- 05 3月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ruijing Dong 提交于
vcn fwlog is for debugging purpose only, by default, it is disabled. Signed-off-by: NRuijing Dong <ruijing.dong@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NLeo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 03 3月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrey Grodzovsky 提交于
This will allow to enable the tests only after latest fix after which the tests passed on my system. I tested on NV21 standalone and Vega 10 and Polaris as pair with DRI_PRIME. It's possible there might be still issues on ASICs i don't have at my posession but that that the point of enbling the tests finally - if other people during testing will encounter errors they will report and I will be able to fix. The releated merge request for enabling libdrm tests suite is in https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/-/merge_requests/227Signed-off-by: NAndrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 25 2月, 2022 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andrey Grodzovsky 提交于
According to my investigation of the state of PCI reset recently it's not working. The reason is due to the fact the kernel PCI code rejects SBR when there are more then one PF under same bridge which we always have (at least AUDIO PF but usually more) and that because SBR will reset all the PFS and devices under the same bridge as you and you cannot assume they support SBR. Once we anble FLR support we can reenable this option as FLR is doable on single PF and doens't have this restriction. Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Alex Sierra 提交于
This parameter controls xGMI p2p communication, which is enabled by default. However, it can be disabled by setting it to 0. In case xGMI p2p is disabled in a dGPU, PCIe p2p interface will be used instead. This parameter is ignored in GPUs that do not support xGMI p2p configuration. Signed-off-by: NAlex Sierra <alex.sierra@amd.com> Acked-by: NLuben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com> Acked-by: NHarish Kasiviswanathan <Harish.Kasiviswanathan@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NFelix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 24 2月, 2022 3 次提交
-
-
由 Mario Limonciello 提交于
commit 0064b0ce ("drm/amd/pm: enable ASPM by default") enabled ASPM by default but a variety of hardware configurations it turns out that this caused a regression. * PPC64LE hardware does not support ASPM at a hardware level. CONFIG_PCIEASPM is often disabled on these architectures. * Some dGPUs on ALD platforms don't work with ASPM enabled and PCIe subsystem disables it Check with the PCIe subsystem to see that ASPM has been enabled or not. Fixes: 0064b0ce ("drm/amd/pm: enable ASPM by default") Link: https://wiki.raptorcs.com/w/images/a/ad/P9_PHB_version1.0_27July2018_pub.pdf Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1723 Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1739 Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1885 Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1907 Tested-by: koba.ko@canonical.com Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NMario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
由 Alex Deucher 提交于
This test is not particularly useful now that GTT and GART are decoupled in the driver. Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Alex Deucher 提交于
Now that we expose the benchmarks via debugfs, there is no longer a need for the module parameter. Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 23 2月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Menzel 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 18 2月, 2022 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mario Limonciello 提交于
Evaluating `pcie_aspm_enabled` as part of driver probe has the implication that if one PCIe bridge with an AMD GPU connected doesn't support ASPM then none of them do. This is an invalid assumption as the PCIe core will configure ASPM for individual PCIe bridges. Create a new helper function that can be called by individual dGPUs to react to the `amdgpu_aspm` module parameter without having negative results for other dGPUs on the PCIe bus. Suggested-by: NLijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NLijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NMario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Mario Limonciello 提交于
commit 0064b0ce ("drm/amd/pm: enable ASPM by default") enabled ASPM by default but a variety of hardware configurations it turns out that this caused a regression. * PPC64LE hardware does not support ASPM at a hardware level. CONFIG_PCIEASPM is often disabled on these architectures. * Some dGPUs on ALD platforms don't work with ASPM enabled and PCIe subsystem disables it Check with the PCIe subsystem to see that ASPM has been enabled or not. Fixes: 0064b0ce ("drm/amd/pm: enable ASPM by default") Link: https://wiki.raptorcs.com/w/images/a/ad/P9_PHB_version1.0_27July2018_pub.pdf Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1723 Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1739 Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1885 Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1907 Tested-by: koba.ko@canonical.com Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NMario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 17 2月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Deucher 提交于
Since this is an existing asic, adjust the code to follow the same logic as previously so the driver state is consistent. No functional change intended. Acked-by: NHuang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 08 2月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Deucher 提交于
These have been at production level for a while. Drop the flag. Reviewed-by: NFelix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 03 2月, 2022 4 次提交
-
-
由 Mario Limonciello 提交于
dGPUs connected to Intel systems configured for suspend to idle will not have the power rails cut at suspend and resetting the GPU may lead to problematic behaviors. Fixes: e25443d2 ("drm/amdgpu: add a dev_pm_ops prepare callback (v2)") Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1879Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NMario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Mario Limonciello 提交于
This will cause misconfigured systems to not run the GPU suspend routines. * In APUs that are properly configured system will go into s2idle. * In APUs that are intended to be S3 but user selects s2idle the GPU will stay fully powered for the suspend. * In APUs that are intended to be s2idle and system misconfigured the GPU will stay fully powered for the suspend. * In systems that are intended to be s2idle, but AMD dGPU is also present, the dGPU will go through S3 Signed-off-by: NMario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Mario Limonciello 提交于
dGPUs connected to Intel systems configured for suspend to idle will not have the power rails cut at suspend and resetting the GPU may lead to problematic behaviors. Fixes: e25443d2 ("drm/amdgpu: add a dev_pm_ops prepare callback (v2)") Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1879Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NMario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Mario Limonciello 提交于
This will cause misconfigured systems to not run the GPU suspend routines. * In APUs that are properly configured system will go into s2idle. * In APUs that are intended to be S3 but user selects s2idle the GPU will stay fully powered for the suspend. * In APUs that are intended to be s2idle and system misconfigured the GPU will stay fully powered for the suspend. * In systems that are intended to be s2idle, but AMD dGPU is also present, the dGPU will go through S3 Signed-off-by: NMario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 28 1月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Deucher 提交于
So mesa and tools know when this is available. Mesa MR: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/-/merge_requests/207Reviewed-by: NEvan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 26 1月, 2022 4 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Deucher 提交于
Extend secondary function handling for runtime pm beyond audio to USB and UCSI. Reviewed-by: NEvan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Alex Deucher 提交于
Seems more logical to enable runtime pm at the end of the init sequence so we don't end up entering runtime suspend before init is finished. Reviewed-by: NEvan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Alex Deucher 提交于
Older radeon boards (r2xx-r5xx) had secondary PCI functions which we solely there for supporting multi-head on OSs with special requirements. Add them to the unsupported list as well so we don't attempt to bind to them. The driver would fail to bind to them anyway, but this does so in a cleaner way that should not confuse the user. Acked-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Alex Deucher 提交于
Older radeon boards (r2xx-r5xx) had secondary PCI functions which we solely there for supporting multi-head on OSs with special requirements. Add them to the unsupported list as well so we don't attempt to bind to them. The driver would fail to bind to them anyway, but this does so in a cleaner way that should not confuse the user. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 15 1月, 2022 5 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Deucher 提交于
Support for IP based discovery is in place now so this check is no longer required. Reviewed-by: NHawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Lukas Fink 提交于
eb4fd29a ("drm/amdgpu: bind to any 0x1002 PCI diplay class device") added generic bindings to amdgpu so that that it binds to all display class devices with VID 0x1002 and then rejects those in amdgpu_pci_probe. Unfortunately it reuses a driver_data value of 0 to detect those new bindings, which is already used to denote CHIP_TAHITI ASICs. The driver_data value given to those new bindings was changed in dd0761fd24ea1 ("drm/amdgpu: set CHIP_IP_DISCOVERY as the asic type by default") to CHIP_IP_DISCOVERY (=36), but it seems that the check in amdgpu_pci_probe was forgotten to be changed. Therefore, it still rejects Tahiti GPUs. Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1860 Fixes: eb4fd29a ("drm/amdgpu: bind to any 0x1002 PCI diplay class device") Signed-off-by: NLukas Fink <lukas.fink1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Alex Deucher 提交于
Support for IP based discovery is in place now so this check is no longer required. Reviewed-by: NHawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Lukas Fink 提交于
eb4fd29a ("drm/amdgpu: bind to any 0x1002 PCI diplay class device") added generic bindings to amdgpu so that that it binds to all display class devices with VID 0x1002 and then rejects those in amdgpu_pci_probe. Unfortunately it reuses a driver_data value of 0 to detect those new bindings, which is already used to denote CHIP_TAHITI ASICs. The driver_data value given to those new bindings was changed in dd0761fd24ea1 ("drm/amdgpu: set CHIP_IP_DISCOVERY as the asic type by default") to CHIP_IP_DISCOVERY (=36), but it seems that the check in amdgpu_pci_probe was forgotten to be changed. Therefore, it still rejects Tahiti GPUs. Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1860 Fixes: eb4fd29a ("drm/amdgpu: bind to any 0x1002 PCI diplay class device") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NLukas Fink <lukas.fink1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Solomon Chiu 提交于
[Why&How] Freesync Video Mode is a experimental feature previously, and need to be enabled by kernel parameter. We enable it by default with removing module paramterter in amdgpu_dm. v2: squash the patches together Signed-off-by: NSolomon Chiu <solomon.chiu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAurabindo Jayamohanan Pillai <Aurabindo.Pillai@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 08 1月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mario Limonciello 提交于
This makes it clearer which codepaths are in use specifically in one state or the other. Signed-off-by: NMario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Acked-by: NEvan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 31 12月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Deucher 提交于
If we are the primary adapter (i.e., the one used by the firwmare framebuffer), disable runtime pm. This fixes a regression caused by commit 55285e21 which results in the displays waking up shortly after they go to sleep due to the device coming out of runtime suspend and sending a hotplug uevent. v2: squash in reworked fix from Evan Fixes: 55285e21 ("fbdev/efifb: Release PCI device's runtime PM ref during FB destroy") Bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215203 Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1840Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 30 12月, 2021 3 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Deucher 提交于
If the platform suspend happens to fail and the power rail is not turned off, the GPU will be in an unknown state on resume, so reset the asic so that it will be in a known good state on resume even if the platform suspend failed. v2: handle s0ix Acked-by: NLuben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com> Acked-by: NEvan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Evan Quan 提交于
By setting mp1_state as PP_MP1_STATE_UNLOAD, MP1 will do some proper cleanups and put itself into a state ready for PNP. That can workaround some random resuming failure observed on BOCO capable platforms. Signed-off-by: NEvan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NGuchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NLijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Alex Deucher 提交于
It's not only supported by HG/PX laptops. It's supported by all dGPUs which supports BOCO/BACO functionality (runtime D3). BOCO - Bus Off, Chip Off. The entire chip is powered off. This is controlled by ACPI. BACO - Bus Active, Chip Off. The chip still shows up on the PCI bus, but the device itself is powered down. v2: fix missed HG/PX reference Reviewed-by: NEvan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 28 12月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Evan Quan 提交于
By setting mp1_state as PP_MP1_STATE_UNLOAD, MP1 will do some proper cleanups and put itself into a state ready for PNP. That can workaround some random resuming failure observed on BOCO capable platforms. Signed-off-by: NEvan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NGuchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NLijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Alex Deucher 提交于
If the platform suspend happens to fail and the power rail is not turned off, the GPU will be in an unknown state on resume, so reset the asic so that it will be in a known good state on resume even if the platform suspend failed. v2: handle s0ix Acked-by: NLuben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com> Acked-by: NEvan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 23 12月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Deucher 提交于
It's not only supported by HG/PX laptops. It's supported by all dGPUs which supports BOCO/BACO functionality (runtime D3). BOCO - Bus Off, Chip Off. The entire chip is powered off. This is controlled by ACPI. BACO - Bus Active, Chip Off. The chip still shows up on the PCI bus, but the device itself is powered down. v2: fix missed HG/PX reference Reviewed-by: NEvan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 02 12月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yann Dirson 提交于
amdgpu_ucode_get_load_type() does not interpret this parameter as documented. It is ignored for many ASIC types (which presumably only support one load_type), and when not ignored it is only used to force direct loading instead of PSP loading. SMU loading is only available for ASICs for which the parameter is ignored. Signed-off-by: NYann Dirson <ydirson@free.fr> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 27 11月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Javier Martinez Canillas 提交于
The "nomodeset" kernel cmdline parameter is handled by the vgacon driver but the exported vgacon_text_force() symbol is only used by DRM drivers. It makes much more sense for the parameter logic to be in the subsystem of the drivers that are making use of it. Let's move the vgacon_text_force() function and related logic to the DRM subsystem. While doing that, rename it to drm_firmware_drivers_only() and make it return true if "nomodeset" was used and false otherwise. This is a better description of the condition that the drivers are testing for. Suggested-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NJavier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com> Acked-by: NThomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Acked-by: NPekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211112133230.1595307-4-javierm@redhat.com
-
由 Javier Martinez Canillas 提交于
The nomodeset kernel parameter handler already prints a message that the DRM drivers will be disabled, so there's no need for drivers to do that. Suggested-by: NThomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NJavier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com> Acked-by: NThomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Acked-by: NPekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211112133230.1595307-2-javierm@redhat.com
-
- 18 11月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Evan Quan 提交于
With the shadow buffer support from generic framebuffer emulation, it's possible now to have runpm kicked when no update for console. Signed-off-by: NEvan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 29 10月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kent Russell 提交于
When a GPU hits the bad_page_threshold, it will not be initialized by the amdgpu driver. This means that the table cannot be cleared, nor can information gathering be performed (getting serial number, BDF, etc). If the bad_page_threshold kernel parameter is set to -2, continue to initialize the GPU, while printing a warning to dmesg that this action has been done v2: squash in Luben's fix to restore RAS info reporting Cc: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com> Cc: Mukul Joshi <Mukul.Joshi@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NKent Russell <kent.russell@amd.com> Acked-by: NFelix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NLuben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 07 10月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marek Olšák 提交于
ind_block_64b_no_128bcl means INDEP_64B && INDEP_128B && MAX_COMPRESSED_BLOCK_SIZE == 64B. Only used by gfx10.3. ind_block_64b means INDEP_64B && !INDEP_128B && MAX_COMPRESSED_BLOCK_SIZE == 64B. Only used by gfx9 and gfx10. Signed-off-by: NMarek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com> Acked-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-