- 14 2月, 2023 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We only have 3 possible mirrors, and we have ASSERT()'s to make sure we're not passing in an invalid super mirror into this function, so technically this value isn't uninitialized. However -Wmaybe-uninitialized will complain, so set it to U64_MAX so if we don't have ASSERT()'s turned on it'll error out later on when it see's the zone is beyond our maximum zones. Reviewed-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 12 1月, 2023 1 次提交
-
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
The commit 79417d04 ("btrfs: zoned: disable metadata overcommit for zoned") disabled the metadata over-commit to track active zones properly. However, it also introduced a heavy overhead by allocating new metadata block groups and/or flushing dirty buffers to release the space reservations. Specifically, a workload (write only without any sync operations) worsen its performance from 343.77 MB/sec (v5.19) to 182.89 MB/sec (v6.0). The performance is still bad on current misc-next which is 187.95 MB/sec. And, with this patch applied, it improves back to 326.70 MB/sec (+73.82%). This patch introduces a new fs_info->flag BTRFS_FS_NO_OVERCOMMIT to indicate it needs to disable the metadata over-commit. The flag is enabled when a device with max active zones limit is loaded into a file-system. Fixes: 79417d04 ("btrfs: zoned: disable metadata overcommit for zoned") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.0+ Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 06 12月, 2022 5 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
In zoned mode the sequential status of zone can be also tracked in the runtime flags of block group. Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We have a 64bit compatible helper to check if a value is a power of two, use it instead of open coding it. Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Update, reformat or reword function comments. This also removes the kdoc marker so we don't get reports when the function name is missing. Changes made: - remove kdoc markers - reformat the brief description to be a proper sentence - reword to imperative voice - align parameter list - fix typos Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This is a large patch, but because they're all macros it's impossible to split up. Simply copy all of the item accessors in ctree.h and paste them in accessors.h, and then update any files to include the header so everything compiles. Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ reformat comments, style fixups ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We have several fs wide related helpers in ctree.h. The bulk of these are the incompat flag test helpers, but there are things such as btrfs_fs_closing() and the read only helpers that also aren't directly related to the ctree code. Move these into a fs.h header, which will serve as the location for file system wide related helpers. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 23 11月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Otherwise the kernel memory allocator seems to be unhappy about failing order 6 allocations for the zones array, that cause 100% reproducible mount failures in my qemu setup: [26.078981] mount: page allocation failure: order:6, mode:0x40dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), nodemask=(null) [26.079741] CPU: 0 PID: 2965 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.1.0-rc5+ #185 [26.080181] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [26.080950] Call Trace: [26.081132] <TASK> [26.081291] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f [26.081554] warn_alloc+0x117/0x140 [26.081808] ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0x1b5/0x300 [26.082174] __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xd0e/0xde0 [26.082569] __alloc_pages+0x32a/0x340 [26.082836] __kmalloc_large_node+0x4d/0xa0 [26.083133] ? trace_kmalloc+0x29/0xd0 [26.083399] kmalloc_large+0x14/0x60 [26.083654] btrfs_get_dev_zone_info+0x1b9/0xc00 [26.083980] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x28/0x50 [26.084328] btrfs_get_dev_zone_info_all_devices+0x54/0x80 [26.084708] open_ctree+0xed4/0x1654 [26.084974] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [26.085288] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140 [26.085603] legacy_get_tree+0x28/0x50 [26.085876] vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 [26.086139] vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x6c/0xb0 [26.086456] btrfs_mount+0x118/0x3a0 [26.086728] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140 [26.087043] legacy_get_tree+0x28/0x50 [26.087323] vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 [26.087587] path_mount+0x2ba/0xbe0 [26.087850] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x38/0x50 [26.088217] __x64_sys_mount+0xfe/0x140 [26.088506] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 [26.088776] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Fixes: 5b316468 ("btrfs: get zone information of zoned block devices") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: NDamien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 21 11月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
generation is an on-disk __le64 value, so use btrfs_super_generation to convert it to host endian before comparing it. Fixes: 12659251 ("btrfs: implement log-structured superblock for ZONED mode") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 07 11月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Thumshirn 提交于
When cloning a btrfs_device, we're not cloning the associated btrfs_zoned_device_info structure of the device in case of a zoned filesystem. Later on this leads to a NULL pointer dereference when accessing the device's zone_info for instance when setting a zone as active. This was uncovered by fstests' testcase btrfs/161. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 26 9月, 2022 3 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
btrfs_check_zoned_mode is really hard to follow, mostly due to the fact that a lot of the checks use duplicate conditions after support for zone emulation for conventional devices on file systems with the ZONED flag was added. Fix this by factoring out the check for host managed devices for !ZONED file systems into a separate helper and then simplifying the rest of the code. Reviewed-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
struct btrfs_caching_ctl::progress and struct btrfs_block_group::last_byte_to_unpin were previously needed to ensure that unpin_extent_range() didn't return a range to the free space cache before the caching thread had a chance to cache that range. However, the commit "btrfs: fix space cache corruption and potential double allocations" made it so that we always synchronously cache the block group at the time that we pin the extent, so this machinery is no longer necessary. Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We use a bit field in the btrfs_block_group for different flags, however this is awkward because we have to hold the block_group->lock for any modification of any of these fields, and makes the code clunky for a few of these flags. Convert these to a properly flags setup so we can utilize the bit helpers. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 13 9月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
Before sending REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH to a zone, we need to ensure that ongoing IOs already finished. Or, we will see a "Zone Is Full" error for the IOs, as the ZONE_FINISH command makes the zone full. We ensure that with btrfs_wait_block_group_reservations() and btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() for a data block group. And, for a metadata block group, the comparison of alloc_offset vs meta_write_pointer mostly ensures IOs for the allocated region already sent. However, there still can be a little time frame where the IOs are sent but not yet completed. Introduce wait_eb_writebacks() to ensure such IOs are completed for a metadata block group. It walks the buffer_radix to find extent buffers in the block group and calls wait_on_extent_buffer_writeback() on them. Fixes: afba2bc0 ("btrfs: zoned: implement active zone tracking") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.19+ Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 05 9月, 2022 3 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Thumshirn 提交于
Since commit 6a921de5 ("btrfs: zoned: introduce space_info->active_total_bytes"), we're only counting the bytes of a block group on an active zone as usable for metadata writes. But on a SMR drive, we don't have active zones and short circuit some of the logic. This leads to an error on mount, because we cannot reserve space for metadata writes. Fix this by also setting the BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_ZONE_IS_ACTIVE bit in the block-group's runtime flag if the zone is a conventional zone. Fixes: 6a921de5 ("btrfs: zoned: introduce space_info->active_total_bytes") Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Shin'ichiro Kawasaki 提交于
The commit 7d7672bc ("btrfs: convert count_max_extents() to use fs_info->max_extent_size") introduced a division by fs_info->max_extent_size. This max_extent_size is initialized with max zone append limit size of the device btrfs runs on. However, in zone emulation mode, the device is not zoned then its zone append limit is zero. This resulted in zero value of fs_info->max_extent_size and caused zero division error. Fix the error by setting non-zero pseudo value to max append zone limit in zone emulation mode. Set the pseudo value based on max_segments as suggested in the commit c2ae7b77 ("btrfs: zoned: revive max_zone_append_bytes"). Fixes: 7d7672bc ("btrfs: convert count_max_extents() to use fs_info->max_extent_size") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NShin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
The commit 2ce543f4 ("btrfs: zoned: wait until zone is finished when allocation didn't progress") implemented a zone finish waiting mechanism to the write path of zoned mode. However, using wait_var_event()/wake_up_all() on fs_info->zone_finish_wait is wrong and wait_var_event() just hangs because no one ever wakes it up once it goes into sleep. Instead, we can simply use wait_on_bit_io() and clear_and_wake_up_bit() on fs_info->flags with a proper barrier installed. Fixes: 2ce543f4 ("btrfs: zoned: wait until zone is finished when allocation didn't progress") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 25 7月, 2022 7 次提交
-
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
When the allocated position doesn't progress, we cannot submit IOs to finish a block group, but there should be ongoing IOs that will finish a block group. So, in that case, we wait for a zone to be finished and retry the allocation after that. Introduce a new flag BTRFS_FS_NEED_ZONE_FINISH for fs_info->flags to indicate we need a zone finish to have proceeded. The flag is set when the allocator detected it cannot activate a new block group. And, it is cleared once a zone is finished. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Fixes: afba2bc0 ("btrfs: zoned: implement active zone tracking") Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
For metadata space on zoned filesystem, reaching ALLOC_CHUNK{,_FORCE} means we don't have enough space left in the active_total_bytes. Before allocating a new chunk, we can try to activate an existing block group in this case. Also, allocating a chunk is not enough to grant a ticket for metadata space on zoned filesystem we need to activate the block group to increase the active_total_bytes. btrfs_zoned_activate_one_bg() implements the activation feature. It will activate a block group by (maybe) finishing a block group. It will give up activating a block group if it cannot finish any block group. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Fixes: afba2bc0 ("btrfs: zoned: implement active zone tracking") Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
The active_total_bytes, like the total_bytes, accounts for the total bytes of active block groups in the space_info. With an introduction of active_total_bytes, we can check if the reserved bytes can be written to the block groups without activating a new block group. The check is necessary for metadata allocation on zoned filesystem. We cannot finish a block group, which may require waiting for the current transaction, from the metadata allocation context. Instead, we need to ensure the ongoing allocation (reserved bytes) fits in active block groups. Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
When we run out of active zones and no sufficient space is left in any block groups, we need to finish one block group to make room to activate a new block group. However, we cannot do this for metadata block groups because we can cause a deadlock by waiting for a running transaction commit. So, do that only for a data block group. Furthermore, the block group to be finished has two requirements. First, the block group must not have reserved bytes left. Having reserved bytes means we have an allocated region but did not yet send bios for it. If that region is allocated by the thread calling btrfs_zone_finish(), it results in a deadlock. Second, the block group to be finished must not be a SYSTEM block group. Finishing a SYSTEM block group easily breaks further chunk allocation by nullifying the SYSTEM free space. In a certain case, we cannot find any zone finish candidate or btrfs_zone_finish() may fail. In that case, we fall back to split the allocation bytes and fill the last spaces left in the block groups. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Fixes: afba2bc0 ("btrfs: zoned: implement active zone tracking") Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
On zoned filesystem, data write out is limited by max_zone_append_size, and a large ordered extent is split according the size of a bio. OTOH, the number of extents to be written is calculated using BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE, and that estimated number is used to reserve the metadata bytes to update and/or create the metadata items. The metadata reservation is done at e.g, btrfs_buffered_write() and then released according to the estimation changes. Thus, if the number of extent increases massively, the reserved metadata can run out. The increase of the number of extents easily occurs on zoned filesystem if BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE > max_zone_append_size. And, it causes the following warning on a small RAM environment with disabling metadata over-commit (in the following patch). [75721.498492] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [75721.505624] BTRFS: block rsv 1 returned -28 [75721.512230] WARNING: CPU: 24 PID: 2327559 at fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c:537 btrfs_use_block_rsv+0x560/0x760 [btrfs] [75721.581854] CPU: 24 PID: 2327559 Comm: kworker/u64:10 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 5.18.0-rc2-BTRFS-ZNS+ #109 [75721.597200] Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/H12SSL-NT, BIOS 2.0 02/22/2021 [75721.607310] Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [75721.616209] RIP: 0010:btrfs_use_block_rsv+0x560/0x760 [btrfs] [75721.646649] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000fbdf3e0 EFLAGS: 00010286 [75721.654126] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000004000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [75721.663524] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: fffff52001f7be6e [75721.672921] RBP: ffffc9000fbdf420 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff889f8d1fc6c7 [75721.682493] R10: ffffed13f1a3f8d8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88980a3c0e28 [75721.692284] R13: ffff889b66590000 R14: ffff88980a3c0e40 R15: ffff88980a3c0e8a [75721.701878] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff889f8d000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [75721.712601] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [75721.720726] CR2: 000055d12e05c018 CR3: 0000800193594000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0 [75721.730499] Call Trace: [75721.735166] <TASK> [75721.739886] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x1e1/0x1100 [btrfs] [75721.747545] ? btrfs_alloc_logged_file_extent+0x550/0x550 [btrfs] [75721.756145] ? btrfs_get_32+0xea/0x2d0 [btrfs] [75721.762852] ? btrfs_get_32+0xea/0x2d0 [btrfs] [75721.769520] ? push_leaf_left+0x420/0x620 [btrfs] [75721.776431] ? memcpy+0x4e/0x60 [75721.781931] split_leaf+0x433/0x12d0 [btrfs] [75721.788392] ? btrfs_get_token_32+0x580/0x580 [btrfs] [75721.795636] ? push_for_double_split.isra.0+0x420/0x420 [btrfs] [75721.803759] ? leaf_space_used+0x15d/0x1a0 [btrfs] [75721.811156] btrfs_search_slot+0x1bc3/0x2790 [btrfs] [75721.818300] ? lock_downgrade+0x7c0/0x7c0 [75721.824411] ? free_extent_buffer.part.0+0x107/0x200 [btrfs] [75721.832456] ? split_leaf+0x12d0/0x12d0 [btrfs] [75721.839149] ? free_extent_buffer.part.0+0x14f/0x200 [btrfs] [75721.846945] ? free_extent_buffer+0x13/0x20 [btrfs] [75721.853960] ? btrfs_release_path+0x4b/0x190 [btrfs] [75721.861429] btrfs_csum_file_blocks+0x85c/0x1500 [btrfs] [75721.869313] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x16/0x80 [75721.876085] ? lock_release+0x552/0xf80 [75721.881957] ? btrfs_del_csums+0x8c0/0x8c0 [btrfs] [75721.888886] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20 [75721.895152] ? do_raw_read_unlock+0x44/0x80 [75721.901323] ? _raw_write_lock_irq+0x60/0x80 [75721.907983] ? btrfs_global_root+0xb9/0xe0 [btrfs] [75721.915166] ? btrfs_csum_root+0x12b/0x180 [btrfs] [75721.921918] ? btrfs_get_global_root+0x820/0x820 [btrfs] [75721.929166] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x23/0x40 [75721.935116] ? unpin_extent_cache+0x1e3/0x390 [btrfs] [75721.942041] btrfs_finish_ordered_io.isra.0+0xa0c/0x1dc0 [btrfs] [75721.949906] ? try_to_wake_up+0x30/0x14a0 [75721.955700] ? btrfs_unlink_subvol+0xda0/0xda0 [btrfs] [75721.962661] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x16/0x80 [75721.969111] ? lock_acquire+0x41b/0x4c0 [75721.974982] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs] [75721.981639] btrfs_work_helper+0x1af/0xa80 [btrfs] [75721.988184] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x28/0x50 [75721.994643] process_one_work+0x815/0x1460 [75722.000444] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x250/0x250 [75722.006643] ? do_raw_spin_trylock+0xbb/0x190 [75722.013086] worker_thread+0x59a/0xeb0 [75722.018511] kthread+0x2ac/0x360 [75722.023428] ? process_one_work+0x1460/0x1460 [75722.029431] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x30/0x30 [75722.036044] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [75722.041255] </TASK> [75722.045047] irq event stamp: 0 [75722.049703] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [75722.057610] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff8118a94a>] copy_process+0x1c1a/0x66b0 [75722.067533] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff8118a989>] copy_process+0x1c59/0x66b0 [75722.077423] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [75722.085335] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- To fix the estimation, we need to introduce fs_info->max_extent_size to replace BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE, which allow setting the different size for regular vs zoned filesystem. Set fs_info->max_extent_size to BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE by default. On zoned filesystem, it is set to fs_info->max_zone_append_size. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Fixes: d8e3fb10 ("btrfs: zoned: use ZONE_APPEND write for zoned mode") Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
This patch is basically a revert of commit 5a80d1c6 ("btrfs: zoned: remove max_zone_append_size logic"), but without unnecessary ASSERT and check. The max_zone_append_size will be used as a hint to estimate the number of extents to cover delalloc/writeback region in the later commits. The size of a ZONE APPEND bio is also limited by queue_max_segments(), so this commit considers it to calculate max_zone_append_size. Technically, a bio can be larger than queue_max_segments() * PAGE_SIZE if the pages are contiguous. But, it is safe to consider "queue_max_segments() * PAGE_SIZE" as an upper limit of an extent size to calculate the number of extents needed to write data. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Pankaj Raghav 提交于
Fix the comment to represent the actual logic used for sb_write_pointer - Empty[0] && In use[1] should be an invalid state instead of returning zone 0 wp - Empty[0] && Full[1] should be returning zone 0 wp instead of zone 1 wp - In use[0] && Empty[1] should be returning zone 0 wp instead of being an invalid state - In use[0] && Full[1] should be returning zone 0 wp instead of returning zone 1 wp - Full[0] && Empty[1] should be returning zone 1 wp instead of returning zone 0 wp - Full[0] && In use[1] should be returning zone 1 wp instead of returning zone 0 wp Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NPankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 09 7月, 2022 2 次提交
-
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
We have an optimization in do_zone_finish() to send REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH only when necessary, i.e. we don't send REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH when we assume we wrote fully into the zone. The assumption is determined by "alloc_offset == capacity". This condition won't work if the last ordered extent is canceled due to some errors. In that case, we consider the zone is deactivated without sending the finish command while it's still active. This inconstancy results in activating another block group while we cannot really activate the underlying zone, which causes the active zone exceeds errors like below. BTRFS error (device nvme3n2): allocation failed flags 1, wanted 520192 tree-log 0, relocation: 0 nvme3n2: I/O Cmd(0x7d) @ LBA 160432128, 127 blocks, I/O Error (sct 0x1 / sc 0xbd) MORE DNR active zones exceeded error, dev nvme3n2, sector 0 op 0xd:(ZONE_APPEND) flags 0x4800 phys_seg 1 prio class 0 nvme3n2: I/O Cmd(0x7d) @ LBA 160432128, 127 blocks, I/O Error (sct 0x1 / sc 0xbd) MORE DNR active zones exceeded error, dev nvme3n2, sector 0 op 0xd:(ZONE_APPEND) flags 0x4800 phys_seg 1 prio class 0 Fix the issue by removing the optimization for now. Fixes: 8376d9e1 ("btrfs: zoned: finish superblock zone once no space left for new SB") Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
The bioc would leak on the normal completion path and also on the RAID56 check (but that one won't happen in practice due to the invalid combination with zoned mode). Fixes: 7db1c5d1 ("btrfs: zoned: support dev-replace in zoned filesystems") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> [ update changelog ] Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 21 6月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
After commit 5f0addf7 ("btrfs: zoned: use dedicated lock for data relocation"), we observe IO errors on e.g, btrfs/232 like below. [09.0][T4038707] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4038707 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2381 btrfs_cross_ref_exist+0xfc/0x120 [btrfs] <snip> [09.9][T4038707] Call Trace: [09.5][T4038707] <TASK> [09.3][T4038707] run_delalloc_nocow+0x7f1/0x11a0 [btrfs] [09.6][T4038707] ? test_range_bit+0x174/0x320 [btrfs] [09.2][T4038707] ? fallback_to_cow+0x980/0x980 [btrfs] [09.3][T4038707] ? find_lock_delalloc_range+0x33e/0x3e0 [btrfs] [09.5][T4038707] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x445/0x1320 [btrfs] [09.2][T4038707] ? test_range_bit+0x320/0x320 [btrfs] [09.4][T4038707] ? lock_downgrade+0x6a0/0x6a0 [09.2][T4038707] ? orc_find.part.0+0x1ed/0x300 [09.5][T4038707] ? __module_address.part.0+0x25/0x300 [09.0][T4038707] writepage_delalloc+0x159/0x310 [btrfs] <snip> [09.4][ C3] sd 10:0:1:0: [sde] tag#2620 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s [09.5][ C3] sd 10:0:1:0: [sde] tag#2620 Sense Key : Illegal Request [current] [09.9][ C3] sd 10:0:1:0: [sde] tag#2620 Add. Sense: Unaligned write command [09.5][ C3] sd 10:0:1:0: [sde] tag#2620 CDB: Write(16) 8a 00 00 00 00 00 02 f3 63 87 00 00 00 2c 00 00 [09.4][ C3] critical target error, dev sde, sector 396041272 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x800 phys_seg 3 prio class 0 [09.9][ C3] BTRFS error (device dm-1): bdev /dev/mapper/dml_102_2 errs: wr 1, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0 The IO errors occur when we allocate a regular extent in previous data relocation block group. On zoned btrfs, we use a dedicated block group to relocate a data extent. Thus, we allocate relocating data extents (pre-alloc) only from the dedicated block group and vice versa. Once the free space in the dedicated block group gets tight, a relocating extent may not fit into the block group. In that case, we need to switch the dedicated block group to the next one. Then, the previous one is now freed up for allocating a regular extent. The BG is already not enough to allocate the relocating extent, but there is still room to allocate a smaller extent. Now the problem happens. By allocating a regular extent while nocow IOs for the relocation is still on-going, we will issue WRITE IOs (for relocation) and ZONE APPEND IOs (for the regular writes) at the same time. That mixed IOs confuses the write pointer and arises the unaligned write errors. This commit introduces a new bit 'zoned_data_reloc_ongoing' to the btrfs_block_group. We set this bit before releasing the dedicated block group, and no extent are allocated from a block group having this bit set. This bit is similar to setting block_group->ro, but is different from it by allowing nocow writes to start. Once all the nocow IO for relocation is done (hooked from btrfs_finish_ordered_io), we reset the bit to release the block group for further allocation. Fixes: c2707a25 ("btrfs: zoned: add a dedicated data relocation block group") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 18 5月, 2022 2 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Thumshirn 提交于
Zoned devices are expected to have zone sizes in the range of 1-2GB for ZNS SSDs and SMR HDDs have zone sizes of 256MB, so there is no need to allow arbitrarily small zone sizes on btrfs. But for testing purposes with emulated devices it is sometimes desirable to create devices with as small as 4MB zone size to uncover errors. So use 4MB as the smallest possible zone size and reject mounts of devices with a smaller zone size. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
The block_group->alloc_offset is an offset from the start of the block group. OTOH, the ->meta_write_pointer is an address in the logical space. So, we should compare the alloc_offset shifted with the block_group->start. Fixes: afba2bc0 ("btrfs: zoned: implement active zone tracking") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 16 5月, 2022 5 次提交
-
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
Commit be1a1d7a ("btrfs: zoned: finish fully written block group") introduced zone finishing code both for data and metadata end_io path. However, the metadata side is not working as it should. First, it compares logical address (eb->start + eb->len) with offset within a block group (cache->zone_capacity) in submit_eb_page(). That essentially disabled zone finishing on metadata end_io path. Furthermore, fixing the issue above revealed we cannot call btrfs_zone_finish_endio() in end_extent_buffer_writeback(). We cannot call btrfs_lookup_block_group() which require spin lock inside end_io context. Introduce btrfs_schedule_zone_finish_bg() to wait for the extent buffer writeback and do the zone finish IO in a workqueue. Also, drop EXTENT_BUFFER_ZONE_FINISH as it is no longer used. Fixes: be1a1d7a ("btrfs: zoned: finish fully written block group") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
Currently, btrfs_zone_finish_endio() finishes a block group only when the written region reaches the end of the block group. We can also finish the block group when no more allocation is possible. Fixes: be1a1d7a ("btrfs: zoned: finish fully written block group") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Reviewed-by: NPankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
btrfs_zone_finish() and btrfs_zone_finish_endio() have similar code. Introduce do_zone_finish() to factor out the common code. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
Introduce a wrapper to check if all the space in a block group is allocated or not. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Johannes Thumshirn 提交于
The current auto-reclaim algorithm starts reclaiming all block groups with a zone_unusable value above a configured threshold. This is causing a lot of reclaim IO even if there would be enough free zones on the device. Instead of only accounting a block groups zone_unusable value, also take the ratio of free and not usable (written as well as zone_unusable) bytes a device has into account. Tested-by: NPankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 06 5月, 2022 2 次提交
-
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
btrfs_zone_activate() checks if it activated all the underlying zones in the loop. However, that check never hit on an unlimited activate zone device (max_active_zones == 0). Fortunately, it still works without ENOSPC because btrfs_zone_activate() returns true in the end, even if block_group->zone_is_active == 0. But, it is confusing to have non zone_is_active block group still usable for allocation. Also, we are wasting CPU time to iterate the loop every time btrfs_zone_activate() is called for the blog groups. Since error case in the loop is handled by out_unlock, we can just set zone_is_active and do the list stuff after the loop. Fixes: f9a912a3 ("btrfs: zoned: make zone activation multi stripe capable") Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
btrfs_zone_activate() checks if block_group->alloc_offset == block_group->zone_capacity every time it iterates the loop. But, it is not depending on the index. Move out the check and do it only once. Fixes: f9a912a3 ("btrfs: zoned: make zone activation multi stripe capable") Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 18 4月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Acked-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NChaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220415045258.199825-9-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
- 24 3月, 2022 2 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Thumshirn 提交于
With commit dcf5652291f6 ("btrfs: zoned: allow DUP on meta-data block groups") we started allowing DUP on metadata block groups, so the ASSERT()s in btrfs_can_activate_zone() and btrfs_zoned_get_device() are no longer valid and in fact even harmful. Fixes: dcf5652291f6 ("btrfs: zoned: allow DUP on meta-data block groups") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.17 Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Johannes Thumshirn 提交于
btrfs_can_activate_zone() can be called with the device_list_mutex already held, which will lead to a deadlock: insert_dev_extents() // Takes device_list_mutex `-> insert_dev_extent() `-> btrfs_insert_empty_item() `-> btrfs_insert_empty_items() `-> btrfs_search_slot() `-> btrfs_cow_block() `-> __btrfs_cow_block() `-> btrfs_alloc_tree_block() `-> btrfs_reserve_extent() `-> find_free_extent() `-> find_free_extent_update_loop() `-> can_allocate_chunk() `-> btrfs_can_activate_zone() // Takes device_list_mutex again Instead of using the RCU on fs_devices->device_list we can use fs_devices->alloc_list, protected by the chunk_mutex to traverse the list of active devices. We are in the chunk allocation thread. The newer chunk allocation happens from the devices in the fs_device->alloc_list protected by the chunk_mutex. btrfs_create_chunk() lockdep_assert_held(&info->chunk_mutex); gather_device_info list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->alloc_list, dev_alloc_list) Also, a device that reappears after the mount won't join the alloc_list yet and, it will be in the dev_list, which we don't want to consider in the context of the chunk alloc. [15.166572] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [15.167117] 5.17.0-rc6-dennis #79 Not tainted [15.167487] -------------------------------------------- [15.167733] kworker/u8:3/146 is trying to acquire lock: [15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.167733] [15.167733] but task is already holding lock: [15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs] [15.167733] [15.167733] other info that might help us debug this: [15.167733] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [15.167733] [15.171834] CPU0 [15.171834] ---- [15.171834] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); [15.171834] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); [15.171834] [15.171834] *** DEADLOCK *** [15.171834] [15.171834] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [15.171834] [15.171834] 5 locks held by kworker/u8:3/146: [15.171834] #0: ffff888100050938 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0 [15.171834] #1: ffffc9000067be80 ((work_completion)(&fs_info->async_data_reclaim_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0 [15.176244] #2: ffff88810521e620 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: flush_space+0x335/0x600 [btrfs] [15.176244] #3: ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs] [15.176244] #4: ffff8881152e4b78 (btrfs-dev-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x130 [btrfs] [15.179641] [15.179641] stack backtrace: [15.179641] CPU: 1 PID: 146 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc6-dennis #79 [15.179641] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1.fc35 04/01/2014 [15.179641] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs] [15.179641] Call Trace: [15.179641] <TASK> [15.179641] dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x59 [15.179641] __lock_acquire.cold+0x217/0x2b2 [15.179641] lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0 [15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.183838] __mutex_lock+0x8e/0x970 [15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.183838] ? lock_is_held_type+0xd7/0x130 [15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.183838] find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.183838] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x24/0x40 [15.183838] ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x106/0x230 [btrfs] [15.187601] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x131/0x260 [btrfs] [15.187601] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb5/0x3b0 [btrfs] [15.187601] __btrfs_cow_block+0x138/0x600 [btrfs] [15.187601] btrfs_cow_block+0x10f/0x230 [btrfs] [15.187601] btrfs_search_slot+0x55f/0xbc0 [btrfs] [15.187601] ? lock_is_held_type+0xd7/0x130 [15.187601] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x2d/0x60 [btrfs] [15.187601] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x2b3/0x560 [btrfs] [15.187601] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x36/0x2a0 [btrfs] [15.192037] flush_space+0x374/0x600 [btrfs] [15.192037] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 [15.192037] ? btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x49/0x180 [btrfs] [15.192037] ? lock_release+0x131/0x2b0 [15.192037] btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x70/0x180 [btrfs] [15.192037] process_one_work+0x24c/0x5a0 [15.192037] worker_thread+0x4a/0x3d0 Fixes: a85f05e5 ("btrfs: zoned: avoid chunk allocation if active block group has enough space") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 14 3月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pankaj Raghav 提交于
Remove the redundant assignment to zone_info variable in btrfs_check_zoned_mode function. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NPankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-