool when a reply is received. If no reply is received
for an RPC, that Receive buffer remains posted. But xprtrdma tries
to post another when the next RPC is sent.

If this happens a few dozen times, there are no receive buffers left
to be posted at send time. I don't see a way for a transport
connection to recover at that point, and it will spit warnings and
unnecessarily delay RPCs on occasion for its remaining lifetime.

Commit 1e465fd4 ("xprtrdma: Replace send and receive arrays")
removed a little bit of logic to detect this case and not provide
a Receive buffer so no more buffers are posted, and then transport
operation continues correctly. We didn't understand what that logic
did, and it wasn't commented, so it was removed as part of the
overhaul to support backchannel requests.

Restore it, but be wary of the need to keep extra Receives posted
to deal with backchannel requests.

Fixes: 1e465fd4 ("xprtrdma: Replace send and receive arrays")
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

Receive buffer exhaustion, if it were to actually occur, would be
catastrophic. However, when there are no reply buffers to post, that
means all of them have already been posted and are waiting for
incoming replies. By design, there can never be more RPCs in flight
than there are available receive buffers.

A receive buffer can be left posted after an RPC exits without a
received reply; say, due to a credential problem or a soft timeout.
This does not result in fewer posted receive buffers than there are
pending RPCs, and there is already logic in xprtrdma to deal
appropriately with this case.

It also looks like the "+ 2" that was removed was accidentally
accommodating the number of extra receive buffers needed for
receiving backchannel requests. That will need to be addressed by
another patch.

Fixes: 3d4cf35b ("xprtrdma: Reply buffer exhaustion can be...")
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

The commit f9b2ee71 ("SUNRPC: Move UDP receive data path
into a workqueue context"), as a side effect, moved the
skb_free_datagram() call outside the scope of the related socket
lock, but UDP sockets require such lock to be held for proper
memory accounting.
Fix it by replacing skb_free_datagram() with
skb_free_datagram_locked().

Fixes: f9b2ee71 ("SUNRPC: Move UDP receive data path into a workqueue context")
Reported-and-tested-by: NJan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

Using NFSv4.1 on RDMA should be safe, so broaden the new checks in
rpc_create().

WARN_ON_ONCE is used, matching most other WARN call sites in clnt.c.

Fixes: 39a9beab ("rpc: share one xps between all backchannels")
Fixes: d50039ea ("nfsd4/rpc: move backchannel create logic...")
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

We don't want to miss a lease period renewal due to the TCP connection
failing to reconnect in a timely fashion. To ensure this doesn't happen,
cap the reconnection timer so that we retry the connection attempt
at least every 1/2 lease period.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

...and ensure that we propagate it to new transports on the same
client.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

When the connect attempt fails and backs off, we should start the clock
at the last connection attempt, not time at which we queue up the
reconnect job.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

If the net.ipv6.conf.*.use_temp_addr sysctl is set to '2',
then TCP connections over IPv6 will prefer a 'private' source
address.
These eventually expire and become invalid, typically after a week,
but the time is configurable.

When the local address becomes invalid the client will not be able to
receive replies from the server.  Eventually the connection will timeout
or break and a new connection will be established, but this can take
half an hour (typically TCP connection break time).

RFC 4941, which describes private IPv6 addresses, acknowledges that some
applications might not work well with them and that the application may
explicitly a request non-temporary (i.e. "public") address.

I believe this is correct for SUNRPC clients.  Without this change, a
client will occasionally experience a long delay if private addresses
have been enabled.

The privacy offered by private addresses is of little value for an NFS
server which requires client authentication.

For NFSv3 this will often not be a problem because idle connections are
closed after 5 minutes.  For NFSv4 connections never go idle due to the
period RENEW (or equivalent) request.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

It's possible to have simultaneous upcalls for the same UIDs but
different GSS service. In that case, we need to allow for the
upcall to gssd to proceed so that not the same context is used
by two different GSS services. Some servers lock the use of context
to the GSS service.
Signed-off-by: NOlga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.9+
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

Ensure that we don't forget to set up the disconnection timer for the
case when a connect request is fulfilled after the RPC request that
initiated it has timed out or been interrupted.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

This modification is useful for debugging issues that happen while
the socket is being initialised.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

We're seeing traces of the following form:

 [10952.396347] svc: transport ffff88042ba4a 000 dequeued, inuse=2
 [10952.396351] svc: tcp_accept ffff88042ba4 a000 sock ffff88042a6e4c80
 [10952.396362] nfsd: connect from 10.2.6.1, port=187
 [10952.396364] svc: svc_setup_socket ffff8800b99bcf00
 [10952.396368] setting up TCP socket for reading
 [10952.396370] svc: svc_setup_socket created ffff8803eb10a000 (inet ffff88042b75b800)
 [10952.396373] svc: transport ffff8803eb10a000 put into queue
 [10952.396375] svc: transport ffff88042ba4a000 put into queue
 [10952.396377] svc: server ffff8800bb0ec000 waiting for data (to = 3600000)
 [10952.396380] svc: transport ffff8803eb10a000 dequeued, inuse=2
 [10952.396381] svc_recv: found XPT_CLOSE
 [10952.396397] svc: svc_delete_xprt(ffff8803eb10a000)
 [10952.396398] svc: svc_tcp_sock_detach(ffff8803eb10a000)
 [10952.396399] svc: svc_sock_detach(ffff8803eb10a000)
 [10952.396412] svc: svc_sock_free(ffff8803eb10a000)

i.e. an immediate close of the socket after initialisation.

The culprit appears to be the test at the end of svc_tcp_init, which
checks if the newly created socket is in the TCP_ESTABLISHED state,
and immediately closes it if not. The evidence appears to suggest that
the socket might still be in the SYN_RECV state at this time.

The fix is to check for both states, and then to add a check in
svc_tcp_state_change() to ensure we don't close the socket when
it transitions into TCP_ESTABLISHED.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

If the connect attempt immediately fails with an EADDRNOTAVAIL error, then
that means our choice of source port number was bad.
This error is expected when we set the SO_REUSEPORT socket option and we
have 2 sockets sharing the same source and destination address and port
combinations.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Fixes: 402e23b4 ("SUNRPC: Fix stupid typo in xs_sock_set_reuseport")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.0+

Fix the report:

net/sunrpc/clnt.c:2580:1: warning: ‘static’ is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c:798:2-3: Unneeded semicolon

 Remove unneeded semicolon.

Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/semicolon.cocci

CC: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

The current min/max resvport settings are independently limited
by the entire range of allowed ports, so max_resvport can be
set to a port lower than min_resvport.

Prevent inversion of min/max values when set through sysfs and
module parameter by setting the limits dependent on each other.
Signed-off-by: NFrank Sorenson <sorenson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

The current min/max resvport settings are independently limited
by the entire range of allowed ports, so max_resvport can be
set to a port lower than min_resvport.

Prevent inversion of min/max values when set through sysctl by
setting the limits dependent on each other.
Signed-off-by: NFrank Sorenson <sorenson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

The range calculation for choosing the random reserved port will panic
with divide-by-zero when min_resvport == max_resvport, a range of one
port, not zero.

Fix the reserved port range calculation by adding one to the difference.
Signed-off-by: NFrank Sorenson <sorenson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>