1. 10 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  2. 24 2月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ARM: cleanup: debugfs error handling · d808aa69
      Russell King 提交于
      Debugfs functions return NULL when they fail, or an error pointer
      when not configured.  The intention behind the error pointer is that
      it appears as a valid pointer to the caller, and so the caller
      continues inspite of debugfs not being available.
      
      Debugfs failure should only ever be checked with (!ptr) and not the
      IS_ERR*() functions.
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      d808aa69
  3. 30 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 12 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • T
      ARM: OMAP2+: Use omap initcalls · b76c8b19
      Tony Lindgren 提交于
      This way the initcalls don't run on other SoCs on multiplatform
      kernels. Otherwise we'll get something like this when booting
      on vexpress:
      
      omap_hwmod: _ensure_mpu_hwmod_is_setup: MPU initiator hwmod mpu not yet registered
      ...
      WARNING: at arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c:82 _init_omap_device+0x74/0x94()
      _init_omap_device: could not find omap_hwmod for mpu
      ...
      omap-dma-engine omap-dma-engine: OMAP DMA engine driver
      ...
      Tested-by: NEzequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      b76c8b19
  5. 17 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  6. 19 10月, 2012 3 次提交
  7. 09 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  8. 11 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  9. 06 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  10. 28 6月, 2011 2 次提交
  11. 21 6月, 2011 2 次提交
  12. 20 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  13. 07 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  14. 05 2月, 2011 1 次提交
  15. 22 12月, 2010 5 次提交
  16. 03 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  17. 09 10月, 2010 1 次提交
    • M
      OMAP: mach-omap2: Fix static declaration warnings · 38815733
      Manjunath Kondaiah G 提交于
      This patch fixes sparse warnings due to non declaration of
      static structures and variables.
      
      Sparse warning logs fixed:
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:88:6: warning: symbol 'omap3_secure_ram_storage' was not declared. Should it be static?
      n
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer-gp.c:50:22: warning: symbol 'gptimer_wakeup' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer-gp.c:240:18: warning: symbol 'omap_timer' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c:121:24: warning: symbol 'prcm_context' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux2420.c:510:29: warning: symbol 'omap2420_pop_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux2430.c:589:29: warning: symbol 'omap2430_pop_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:934:28: warning: symbol 'omap3_cus_subset' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1080:29: warning: symbol 'omap3_cus_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1272:28: warning: symbol 'omap3_cbb_subset' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1393:29: warning: symbol 'omap3_cbb_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1603:28: warning: symbol 'omap36xx_cbp_subset' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1821:29: warning: symbol 'omap36xx_cbp_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm-debug.c:165:15: warning: symbol 'pm_dbg_dir' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c:587:30: warning: symbol 'ads7846_config' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c:606:23: warning: symbol 'omap3evm_spi_board_info' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-sdram.c:46:25: warning: symbol 'rx51_sdrc_params' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-sdram.c:211:25: warning: symbol 'rx51_get_sdram_timings' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3touchbook.c:64:15: warning: symbol 'touchbook_revision' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-am3517evm.c:350:24: warning: symbol 'am3517_evm_dss_device' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3stalker.c:567:23: warning: symbol 'omap3stalker_spi_board_info' was not declared. Should it be static?
      Signed-off-by: NManjunath Kondaiah G <manjugk@ti.com>
      Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
      Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      38815733
  18. 24 9月, 2010 2 次提交
  19. 22 9月, 2010 1 次提交
  20. 13 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  21. 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking... · 5a0e3ad6
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h
      
      percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
      included when building most .c files.  percpu.h includes slab.h which
      in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
      universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.
      
      percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed.  Prepare for
      this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
      headers directly instead of assuming availability.  As this conversion
      needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
      used as the basis of conversion.
      
        http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py
      
      The script does the followings.
      
      * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
        only the necessary includes are there.  ie. if only gfp is used,
        gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.
      
      * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
        blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
        to its surrounding.  It's put in the include block which contains
        core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
        alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
        doesn't seem to be any matching order.
      
      * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
        because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
        an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
        file.
      
      The conversion was done in the following steps.
      
      1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
         over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
         and ~3000 slab.h inclusions.  The script emitted errors for ~400
         files.
      
      2. Each error was manually checked.  Some didn't need the inclusion,
         some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
         embedding .c file was more appropriate for others.  This step added
         inclusions to around 150 files.
      
      3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
         from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.
      
      4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
         e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
         APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.
      
      5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
         editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
         files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell.  Most gfp.h
         inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
         wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros.  Each
         slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
         necessary.
      
      6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.
      
      7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
         were fixed.  CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
         distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
         more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
         build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).
      
         * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
         * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * ia64 SMP allmodconfig
         * s390 SMP allmodconfig
         * alpha SMP allmodconfig
         * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig
      
      8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
         a separate patch and serve as bisection point.
      
      Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
      6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
      If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
      headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
      the specific arch.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
      5a0e3ad6
  22. 25 2月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      OMAP3 PM: Adding counters for power domain logic off and mem off during retention. · cde08f81
      Thara Gopinath 提交于
      This patch adds counters to keep track of whether the powerdomain
      logic or software controllable memory banks are turned off when
      the power domain enters retention. During power domain retention
      if logic gets turned off, the scenario is known as Open Switch Retention.
      Also during retention s/w controllable memory banks of a power
      domain can be chosen to be kept in retention or off.
      
      This patch adds one counter per powerdomain to track the power domain
      logic state during retention. Number of memory bank state counters
      added depends on the number of software controllable memory banks
      of the powerdomain. To view these counters do
      	cat ../debug/pm_debug/count
      Signed-off-by: NThara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
      [paul@pwsan.com: conditional expressions simplified; counter increment
       code moved to its own function]
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
      cde08f81
  23. 27 1月, 2010 3 次提交
  24. 21 1月, 2010 3 次提交
  25. 12 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  26. 12 11月, 2009 2 次提交