• A
    x86: show number of core_siblings instead of thread_siblings in /proc/cpuinfo · 35d11680
    Andreas Herrmann 提交于
    Commit 7ad728f9
    (cpumask: x86: convert cpu_sibling_map/cpu_core_map to cpumask_var_t)
    changed the output of /proc/cpuinfo for siblings:
    
    Example on an AMD Phenom:
    
      physical id   : 0
      siblings : 1
      core id	   : 3
      cpu cores  : 4
    
    Before that commit it was:
    
      physical id	: 0
      siblings : 4
      core id	   : 3
      cpu cores  : 4
    
    Instead of cpu_core_mask it now uses cpu_sibling_mask to count siblings.
    This is due to the following hunk of above commit:
    
    |  --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
    |  +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
    |  @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ static void show_cpuinfo_core(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinf
    |          if (c->x86_max_cores * smp_num_siblings > 1) {
    |                  seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", c->phys_proc_id);
    |                  seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n",
    |  -                          cpus_weight(per_cpu(cpu_core_map, cpu)));
    |  +                          cpumask_weight(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu)));
    |                  seq_printf(m, "core id\t\t: %d\n", c->cpu_core_id);
    |                  seq_printf(m, "cpu cores\t: %d\n", c->booted_cores);
    |                  seq_printf(m, "apicid\t\t: %d\n", c->apicid);
    
    This was a mistake, because the impact line shows that this side-effect
    was not anticipated:
    
       Impact: reduce per-cpu size for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y
    
    So revert the respective hunk to restore the old behavior.
    
    [ Impact: fix sibling-info regression in /proc/cpuinfo ]
    Signed-off-by: NAndreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
    Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
    LKML-Reference: <20090504182859.GA29045@alberich.amd.com>
    Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
    35d11680
proc.c 4.1 KB