1. 17 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  2. 04 11月, 2014 2 次提交
  3. 31 10月, 2014 8 次提交
    • M
      ath10k: speed up hw recovery · 7962b0d8
      Michal Kazior 提交于
      In some cases hw recovery was taking an absurdly
      long time due to ath10k waiting for things that
      would never really complete.
      
      Instead of waiting for inevitable timeouts poke
      all completions and wakequeues and check if it's
      still worth waiting.
      
      Reading/writing ar->state requires conf_mutex.
      Since waiters might be holding it introduce a new
      flag CRASH_FLUSH so it's possible to tell waiters
      to abort whatever they were waiting for.
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
      7962b0d8
    • M
      ath10k: expose hw restart via debugfs · 605cdba1
      Michal Kazior 提交于
      Until now it was possible to simulate soft and
      hard fw crashes but it wasn't possible to trigger
      an immediately hw restart itself (without the fw
      crash).
      
      This can be useful when stress testing hw
      restarting stability, e.g. during heavy tx/rx
      traffic.
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
      605cdba1
    • M
      ath10k: fix possible bmi crash · 04ed9dfe
      Michal Kazior 提交于
      While testing other things I've found that CE
      items aren't cleared properly. This could lead to
      null dereferences in BMI.
      
      To prevent that make sure CE revoking clears the
      nbytes value (which is used as a buffer completion
      indication) and memset the entire CE ring data
      shared between host and target when
      (re)initializing.
      
      Also make sure to check BMI xfer pointer and print
      a splat instead of crashing the kernel.
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
      04ed9dfe
    • M
      ath10k: don't reset chip on power_down · c011b281
      Michal Kazior 提交于
      Currently hif_power_up performs effectively a
      reset and hif_stop resets the chip as well so
      there's no point in resetting here.
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
      c011b281
    • M
      ath10k: split reset logic from power up · 0bc14d06
      Michal Kazior 提交于
      The power up procedure was overly complex due to
      warm/cold reset workarounds and issues.
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
      0bc14d06
    • M
      ath10k: make warm reset a bit safer and faster · 61c1648b
      Michal Kazior 提交于
      One of the problems with warm reset I've found is
      that it must be guaranteed that copy engine
      registers are not being accessed while being
      reset. Otherwise in worst case scenario the host
      may lock up.
      
      Instead of using sleeps and hoping the device is
      operational in some arbitrary timeframes use
      firmware indication register.
      
      As a side effect this makes driver
      boot/stop/recovery faster.
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
      61c1648b
    • M
      ath10k: change ce ring cleanup logic · 099ac7ce
      Michal Kazior 提交于
      Make ath10k_pci_init_pipes() effectively only
      alter shared target-host data.
      
      The per_transfer_context is a host-only thing.
      It is necessary to preserve it's contents for a
      more robust ring cleanup.
      
      This is required for future warm reset fixes.
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
      099ac7ce
    • M
      ath10k: avoid possible deadlock with scan timeout · 4eb2e164
      Michal Kazior 提交于
      This should prevent deadlock predicted by the
      following splat:
      
       ======================================================
       [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
       3.17.0-wl-ath+ #67 Not tainted
       -------------------------------------------------------
       kworker/u32:1/7230 is trying to acquire lock:
        (&ar->conf_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa040a57d>] ath10k_scan_timeout_work+0x2d/0x50 [ath10k_core]
      
       but task is already holding lock:
        ((&(&ar->scan.timeout)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8106dae1>] process_one_work+0x151/0x470
      
       which lock already depends on the new lock.
      
       the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
      
       -> #1 ((&(&ar->scan.timeout)->work)){+.+...}:
              [<ffffffff810a12e5>] lock_acquire+0x85/0x100
              [<ffffffff8106cb4d>] flush_work+0x3d/0x270
              [<ffffffff8106e49d>] __cancel_work_timer+0x7d/0x110
              [<ffffffff8106e543>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x13/0x20
              [<ffffffffa0409f16>] ath10k_cancel_remain_on_channel+0x36/0x60 [ath10k_core]
              [<ffffffffa028c75c>] ieee80211_cancel_roc+0x1cc/0x2f0 [mac80211]
              [<ffffffffa028c8a2>] ieee80211_mgmt_tx_cancel_wait+0x22/0x30 [mac80211]
              [<ffffffffa0132288>] nl80211_tx_mgmt_cancel_wait+0xa8/0x130 [cfg80211]
              [<ffffffff816654a5>] genl_family_rcv_msg+0x1a5/0x3c0
              [<ffffffff81665749>] genl_rcv_msg+0x89/0xc0
              [<ffffffff81664e91>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xb1/0xc0
              [<ffffffff816650bc>] genl_rcv+0x2c/0x40
              [<ffffffff8166474d>] netlink_unicast+0x18d/0x200
              [<ffffffff81664add>] netlink_sendmsg+0x31d/0x430
              [<ffffffff8161a9ac>] sock_sendmsg+0x9c/0xd0
              [<ffffffff8161b469>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x389/0x3a0
              [<ffffffff8161bed9>] __sys_sendmsg+0x49/0x90
              [<ffffffff8161bf32>] SyS_sendmsg+0x12/0x20
              [<ffffffff8174c456>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
      
       -> #0 (&ar->conf_mutex){+.+.+.}:
              [<ffffffff810a0bde>] __lock_acquire+0x1b6e/0x1ce0
              [<ffffffff810a12e5>] lock_acquire+0x85/0x100
              [<ffffffff817491eb>] mutex_lock_nested+0x4b/0x370
              [<ffffffffa040a57d>] ath10k_scan_timeout_work+0x2d/0x50 [ath10k_core]
              [<ffffffff8106db41>] process_one_work+0x1b1/0x470
              [<ffffffff8106df63>] worker_thread+0x123/0x460
              [<ffffffff81073f34>] kthread+0xe4/0x100
              [<ffffffff8174c3ac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
      
       other info that might help us debug this:
      
        Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      
              CPU0                    CPU1
              ----                    ----
         lock((&(&ar->scan.timeout)->work));
                                      lock(&ar->conf_mutex);
                                      lock((&(&ar->scan.timeout)->work));
         lock(&ar->conf_mutex);
      
        *** DEADLOCK ***
      Reported-by: NMarek Puzyniak <marek.puzyniak@tieto.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
      4eb2e164
  4. 24 10月, 2014 13 次提交
  5. 23 10月, 2014 3 次提交
  6. 21 10月, 2014 8 次提交
  7. 13 10月, 2014 1 次提交
  8. 08 10月, 2014 4 次提交