Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 26 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 22 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 19 9月, 2012 8 次提交
  7. 15 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  9. 22 2月, 2012 2 次提交
  11. 21 2月, 2012 3 次提交
    • L
      i387: support lazy restore of FPU state · 7e16838d
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      This makes us recognize when we try to restore FPU state that matches
what we already have in the FPU on this CPU, and avoids the restore
entirely if so.

To do this, we add two new data fields:

 - a percpu 'fpu_owner_task' variable that gets written any time we
   update the "has_fpu" field, and thus acts as a kind of back-pointer
   to the task that owns the CPU.  The exception is when we save the FPU
   state as part of a context switch - if the save can keep the FPU
   state around, we leave the 'fpu_owner_task' variable pointing at the
   task whose FP state still remains on the CPU.

 - a per-thread 'last_cpu' field, that indicates which CPU that thread
   used its FPU on last.  We update this on every context switch
   (writing an invalid CPU number if the last context switch didn't
   leave the FPU in a lazily usable state), so we know that *that*
   thread has done nothing else with the FPU since.

These two fields together can be used when next switching back to the
task to see if the CPU still matches: if 'fpu_owner_task' matches the
task we are switching to, we know that no other task (or kernel FPU
usage) touched the FPU on this CPU in the meantime, and if the current
CPU number matches the 'last_cpu' field, we know that this thread did no
other FP work on any other CPU, so the FPU state on the CPU must match
what was saved on last context switch.

In that case, we can avoid the 'f[x]rstor' entirely, and just clear the
CR0.TS bit.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      7e16838d
    • L
      i387: use 'restore_fpu_checking()' directly in task switching code · 80ab6f1e
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      This inlines what is usually just a couple of instructions, but more
importantly it also fixes the theoretical error case (can that FPU
restore really ever fail? Maybe we should remove the checking).

We can't start sending signals from within the scheduler, we're much too
deep in the kernel and are holding the runqueue lock etc.  So don't
bother even trying.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      80ab6f1e
    • L
      i387: fix up some fpu_counter confusion · cea20ca3
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      This makes sure we clear the FPU usage counter for newly created tasks,
just so that we start off in a known state (for example, don't try to
preload the FPU state on the first task switch etc).

It also fixes a thinko in when we increment the fpu_counter at task
switch time, introduced by commit 34ddc81a ("i387: re-introduce FPU
state preloading at context switch time").  We should increment the
*new* task fpu_counter, not the old task, and only if we decide to use
that state (whether lazily or preloaded).
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      cea20ca3
  13. 19 2月, 2012 2 次提交
    • L
      i387: re-introduce FPU state preloading at context switch time · 34ddc81a
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      After all the FPU state cleanups and finally finding the problem that
caused all our FPU save/restore problems, this re-introduces the
preloading of FPU state that was removed in commit b3b0870e ("i387:
do not preload FPU state at task switch time").

However, instead of simply reverting the removal, this reimplements
preloading with several fixes, most notably

 - properly abstracted as a true FPU state switch, rather than as
   open-coded save and restore with various hacks.

   In particular, implementing it as a proper FPU state switch allows us
   to optimize the CR0.TS flag accesses: there is no reason to set the
   TS bit only to then almost immediately clear it again.  CR0 accesses
   are quite slow and expensive, don't flip the bit back and forth for
   no good reason.

 - Make sure that the same model works for both x86-32 and x86-64, so
   that there are no gratuitous differences between the two due to the
   way they save and restore segment state differently due to
   architectural differences that really don't matter to the FPU state.

 - Avoid exposing the "preload" state to the context switch routines,
   and in particular allow the concept of lazy state restore: if nothing
   else has used the FPU in the meantime, and the process is still on
   the same CPU, we can avoid restoring state from memory entirely, just
   re-expose the state that is still in the FPU unit.

   That optimized lazy restore isn't actually implemented here, but the
   infrastructure is set up for it.  Of course, older CPU's that use
   'fnsave' to save the state cannot take advantage of this, since the
   state saving also trashes the state.

In other words, there is now an actual _design_ to the FPU state saving,
rather than just random historical baggage.  Hopefully it's easier to
follow as a result.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      34ddc81a
    • L
      i387: move TS_USEDFPU flag from thread_info to task_struct · f94edacf
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      This moves the bit that indicates whether a thread has ownership of the
FPU from the TS_USEDFPU bit in thread_info->status to a word of its own
(called 'has_fpu') in task_struct->thread.has_fpu.

This fixes two independent bugs at the same time:

 - changing 'thread_info->status' from the scheduler causes nasty
   problems for the other users of that variable, since it is defined to
   be thread-synchronous (that's what the "TS_" part of the naming was
   supposed to indicate).

   So perfectly valid code could (and did) do

	ti->status |= TS_RESTORE_SIGMASK;

   and the compiler was free to do that as separate load, or and store
   instructions.  Which can cause problems with preemption, since a task
   switch could happen in between, and change the TS_USEDFPU bit. The
   change to TS_USEDFPU would be overwritten by the final store.

   In practice, this seldom happened, though, because the 'status' field
   was seldom used more than once, so gcc would generally tend to
   generate code that used a read-modify-write instruction and thus
   happened to avoid this problem - RMW instructions are naturally low
   fat and preemption-safe.

 - On x86-32, the current_thread_info() pointer would, during interrupts
   and softirqs, point to a *copy* of the real thread_info, because
   x86-32 uses %esp to calculate the thread_info address, and thus the
   separate irq (and softirq) stacks would cause these kinds of odd
   thread_info copy aliases.

   This is normally not a problem, since interrupts aren't supposed to
   look at thread information anyway (what thread is running at
   interrupt time really isn't very well-defined), but it confused the
   heck out of irq_fpu_usable() and the code that tried to squirrel
   away the FPU state.

   (It also caused untold confusion for us poor kernel developers).

It also turns out that using 'task_struct' is actually much more natural
for most of the call sites that care about the FPU state, since they
tend to work with the task struct for other reasons anyway (ie
scheduling).  And the FPU data that we are going to save/restore is
found there too.

Thanks to Arjan Van De Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> for pointing us to
the %esp issue.

Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: NRaphael Prevost <raphael@buro.asia>
Acked-and-tested-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Tested-by: NPeter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      f94edacf
  15. 17 2月, 2012 5 次提交
    • L
      i387: move AMD K7/K8 fpu fxsave/fxrstor workaround from save to restore · 4903062b
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      The AMD K7/K8 CPUs don't save/restore FDP/FIP/FOP unless an exception is
pending.  In order to not leak FIP state from one process to another, we
need to do a floating point load after the fxsave of the old process,
and before the fxrstor of the new FPU state.  That resets the state to
the (uninteresting) kernel load, rather than some potentially sensitive
user information.

We used to do this directly after the FPU state save, but that is
actually very inconvenient, since it

 (a) corrupts what is potentially perfectly good FPU state that we might
     want to lazy avoid restoring later and

 (b) on x86-64 it resulted in a very annoying ordering constraint, where
     "__unlazy_fpu()" in the task switch needs to be delayed until after
     the DS segment has been reloaded just to get the new DS value.

Coupling it to the fxrstor instead of the fxsave automatically avoids
both of these issues, and also ensures that we only do it when actually
necessary (the FP state after a save may never actually get used).  It's
simply a much more natural place for the leaked state cleanup.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      4903062b
    • L
      i387: do not preload FPU state at task switch time · b3b0870e
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      Yes, taking the trap to re-load the FPU/MMX state is expensive, but so
is spending several days looking for a bug in the state save/restore
code.  And the preload code has some rather subtle interactions with
both paravirtualization support and segment state restore, so it's not
nearly as simple as it should be.

Also, now that we no longer necessarily depend on a single bit (ie
TS_USEDFPU) for keeping track of the state of the FPU, we migth be able
to do better.  If we are really switching between two processes that
keep touching the FP state, save/restore is inevitable, but in the case
of having one process that does most of the FPU usage, we may actually
be able to do much better than the preloading.

In particular, we may be able to keep track of which CPU the process ran
on last, and also per CPU keep track of which process' FP state that CPU
has.  For modern CPU's that don't destroy the FPU contents on save time,
that would allow us to do a lazy restore by just re-enabling the
existing FPU state - with no restore cost at all!
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b3b0870e
    • L
      i387: don't ever touch TS_USEDFPU directly, use helper functions · 6d59d7a9
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      This creates three helper functions that do the TS_USEDFPU accesses, and
makes everybody that used to do it by hand use those helpers instead.

In addition, there's a couple of helper functions for the "change both
CR0.TS and TS_USEDFPU at the same time" case, and the places that do
that together have been changed to use those.  That means that we have
fewer random places that open-code this situation.

The intent is partly to clarify the code without actually changing any
semantics yet (since we clearly still have some hard to reproduce bug in
this area), but also to make it much easier to use another approach
entirely to caching the CR0.TS bit for software accesses.

Right now we use a bit in the thread-info 'status' variable (this patch
does not change that), but we might want to make it a full field of its
own or even make it a per-cpu variable.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      6d59d7a9
    • L
      i387: move TS_USEDFPU clearing out of __save_init_fpu and into callers · b6c66418
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      Touching TS_USEDFPU without touching CR0.TS is confusing, so don't do
it.  By moving it into the callers, we always do the TS_USEDFPU next to
the CR0.TS accesses in the source code, and it's much easier to see how
the two go hand in hand.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b6c66418
    • L
      i387: fix x86-64 preemption-unsafe user stack save/restore · 15d8791c
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      Commit 5b1cbac3 ("i387: make irq_fpu_usable() tests more robust")
added a sanity check to the #NM handler to verify that we never cause
the "Device Not Available" exception in kernel mode.

However, that check actually pinpointed a (fundamental) race where we do
cause that exception as part of the signal stack FPU state save/restore
code.

Because we use the floating point instructions themselves to save and
restore state directly from user mode, we cannot do that atomically with
testing the TS_USEDFPU bit: the user mode access itself may cause a page
fault, which causes a task switch, which saves and restores the FP/MMX
state from the kernel buffers.

This kind of "recursive" FP state save is fine per se, but it means that
when the signal stack save/restore gets restarted, it will now take the
'#NM' exception we originally tried to avoid.  With preemption this can
happen even without the page fault - but because of the user access, we
cannot just disable preemption around the save/restore instruction.

There are various ways to solve this, including using the
"enable/disable_page_fault()" helpers to not allow page faults at all
during the sequence, and fall back to copying things by hand without the
use of the native FP state save/restore instructions.

However, the simplest thing to do is to just allow the #NM from kernel
space, but fix the race in setting and clearing CR0.TS that this all
exposed: the TS bit changes and the TS_USEDFPU bit absolutely have to be
atomic wrt scheduling, so while the actual state save/restore can be
interrupted and restarted, the act of actually clearing/setting CR0.TS
and the TS_USEDFPU bit together must not.

Instead of just adding random "preempt_disable/enable()" calls to what
is already excessively ugly code, this introduces some helper functions
that mostly mirror the "kernel_fpu_begin/end()" functionality, just for
the user state instead.

Those helper functions should probably eventually replace the other
ad-hoc CR0.TS and TS_USEDFPU tests too, but I'll need to think about it
some more: the task switching functionality in particular needs to
expose the difference between the 'prev' and 'next' threads, while the
new helper functions intentionally were written to only work with
'current'.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      15d8791c
  17. 16 2月, 2012 1 次提交
    • L
      i387: fix sense of sanity check · c38e2345
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      The check for save_init_fpu() (introduced in commit 5b1cbac3: "i387:
make irq_fpu_usable() tests more robust") was the wrong way around, but
I hadn't noticed, because my "tests" were bogus: the FPU exceptions are
disabled by default, so even doing a divide by zero never actually
triggers this code at all unless you do extra work to enable them.

So if anybody did enable them, they'd get one spurious warning.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c38e2345
  19. 14 2月, 2012 2 次提交
    • L
      i387: make irq_fpu_usable() tests more robust · 5b1cbac3
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      Some code - especially the crypto layer - wants to use the x86
FP/MMX/AVX register set in what may be interrupt (typically softirq)
context.

That *can* be ok, but the tests for when it was ok were somewhat
suspect.  We cannot touch the thread-specific status bits either, so
we'd better check that we're not going to try to save FP state or
anything like that.

Now, it may be that the TS bit is always cleared *before* we set the
USEDFPU bit (and only set when we had already cleared the USEDFP
before), so the TS bit test may actually have been sufficient, but it
certainly was not obviously so.

So this explicitly verifies that we will not touch the TS_USEDFPU bit,
and adds a few related sanity-checks.  Because it seems that somehow
AES-NI is corrupting user FP state.  The cause is not clear, and this
patch doesn't fix it, but while debugging it I really wanted the code to
be more obviously correct and robust.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      5b1cbac3
    • L
      i387: math_state_restore() isn't called from asm · be98c2cd
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      It was marked asmlinkage for some really old and stale legacy reasons.
Fix that and the equally stale comment.

Noticed when debugging the irq_fpu_usable() bugs.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      be98c2cd
  21. 06 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  23. 07 4月, 2011 1 次提交
    • H
      x86-32, fpu: Fix FPU exception handling on non-SSE systems · f994d99c
      由 Hans Rosenfeld 提交于 
      On 32bit systems without SSE (that is, they use FSAVE/FRSTOR for FPU
context switches), FPU exceptions in user mode cause Oopses, BUGs,
recursive faults and other nasty things:

fpu exception: 0000 [#1]
last sysfs file: /sys/power/state
Modules linked in: psmouse evdev pcspkr serio_raw [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]

Pid: 1638, comm: fxsave-32-excep Not tainted 2.6.35-07798-g58a992b9-dirty #633 VP3-596B-DD/VT82C597
EIP: 0060:[<c1003527>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0
EIP is at math_error+0x1b4/0x1c8
EAX: 00000003 EBX: cf9be7e0 ECX: 00000000 EDX: cf9c5c00
ESI: cf9d9fb4 EDI: c1372db3 EBP: 00000010 ESP: cf9d9f1c
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
Process fxsave-32-excep (pid: 1638, ti=cf9d8000 task=cf9be7e0 task.ti=cf9d8000)
Stack:
00000000 00000301 00000004 00000000 00000000 cf9d3000 cf9da8f0 00000001
<0> 00000004 cf9b6b60 c1019a6b c1019a79 00000020 00000242 000001b6 cf9c5380
<0> cf806b40 cf791880 00000000 00000282 00000282 c108a213 00000020 cf9c5380
Call Trace:
[<c1019a6b>] ? need_resched+0x11/0x1a
[<c1019a79>] ? should_resched+0x5/0x1f
[<c108a213>] ? do_sys_open+0xbd/0xc7
[<c108a213>] ? do_sys_open+0xbd/0xc7
[<c100353b>] ? do_coprocessor_error+0x0/0x11
[<c12d5965>] ? error_code+0x65/0x70
Code: a8 20 74 30 c7 44 24 0c 06 00 03 00 8d 54 24 04 89 d9 b8 08 00 00 00 e8 9b 6d 02 00 eb 16 8b 93 5c 02 00 00 eb 05 e9 04 ff ff ff <9b> dd 32 9b e9 16 ff ff ff 81 c4 84 00 00 00 5b 5e 5f 5d c3 c6
EIP: [<c1003527>] math_error+0x1b4/0x1c8 SS:ESP 0068:cf9d9f1c

This usually continues in slight variations until the system is reset.

This bug was introduced by commit 58a992b9:
	x86-32, fpu: Rewrite fpu_save_init()
Signed-off-by: NHans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@amd.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1302106003-366952-1-git-send-email-hans.rosenfeld@amd.comSigned-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      f994d99c
  25. 23 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  27. 14 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  29. 10 9月, 2010 8 次提交
  31. 01 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  33. 22 7月, 2010 1 次提交