Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 03 12月, 2015 6 次提交
    • N
      drm/i915: Extend LRC pinning to cover GPU context writeback · 6d65ba94
      由 Nick Hoath 提交于 
      Use the first retired request on a new context to unpin
the old context. This ensures that the hw context remains
bound until it has been written back to by the GPU.
Now that the context is pinned until later in the request/context
lifecycle, it no longer needs to be pinned from context_queue to
retire_requests.
This fixes an issue with GuC submission where the GPU might not
have finished writing back the context before it is unpinned. This
results in a GPU hang.

v2: Moved the new pin to cover GuC submission (Alex Dai)
    Moved the new unpin to request_retire to fix coverage leak
v3: Added switch to default context if freeing a still pinned
    context just in case the hw was actually still using it
v4: Unwrapped context unpin to allow calling without a request
v5: Only create a switch to idle context if the ring doesn't
    already have a request pending on it (Alex Dai)
    Rename unsaved to dirty to avoid double negatives (Dave Gordon)
    Changed _no_req postfix to __ prefix for consistency (Dave Gordon)
    Split out per engine cleanup from context_free as it
    was getting unwieldy
    Corrected locking (Dave Gordon)
v6: Removed some bikeshedding (Mika Kuoppala)
    Added explanation of the GuC hang that this fixes (Daniel Vetter)
v7: Removed extra per request pinning from ring reset code (Alex Dai)
    Added forced ring unpin/clean in error case in context free (Alex Dai)
Signed-off-by: NNick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Issue: VIZ-4277
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: David Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      6d65ba94
    • P
      drm/i915: kill fbc.uncompressed_size · 559d9135
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      Directly call intel_fbc_calculate_cfb_size() in the only place that
actually needs it, and use the proper check before removing the stolen
node. IMHO, this change makes our code easier to understand.

v2: Use drm_mm_node_allocated() (Chris).
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      559d9135
    • P
      drm/i915: use a single intel_fbc_work struct · 128d7356
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      This was already on my TODO list, and was requested both by Chris and
Ville, for different reasons. The advantages are avoiding a frequent
malloc/free pair, and the locality of having the work structure
embedded in dev_priv. The maximum used memory is also smaller since
previously we could have multiple allocated intel_fbc_work structs at
the same time, and now we'll always have a single one - the one
embedded on dev_priv. Of course, we're now using a little more memory
on the cases where there's nothing scheduled.

The biggest challenge here is to keep everything synchronized the way
it was before.

Currently, when we try to activate FBC, we allocate a new
intel_fbc_work structure. Then later when we conclude we must delay
the FBC activation a little more, we allocate a new intel_fbc_work
struct, and then adjust dev_priv->fbc.fbc_work to point to the new
struct. So when the old work runs - at intel_fbc_work_fn() - it will
check that dev_priv->fbc.fbc_work points to something else, so it does
nothing. Everything is also protected by fbc.lock.

Just cancelling the old delayed work doesn't work because we might
just cancel it after the work function already started to run, but
while it is still waiting to grab fbc.lock. That's why we use the
"dev_priv->fbc.fbc_work == work" check described in the paragraph
above.

So now that we have a single work struct we have to introduce a new
way to synchronize everything. So we're making the work function a
normal work instead of a delayed work, and it will be responsible for
sleeping the appropriate amount of time itself. This way, after it
wakes up it can grab the lock, ask "were we delayed or cancelled?" and
then go back to sleep, enable FBC or give up.

v2:
  - Spelling fixes.
  - Rebase after changing the patch order.
  - Fix ms/jiffies confusion.

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v1)
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      128d7356
    • P
      drm/i915: introduce intel_fbc_{enable,disable} · d029bcad
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      The goal is to call FBC enable/disable only once per modeset, while
activate/deactivate/update will be called multiple times.

The enable() function will be responsible for deciding if a CRTC will
have FBC on it and then it will "lock" FBC on this CRTC: it won't be
possible to change FBC's CRTC until disable(). With this, all checks
and resource acquisition that only need to be done once per modeset
can be moved from update() to enable(). And then the update(),
activate() and deactivate() code will also get simpler since they
won't need to worry about the CRTC being changed.

The disable() function will do the reverse operation of enable(). One
of its features is that it should only be called while the pipe is
already off. This guarantees that FBC is stopped and nothing is
using the CFB.

With this, the activate() and deactivate() functions just start and
temporarily stop FBC. They are the ones touching the hardware enable
bit, so HW state reflects dev_priv->crtc.active.

The last function remaining is update(). A lot of times I thought
about renaming update() to activate() or try_to_activate() since it's
called when we want to activate FBC. The thing is that update() may
not only decide to activate FBC, but also deactivate or keep it on the
same state, so I'll leave this name for now.

Moving code to enable() and disable() will also help in case we decide
to move FBC to pipe_config or something else later.

The current patch only puts the very basic code on enable() and
disable(). The next commits will take care of moving more stuff from
update() to the new functions.

v2:
  - Rebase.
  - Improve commit message (Chris).
v3: Rebase after changing the patch order.
v4: Rebase again after upstream changes.
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      d029bcad
    • P
      drm/i915: introduce is_active/activate/deactivate to the FBC terminology · 0e631adc
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      The long term goal is to have enable/disable as the higher level
functions and activate/deactivate as the lower level functions, just
like we do for PSR and for the CRTC. This way, we'll run enable and
disable once per modeset, while update, activate and deactivate will
be run many times. With this, we can move the checks and code that
need to run only once per modeset to enable(), making the code simpler
and possibly a little faster.

This patch is just the first step on the conversion: it starts by
converting the current low level functions from enable/disable to
activate/deactivate. This patch by itself has no benefits other than
making review and rebase easier. Please see the next patches for more
details on the conversion.

v2:
  - Rebase.
  - Improve commit message (Chris).
v3: Rebase after changing the patch order.
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      0e631adc
    • P
      drm/i915: set dev_priv->fbc.crtc before scheduling the enable work · e9c5fd26
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      This thing where we need to get the crtc either from the work
structure or the fbc structure itself is confusing and unnecessary.
Set fbc.crtc right when scheduling the enable work so we can always
use it.

The problem is not what gets passed and how to retrieve it. The
problem is that when we're in the other parts of the code we always
have to keep in mind that if FBC is already enabled we have to get the
CRTC from place A, if FBC is scheduled we have to get the CRTC from
place B, and if it's disabled there's no CRTC. Having a single place
to retrieve the CRTC from allows us to treat the "is enabled" and "is
scheduled" cases as the same case, reducing the mistake surface. I
guess I should add this to the commit message.

Besides the immediate advantages, this is also going to make one of
the next commits much simpler. And even later, when we introduce
enable/disable + activate/deactivate, this will be even simpler as
we'll set the CRTC at enable time. So all the
activate/deactivate/update code can just look at the single CRTC
variable regardless of the current state.

v2: Improve commit message (Chris).
v3: Rebase after changing the patch order.
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      e9c5fd26
  3. 02 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  5. 27 11月, 2015 3 次提交
  7. 26 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  9. 23 11月, 2015 2 次提交
  11. 19 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  13. 18 11月, 2015 7 次提交
  15. 16 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  17. 12 11月, 2015 3 次提交
  19. 10 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  21. 04 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  23. 02 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  25. 29 10月, 2015 2 次提交
  27. 26 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  29. 23 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  31. 22 10月, 2015 3 次提交
  33. 21 10月, 2015 3 次提交
  35. 13 10月, 2015 2 次提交