- 22 5月, 2014 24 次提交
-
-
由 Al Cooper 提交于
The SD Host Controller spec states that the SD Host Controller can request that the driver send up to 40 CMD19's while doing tuning and that the total time the card spends responding must be < 150ms. The sdhci_execute_tuning() function in sdhci.c that loops through sending the CMD19's has multiple bugs. First it sets a "timeout" variable to 150 and a loop counter variable to 40. It then decrements both variables by 1 at the end of each loop. It tries to handle violations of the count and time by doing a break when BOTH variables are equal to zero, which can never happen because they we set to different values and decremented by 1 at the same time. The timeout variable is not based on time at all and is totally useless. The routine also considers a loop counter of zero to be an error which means that any controller that requests the max of 40 CMD19s will cause tuning to fail and be disabled. I've fixed these issues by allowing up to 40 CMD19's and I've removed any attempt to handle the 150ms time limit. Removing timeout checking seems safe here because each CMD19 is timeout protected and the max loop counters insures we don't loop forever. Adding timeout checking would not be as simple as snapping the time at the loop start and checking for 150ms to pass because the loop queues the CMD19's and uses events to wait for completion so the time would include all the normal scheduler latencies. Signed-off-by: NAl Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Track whether preset mode is currently enabled in hardware, and use that when making decisions elsewhere in the code rather than reading the register and checking the bit. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Move the remaining parts of the power handling in sdhci_do_set_ios() into sdhci_set_power(). Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Move the regulator handling into sdhci_set_power() rather than being in sdhci_do_set_ios(). This wraps all power control up into this function. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
The only user (sdhci-of-esdhc) no longer uses these callbacks, so lets remove them to discourage any further use. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Clean up the code in sdhci_execute_tuning() so the decision whether to execute tuning is clearer - and despite this reflecting what the original code was doing, it shows that it may not be what the author actually intended. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Rather than reading back the timing information from the registers, cache it locally. This allows implementations to translate the UHS timing by overriding the set_uhs_signaling() method as required without also having to emulate the SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2 register. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> [Ulf Hansson] Resolved conflict Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Add sdhci_set_uhs_signaling() and always call the set_uhs_signaling method. This avoids quirks being added into sdhci_set_uhs_signaling(). Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> [Ulf Hansson] Resolved conflict Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Move the setting of mmc->actual_clock to zero into the set_clock handlers themselves. This will allow us to clean up the calling logic for the set_clock() method, and turn sdhci_set_clock() into a library function. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
We don't need implementations to do this, since the only time it's necessary is when we change the clock, and the only place that happens is in sdhci_do_set_ios(). So, move it there, and remove it from the iMX platform backend. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Only one caller to sdhci_set_clock() needs to check whether the requested clock frequency was the same as the currently set frequency, yet we work around this in several other sites via sdhci_update_clock(). Rather than doing this, move those checks out into sdhci_do_set_ios(), which then allows sdhci_update_clock() to be eliminated. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Rather than using the streaming API, use the coherent allocator to provide this memory, thereby eliminating cache flushing of it each time we map and unmap it. This results in a 7.5% increase in transfer speed with a UHS-1 card operating in 3.3v mode at a clock of 49.5MHz. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
On read, we don't need to sync the whole scatterlist and then check whether any segments need copying - if we check first, we avoid potentially expensive cache handling. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
The Freescale esdhc driver is the only driver which needs the interrupt registers restored after a reset. Move this quirk to be part of the ESDHC driver implementation. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Rather than having platform_reset_enter/platform_reset_exit methods, turn the core of the reset handling into a library function which platforms can call at the appropriate moment in their (new) reset method. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
When we disable card detection interrupts, we should disable both the insert and remove interrupts irrespective of the current state - this avoids races between the hardware card detect changing state before we've read that updated state and altered the interrupt mask. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Rather than wasting cycles read-modify-writing the interrupt enable registers, cache the value locally instead. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Allow SDIO interrupts to be received while the SDHCI host is runtime suspended. We do this by leaving the AHB clock enabled while the host is runtime suspended so we can access the SDHCI registers, and so read and raise the SDIO card interrupt. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
There's no requirement to have the card tasklet separate now that we have a threaded interrupt handler, so kill this and move the called code into the threaded part of the handler. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Use a generic threaded interrupt handler for SDIO interrupt handling, rather than allowing the SDIO core code to buggily spawn its own thread. This results in host drivers to be more in control of how SDIO interrupts are acknowledged in the hardware, rather than having the internals of the SDIO core placed upon them, possibly resulting in sub-standard handling. At least one SDHCI implementation specifies a very specific sequence to deal with a card interrupt. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
We don't need to change the SDHCI_SDIO_IRQ_ENABLED flag when we're merely receiving an interrupt - IRQ handling thread in the MMC core will either re-enable or disable the interrupt via the enable_sdio_irq callback, which will update this status appropriately. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
sdhci interrupt handling is a mess; there is a lot of code doing very similar things. Let's clean this up a bit: 1. set's clear down cmd, data and bus power interrupts in one go - we're always going to handle these. 2. use a do { } while () loop for looping while there are pending interrupts. 3. group clearing of bits in intmask into one place. This results in the code becoming simpler and easier to read. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
- 14 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nick Sanders 提交于
This patch removes an unneccesary 1ms mdelay in the HS200 tuning loop, called 40 times per retuning. Currently this causes a latency of >40ms on any emmc accesses triggering wake from runtime PM, which can occur for a significant portion of reads on a mostly idle system. The delay is left in place for SD Cards, which use MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK rather than MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200. I'm not able to find evidence that this is required for SD in the specs I have access to, however this delay has been present from initial checkin for SD so I have preserved the original behavior for compatibility. This has been verified to fix observed glitching on local audio playback and recording on apps with inbuilt assumptions on storage latency. Signed-off-by: NNick Sanders <nsanders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NGrant Grundler <grundler@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NDoug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Acked-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
- 21 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Seungwon Jeon 提交于
Added MMC_DDR52 as eMMC's DDR mode is distinguished from SD-UHS. Signed-off-by: NSeungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
- 26 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arend van Spriel 提交于
When the host->tuning_count is zero it means that the retuning is disabled. This is checked on the first run of sdhci_execute_tuning() by the if statement below: if (!(host->flags & SDHCI_NEEDS_RETUNING) && host->tuning_count && (host->tuning_mode == SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1)) { So only when tuning_count is non-zero it will set the host flag SDHCI_USING_RETUNING_TIMER. The else statement is only for re-programming the timer, which means that flag must be set. Because that is not checked the else statement is executed in the first run when tuning_count is zero. This was seen on a host controller which indicated SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1 (0) and tuning_count being zero. Suspect that (one of) these registers is not properly set. Signed-off-by: NArend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com> Acked-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
- 17 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
If the SDHCI irq is shared with another device then the interrupt handler can get called while SDHCI is runtime suspended. That is harmless but the warning message is not useful so remove it. Also returning IRQ_NONE is more appropriate. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
- 23 2月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
To better reflect that the cmd_timeout_ms is directly related to the busy detection timeout, let's rename it. Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
Rename host->max_discard_to to host->max_busy_timeout, to reflect that it tells the mmc core layer about the maximum supported busy detection timeout by the host. This timeout is at the moment only applicable to erase/trim/discard commands. By the renaming we provide the option of make use of it for other commands that cares about busy detection. In other words, those commands that wants an R1B response, like for example the mmc switch command. Do note that the max_busy_timeout is supposed to be specified only by hosts supporting MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY. Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Micky Ching 提交于
Add support for realtek rts5250 pci card reader. The card reader has some problems with DDR50 mode, so add a new quirks2 for broken ddr50. Signed-off-by: NMicky Ching <micky_ching@realsil.com.cn> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
- 20 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
The driver has a timer with a 10 second timeout to catch devices that stop responding. However it is possible for commands to take even longer than that. Change the timer timeout to reflect the command timeout. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
- 18 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aisheng Dong 提交于
The sdhci_execute_tuning routine gets lock separately by disable_irq(host->irq); spin_lock(&host->lock); It will cause the following lockdep error message since the &host->lock could also be got in irq context. Use spin_lock_irqsave/spin_unlock_restore instead to get rid of this error message. [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] 3.13.0-rc1+ #287 Not tainted --------------------------------- inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage. kworker/u2:1/33 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: (&(&host->lock)->rlock){?.-...}, at: [<8045f7f4>] sdhci_execute_tuning+0x4c/0x710 {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at: [<8005f030>] mark_lock+0x140/0x6ac [<80060760>] __lock_acquire+0xb30/0x1cbc [<800620d0>] lock_acquire+0x70/0x84 [<8061d1c8>] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40 [<804605cc>] sdhci_irq+0x24/0xa68 [<8006b1d4>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x54/0x18c [<8006b350>] handle_irq_event+0x44/0x64 [<8006e50c>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa0/0x170 [<8006a8f0>] generic_handle_irq+0x30/0x44 [<8000f238>] handle_IRQ+0x54/0xbc [<8000864c>] gic_handle_irq+0x30/0x64 [<80013024>] __irq_svc+0x44/0x5c [<80329bf4>] dev_vprintk_emit+0x50/0x58 [<80329c24>] dev_printk_emit+0x28/0x30 [<80329fec>] __dev_printk+0x4c/0x90 [<8032a180>] dev_err+0x3c/0x48 [<802dd4f0>] _regulator_get+0x158/0x1cc [<802dd5b4>] regulator_get_optional+0x18/0x1c [<80461df4>] sdhci_add_host+0x42c/0xbd8 [<80464820>] sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe+0x378/0x67c [<8032ee88>] platform_drv_probe+0x20/0x50 [<8032d48c>] driver_probe_device+0x118/0x234 [<8032d690>] __driver_attach+0x9c/0xa0 [<8032b89c>] bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0x9c [<8032cf44>] driver_attach+0x20/0x28 [<8032cbc8>] bus_add_driver+0x148/0x1f4 [<8032dce0>] driver_register+0x80/0x100 [<8032ee54>] __platform_driver_register+0x50/0x64 [<8084b094>] sdhci_esdhc_imx_driver_init+0x18/0x20 [<80008980>] do_one_initcall+0x108/0x16c [<8081cca4>] kernel_init_freeable+0x10c/0x1d0 [<80611b28>] kernel_init+0x10/0x120 [<8000e9c8>] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c irq event stamp: 805 hardirqs last enabled at (805): [<8061d43c>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x38/0x4c hardirqs last disabled at (804): [<8061d2c8>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x24/0x54 softirqs last enabled at (570): [<8002b824>] __do_softirq+0x1c4/0x290 softirqs last disabled at (561): [<8002bcf4>] irq_exit+0xb4/0x10c other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock); <Interrupt> lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by kworker/u2:1/33: #0: (kmmcd){.+.+..}, at: [<8003db18>] process_one_work+0x128/0x468 #1: ((&(&host->detect)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<8003db18>] process_one_work+0x128/0x468 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 33 Comm: kworker/u2:1 Not tainted 3.13.0-rc1+ #287 Workqueue: kmmcd mmc_rescan Backtrace: [<80012160>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x10c) from [<80012438>] (show_stack+0x18/0x1c) r6:bfad0900 r5:00000000 r4:8088ecc8 r3:bfad0900 [<80012420>] (show_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<806169ec>] (dump_stack+0x84/0x9c) [<80616968>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x9c) from [<806147b4>] (print_usage_bug+0x260/0x2d0) r5:8076ba88 r4:80977410 [<80614554>] (print_usage_bug+0x0/0x2d0) from [<8005f0d0>] (mark_lock+0x1e0/0x6ac) r9:8005e678 r8:00000000 r7:bfad0900 r6:00001015 r5:bfad0cd0 r4:00000002 [<8005eef0>] (mark_lock+0x0/0x6ac) from [<80060234>] (__lock_acquire+0x604/0x1cbc) [<8005fc30>] (__lock_acquire+0x0/0x1cbc) from [<800620d0>] (lock_acquire+0x70/0x84) [<80062060>] (lock_acquire+0x0/0x84) from [<8061d1c8>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40) r7:00000000 r6:bfb63000 r5:00000000 r4:bfb60568 [<8061d198>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x0/0x40) from [<8045f7f4>] (sdhci_execute_tuning+0x4c/0x710) r4:bfb60000 [<8045f7a8>] (sdhci_execute_tuning+0x0/0x710) from [<80453454>] (mmc_sd_init_card+0x5f8/0x660) [<80452e5c>] (mmc_sd_init_card+0x0/0x660) from [<80453748>] (mmc_attach_sd+0xb4/0x180) r9:bf92d400 r8:8065f364 r7:00061a80 r6:bfb60000 r5:8065f358 r4:bfb60000 [<80453694>] (mmc_attach_sd+0x0/0x180) from [<8044d9f8>] (mmc_rescan+0x284/0x2f0) r5:8065f358 r4:bfb602f8 [<8044d774>] (mmc_rescan+0x0/0x2f0) from [<8003db94>] (process_one_work+0x1a4/0x468) r8:00000000 r7:bfb55eb0 r6:bf80dc00 r5:bfb602f8 r4:bfb35980 r3:8044d774 [<8003d9f0>] (process_one_work+0x0/0x468) from [<8003e850>] (worker_thread+0x118/0x3e0) [<8003e738>] (worker_thread+0x0/0x3e0) from [<80044de0>] (kthread+0xd4/0xf0) [<80044d0c>] (kthread+0x0/0xf0) from [<8000e9c8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) r7:00000000 r6:00000000 r5:80044d0c r4:bfb37b40 Signed-off-by: NDong Aisheng <b29396@freescale.com> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
- 14 1月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Cohen 提交于
This patch defines a quirk for platforms unable to enable HS200 support. Signed-off-by: NDavid Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChuanxiao Dong <chuanxiao.dong@intel.com> Acked-by: NDong Aisheng <b29396@freescale.com> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # [3.13] Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <chris@printf.net>
-
由 Chuansheng Liu 提交于
In function sdhci_request(), it is possible to do the tuning execution like below: sdhci_request() { spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags); host->mrq = mrq; ... spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags); <=== Here it is possible one pending finish_tasklet get running and it will operate the original mrq, and notified the mrq is done, and causes memory corruption. sdhci_execute_tuning(mmc, tuning_opcode); spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags); host->mrq = mrq; ... } In the above race place, the original mrq should not be finished wrongly, so here before unlock the spinlock, we need to set the host->mrq to NULL to avoid this case. Signed-off-by: NLiu, Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
-
- 27 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dong Aisheng 提交于
The auto cmd settings bits should be cleared before sending new commands or we may receive command timeout error for normal commands due to wrongly pre-sent auto cmd. e.g. we receive CMD13 timeout error due to ACMD23 is wrongly enabled by former data commands. mmc2: new high speed DDR MMC card at address 0001 mmcblk1: mmc2:0001 SEM08G 7.39 GiB mmcblk1boot0: mmc2:0001 SEM08G partition 1 2.00 MiB mmcblk1boot1: mmc2:0001 SEM08G partition 2 2.00 MiB mmcblk1rpmb: mmc2:0001 SEM08G partition 3 128 KiB mmcblk1: p1 p2 p3 p4 < p5 p6 p7 > mmc2: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt. mmcblk1boot1: unknown partition table mmc2: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt. mmcblk1boot0: unknown partition table Signed-off-by: NDong Aisheng <b29396@freescale.com> Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
-
- 09 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Neyman 提交于
Ignore Card Interrupt bit in the interrupt status if we already know that mmc_signal_sdio_irq() is going to be called at the end of sdhci_irq(). This avoids a needless loop in sdhci_irq() repeatedly reading interrupt status and doing nothing. Signed-off-by: NAlexey Neyman <stilor@att.net> Acked-by: NDong Aisheng <b29396@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
-
- 31 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
Suspend and resume of cards are being handled from the protocol layer and consequently the mmc_suspend|resume_host APIs are deprecated. This means we can simplify the suspend|resume callbacks by removing the use of the deprecated APIs. Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
-
- 22 10月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dong Aisheng 提交于
Remove unneeded call of call sdhci_enable_preset_value when having SDHCI_QUIRK2_PRESET_VALUE_BROKEN. Signed-off-by: NDong Aisheng <b29396@freescale.com> Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
-
由 Dong Aisheng 提交于
The original code missed to report an error when the maximum tuning loops exhausted or timeout, it will cause the upper layer to wrongly think the tuning process is passed. Signed-off-by: NDong Aisheng <b29396@freescale.com> Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
-