We may do some ONFI get/set features operations before we call the
nand_scan_tail().

So move the default ONFI nand hooks into nand_set_defaults().
Signed-off-by: NHuang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

Set the ecc step size for master/slave mtd_info{}.
Signed-off-by: NHuang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

There are static checkers which complain when we declare variables as
64 bit bitfields but only use the lower 32 bits because of shift
wrapping.  In this case "len" is declared as u64 as opposed to unsigned
long or something which might be 32 bits.
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

Parse out the ECC information for the full-id nand chips.
Signed-off-by: NHuang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

The current code uses the hardcode to detect the 16-bit bus width.
Use the onfi_feature() to replace it.
Signed-off-by: NHuang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
[Brian: small fixup]
Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

Since the ONFI 2.1, the onfi spec adds the Extended Parameter Page
to store the ECC info.

The onfi spec tells us that if the nand chip's recommended ECC codeword
size is not 512 bytes, then the @ecc_bits is 0xff. The host _SHOULD_ then
read the Extended ECC information that is part of the extended parameter
page to retrieve the ECC requirements for this device.

This patch implement the reading of the Extended Parameter Page, and parses
the sections for ECC type, and get the ECC info from the ECC section.

Tested this patch with Micron MT29F64G08CBABAWP.
Acked-by: NPekon Gupta <pekon@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NHuang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

From the ONFI spec, we can just get the ECC info from the @ecc_bits field of
the parameter page.
Signed-off-by: NHuang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

nand_base.c shouldn't have to know the implementation details of
nand_bbt's in-memory BBT. Specifically, nand_base shouldn't perform the
bit masking and shifting to isolate a BBT entry.

Instead, just move some of the BBT code into a new nand_markbad_bbt()
interface. This interface allows external users (i.e., nand_base) to
mark a single block as bad in the BBT. Then nand_bbt will take care of
modifying the in-memory BBT and updating the flash-based BBT (if
applicable).
Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

The chip->block_markbad pointer should really only be responsible for
writing a bad block marker for new bad blocks. It should not take care
of BBT-related functionality, nor should it handle bookkeeping of bad
block stats.

This patch refactors the 3 users of the block_markbad interface (plus
the default nand_base implementation) so that the common code is kept in
nand_block_markbad_lowlevel(). It removes some inconsistencies between
the various implementations and should allow for more centralized
improvements in the future.

Because gpmi-nand no longer needs the nand_update_bbt() function, let's
stop exporting it as well.
Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com> (for gpmi-nand parts)
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

Toshiba NAND datasheets have not been very forthcoming on OOB size
information; they do not provide any bitfields in the ID string for
spare area. In their 24nm technology flash, however, Toshiba migrated
their NAND to have 32 bytes spare per 512 bytes of page area (up from
the traditional 16 bytes), as they now require 8-bit ECC or higher.

I have discussed this issue directly with Toshiba representatives, and
they acknowledge this problem. They recommend detecting these flash
based on their technology node as follows:

  For 24nm Toshiba SLC raw NAND (not BENAND -- Built-in Ecc NAND), there
  are 32 bytes of spare area for every 512 bytes of in-band data area.

We can implement this rule with the following snippet of a device ID
decode table, which applies to all their 43nm, 32nm, and 24nm SLC NAND
(this table is not fully in the NAND datasheets, but it was provided
directly by Toshiba representatives):

  - ID byte 5, bit[7]:
          1    -> BENAND
          0    -> raw SLC

  - ID byte 6, bits[2:0]:
          100b -> 43nm
          101b -> 32nm
          110b -> 24nm
          111b -> Reserved

I'm also working with Toshiba on including this bitfield description for
their 5th and 6th ID bytes in their public data sheets.

I will provide the 8-byte ID strings from the two 24nm Toshiba samples I
have; their first 6 bytes match the documentation I received from
Toshiba:

  24nm SLC 1Gbit TC58NVG0S3HTA00
  0x98 0xf1 0x80 0x15 0x72 0x16 0x08 0x00

  24nm SLC 2Gbit TC58NVG1S3HTA00
  0x98 0xda 0x90 0x15 0x76 0x16 0x08 0x00

I have also tested for regressions with:

  43nm SLC 4Gbit TC58NVG2S3ETA00
  0x98 0xdc 0x90 0x15 0x76 0x14 0x03 0x10

  32nm SLC 8Gbit TC58NVG3SOFA00
  0x98 0xd3 0x90 0x26 0x76 0x15 0x02 0x08
Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

The code for NAND_BUSWIDTH_AUTO is broken. According to Alexander:

  "I have a problem with attach NAND UBI in 16 bit mode.
   NAND works fine if I specify NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 option, but not
   working with NAND_BUSWIDTH_AUTO option. In second case NAND
   chip is identifyed with ONFI."

See his report for the rest of the details:

  http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2013-July/047515.html

Anyway, the problem is that nand_set_defaults() is called twice, we
intend it to reset the chip functions to their x16 buswidth verions
if the buswidth changed from x8 to x16; however, nand_set_defaults()
does exactly nothing if called a second time.

Fix this by hacking nand_set_defaults() to reset the buswidth-dependent
functions if they were set to the x8 version the first time. Note that
this does not do anything to reset from x16 to x8, but that's not the
supported use case for NAND_BUSWIDTH_AUTO anyway.
Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Reported-by: NAlexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Tested-by: NAlexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Cc: Matthieu Castet <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.8+
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

Spansion's S34MLx chips support ONFI but not the GET/SET FEATURES calls.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Mosberger <dmosberger@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

This patch replaces the usage of loops in the nand_base code with
io{read,write}{8,16}_rep calls instead.
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

This patch adds support for subpage (partial-page) writes when using
hardware based ECC schemes.
Advantages:
(1) reduces storage overhead when using file-systems like UBIFS, which
store LEB header at page-size granularity.
(2) allows independent subpage writes, thereby increasing NAND storage
efficiency for non-page aligned data.
+ updated cafe_nand and lpc32xx_mlc NAND drivers for change in
chip->write_page interface.
Signed-off-by: NGupta, Pekon <pekon@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

When we meet a full-id nand type whose @id_len is not zero, we can use
the find_full_id_nand() to parse out the necessary information for a
nand chip.

If we meet a non full-id nand type, we can handle it in the legacy way.
Signed-off-by: NHuang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Reviewed-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

Variable "onfi_version" is already set to zero before nand_flash_detect_onfi()
call, so additional cleaning is not necessary.
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Acked-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

NAND command, passed to cmd_ctrl(), is masked with 0xff. This patch
removes this since masking is not necessary and masking is not performed
in other places for same call.
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

NAND flashes with 256 bytes NAND pages are so old that probably do not exist
any more. Let's remove few related pieces of code and forget about them
forever. The assumption will be that 512 bytes NAND page size is the minimum
possible.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

The 'id' is a bit confusing name because NAND IDs are multi-byte. Re-name
it to 'dev_id' to make it clear that this is the "device ID" part (the second
byte).

While on it, clean-up the commentary for 'struct nand_flash_dev'.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

We have this unused macro, let's use it and justify its existence.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

We have only one AG-AND driver and it was not touched since 2005. It looks
like AG-AND was not really make it to mass-production and can be considered
a dead technology.

Along with the AG-AND support, this patch removes the BBT_AUTO_REFRESH feature,
because the only user of this feature is AG-AND. And even though it is
implemented as a generic feature, I prefer to remove it because NAND flashes do
not really need it in this form.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

This partially reverts commit 1696e6bc
("mtd: nand: kill NAND_NO_READRDY").

In that patch I overlooked a few things.

The original documentation for NAND_NO_READRDY included "True for all
large page devices, as they do not support autoincrement." I was
conflating "not support autoincrement" with the NAND_NO_AUTOINCR option,
which was in fact doing nothing. So, when I dropped NAND_NO_AUTOINCR, I
concluded that I then could harmlessly drop NAND_NO_READRDY. But of
course the fact the NAND_NO_AUTOINCR was doing nothing didn't mean
NAND_NO_READRDY was doing nothing...

So, NAND_NO_READRDY is re-introduced as NAND_NEED_READRDY and applied
only to those few remaining small-page NAND which needed it in the first
place.

Cc: stable@kernel.org [3.5+]
Reported-by: NAlexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Tested-by: NAlexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

The panic_nand_wait() expects the timeo in ms and not in jiffies.
But in nand_wait(), the timeo for panic_nand_wait() is assigned with
wrong value(jiffies + some delay). The timeo should be set like the
panic_nand_write() does.

This patch passes timeo in ms to panic_nand_wait().
And this patch also passes timeo in jiffies(converted by msecs_to_jiffies)
to time_before() which makes the code more readable.
Signed-off-by: NHuang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>

Commit ff3206b2 ('mtd: nand: onfi need 
to be probed in 8 bits mode') adds a WARN if the onfi probe is in 16 
bits mode. This allows to detect driver that need to be fixed, but this 
is a bit noisy¹. Transform the WARN in a pr_err.

¹ http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/91317Signed-off-by: NMatthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

The simple example provided in the comments for nand_id_has_period()
actually has a period of 3, not 2. Silly mistake...
Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>

- NAND_CMD_READID want an address that it is not scaled on x16 device (it is always 0x20)
- NAND_CMD_PARAM want 8 bits data
Signed-off-by: NMatthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>

The driver call nand_scan_ident in 8 bit mode, then
readid or onfi detection are done (and detect bus width).
The driver should update its bus width before calling nand_scan_tail.

This work because readid and onfi are read work 8 byte mode.

Note that nand_scan_ident send command (NAND_CMD_RESET, NAND_CMD_READID, NAND_CMD_PARAM), address and read data
The ONFI specificication is not very clear for x16 device if high byte of address should be driven to 0,
but according to [1] it should be ok to not drive it during autodetection.

[1]
3.3.2. Target Initialization

[...]
The Read ID and Read Parameter Page commands only use the lower 8-bits of the data bus.
The host shall not issue commands that use a word data width on x16 devices until the host
determines the device supports a 16-bit data bus width in the parameter page.
Signed-off-by: NMatthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>

This help to detect bad flash identification in case the size is not present
on the name (ONFI).
Signed-off-by: NMatthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>

nand_wait_ready timeout should not assume HZ=100.
Make it independent of HZ value by using msecs_to_jiffies.
Signed-off-by: NMatthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>

There are two reasons to remove the "chip" parameter in nand_get_device():

[1] The nand_release_device() does not have the "chip" parameter.
[2] We can get the nand_chip by the mtd->priv field.

This patch removes the "chip" parameter in nand_get_device().
Signed-off-by: NHuang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>

The nand_get_device() does not select the chip, but nand_release_device()
does de-select the chip. It is really strange.

With the current code, nand_sync() will de-select the chip, even if the chip
has never been selected.

To make the balance of select/de-select chip, it's better to remove the
de-select chip code in nand_release_device() which makes the code more
clear.
Signed-off-by: NHuang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>

Correct spelling typo in printk within drivers/mtd/tests.
Signed-off-by: NMasanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>

When we scan several nand chips with nand_scan(), such as
     .......................
      nand_scan(*, 2);
     .......................

In nand_scan_ident(), the maxchips will become 2, so the current code
will select chip 1 to read the device ID. But the chip 0 is still
selected in this case.

To make the logic clear, we'd better de-select the chip when it is not used.

This patch de-select the nand chip if it is not used any more.
Signed-off-by: NHuang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>

This patch allow to detect buggy driver/hardware with
bad RnB (dev_ready) management or when timeout occurs in polling mode.

This works when dev_ready is set or not set.
There are 2 methods to wait for an erase/program command completion:

1. Wait until nand RnB pin goes high (that's what chip->dev_ready usually does)
2. Poll the device: send a status (0x70) command and read status byte in a loop
   until bit NAND_STATUS_READY is set

In all cases, you should send a status command after completion, to check if
the operation was successful. And if the operation completed, the status should
have bit NAND_STATUS_READY set.
Signed-off-by: NMatthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>

Use the NAND_STATUS_FAIL to replace the hardcode "0x01",
which make the code more readable.
Signed-off-by: NHuang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>

This patch fixes errors seen in identifying old Samsung SLC, due to the
following commits:

    commit e2d3a35e
    mtd: nand: detect Samsung K9GBG08U0A, K9GAG08U0F ID

    commit e3b88bd6
    mtd: nand: add generic READ ID length calculation functions

Some Samsung NAND with "5-byte" ID really appear to have 6-byte IDs, with
wraparound like:

  Samsung K9K8G08U0D
  ec d3 51 95 58 ec ec d3

  Samsung K9F1G08U0C
  ec f1 00 95 40 ec ec f1

  Samsung K9F2G08U0B
  ec da 10 95 44 00 ec da

This bad wraparound makes it hard to reliably detect the difference
between Samsung SLC with 5-byte ID and Samsung SLC with 6-byte ID.

The fix is to, for now, only use the new Samsung table for MLC. We
cannot support the new SLC (K9FAG08U0M) until Samsung gives better ID
decode information.

Note that this applies in addition to the previous regression fix:

    commit bc86cf7a
    mtd: nand: fix Samsung SLC NAND identification regression

Together, these patches completely restore the previous detection
behavior so that we cannot see any more regressions in Samsung SLC NAND
(finger crossed). With luck, I can get a hold of a Samsung
representative and stop having to cross my fingers eventually.
Reported-by: NSylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NSylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>

A combination of the following two commits caused a regression in 3.7-rc1
when identifying some Samsung NAND, so that some previously working NAND
were no longer detected properly:

    commit e3b88bd6
    mtd: nand: add generic READ ID length calculation functions

    commit e2d3a35e
    mtd: nand: detect Samsung K9GBG08U0A, K9GAG08U0F ID

Particularly, a regression was seen on Samsung K9F2G08U0B, with the
following full 8-byte READ ID string:

    ec da 10 95 44 00 ec da

The basic problem is that Samsung manufactures both SLC and MLC NAND
that use a non-standard decoding table for deriving information from
their IDs. I have heuristically determined that all the chips that use
the new table have ID strings which wrap around after the 6th byte.
Unfortunately, I overlooked the fact that some older Samsung SLC (which
use a different decoding table) have "5 byte ID strings" which also wrap
around after the 6th byte.

This patch re-introduces a distinction between these old and new Samsung
NAND by checking that the 6th byte is non-zero, allowing both old and
new Samsung NAND to be detected properly.
Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Reported-by: NMarek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Tested-by: NMarek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>

A combination of the following two commits caused a regression in 3.7-rc1
when identifying some Samsung NAND, so that some previously working NAND
were no longer detected properly:

    commit e3b88bd6
    mtd: nand: add generic READ ID length calculation functions

    commit e2d3a35e
    mtd: nand: detect Samsung K9GBG08U0A, K9GAG08U0F ID

Particularly, a regression was seen on Samsung K9F2G08U0B, with the
following full 8-byte READ ID string:

    ec da 10 95 44 00 ec da

The basic problem is that Samsung manufactures both SLC and MLC NAND
that use a non-standard decoding table for deriving information from
their IDs. I have heuristically determined that all the chips that use
the new table have ID strings which wrap around after the 6th byte.
Unfortunately, I overlooked the fact that some older Samsung SLC (which
use a different decoding table) have "5 byte ID strings" which also wrap
around after the 6th byte.

This patch re-introduces a distinction between these old and new Samsung
NAND by checking that the 6th byte is non-zero, allowing both old and
new Samsung NAND to be detected properly.
Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Reported-by: NMarek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Tested-by: NMarek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

Datasheets for the following Samsung NAND parts (both MLC and SLC) describe
extensions to the Samsung 6-byte extended ID decoding table:

K9GBG08U0A (MLC, 6-byte ID)
K9GAG08U0F (MLC, 6-byte ID)
K9FAG08U0M (SLC, 6-byte ID)

The table found in K9GAG08U0F, p.44, contains a superset of the information
found in other previous datasheets.

This patch adds support for all of these chips, with 512B and 640B OOB sizes.
It also changes the detection pattern such that this table applies to all
Samsung 6-byte ID NAND, not just MLC. This is safe, according to the NAND
parameter data I have collected:

Note that nand_base.c does not yet support the bad block marker scheme defined
for these chips (i.e., scan 1st and last page for BB markers).
Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>