- 19 11月, 2015 5 次提交
-
-
由 Bamvor Jian Zhang 提交于
We need to check if number of gpio is positive if there is no such check in devicetree or acpi or whatever called before gpiochip_add. I suppose that devicetree and acpi do not allow insert gpiochip with zero number but I do not know if it is enough to ignore this check in gpiochip_add. Signed-off-by: NBamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Bamvor Jian Zhang 提交于
There are limitations for the current checker: 1. Could not check the overlap if the new gpiochip is the secondly gpiochip. 2. Could not check the overlap if the new gpiochip is overlap with the left of gpiochip. E.g. if we insert [c, d] between [a,b] and [e, f], and e >= c + d, it will successful even if c < a + b. 3. Allow overlap of base of different gpiochip. This patch fix these issues by checking the overlap of both right and left gpiochip in the same loop statement. Signed-off-by: NBamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@linaro.org> [Tweaked to remove unnecessary ret variable] Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Bamvor Jian Zhang 提交于
The commit f881bab0 ("gpio: keep the GPIO line names internal") change the error to warning in gpiochip_set_desc_names. Update the comment accordingly. Signed-off-by: NBamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Dmitry Torokhov 提交于
We should not fall back to the legacy unnamed gpio lookup style if the driver requests gpios with different names, because we'll give out the same gpio twice. Let's keep track of the names that were used for the device and only do the fallback for the first name used. Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
The name .dev in a struct is normally reserved for a struct device that is let us say a superclass to the thing described by the struct. struct gpio_chip stands out by confusingly using a struct device *dev to point to the parent device (such as a platform_device) that represents the hardware. As we want to give gpio_chip:s real devices, this is not working. We need to rename this member to parent. This was done by two coccinelle scripts, I guess it is possible to combine them into one, but I don't know such stuff. They look like this: @@ struct gpio_chip *var; @@ -var->dev +var->parent and: @@ struct gpio_chip var; @@ -var.dev +var.parent and: @@ struct bgpio_chip *var; @@ -var->gc.dev +var->gc.parent Plus a few instances of bgpio that I couldn't figure out how to teach Coccinelle to rewrite. This patch hits all over the place, but I *strongly* prefer this solution to any piecemal approaches that just exercise patch mechanics all over the place. It mainly hits drivers/gpio and drivers/pinctrl which is my own backyard anyway. Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com> Cc: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Alek Du <alek.du@intel.com> Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com> Acked-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Acked-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Acked-by: NHans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: NJacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 17 10月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Laurent Pinchart 提交于
The flag matches the DT GPIO_SINGLE_ENDED flag and allows drivers to parse and use the DT flag to handle single-ended (open-drain or open-source) GPIOs. Signed-off-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Laurent Pinchart 提交于
When requesting a GPIO through the legacy or the gpiod_* API the gpiochip request operation is first called and then the GPIO flags are parsed and the GPIO is configured. This prevents the gpiochip from rejecting the request if the flags are not supported by the device. To fix this split the parse-and-configure operation in two and parse flags before requesting the GPIO. Signed-off-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Jonas Gorski 提交于
Provide generic request/free implementations that pinctrl aware gpio drivers can use instead of open coding if they use a 1:1 pin to gpio signal mapping. Signed-off-by: NJonas Gorski <jogo@openwrt.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 02 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dirk Behme 提交于
The parameter offset is an unsigned, so it makes no sense to compare it for >= 0. Fix the compiler warning regarding this by removing this comparison. As the macro GPIO_OFFSET_VALID is only used at this single place, simplify the code by dropping the macro completely and dropping the invert, too. No functional change. Signed-off-by: NDirk Behme <dirk.behme@gmail.com> Acked-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 25 9月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
This refactors the changes to the GPIO line naming mechanism to not have so widespread effects, instead we conclude the patch series by having created a name attribute in the GPIO descriptor, that need not be globally unique, and it will be initialized from the old .names array in struct gpio_chip if it exists, then used in the legacy sysfs code like the array was used previously. The associated changes to name lines from the device tree are controversial and need to stand alone from this. Resulting changes: 1. Remove the export and the header for the gpio_name_to_desc() as so far the only use is inside gpiolib.c. Staticize gpio_name_to_desc() and move it above the only function using it. 2. Only print a warning if there are two GPIO lines with the same name. The reason is to preserve current behaviour: before the previous changes to the naming mechanism this would not reject probing the driver, instead the error would occur when trying to export the line in sysfs, so restore this behaviour, but print a friendly warning if names collide. Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> Cc: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Markus Pargmann 提交于
Add some information about gpio names to the debugfs gpio file. name and label of a GPIO are then displayed next to each other. This way it is easy to see what the real name of GPIO is and what the driver requested it for. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> [Dropped unsolicited sysfs ABI patch hunk] Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Markus Pargmann 提交于
This patch adds GPIO names to the GPIO descriptors when initializing the gpiochip. It also introduces a check whether any of the new names will conflict with an existing GPIO name. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Markus Pargmann 提交于
The latest gpio hogging mechanism assigns each gpio a 'line-name' in the devicetree. The 'name' field is different from the 'label' field. 'label' is only used for requested GPIOs to describe its current use by driver or userspace. The 'name' field describes the GPIO itself, not the use. This is most likely identical to the label in the schematic on the GPIO line and should help to find this particular GPIO. This is equivalent to the gpiochip->names array. However names should be stored in the GPIO descriptor. We will use gpiochip->names in the future only as initializer for the GPIO descriptors for drivers that assign GPIO names hardcoded. All other GPIO names will be parsed from DT and directly assigned to the GPIO descriptor. This patch adds a helper function to find gpio descriptors by name instead of gpio number. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 15 9月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Make device_get_next_child_node() work with ACPI data-only subnodes introduced previously. Namely, replace acpi_get_next_child() with acpi_get_next_subnode() that can handle (and return) child device objects as well as child data-only subnodes of the given device and modify the ACPI part of the GPIO subsystem to handle data-only subnodes returned by it. To that end, introduce acpi_node_get_gpiod() taking a struct fwnode_handle pointer as the first argument. That argument may point to an ACPI device object as well as to a data-only subnode and the function should do the right thing (ie. look for the matching GPIO descriptor correctly) in either case. Next, modify fwnode_get_named_gpiod() to use acpi_node_get_gpiod() instead of acpi_get_gpiod_by_index() which automatically causes devm_get_gpiod_from_child() to work with ACPI data-only subnodes that may be returned by device_get_next_child_node() which in turn is required by the users of that function (the gpio_keys_polled and gpio-leds drivers). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Modify is_acpi_node() to return "true" for ACPI data-only subnodes as well as for ACPI device objects and change the name of to_acpi_node() to to_acpi_device_node() so it is clear that it covers ACPI device objects only. Accordingly, introduce to_acpi_data_node() to cover data-only subnodes in an analogous way. With that, make the fwnode_property_* family of functions work with ACPI data-only subnodes introduced previously. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 14 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Andersson 提交于
It's possible to have gpio chips hanging off unreliable remote buses where the get() operation will fail to acquire a readout of the current gpio state. Propagate these errors to the consumer so that they can act on, retry or ignore these failing reads, instead of treating them as the line being held high. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 17 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Grygorii Strashko 提交于
Since IRQ chip helpers were introduced drivers lose ability to register separate lockdep classes for each registered GPIO IRQ chip and the gpiolib now is using shared lockdep class for all GPIO IRQ chips (gpiochip_irq_lock_class). As result, lockdep will produce warning when there are min two stacked GPIO chips and all of them are interrupt controllers. HW configuration which generates lockdep warning (TI dra7-evm): [SOC GPIO bankA.gpioX] <- irq - [pcf875x.gpioY] <- irq - DevZ.enable_irq_wake(pcf_gpioY_irq); The issue was reported in [1] and discussed [2]. ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 4.2.0-rc6-00013-g5d050ed-dirty #55 Not tainted --------------------------------------------- sh/63 is trying to acquire lock: (class){......}, at: [<c009b91c>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94 but task is already holding lock: (class){......}, at: [<c009b91c>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(class); lock(class); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 7 locks held by sh/63: #0: (sb_writers#4){.+.+.+}, at: [<c016bbb8>] vfs_write+0x13c/0x164 #1: (&of->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c01debf4>] kernfs_fop_write+0x4c/0x1a0 #2: (s_active#36){.+.+.+}, at: [<c01debfc>] kernfs_fop_write+0x54/0x1a0 #3: (pm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c009758c>] pm_suspend+0xec/0x4c4 #4: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c03f77f8>] __device_suspend+0xd4/0x398 #5: (&gpio->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c009b940>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x74/0x94 #6: (class){......}, at: [<c009b91c>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 63 Comm: sh Not tainted 4.2.0-rc6-00013-g5d050ed-dirty #55 Hardware name: Generic DRA74X (Flattened Device Tree) [<c0016e24>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0013338>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c0013338>] (show_stack) from [<c05f6b24>] (dump_stack+0x84/0x9c) [<c05f6b24>] (dump_stack) from [<c00903f4>] (__lock_acquire+0x19c0/0x1e20) [<c00903f4>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c0091098>] (lock_acquire+0xa8/0x128) [<c0091098>] (lock_acquire) from [<c05fd61c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x38/0x4c) [<c05fd61c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c009b91c>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94) [<c009b91c>] (__irq_get_desc_lock) from [<c009c4f4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xfc) [<c009c4f4>] (irq_set_irq_wake) from [<c0393ac4>] (pcf857x_irq_set_wake+0x24/0x54) [<c0393ac4>] (pcf857x_irq_set_wake) from [<c009c560>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xfc) [<c009c560>] (irq_set_irq_wake) from [<c04a02ac>] (gpio_keys_suspend+0x70/0xd4) [<c04a02ac>] (gpio_keys_suspend) from [<c03f6a00>] (dpm_run_callback+0x50/0x124) [<c03f6a00>] (dpm_run_callback) from [<c03f7830>] (__device_suspend+0x10c/0x398) [<c03f7830>] (__device_suspend) from [<c03f90f0>] (dpm_suspend+0x134/0x2f4) [<c03f90f0>] (dpm_suspend) from [<c0096e20>] (suspend_devices_and_enter+0xa8/0x728) [<c0096e20>] (suspend_devices_and_enter) from [<c00977cc>] (pm_suspend+0x32c/0x4c4) [<c00977cc>] (pm_suspend) from [<c0096060>] (state_store+0x64/0xb8) [<c0096060>] (state_store) from [<c01dec64>] (kernfs_fop_write+0xbc/0x1a0) [<c01dec64>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c016b280>] (__vfs_write+0x20/0xd8) [<c016b280>] (__vfs_write) from [<c016bb0c>] (vfs_write+0x90/0x164) [<c016bb0c>] (vfs_write) from [<c016c330>] (SyS_write+0x44/0x9c) [<c016c330>] (SyS_write) from [<c000f500>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x54) Lets fix it by using separate lockdep class for each registered GPIO IRQ Chip. This is done by wrapping gpiochip_irqchip_add call into macros. The implementation of this patch inspired by solution done by Nicolas Boichat for regmap [3] [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg05844.html [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg06021.html [3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg429834.html Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> Reported-by: NRoger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> Tested-by: NRoger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 03 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rabin Vincent 提交于
If the driver has specified its own irq_{request/release}_resources() functions, don't override them. The gpio-etraxfs driver will use this. Signed-off-by: NRabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> [Added a small comment blurb] Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 28 7月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Tomeu Vizoso 提交于
When an OF node has a pin range for its GPIOs, return -EPROBE_DEFER if the pin controller isn't available. Otherwise, the GPIO range wouldn't be set at all unless the pin controller probed always before the GPIO chip. With this change, the probe of the GPIO chip will be deferred and will be retried at a later point, hopefully once the pin controller has been registered and probed already. Signed-off-by: NTomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Rob Herring 提交于
set_irq_flags is ARM specific with custom flags which have genirq equivalents. Convert drivers to use the genirq interfaces directly, so we can kill off set_irq_flags. The translation of flags is as follows: IRQF_VALID -> !IRQ_NOREQUEST IRQF_PROBE -> !IRQ_NOPROBE IRQF_NOAUTOEN -> IRQ_NOAUTOEN For IRQs managed by an irqdomain, the irqdomain core code handles clearing and setting IRQ_NOREQUEST already, so there is no need to do this in .map() functions and we can simply remove the set_irq_flags calls. Some users also modify IRQ_NOPROBE and this has been maintained although it is not clear that is really needed as most platforms don't use probing. There appears to be a great deal of blind copy and paste of this code. Signed-off-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 27 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Masahiro Yamada 提交于
This variable is used as an iterator and initialized in the list_for_each() loop. Signed-off-by: NMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 21 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shobhit Kumar 提交于
In case we unload and load a driver module again that is registering a lookup table, without this it will result in multiple entries. Provide an option to remove the lookup table on driver unload Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Tested-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NShobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com> Acked-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 16 7月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Grygorii Strashko 提交于
Assign GPIO chip owner field to chip->dev->driver->owner if it was not configured by GPIO driver. Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Acked-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Grygorii Strashko 提交于
Now nothing prevents GPIO driver from being unloaded if its gpios were requested as GPIO IRQs only (without calling gpio_request()). Hence, add calls of try_module_get()/module_put() into gpiochip_irq_reqres/relres() to track such scenario properly. Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Tomeu Vizoso 提交于
gpiochip_add_pingroup_range() has a pctldev argument, not pinctrl. Signed-off-by: NTomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 14 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Chained irq handlers usually set up handler data as well. We now have a function to set both under irq_desc->lock. Replace the two calls with one. Search and conversion was done with coccinelle: Reported-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
-
- 06 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Uwe Kleine-König 提交于
Now that all[1] users of the gpiod_get functions are converted to make use of the up to now optional flags parameter, make it mandatory which allows to remove some cpp magic. [1] all but etraxfs-uart which is broken anyhow and I'm allowed to ignore it by Jesper Nilsson :-) Acked-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
-
- 25 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Sverdlin 提交于
Commit 8a0662d9 introduced of_node and acpi_node symbols in global namespace but there were already ~63 of_node local variables or function parameters (no single acpi_node though, but anyway). After debugging undefined but used of_node local varible (which turned out to reference static function of_node() instead) it became clear that the names for the functions are too short and too generic for global scope. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 16 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Lockyer 提交于
This patch fixes some issues given by checkpatch. Fixes include bracket placement, spacing and indenting. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Lockyer <thisisdaniellockyer@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 10 6月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
When requesting own descriptors through hogs, it is useful to get some details about what's going on if we encounter problems. Acked-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
These error messages are helpful to see that we fail to get hogs. Promote them to real errors so they appear in the boot crawl. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 01 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rojhalat Ibrahim 提交于
There have been concerns that the function names gpiod_set_array() and gpiod_get_array() might be confusing to users. One might expect gpiod_get_array() to return array values, while it is actually the array counterpart of gpiod_get(). To be consistent with the single descriptor API we could rename gpiod_set_array() to gpiod_set_array_value(). This makes some function names a bit lengthy: gpiod_set_raw_array_value_cansleep(). Signed-off-by: NRojhalat Ibrahim <imr@rtschenk.de> Acked-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 19 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Colin Cronin 提交于
Fixed several spelling errors in gpio-lynxpoint, gpio-pca953x, gpio-tegra, gpio-zynq, gpiolib-of, gpiolib. Signed-off-by: NColin Cronin <colinpatrickcronin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 13 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov 提交于
Clean up chained handler and handler data if they were set by gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(). Signed-off-by: NDmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 12 5月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Johan Hovold 提交于
Make sure to free any hogged gpios on errors in gpiochip_add. Also move all forward declarations to the top of the file. Fixes: f625d460 ("gpio: add GPIO hogging mechanism") Signed-off-by: NJohan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Johan Hovold 提交于
Rename the gpio-chip export/unexport functions to the more descriptive names gpiochip_sysfs_register and gpiochip_sysfs_unregister. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Johan Hovold 提交于
Clean up gpiochip_remove somewhat and only output warning about removing chip with GPIOs requested once. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 19 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If dev is NULL in __gpiod_get_index() and both ACPI and OF are enabled, it will be checked twice before the code decides to give up with DT/ACPI lookup, so avoid that. Also use the observation that ACPI_COMPANION() is much more efficient than ACPI_HANDLE(), because the latter uses the former and carries out a check and a pointer dereference on top of it, so replace the ACPI_HANDLE() check with an ACPI_COMPANION() one which does not require the additional IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) check too. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 05 3月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rojhalat Ibrahim 提交于
Introduce new functions for conveniently obtaining and disposing of an entire array of GPIOs with one function call. ACPI parts tested by Mika Westerberg, DT parts tested by Rojhalat Ibrahim. Change log: v5: move the ACPI functions to gpiolib-acpi.c v4: - use shorter names for members of struct gpio_descs - rename lut_gpio_count to platform_gpio_count for clarity - add check for successful memory allocation - use ERR_CAST() v3: - rebase on current linux-gpio devel branch - fix ACPI GPIO counting - allow for zero-sized arrays - make the flags argument mandatory for the new functions - clarify documentation v2: change interface Suggested-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NRojhalat Ibrahim <imr@rtschenk.de> Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: NRojhalat Ibrahim <imr@rtschenk.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Rojhalat Ibrahim 提交于
Avoid multiple identical definitions of the gpio suffix strings by putting them into a global constant array. Signed-off-by: NRojhalat Ibrahim <imr@rtschenk.de> Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-