- 05 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andreas Herrmann 提交于
Commit 7ad728f9 (cpumask: x86: convert cpu_sibling_map/cpu_core_map to cpumask_var_t) changed the output of /proc/cpuinfo for siblings: Example on an AMD Phenom: physical id : 0 siblings : 1 core id : 3 cpu cores : 4 Before that commit it was: physical id : 0 siblings : 4 core id : 3 cpu cores : 4 Instead of cpu_core_mask it now uses cpu_sibling_mask to count siblings. This is due to the following hunk of above commit: | --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c | +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c | @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ static void show_cpuinfo_core(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinf | if (c->x86_max_cores * smp_num_siblings > 1) { | seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", c->phys_proc_id); | seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n", | - cpus_weight(per_cpu(cpu_core_map, cpu))); | + cpumask_weight(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu))); | seq_printf(m, "core id\t\t: %d\n", c->cpu_core_id); | seq_printf(m, "cpu cores\t: %d\n", c->booted_cores); | seq_printf(m, "apicid\t\t: %d\n", c->apicid); This was a mistake, because the impact line shows that this side-effect was not anticipated: Impact: reduce per-cpu size for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y So revert the respective hunk to restore the old behavior. [ Impact: fix sibling-info regression in /proc/cpuinfo ] Signed-off-by: NAndreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> LKML-Reference: <20090504182859.GA29045@alberich.amd.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 13 3月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rusty Russell 提交于
Impact: cleanup 1) &cpu_online_map -> cpu_online_mask 2) first_cpu/next_cpu_nr -> cpumask_first/cpumask_next 3) cpu_*_map manipulation -> init_cpu_* / set_cpu_* Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
-
由 Rusty Russell 提交于
Impact: reduce per-cpu size for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y In most places it's cleaner to use the accessors cpu_sibling_mask() and cpu_core_mask() wrappers which already exist. I couldn't avoid cleaning up the access in oprofile, either. Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
-
- 01 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jaswinder Singh Rajput 提交于
Impact: unification show_cpuinfo_core is identical for 32 and 64 bit and can be unified, and CONFIG_X86_HT inherently depends on CONFIG_X86_SMP. Signed-off-by: NJaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
- 22 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
Impact: fix missing CPUs in /proc/cpuinfo after CPU hotunplug/hotreplug In my test, I found that if a cpu has been offline, the next cpus may not be shown in the /proc/cpuinfo. if one read() cannot consume the whole /proc/cpuinfo, c_start() will be called again in the next read() calls. And *pos has been increased by 1 by the caller(seq_read()). if this time the cpu#*pos is offline, c_start() will return NULL, and the next cpus can not be shown. this fix use next_cpu_nr(*pos - 1, cpu_online_map) to search the next unshown cpu. the most easy way to reproduce this bug: 1) offline cpu#1 (cpu#0 is online) 2) dd ibs=2 if=/proc/cpuinfo the result is that only cpu#0 is shown. cpu#2 and cpu#3 .... cannot be shown in /proc/cpuinfo it's bug. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 20 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Travis 提交于
* Use nr_cpu_ids instead of NR_CPUS to limit traversal of cpu online map. Signed-off-by: NMike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 19 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
None of these files use any of the functionality promised by asm/semaphore.h. It's possible that they rely on it dragging in some unrelated header file, but I can't build all these files, so we'll have fix any build failures as they come up. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
-
- 17 4月, 2008 5 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
store initial_apicid from early identify. it is could be different from phys_proc_id later. also print it out in /proc/cpuinfo. Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Hiroshi Shimamoto 提交于
make cpu/proc.c and cpu/proc_64.c same. Signed-off-by: NHiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Hiroshi Shimamoto 提交于
Change /proc/cpuinfo on 32-bit, it will look like on 64-bit. 'power management' line is added and power management information will be printed at the line. Signed-off-by: NHiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Hiroshi Shimamoto 提交于
clean up for unification. Signed-off-by: NHiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 04 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 H. Peter Anvin 提交于
Move the CPU feature string names to a separate file (common to 32 and 64 bits); additionally, make <asm/cpufeature.h> includable by host code in preparation for including the CPU feature strings in the boot code. Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 30 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Engelhardt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 17 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andreas Herrmann 提交于
Fix regressions introduced with 92cb7612. It can happen that cpuinfo is displayed for CPUs that are not online or even worse for CPUs not present at all. As an example, following was shown for a "second" CPU of a single core K8 variant: processor : 0 vendor_id : unknown cpu family : 0 model : 0 model name : unknown stepping : 0 cache size : 0 KB fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 0 wp : yes flags : bogomips : 0.00 clflush size : 0 cache_alignment : 0 address sizes : 0 bits physical, 0 bits virtual power management: Signed-off-by: NAndreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 30 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 H. Peter Anvin 提交于
Additional CPUID strings (sse4_1, sse4_2, sse5, skinit, wdt); fix the positioning of the AMD ecx strings (cr8_legacy was duplicated under two different names, so the alignment of all the other strings were off by one.) Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 20 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Travis 提交于
cpu_data is currently an array defined using NR_CPUS. This means that we overallocate since we will rarely really use maximum configured cpus. When NR_CPU count is raised to 4096 the size of cpu_data becomes 3,145,728 bytes. These changes were adopted from the sparc64 (and ia64) code. An additional field was added to cpuinfo_x86 to be a non-ambiguous cpu index. This corresponds to the index into a cpumask_t as well as the per_cpu index. It's used in various places like show_cpuinfo(). cpu_data is defined to be the boot_cpu_data structure for the NON-SMP case. Signed-off-by: NMike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Acked-by: NChristoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru> Cc: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@pol.net> Cc: Mark M. Hoffman <mhoffman@lightlink.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 17 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Travis 提交于
This is from an earlier message from 'Christoph Lameter': cpu_core_map is currently an array defined using NR_CPUS. This means that we overallocate since we will rarely really use maximum configured cpu. If we put the cpu_core_map into the per cpu area then it will be allocated for each processor as it comes online. This means that the core map cannot be accessed until the per cpu area has been allocated. Xen does a weird thing here looping over all processors and zeroing the masks that are not yet allocated and that will be zeroed when they are allocated. I commented the code out. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NMike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 11 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 13 7月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Venki Pallipadi 提交于
Some Intel features are spread around in different CPUID leafs like 0x5, 0x6 and 0xA. Make this feature detection code common across i386 and x86_64. Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo. This feature will be enabled automatically by current acpi-cpufreq driver. Refer to Intel Software Developer's Manual for more details about the feature. Thanks to hpa (H Peter Anvin) for the making the actual code detecting the scattered features data-driven. Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 H. Peter Anvin 提交于
Unify the handling of the CPU features vectors between i386 and x86-64. This also adopts the collapsing of features which are required at compile-time into constant tests from x86-64 to i386. Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 03 5月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joerg Roedel 提交于
remove the reporting of the constant_tsc flag from the "power management" field in /proc/cpuinfo. The NULL value there was replaced by "" because the former would result in a printout of [8] if the flag is set. Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
-
- 13 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
Just various new acronyms. The new popcnt bit is in the middle of Intel space. This looks a little weird, but I've been assured it's ok. Also I fixed RDTSCP for i386 which was at the wrong place. For i386 and x86-64. Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
-
- 07 12月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
Also report it in /proc/cpuinfo similar to x86-64. Needed for followon patch Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
-
- 26 9月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
Add supplemental SSE3 instructions flag, and Direct Cache Access flag. As described in "Intel Processor idenfication and the CPUID instruction AP485 Sept 2006" AK: also added for x86-64 Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
-
- 28 6月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rohit Seth 提交于
Move the phys_core_id and cpu_core_id to cpuinfo_x86 structure. Similar patch for x86_64 is already accepted by Andi earlier this week. [akpm@osdl.org: fix warning] Signed-off-by: NRohit Seth <rohitseth@google.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Andreas Mohr 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAndreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 23 6月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Ludvig 提交于
New CPU flags for next generation of crypto engine as found in VIA C7 processors. Signed-off-by: NMichal Ludvig <michal@logix.cz> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 26 3月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
Spec just got published so we know the CPUID bit. Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 23 3月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gerd Hoffmann 提交于
Implement SMP alternatives, i.e. switching at runtime between different code versions for UP and SMP. The code can patch both SMP->UP and UP->SMP. The UP->SMP case is useful for CPU hotplug. With CONFIG_CPU_HOTPLUG enabled the code switches to UP at boot time and when the number of CPUs goes down to 1, and switches to SMP when the number of CPUs goes up to 2. Without CONFIG_CPU_HOTPLUG or on non-SMP-capable systems the code is patched once at boot time (if needed) and the tables are released afterwards. The changes in detail: * The current alternatives bits are moved to a separate file, the SMP alternatives code is added there. * The patch adds some new elf sections to the kernel: .smp_altinstructions like .altinstructions, also contains a list of alt_instr structs. .smp_altinstr_replacement like .altinstr_replacement, but also has some space to save original instruction before replaving it. .smp_locks list of pointers to lock prefixes which can be nop'ed out on UP. The first two are used to replace more complex instruction sequences such as spinlocks and semaphores. It would be possible to deal with the lock prefixes with that as well, but by handling them as special case the table sizes become much smaller. * The sections are page-aligned and padded up to page size, so they can be free if they are not needed. * Splitted the code to release init pages to a separate function and use it to release the elf sections if they are unused. Signed-off-by: NGerd Hoffmann <kraxel@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NChuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 12 1月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
Print bits for RDTSCP, SVM, CR8-LEGACY. Also now print power flags on i386 like x86-64 always did. This will add a new line in the 386 cpuinfo, but that shouldn't be an issue - did that in the past too and I haven't heard of any breakage. I shrunk some of the fields in the i386 cpuinfo_x86 to chars to make up for the new int "x86_power" field. Overall it's smaller than before. Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
Define it for i386 too. This is a synthetic flag that signifies that the CPU's TSC runs at a constant P state invariant frequency. Fix up the logic on x86-64/i386 to set it on all known CPUs. Use the AMD defined bit to set it on future AMD CPUs. Cc: venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 07 12月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Venkatesh Pallipadi 提交于
What is the value shown in "cpu MHz" of /proc/cpuinfo when CPUs are capable of changing frequency? Today the answer is: It depends. On i386: SMP kernel - It is always the boot frequency UP kernel - Scales with the frequency change and shows that was last set. On x86_64: There is one single variable cpu_khz that gets written by all the CPUs. So, the frequency set by last CPU will be seen on /proc/cpuinfo of all the CPUs in the system. What you see also depends on whether you have constant_tsc capable CPU or not. On ia64: It is always boot time frequency of a particular CPU that gets displayed. The patch below changes this to: Show the last known frequency of the particular CPU, when cpufreq is present. If cpu doesnot support changing of frequency through cpufreq, then boot frequency will be shown. The patch affects i386, x86_64 and ia64 architectures. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi<venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 15 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Siddha, Suresh B 提交于
Fields obtained through cpuid vector 0x1(ebx[16:23]) and vector 0x4(eax[14:25], eax[26:31]) indicate the maximum values and might not always be the same as what is available and what OS sees. So make sure "siblings" and "cpu cores" values in /proc/cpuinfo reflect the values as seen by OS instead of what cpuid instruction says. This will also fix the buggy BIOS cases (for example where cpuid on a single core cpu says there are "2" siblings, even when HT is disabled in the BIOS. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4359) Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 31 10月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kamble, Nitin A 提交于
If VMX feature is available in the CPU, this patch will make it visible in the /proc/cpuinfo with the cpuid detection. Signed-Off-By: NNitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 24 6月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Morton 提交于
x86_64's cpu_khz is unsigned int and there is no reason why x86 needs to use unsigned long. So make cpu_khz unsigned int on x86 as well. Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 01 5月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zwane Mwaikambo 提交于
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4426 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 10 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) XP stepping : 0 cpu MHz : 2204.807 <snipped> cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse pni syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow bogomips : 4358.14 We're marking bit 0 of extended function 0x80000001 cpuid as PNI support on AMD processors, when it actually denotes x87 FPU present. Patch for i386 and x86_64 below. Signed-off-by: NZwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 3 次提交
-
-
由 Siddha, Suresh B 提交于
- broken sibling_map setup in x86_64 - grouping all the core and HT related cpuinfo fields. We are reasonably sure that adding new cpuinfo fields after "siblings" field, will not cause any app failure. Thats because today's /proc/cpuinfo format is completely different on x86, x86_64 and we haven't heard of any x86 app breakage because of this issue. Grouping these fields will result in more or less common format on all architectures (ia64, x86 and x86_64) and will cause less confusion. Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
Appended patch adds the support for Intel dual-core detection and displaying the core related information in /proc/cpuinfo. It adds two new fields "core id" and "cpu cores" to x86 /proc/cpuinfo and the "core id" field for x86_64("cpu cores" field is already present in x86_64). Number of processor cores in a die is detected using cpuid(4) and this is documented in IA-32 Intel Architecture Software Developer's Manual (vol 2a) (http://developer.intel.com/design/pentium4/manuals/index_new.htm#sdm_vol2a) This patch also adds cpu_core_map similar to cpu_sibling_map. Slightly hacked by AK. Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
Only display physical id/siblings when there are siblings or dual core. In 2.6.11 I accidentially broke it and it was always displaying these fields But for compatibility to all these /proc parsers around it is better to do it in the old way again. Noticed by Suresh Siddha Cc: <Suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-