A lot of modern laptops use the Parade PS8461E MUX for eDP
switching. The MUX can operate in jitter cleaning mode or
redriver mode, the first one resulting in higher link
quality. The jitter cleaning mode needs to know the link
rate used and the MUX achieves this by snooping the
LINK_BW_SET, LINK_RATE_SELECT and SUPPORTED_LINK_RATES
DPCD accesses.

When the MUX is powered down (seems this can happen whenever
the display is turned off) it loses track of the snooped
link rates so when we do the LINK_RATE_SELECT write it no
longer knowns which link rate we're selecting, and thus it
falls back to the lower quality redriver mode. This results
in unstable high link rates (eg. usually 8.1Gbps link rate
no longer works correctly).

In order to avoid all that let's re-snoop SUPPORTED_LINK_RATES
from the sink at the start of every link training.

Unfortunately we don't have a way to detect the presence of
the MUX. It looks like the set of laptops equipped with this
MUX is fairly large and contains devices from multiple
manufacturers. It may also still be growing with new models.
So a quirk doesn't seem like a very easily maintainable
option, thus we shall attempt to do this unconditionally on
all machines that use LINK_RATE_SELECT. Hopefully this extra
DPCD read doesn't cause issues for any unaffected machine.
If that turns out to be the case we'll need to convert this
into a quirk in the future.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6205Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220902070319.15395-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comTested-by: NAaron Ma <aaron.ma@canonical.com>
Tested-by: NJason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 25899c59)
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

To avoid AUX timeouts and subsequent spurious hotplug interrupts, make
sure that the first DPCD access during detection is a read from an LTTPR
register.

Some ADLP DP link configuration at least with multiple LTTPRs expects
the first DPCD access during the LTTPR/DPCD detection after hotplug to
be a read from the LTTPR range starting with
DP_LT_TUNABLE_PHY_REPEATER_FIELD_DATA_STRUCTURE_REV. The side effect of
this read is to put each LTTPR into the LTTPR transparent or LTTPR
non-transparent mode.

The lack of the above read may leave some of the LTTPRs in non-LTTPR
mode, while other LTTPRs in LTTPR transparent or LTTPR non-transparent
mode (for instance LTTPRs after system suspend/resume that kept their
mode from before suspend). Due to the different AUX timeouts the
different modes imply, the DPCD access from a non-LTTPR range will
timeout and lead to an LTTPR generated hotplug towards the source (which
the LTTPR firmware uses to account for buggy TypeC adapters with a long
wake-up delay).

SYSCROS: 72939

v2: Keep DPCD read-out working on non-LTTPR platforms.
v3: Summarize what and why the patch does at the beginning of the commit
    log. (Jani)
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220408224629.845887-1-imre.deak@intel.com

At least some DELL monitors (P2715Q) with DPCD_REV 1.2 return corrupted
DPCD register values when reading from the 0xF0000- LTTPR range with an
AUX transaction block size bigger than 1. The DP standard requires 0 to
be returned - as for any other reserved/invalid addresses - but these
monitors return the DPCD_REV register value repeated in each byte of the
read buffer. This will in turn corrupt the values returned by the LTTPRs
between the source and the monitor: LTTPRs must adjust the values they
read from the downstream DPRX, for instance right-shift/init the
downstream DP_PHY_REPEATER_CNT value. Since the value returned by the
monitor's DPRX is non-zero the adjusted values will be corrupt.

Reading the LTTPR registers one-by-one instead of reading all of them
with a single AUX transfer works around the issue.

According to the DP standard's 0xF0000 register description:
"LTTPR-related registers at DPCD Addresses F0000h through F02FFh are
valid only for DPCD r1.4 (or higher)." While it's unclear if DPCD r1.4
refers to the DPCD_REV or to the
LT_TUNABLE_PHY_REPEATER_FIELD_DATA_STRUCTURE_REV register (tickets filed
at the VESA site to clarify this haven't been addressed), one
possibility is that it's a restriction due to non-compliant monitors
described above. Disabling the non-transparent LTTPR mode for all such
monitors is not a viable solution: the transparent LTTPR mode has its
own issue causing link training failures and this would affect a lot of
monitors in use with DPCD_REV < 1.4. Instead this patch works around
the problem by reading the LTTPR common and PHY cap registers one-by-one
for any monitor with a DPCD_REV < 1.4.

The standard requires the DPCD capabilities to be read after the LTTPR
common capabilities are read, so re-read the DPCD capabilities after
the LTTPR common and PHY caps were read out.

v2:
- Use for instead of a while loop. (Ville)
- Add to code comment the monitor model with the problem.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4531
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220322143844.42616-1-imre.deak@intel.com

The variable should obviously be local, not static.

Fixes: a421d8a9 ("drm/i915/dp: rewrite DP 2.0 128b/132b link training based on errata")
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220217083938.3587465-1-jani.nikula@intel.com

Abstract link status check to a function that takes 128b/132b and 8b/10b
into account, and use it. Also dump link status on failures.

Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/cec395d435679a290a1c35fcbfc54555101bfad1.1643878928.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The DP 2.0 errata completely overhauls the 128b/132b link training, with
no provisions for backward compatibility with the original DP 2.0
specification.

The changes are too intrusive to consider reusing the same code for both
8b/10b and 128b/132b, mainly because the LTTPR channel equalisation is
done concurrently instead of serialized.

NOTES:

* It's a bit unclear when to wait for DP_INTERLANE_ALIGN_DONE and
  per-lane DP_LANE_SYMBOL_LOCKED. Figure xx4 in the SCR implies the
  LANEx_CHANNEL_EQ_DONE sequence may end with either 0x77,0x77,0x85 *or*
  0x33,0x33,0x84 (for four lane configuration in DPCD 0x202..0x204)
  i.e. without the above bits set. Text elsewhere seems contradictory or
  incomplete.

* We read entire link status (6 bytes) everywhere instead of individual
  DPCD addresses.

* There are some subtle ambiguities or contradictions in the order of
  some DPCD access and TPS signal enables/disables. It's also not clear
  whether these are significant.

v4:
- Wait for intra-hop clear after link training end (Ville)
- Wait instead of single check for intra-hop clear before link train

v3:
- Use msecs_to_jiffies_timeout() (Ville)
- Read status at the beginning of interlane align done loop (Ville)
- Try to simplify timeout flag use where possible (Ville)

v2:
- Always try one last time after timeouts to avoid races (Ville)
- Extend timeout to cover the entire LANEx_EQ_DONE sequence (Ville)
- Also check for eq interlane align done in LANEx_CDS_DONE Sequence (Ville)
- Check for Intra-hop status before link training

Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220208143209.2997337-1-jani.nikula@intel.com

Call it from the higher level function, as it will be shared between two
code paths.

Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/c0fffbf7213c09e42be9875d38d3001e0026b063.1643878928.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Break the dependency on i915_drv.h.
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ee740f494e416d875e057c2eda585f4e66d65500.1638366969.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Now that the link buf_trans, link training, and the
combo/mg/dkl/snps phy programming are all fixed up we can
allow per-lane DP drive settings on icl+. Make it so.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211006204937.30774-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>

Use the new link training delay helpers, fixing the delays for
128b/132b.

For existing 8b/10b functionality, this will cause additional 1-byte
DPCD reads for LTTPR delays instead of using the cached values. It's
just too complicated to combine generic helpers with local caching in a
sensible way.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014150059.28957-3-jani.nikula@intel.com

The 128b/132b channel coding link training uses more straightforward TX
FFE preset values. Reuse voltage tries and max vswing for retry logic.

The delays for 128b/132b are still all wrong, but this is regardless a
step forward.

v2: Fix UHBR rate checks, use intel_dp_is_uhbr() helper

v3:
- Rebase
- Modify intel_dp_adjust_request_changed() and
  intel_dp_link_max_vswing_reached() to take 128b/132b into
  account. (Ville)

v4:
- Train request printing for TX FFE (Ville)
- Log 8b/10b vs. 128b/132b (Ville)
- Add helper for per-lane max vswing / tx ffe (Ville)
- Name functions with tx_ffe/vswing instead of 128b132b/8b10b

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211011182144.22074-2-jani.nikula@intel.com

Add per-lane abstraction for max vswing reached to make follow-up
cleaner, as this one reverses the conditions.

v2: both conditions need to be true, reverse (Ville)

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211011182144.22074-1-jani.nikula@intel.com

I suppose intel_dp_dump_link_status() might be useful for diagnosing
link training failures. Hoever we only call from the channel EQ phase
currently. Let's call it from the CR phase as well.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211004170535.4173-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

Unify all debug prints during link training to include information
on both the encoder and the LTTPR. We unify the format to something
like "[ENCODER:1:FOO][LTTPR 1] Something something". Though not
sure if those brackets around the dp_phy just make it look like
line noise? I'll accept suggestions on better formatting.

I'm slightly on the fence about also including the connector,
but technically only the DPRX is the SST connector (ie.
intel_dp->attached_connector). I suppose you could think of it
as the branch device/whatever in the topology, and we're training
the link leading to it. So that could argue for its inclusion.
But it's all getting a bit long alrady, so not going to do it
I think.

v2: Keep the connector name in the final passed/failed debug print
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211004170535.4173-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

Print out each DP vswing adjustment request we got from the RX.
Could help in diagnosing what's going on during link training.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211004170535.4173-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

Indicate which LTTPR we're currently attempting to train when
we print which training pattern we're using.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211004170535.4173-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

Currently we consider the max vswing reached when we transmit a
the max voltage level, but we don't consider pre-emphasis at all.
This kinda matches older DP specs that only had some vague text
about transmitting the maximum voltage swing. Latest versions
now say something vague about consider the sum of the vswing
and pre-emphasis fields in the ADJUST_REQUEST_LANE registers.
Very vague, and super confusing especially the fact that it
talks about transmitted voltgage swing in the same sentence
as it say to look at the requested values.

Also glanced at the link CTS spec, and that one seems to have
tests that assume contradicting behaviour. Some say to consider
just the vswing level we transmit, others say to check for
sum of transmitted vswing+preemph being 3.

So let's try to take some kind of sane middle ground here.
I think what could make sense is only consider max vswing
reached if MAX_SWING_REACHED==1 _and_ vswing+preemph==3.
That will allow things to go all the way up to vswing 3 +
pre-emph 0 or vswing 2 + pre-emph 1, depending on what
the maximum supported vswing is. Only considering the sum
of vswing+pre-emph doesn't make much sense to me since
we could terminate too early if the sink requests eg.
vswing 0 + pre-emph 3. And if we'd stick to the current
code we could terminate too early of the sink asks for
vswing 2 + pre-emph 0 when vswing level 3 is not supported.

Side note: I don't really understand why any of this stuff is
"specified" at all. There is already a limit of 5 attempts at
the same vswing+pre-emph level, and a total limit of 10
attempts. So might as well stick to the same max 5 attempts
across the board IMO.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211004170535.4173-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

LTTPRs should support per-lane drive settings I think, and even if
they don't they should implement their own fallback logic to determine
suitable common drive settings to use for all the lanes.

v2: Actually check the correct thing
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211001130107.1746-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

Adjust the link training code to accommodate per-lane drive settings,
if supported by the platform. Actually enabling this will involve
some changes to each platform's .set_signal_level() implementation,
so for the moment all supported platforms will keep using the current
codepath that just uses the same drive settings for all the lanes.

v2: Fix min() vs. max() fumble
v3: Compact the debug print to a single line
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211001130107.1746-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

Currently .set_signal_levels() is only used by encoders in DP mode.
For most modern platforms there is no essential difference between
DP and HDMI, and both codepaths just end up calling the same function
under the hood. Let's get remove the need for that extra indirection
by moving .set_signal_levels() into the encoder from intel_dp.
Since we already plumb the crtc_state/etc. into .set_signal_levels()
the code will do the right thing for both DP and HDMI.

HSW/BDW/SKL are the only platforms that need a bit of care on
account of having to preload the hardware buf_trans register
with the full set of values. So we must still remember to call
hsw_prepare_{dp,hdmi}_ddi_buffers() to do said preloading, and
.set_signal_levels() will just end up selecting the correct entry
for DP, and also setting up the iboost magic for both DP and HDMI.

Note that previously on HSW/BDW/SKL we did write to DDI_BUF_CTL to
select the correct entry until link training started, now that we
call .set_signal_levels() already from hsw_ddi_pre_enable_dp() that
is no longer the case. But it's all safe now that the
intel_ddi_init_dp_buf_reg() call was hoisted up and it no longer
sets up the DDI_BUF_CTL_ENABLE bit (that is still deferred until
link training).

v2: Rebase due to has_{iboost,buf_trans_select}()
    Add some notes about the DDI_BUF_CTL situation on HSW/BDW/SKL (Imre)
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211001130107.1746-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

The DP spec says:
"If the receiver keeps the same value in the ADJUST_REQUEST_LANEx_y
 register(s) while the LANEx_CR_DONE bits remain unset, the transmitter
 must loop four times with the same voltage swing. On the fifth time,
 the transmitter must down-shift to the lower bit rate and must repeat
 the CR-lock training sequence as described below."

Lets fix the code to follow that instead of terminating after five
times of transmitting the same signal levels. The text in spec feels
a little bit ambiguous still, but this is my best guess at its meaning.

As a bonus this also gets rid of the train_set[0] stuff which
would not work for per-lane drive settings anyway.

Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
CC: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211001160826.17080-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

Setting DP_PORT_EN in intel_dp->DP is already handled by
intel_dp_enable_port() so there is no point in setting it also
from the link training code.

For DDI platforms a bit with that name doesn't even exist. The
counterpart is DDI_BUF_CTL_ENABLE, which is already set up by
intel_ddi_prepare_link_retrain(). Fortunately it is the same bit
so there was no harm in doing this from the platform independent
code as well. But it's just confusing when platform independent
code sets platform specific bits in intel_dp->DP. Just get rid
of it.

Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930134310.31669-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak.intel.com>

Stop using HBR2/3 support as a proxy for TPS3/4 support.
The two are no longer 1:1 in the hardware, arguably they
never were due to HSW ULX which does support TPS3 while
being limited to HBR1.

In more recent times GLK gained support for TPS4 while
being limited to HBR2. And on CNL+ some ports support
HBR3 while others are limited to HBR2, but all ports
support TPS4.

v2: s/INTEL_GEN/DISPLAY_VER/
Reviewed-by: NManasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210929162404.6717-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comAcked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

UHBR rates and 128b/132b channel encoding go hand in hand.

v2: Fix check for >= UHBR rates using intel_dp_is_uhbr() (Ville)
Reviewed-by: NManasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/b4ffd0187b306c0abaa08b89ed35c993ad8145c7.1631191763.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

128b/132b channel encoding has separate TPS1 and TPS2, although the DPCD
register values coincide with 8b/10b TPS1 and TPS2 values. Use 128b/132b
TPS2 for channel equalization.

v2: Use intel_dp_is_uhbr

Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> # v1
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/723b29223dc570c8b63c3c6fe5fb772d9db06c0d.1631191763.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

After DPRX link training, intel_dp_link_train_phy() did not
return the training result properly. If link training failed,
i915 driver would not run into link train fallback function.
And no hotplug uevent would be received by user space application.

Fixes: b30edfd8 ("drm/i915: Switch to LTTPR non-transparent mode link training")
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
Cc: William Tseng <william.tseng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210706152541.25021-1-shawn.c.lee@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit dab1b47e)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

After DPRX link training, intel_dp_link_train_phy() did not
return the training result properly. If link training failed,
i915 driver would not run into link train fallback function.
And no hotplug uevent would be received by user space application.

Fixes: b30edfd8 ("drm/i915: Switch to LTTPR non-transparent mode link training")
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
Cc: William Tseng <william.tseng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210706152541.25021-1-shawn.c.lee@intel.com

The symbol isn't needed outside of i915.ko.

Fixes: b30edfd8 ("drm/i915: Switch to LTTPR non-transparent mode link training")
Fixes: 264613b4 ("drm/i915: Disable LTTPR support when the DPCD rev < 1.4")
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210816071737.2917-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit d8959fb3)
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

The symbol isn't needed outside of i915.ko.

Fixes: b30edfd8 ("drm/i915: Switch to LTTPR non-transparent mode link training")
Fixes: 264613b4 ("drm/i915: Disable LTTPR support when the DPCD rev < 1.4")
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210816071737.2917-1-jani.nikula@intel.com

The driver currently disables the LTTPR non-transparent link training
mode for sinks with a DPCD_REV<1.4, based on the following description
of the LTTPR DPCD register range in DP standard 2.0 (at the 0xF0000
register description):

""
LTTPR-related registers at DPCD Addresses F0000h through F02FFh are valid
only for DPCD r1.4 (or higher).
"""

The transparent link training mode should still work fine, however the
implementation for this in some retimer FWs seems to be broken, see the
References: link below.

After discussions with DP standard authors the above "DPCD r1.4" does
not refer to the DPCD revision (stored in the DPCD_REV reg at 0x00000),
rather to the "LTTPR field data structure revision" stored in the
0xF0000 reg. An update request has been filed at vesa.org (see
wg/Link/documentComment/3746) for the upcoming v2.1 specification to
clarify the above description along the following lines:

"""
LTTPR-related registers at DPCD Addresses F0000h through F02FFh are
valid only for LT_TUNABLE_PHY_REPEATER_FIELD_DATA_STRUCTURE_REV 1.4 (or
higher)
"""

Based on my tests Windows uses the non-transparent link training mode
for DPCD_REV==1.2 sinks as well (so presumably for all DPCD_REVs), and
forcing it to use transparent mode on ICL/TGL platforms leads to the
same LT failure as reported at the References: link.

Based on the above let's assume that the transparent link training mode
is not well tested/supported and align the code to the correct
interpretation of what the r1.4 version refers to.
Reported-and-tested-by: NCasey Harkins <caseyharkins@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NKhaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com>
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3415
Fixes: 264613b4 ("drm/i915: Disable LTTPR support when the DPCD rev < 1.4")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.11+
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NKhaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210512212809.1234701-1-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit cb4920cc)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

The driver currently disables the LTTPR non-transparent link training
mode for sinks with a DPCD_REV<1.4, based on the following description
of the LTTPR DPCD register range in DP standard 2.0 (at the 0xF0000
register description):

""
LTTPR-related registers at DPCD Addresses F0000h through F02FFh are valid
only for DPCD r1.4 (or higher).
"""

The transparent link training mode should still work fine, however the
implementation for this in some retimer FWs seems to be broken, see the
References: link below.

After discussions with DP standard authors the above "DPCD r1.4" does
not refer to the DPCD revision (stored in the DPCD_REV reg at 0x00000),
rather to the "LTTPR field data structure revision" stored in the
0xF0000 reg. An update request has been filed at vesa.org (see
wg/Link/documentComment/3746) for the upcoming v2.1 specification to
clarify the above description along the following lines:

"""
LTTPR-related registers at DPCD Addresses F0000h through F02FFh are
valid only for LT_TUNABLE_PHY_REPEATER_FIELD_DATA_STRUCTURE_REV 1.4 (or
higher)
"""

Based on my tests Windows uses the non-transparent link training mode
for DPCD_REV==1.2 sinks as well (so presumably for all DPCD_REVs), and
forcing it to use transparent mode on ICL/TGL platforms leads to the
same LT failure as reported at the References: link.

Based on the above let's assume that the transparent link training mode
is not well tested/supported and align the code to the correct
interpretation of what the r1.4 version refers to.
Reported-and-tested-by: NCasey Harkins <caseyharkins@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NKhaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com>
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3415
Fixes: 264613b4 ("drm/i915: Disable LTTPR support when the DPCD rev < 1.4")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.11+
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NKhaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210512212809.1234701-1-imre.deak@intel.com

So that we can start using drm_dbg_*() for
drm_dp_link_train_channel_eq_delay() and
drm_dp_lttpr_link_train_channel_eq_delay().
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210423184309.207645-7-lyude@redhat.comReviewed-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

So that we can start using drm_dbg_*() in
drm_dp_link_train_clock_recovery_delay().
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210423184309.207645-6-lyude@redhat.comReviewed-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

The glk display version change is causing us to again attempt
LTTPR detection on glk. We must not do tha since glk doesn't
have a long enough AUX timeout. Restore the correct logic to
skip the detection.

Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Fixes: 2b5a4562 ("drm/i915/display: Simplify GLK display version tests")
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210412054607.18133-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 543d592a)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

In case AUX failures happen unexpectedly during a modeset, the driver
should still complete the modeset. In particular the driver should
perform the link training sequence steps even in case of an AUX failure,
as this sequence also includes port initialization steps. Not doing that
can leave the port/pipe in a broken state and lead for instance to a
flip done timeout.

Fix this by continuing with link training (in a no-LTTPR mode) if the
DPRX DPCD readout failed for some reason at the beginning of link
training. After a successful connector detection we already have the
DPCD read out and cached, so the failed repeated read for it should not
cause a problem. Note that a partial AUX read could in theory partly
overwrite the cached DPCD (and return error) but this overwrite should
not happen if the returned values are corrupted (due to a timeout or
some other IO error).

Kudos to Ville to root cause the problem.

Fixes: 7dffbded ("drm/i915: Disable LTTPR support when the DPCD rev < 1.4")
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3308
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.11
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210412232413.2755054-1-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit e42e7e58)
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
[adjusted Fixes: tag]

The address-of op in front of an array is just an alias to using the
array on its own, so drop the op.
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210412232413.2755054-2-imre.deak@intel.com

In case AUX failures happen unexpectedly during a modeset, the driver
should still complete the modeset. In particular the driver should
perform the link training sequence steps even in case of an AUX failure,
as this sequence also includes port initialization steps. Not doing that
can leave the port/pipe in a broken state and lead for instance to a
flip done timeout.

Fix this by continuing with link training (in a no-LTTPR mode) if the
DPRX DPCD readout failed for some reason at the beginning of link
training. After a successful connector detection we already have the
DPCD read out and cached, so the failed repeated read for it should not
cause a problem. Note that a partial AUX read could in theory partly
overwrite the cached DPCD (and return error) but this overwrite should
not happen if the returned values are corrupted (due to a timeout or
some other IO error).

Kudos to Ville to root cause the problem.

Fixes: 264613b4 ("drm/i915: Disable LTTPR support when the DPCD rev < 1.4")
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3308
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.11
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210412232413.2755054-1-imre.deak@intel.com

The glk display version change is causing us to again attempt
LTTPR detection on glk. We must not do tha since glk doesn't
have a long enough AUX timeout. Restore the correct logic to
skip the detection.

Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Fixes: 2b5a4562 ("drm/i915/display: Simplify GLK display version tests")
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210412054607.18133-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

Use Coccinelle to convert most of the usage of INTEL_GEN() and IS_GEN()
in the display code to use DISPLAY_VER() comparisons instead.  The
following semantic patch was used:

        @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@
        - INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == E
        + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)

        @@ expression dev_priv; @@
        - INTEL_GEN(dev_priv)
        + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv)

        @@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@
        - IS_GEN(dev_priv, E)
        + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)

        @@
        expression dev_priv;
        expression from, until;
        @@
        - IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
        + IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)

There are still some display-related uses of INTEL_GEN() in intel_pm.c
(watermark code) and i915_irq.c.  Those will be updated separately.

v2:
 - Use new IS_DISPLAY_RANGE and IS_DISPLAY_VER helpers.  (Jani)
Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210320044245.3920043-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

By the specification the 0xF0000 - 0xF02FF range is only valid if the
LTTPR revision at 0xF0000 is at least 1.4. Disable the LTTPR support
otherwise.

Fixes: 7b2a4ab8 ("drm/i915: Switch to LTTPR transparent mode link training")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.11
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210317184901.4029798-4-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 1663ad49)
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>