1. 01 6月, 2011 1 次提交
    • C
      ip_options_compile: properly handle unaligned pointer · 48bdf072
      Chris Metcalf 提交于
      The current code takes an unaligned pointer and does htonl() on it to
      make it big-endian, then does a memcpy().  The problem is that the
      compiler decides that since the pointer is to a __be32, it is legal
      to optimize the copy into a processor word store.  However, on an
      architecture that does not handled unaligned writes in kernel space,
      this produces an unaligned exception fault.
      
      The solution is to track the pointer as a "char *" (which removes a bunch
      of unpleasant casts in any case), and then just use put_unaligned_be32()
      to write the value to memory.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@zippy.davemloft.net>
      48bdf072
  2. 28 5月, 2011 12 次提交
  3. 27 5月, 2011 20 次提交
  4. 26 5月, 2011 7 次提交
    • F
      bonding: documentation and code cleanup for resend_igmp · 94265cf5
      Flavio Leitner 提交于
      Improves the documentation about how IGMP resend parameter
      works, fix two missing checks and coding style issues.
      Signed-off-by: NFlavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NRick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      94265cf5
    • N
      bonding: prevent deadlock on slave store with alb mode (v3) · 9fe0617d
      Neil Horman 提交于
      This soft lockup was recently reported:
      
      [root@dell-per715-01 ~]# echo +bond5 > /sys/class/net/bonding_masters
      [root@dell-per715-01 ~]# echo +eth1 > /sys/class/net/bond5/bonding/slaves
      bonding: bond5: doing slave updates when interface is down.
      bonding bond5: master_dev is not up in bond_enslave
      [root@dell-per715-01 ~]# echo -eth1 > /sys/class/net/bond5/bonding/slaves
      bonding: bond5: doing slave updates when interface is down.
      
      BUG: soft lockup - CPU#12 stuck for 60s! [bash:6444]
      CPU 12:
      Modules linked in: bonding autofs4 hidp rfcomm l2cap bluetooth lockd sunrpc
      be2d
      Pid: 6444, comm: bash Not tainted 2.6.18-262.el5 #1
      RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff80064bf0>]  [<ffffffff80064bf0>]
      .text.lock.spinlock+0x26/00
      RSP: 0018:ffff810113167da8  EFLAGS: 00000286
      RAX: ffff810113167fd8 RBX: ffff810123a47800 RCX: 0000000000ff1025
      RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff810123a47800 RDI: ffff81021b57f6f8
      RBP: ffff81021b57f500 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000000c
      R10: 00000000ffffffff R11: ffff81011d41c000 R12: ffff81021b57f000
      R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000282 R15: 0000000000000282
      FS:  00002b3b41ef3f50(0000) GS:ffff810123b27940(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
      CR2: 00002b3b456dd000 CR3: 000000031fc60000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
      
      Call Trace:
       [<ffffffff80064af9>] _spin_lock_bh+0x9/0x14
       [<ffffffff886937d7>] :bonding:tlb_clear_slave+0x22/0xa1
       [<ffffffff8869423c>] :bonding:bond_alb_deinit_slave+0xba/0xf0
       [<ffffffff8868dda6>] :bonding:bond_release+0x1b4/0x450
       [<ffffffff8006457b>] __down_write_nested+0x12/0x92
       [<ffffffff88696ae4>] :bonding:bonding_store_slaves+0x25c/0x2f7
       [<ffffffff801106f7>] sysfs_write_file+0xb9/0xe8
       [<ffffffff80016b87>] vfs_write+0xce/0x174
       [<ffffffff80017450>] sys_write+0x45/0x6e
       [<ffffffff8005d28d>] tracesys+0xd5/0xe0
      
      It occurs because we are able to change the slave configuarion of a bond while
      the bond interface is down.  The bonding driver initializes some data structures
      only after its ndo_open routine is called.  Among them is the initalization of
      the alb tx and rx hash locks.  So if we add or remove a slave without first
      opening the bond master device, we run the risk of trying to lock/unlock a
      spinlock that has garbage for data in it, which results in our above softlock.
      
      Note that sometimes this works, because in many cases an unlocked spinlock has
      the raw_lock parameter initialized to zero (meaning that the kzalloc of the
      net_device private data is equivalent to calling spin_lock_init), but thats not
      true in all cases, and we aren't guaranteed that condition, so we need to pass
      the relevant spinlocks through the spin_lock_init function.
      
      Fix it by moving the spin_lock_init calls for the tx and rx hashtable locks to
      the ndo_init path, so they are ready for use by the bond_store_slaves path.
      
      Change notes:
      v2) Based on conversation with Jay and Nicolas it seems that the ability to
      enslave devices while the bond master is down should be safe to do.  As such
      this is an outlier bug, and so instead we'll just initalize the errant spinlocks
      in the init path rather than the open path, solving the problem.  We'll also
      remove the warnings about the bond being down during enslave operations, since
      it should be safe
      
      v3) Fix spelling error
      Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
      Reported-by: jtluka@redhat.com
      CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
      CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
      CC: nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com
      CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Signed-off-by: NJay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      9fe0617d
    • E
      net: hold rtnl again in dump callbacks · 2907c35f
      Eric Dumazet 提交于
      Commit e67f88dd (dont hold rtnl mutex during netlink dump callbacks)
      missed fact that rtnl_fill_ifinfo() must be called with rtnl held.
      
      Because of possible deadlocks between two mutexes (cb_mutex and rtnl),
      its not easy to solve this problem, so revert this part of the patch.
      
      It also forgot one rcu_read_unlock() in FIB dump_rules()
      
      Add one ASSERT_RTNL() in rtnl_fill_ifinfo() to remind us the rule.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
      CC: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
      CC: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      2907c35f
    • M
      Add Fujitsu 1000base-SX PCI ID to tg3 · 1dcb14d9
      Meelis Roos 提交于
      This patch adds the PCI ID of Fujitsu 1000base-SX NIC to tg3 driver.
      Tested to detect the card, MAC and serdes, not tested with link at the
      moment since I have no fiber switch here. I did not add new constants to
      the pci_ids.h header file since these constants are used only here.
      Signed-off-by: NMeelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      1dcb14d9
    • D
      a5971d43
    • E
      sch_sfq: fix peek() implementation · 07bd8df5
      Eric Dumazet 提交于
      Since commit eeaeb068 (sch_sfq: allow big packets and be fair),
      sfq_peek() can return a different skb that would be normally dequeued by
      sfq_dequeue() [ if current slot->allot is negative ]
      
      Use generic qdisc_peek_dequeued() instead of custom implementation, to
      get consistent result.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
      CC: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
      CC: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
      CC: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@diku.dk>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      07bd8df5
    • P
      isdn: netjet - blacklist Digium TDM400P · 367bbf2a
      Prarit Bhargava 提交于
      [2nd try ... 1st attempt didn't make it to netdev mailing list]
      
      A quick google search reveals that people with this card are blacklisting it
      in the initramfs and in the module blacklist based on a statement that it
      is unsupported. Since the older Digium is also unsupported I'm pretty
      confident that this newer card is also not supported.
      
      lspci -xxx -vv shows
      
      04:07.0 Communication controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface
              Subsystem: Device b100:0003
      P.
      
      ----8<----
      The Asterisk Voice Card, DIGIUM TDM400P is unsupported by the netjet driver.
      Blacklist it like the Digium X100P/X101P card.
      Signed-off-by: NPrarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      367bbf2a