1. 02 12月, 2016 26 次提交
  2. 27 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  3. 23 11月, 2016 1 次提交
    • A
      NFSv4.x: hide array-bounds warning · d55b352b
      Arnd Bergmann 提交于
      A correct bugfix introduced a harmless warning that shows up with gcc-7:
      
      fs/nfs/callback.c: In function 'nfs_callback_up':
      fs/nfs/callback.c:214:14: error: array subscript is outside array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
      
      What happens here is that the 'minorversion == 0' check tells the
      compiler that we assume minorversion can be something other than 0,
      but when CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 is disabled that would be invalid and
      result in an out-of-bounds access.
      
      The added check for IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NFS_V4_1) tells gcc that this
      really can't happen, which makes the code slightly smaller and also
      avoids the warning.
      
      The bugfix that introduced the warning is marked for stable backports,
      we want this one backported to the same releases.
      
      Fixes: 98b0f80c ("NFSv4.x: Fix a refcount leak in nfs_callback_up_net")
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.7+
      Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
      d55b352b
  4. 22 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 20 11月, 2016 3 次提交
  6. 19 11月, 2016 4 次提交
  7. 17 11月, 2016 2 次提交
    • A
      xattr: Fix setting security xattrs on sockfs · 4a590153
      Andreas Gruenbacher 提交于
      The IOP_XATTR flag is set on sockfs because sockfs supports getting the
      "system.sockprotoname" xattr.  Since commit 6c6ef9f2, this flag is checked for
      setxattr support as well.  This is wrong on sockfs because security xattr
      support there is supposed to be provided by security_inode_setsecurity.  The
      smack security module relies on socket labels (xattrs).
      
      Fix this by adding a security xattr handler on sockfs that returns
      -EAGAIN, and by checking for -EAGAIN in setxattr.
      
      We cannot simply check for -EOPNOTSUPP in setxattr because there are
      filesystems that neither have direct security xattr support nor support
      via security_inode_setsecurity.  A more proper fix might be to move the
      call to security_inode_setsecurity into sockfs, but it's not clear to me
      if that is safe: we would end up calling security_inode_post_setxattr after
      that as well.
      Signed-off-by: NAndreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      4a590153
    • M
      orangefs: add .owner to debugfs file_operations · 19ff7fcc
      Mike Marshall 提交于
      Without ".owner = THIS_MODULE" it is possible to crash the kernel
      by unloading the Orangefs module while someone is reading debugfs
      files.
      Signed-off-by: NMike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com>
      19ff7fcc
  8. 15 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 12 11月, 2016 1 次提交