- 02 12月, 2016 14 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Amend the pnfs return on close helper functions to enable sending the layoutreturn op in CLOSE/DELEGRETURN. This closes a potential race between CLOSE/DELEGRETURN and parallel OPEN calls to the same file, and allows the client and the server to agree on whether or not there is an outstanding layout. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The layoutreturn call will take care of invalidating the layout segments once the call is successful. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
There is no change to the value of NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN, so we should not be waking up the RPC call. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Fix a potential race with CB_LAYOUTRECALL in which the server recalls the remaining layout segments while our LAYOUTRETURN is still in transit. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We may want to process and transmit layout stat information for the layout segments that are being returned, so we should defer freeing them until after the layoutreturn has completed. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Both pnfs.c and the flexfiles code have their own versions of the range intersection testing, and the "end_offset" helper. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We must put the task to sleep while holding the inode->i_lock in order to ensure atomicity with the test for NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN. Fixes: 500d701f ("NFS41: make close wait for layoutreturn") Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If there is an I/O error, we should not call LAYOUTGET until the LAYOUTRETURN that reports the error is complete. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.8+
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the server sends us a completely new stateid, and the client thinks it already holds a layout, then force a retry of the LAYOUTGET after invalidating the existing layout in order to avoid corruption due to races. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We must ensure that we don't schedule a layoutreturn if the layout stateid has been marked as invalid. Fixes: 2a59a041 ("pNFS: Fix pnfs_set_layout_stateid() to clear...") Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.8+
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we no longer hold any layout segments, we're normally expected to consider the layout stateid to be invalid. However we cannot assume this if we're about to, or in the process of sending a layoutreturn. Fixes: 334a8f37 ("pNFS: Don't forget the layout stateid if...") Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.8+
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We must not call nfs_pageio_init_read() on a new nfs_pageio_descriptor while holding a reference to a layout segment, as that can deadlock pnfs_update_layout(). Fixes: d67ae825 ("pnfs/flexfiles: Add the FlexFile Layout Driver") Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.0+
-
- 08 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
We used to check for a valid layout type id before verifying pNFS flags as an indicator for if we are using pNFS. This changed in 3132e49e with the introduction of multiple layout types, since now we are passing an array of ids instead of just one. Since then, users have been seeing a KERN_ERR printk show up whenever mounting NFS v4 without pNFS. This patch restores the original behavior of exiting set_pnfs_layoutdriver() early if we aren't using pNFS. Fixes 3132e49e ("pnfs: track multiple layout types in fsinfo structure") Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 28 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Fix the code so that we always mark the atime as invalid in nfs4_read_done(). Currently, the expectation appears to be that the pNFS drivers should always do this, with the result that most of them don't. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 20 9月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Currently, the layout driver selection code always chooses the first one from the list. That's not really ideal however, as the server can send the list of layout types in any order that it likes. It's up to the client to select the best one for its needs. This patch adds an ordered list of preferred driver types and has the selection code sort the list of available layout drivers according to it. Any unrecognized layout type is sorted to the end of the list. For now, the order of preference is hardcoded, but it should be possible to make this configurable in the future. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Current NFSv4.1/pNFS client assumes that MDS supports only one layout type. While it's true for most existing servers, nevertheless, this can be change in the near future. For now, this patch just plumbs in the ability to track a list of layouts in the fsinfo structure. The existing behavior of the client is preserved, by having it just select the first entry in the list. Signed-off-by: NTigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Reviewed-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 05 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If there are outstanding LAYOUTGET rpc calls, then we want to ensure that we keep the layout stateid around so we that don't inadvertently pick up an old/misordered sequence id. The race is as follows: Client Server ====== ====== LAYOUTGET(seqid) LAYOUTGET(seqid) return LAYOUTGET(seqid+1) return LAYOUTGET(seqid+2) process LAYOUTGET(seqid+2) forget layout process LAYOUTGET(seqid+1) If it forgets the layout stateid before processing seqid+1, then the client will not check the layout->plh_barrier, and so will set the stateid with seqid+1. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 04 9月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the layout was marked as invalid, we want to ensure to initialise the layout header fields correctly. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
According to RFC5661, the client is responsible for serialising LAYOUTGET and LAYOUTRETURN to avoid ambiguity. Consider the case where we send both in parallel. Client Server ====== ====== LAYOUTGET(seqid=X) LAYOUTRETURN(seqid=X) LAYOUTGET return seqid=X+1 LAYOUTRETURN return seqid=X+2 Process LAYOUTRETURN Forget layout stateid Process LAYOUTGET Set seqid=X+1 The client processes the layoutget/layoutreturn in the wrong order, and since the result of the layoutreturn was to clear the only existing layout segment, the client forgets the layout stateid. When the LAYOUTGET comes in, it is treated as having a completely new stateid, and so the client sets the wrong sequence id... Fix is to check if there are outstanding LAYOUTGET requests before we send the LAYOUTRETURN (note that LAYOUGET will already wait if it sees an outstanding LAYOUTRETURN). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.5+ Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 23 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure that the client conforms to the normative behaviour described in RFC5661 Section 12.7.2: "If a client believes its lease has expired, it MUST NOT send I/O to the storage device until it has validated its lease." So ensure that we wait for the lease to be validated before using the layout. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.20+
-
- 20 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We normally want to update the stateid and then retry, Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 25 7月, 2016 12 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
It's not visible yet, and won't be until after we grab the inode->i_lock. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
...instead of splitting the initialisation over init_lseg() and pnfs_layout_process(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The layout stateid will be invalidated once it holds no more layout segments anyway. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
That's already being taken care of in pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the server changed the layout stateid's "other" field, then we should treat the old layout as being completely gone. In that case, we want to clear the metadata such as scheduled layoutreturns. Do this by calling pnfs_mark_layout_stateid_invalid(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure nfs42_layoutstat_done() layoutget don't open code layout stateid invalidation. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When determining which layout segments to return, we do want pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return to check that they match the layout sequence id. This ensures that we don't waste time if the server is replaying a layout recall that has already been satisfied. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In cases where we need to send a layoutreturn in order to propagate an error, we should not tie that to a specific layout stateid. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When we return NFS_OK to the CB_LAYOUTRECALL, we are required to send a layoutreturn that "completes" that layout recall request, using the correct stateid. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Currently, pnfs_set_layout_stateid() will update the layout sequence id barrier only if the stateid itself is newer than the current layout stateid. However in a situation where multiple LAYOUTGET calls and a LAYOUTRETURN raced, it is entirely possible for one of the LAYOUTGET to set the current stateid to something newer than the LAYOUTRETURN that needs to set the barrier. The fix is to allow the "update_barrier" flag to force a check as to whether or not the barrier needs to be updated. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the layout stateid is invalid, then pnfs_set_layout_stateid() must always initialise it. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure that we don't carry over layoutreturn info from a previous incarnation of this layout. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 20 7月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Instead of giving up altogether and falling back to doing I/O through the MDS, which may make the situation worse, wait for 2 lease periods for the callback to resolve itself, and then try destroying the existing layout. Only if this was an attempt at getting a first layout, do we give up altogether, as the server is clearly crazy. Fixes: 183d9e7b ("pnfs: rework LAYOUTGET retry handling") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7 Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
They are not the same error, and need to be handled differently. Fixes: 183d9e7b ("pnfs: rework LAYOUTGET retry handling") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7 Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The non-retry error path is currently broken and ends up releasing the reference to the layout twice. It also can end up clearing the NFS_LAYOUT_FIRST_LAYOUTGET flag twice, causing a race. In addition, the retry path will fail to decrement the plh_outstanding counter. Fixes: 183d9e7b ("pnfs: rework LAYOUTGET retry handling") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7 Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
-
- 06 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
So ensure that we mark the layout for commit once the write is done, and then ensure that the commit to ds is finished before sending layoutcommit. Note that by doing this, we're able to optimise away the commit for the case of servers that don't need layoutcommit in order to return updated attributes. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 25 6月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
According to RFC5661, section 12.5.3. the layout stateid is no longer valid once the client no longer holds any layout segments. Ensure that we mark it invalid. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-