1. 23 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  2. 20 10月, 2010 1 次提交
    • N
      arm: remove machine_desc.io_pg_offst and .phys_io · 6451d778
      Nicolas Pitre 提交于
      Since we're now using addruart to establish the debug mapping, we can
      remove the io_pg_offst and phys_io members of struct machine_desc.
      
      The various declarations were removed using the following script:
      
        grep -rl MACHINE_START arch/arm | xargs \
        sed -i '/MACHINE_START/,/MACHINE_END/ { /\.\(phys_io\|io_pg_offst\)/d }'
      
      [ Initial patch was from Jeremy Kerr, example script from Russell King ]
      Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
      Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao at canonical.com>
      6451d778
  3. 09 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  4. 11 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  5. 02 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  6. 13 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  7. 01 12月, 2009 2 次提交
  8. 10 9月, 2009 4 次提交
  9. 23 7月, 2009 1 次提交
  10. 16 6月, 2009 4 次提交
  11. 05 6月, 2009 6 次提交
  12. 14 4月, 2009 2 次提交
  13. 04 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  14. 09 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • E
      [ARM] pxa: introduce pxa{25x,27x,300,320,930}.h for board usage · 51c62982
      Eric Miao 提交于
      Considering the header mess ATM, it is not always possible to include
      the correct header files within board code. Let's keep this simple:
      
        <mach/pxa25x.h>  - for pxa25x based platforms
        <mach/pxa27x.h>  - for pxa27x based platforms
        <mach/pxa300.h>  - for pxa300 based platforms
        <mach/pxa320.h>  - for pxa320 based platforms
        <mach/pxa930.h>  - for pxa930 based platforms
      
      NOTE:
      
      1. one header one board file, they are not compatible (i.e. they have
         conflicting definitions which won't compile if included together).
      
      2. Unless strictly necessary, the following header files are considered
         to be SoC files use _only_, and is not recommended to be included in
         board code:
      
          <mach/hardware.h>
          <mach/pxa-regs.h>
          <mach/pxa2xx-regs.h>
          <mach/pxa3xx-regs.h>
          <mach/mfp.h>
          <mach/mfp-pxa2xx.h>
          <mach/mfp-pxa25x.h>
          <mach/mfp-pxa27x.h>
          <mach/mfp-pxa3xx.h>
          <mach/mfp-pxa300.h>
          <mach/mfp-pxa320.h>
          <mach/mfp-pxa930.h>
      Signed-off-by: NEric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
      51c62982
  15. 02 2月, 2009 5 次提交
  16. 21 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  17. 08 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  18. 07 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 10 7月, 2008 2 次提交
  20. 02 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  21. 19 5月, 2008 1 次提交
    • R
      [ARM] pxa: separate PXA25x and PXA27x UDC register definitions · 284d115e
      Russell King 提交于
      The PXA25x and PXA27x USB device controller register definitions are
      different.  Currently, they live side by side in pxa-regs.h, but only
      one set is available depending on the setting of PXA25x or PXA27x.
      
      This means that if we build to support both PXA25x and PXA27x, the
      PXA27x definitions are unavailable, even to PXA27x specific code.
      
      Remove these definitions from pxa-regs.h, and place them in separate
      files.  Include these files where appropriate.
      
      Note: according to the dependencies in drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig,
      we do not support the UDC on PXA27x nor PXA3xx CPUs, so remove the
      platform devices from pxa27x.c and pxa3xx.c.
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      284d115e
  22. 19 4月, 2008 1 次提交