- 22 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
in: fe86cdce block: do not artificially constrain max_sectors for stacking drivers max_sectors defaults to UINT_MAX. md faulty wasn't using disk_stack_limits(), so inherited this large value as well. This triggered a bug in XFS when stressed over md_faulty, when a very large bio_alloc() failed. That was on an older kernel, and I can't reproduce exactly the same thing upstream, but I think the fix is appropriate in any case. Thanks to Mike Snitzer for pointing out the problem. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
- 13 10月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Mikulas Patocka 提交于
Use the recently-added bio front_pad field to allocate struct dm_target_io. Prior to this patch, dm_target_io was allocated from a mempool. For each dm_target_io, there is exactly one bio allocated from a bioset. This patch merges these two allocations into one allocation: we create a bioset with front_pad equal to the size of dm_target_io so that every bio allocated from the bioset has sizeof(struct dm_target_io) bytes before it. We allocate a bio and use the bytes before the bio as dm_target_io. _tio_cache is removed and the tio_pool mempool is now only used for request-based devices. This idea was introduced by Kent Overstreet. Signed-off-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Cc: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@viridian.itc.virginia.edu> Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
-
由 Mike Snitzer 提交于
The bio prison code will be useful to other future DM targets so move it to a separate module. Signed-off-by: NMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJoe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
-
由 Mike Snitzer 提交于
The bio prison code will be useful to share with future DM targets. Prepare to move this code into a separate module, adding a dm prefix to structures and functions that will be exported. Signed-off-by: NMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJoe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
-
由 Mike Snitzer 提交于
Support discards when the pool's block size is not a power of 2. The block layer assumes discard_granularity is a power of 2 (in blkdev_issue_discard), so we set this to the largest power of 2 that is a divides into the number of sectors in each block, but never less than DATA_DEV_BLOCK_SIZE_MIN_SECTORS. This patch eliminates the "Discard support must be disabled when the block size is not a power of 2" constraint that was imposed in commit 55f2b8bd ("dm thin: support for non power of 2 pool blocksize"). That commit was incomplete: using a block size that is not a power of 2 shouldn't mean disabling discard support on the device completely. Signed-off-by: NMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJoe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
-
- 12 10月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
Convert cpu_to_le32(le32_to_cpu(E1) + E2) to use le32_add_cpu(). dpatch engine is used to auto generate this patch. (https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch) Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn> Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
-
由 Mikulas Patocka 提交于
Use the ACCESS_ONCE macro in dm-bufio and dm-verity where a variable can be modified asynchronously (through sysfs) and we want to prevent compiler optimizations that assume that the variable hasn't changed. (See Documentation/atomic_ops.txt.) Signed-off-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
Use list_move() instead of list_del() + list_add(). spatch with a semantic match was used to find this. (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn> Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
The mpio dereference should be moved below the BUG_ON NULL test in multipath_end_io(). spatch with a semantic match was used to found this. (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn> Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
-
- 11 10月, 2012 28 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
If 'resync_max' is set to 0 (as is often done when starting a reshape, so the mdadm can remain in control during a sensitive period), and if the reshape request is initially delayed because another array using the same array is resyncing or reshaping etc, when user-space cannot easily tell when the delay changes from being due to a conflicting reshape, to being due to resync_max = 0. So introduce a new state: (curr_resync == 3) to reflect this, make sure it is visible both via /proc/mdstat and via the "sync_completed" sysfs attribute, and ensure that the event transition from one delay state to the other is properly notified. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
When a RAID5 is reshaping, conf->raid_disks is increased before mddev->delta_disks becomes zero. This can result in check_reshape calling resize_stripes with a number that is too large. This particularly happens when md_check_recovery calls ->check_reshape(). If we use ->previous_raid_disks, we don't risk this. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
If you make an array bigger but suppress resync of the new region with mdadm --grow /dev/mdX --size=max --assume-clean then stop the array before anything is written to it, the effect of the "--assume-clean" is lost and the array will resync the new space when restarted. So ensure that we update the metadata in the case. Reported-by: NSebastian Riemer <sebastian.riemer@profitbricks.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
Clang complains that we are assigning a variable to itself. This should be using bad_sectors like the similar earlier check does. Bug has been present since 3.1-rc1. It is minor but could conceivably cause corruption or other bad behaviour. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
In some cases array are started in 'read-auto' state where in nothing gets written to any device until the array is written to. The purpose of this is to make accidental auto-assembly of the wrong arrays less of a risk, and to allow arrays to be started to read suspend-to-disk images without actually changing anything (as might happen if the array were dirty and a resync seemed necessary). Explicitly writing the 'sync_action' for a read-auto array currently doesn't clear the read-auto state, so the sync action doesn't happen, which can be confusing. So allow any successful write to sync_action to clear any read-auto state. Reported-by: NAlexander Kühn <alexander.kuehn@nagilum.de> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Jianpeng Ma 提交于
Now that multiple threads can handle stripes, it is safer to use an atomic64_t for resync_mismatches, to avoid update races. Signed-off-by: NJianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
to_read and to_write are part of the result of analysing a stripe before handling it. Their use is to avoid some loops and tests if the values are known to be zero. Thus it is not a problem if they are a little bit larger than they should be. So decrementing them in handle_failed_stripe serves little value, and due to races it could cause some loops to be skipped incorrectly. So remove those decrements. Reported-by: N"Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Alexander Lyakas 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAlex Lyakas <alex@zadarastorage.com> Suggested-by: NYair Hershko <yair@zadarastorage.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
The pr_debug in add_stripe_bio could race with something changing *bip, so it is best to hold the lock until after the pr_debug. Reported-by: N"Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
We really should hold the stripe_lock while accessing 'toread' else we could race with add_stripe_bio and corrupt a list. Reported-by: N"Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Shaohua Li 提交于
We want to avoid zero discarded dev page, because it's useless for discard. But if we don't zero it, another read/write hit such page in the cache and will get inconsistent data. To avoid zero the page, we don't set R5_UPTODATE flag after construction is done. In this way, discard write request is still issued and finished, but read will not hit the page. If the stripe gets accessed soon, we need reread the stripe, but since the chance is low, the reread isn't a big deal. Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Shaohua Li 提交于
Discard for raid4/5/6 has limitation. If discard request size is small, we do discard for one disk, but we need calculate parity and write parity disk. To correctly calculate parity, zero_after_discard must be guaranteed. Even it's true, we need do discard for one disk but write another disks, which makes the parity disks wear out fast. This doesn't make sense. So an efficient discard for raid4/5/6 should discard all data disks and parity disks, which requires the write pattern to be (A, A+chunk_size, A+chunk_size*2...). If A's size is smaller than chunk_size, such pattern is almost impossible in practice. So in this patch, I only handle the case that A's size equals to chunk_size. That is discard request should be aligned to stripe size and its size is multiple of stripe size. Since we can only handle request with specific alignment and size (or part of the request fitting stripes), we can't guarantee zero_after_discard even zero_after_discard is true in low level drives. The block layer doesn't send down correctly aligned requests even correct discard alignment is set, so I must filter out. For raid4/5/6 parity calculation, if data is 0, parity is 0. So if zero_after_discard is true for all disks, data is consistent after discard. Otherwise, data might be lost. Let's consider a scenario: discard a stripe, write data to one disk and write parity disk. The stripe could be still inconsistent till then depending on using data from other data disks or parity disks to calculate new parity. If the disk is broken, we can't restore it. So in this patch, we only enable discard support if all disks have zero_after_discard. If discard fails in one disk, we face the similar inconsistent issue above. The patch will make discard follow the same path as normal write request. If discard fails, a resync will be scheduled to make the data consistent. This isn't good to have extra writes, but data consistency is important. If a subsequent read/write request hits raid5 cache of a discarded stripe, the discarded dev page should have zero filled, so the data is consistent. This patch will always zero dev page for discarded request stripe. This isn't optimal because discard request doesn't need such payload. Next patch will avoid it. Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Jianpeng Ma 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
When we get a read error, we arrange for raid1d to handle it. Currently we release the reference on the device. This can result in conf->mirrors[read_disk].rdev being NULL in fix_read_error, if the device happens to get removed before the read error is handled. So instead keep the reference until the read error has been fully handled. Reported-by: Nhank <pyu@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Michael Wang 提交于
This patch replaces list_for_each_continue_rcu() with list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() to save a few lines of code and allow removing list_for_each_continue_rcu(). Reviewed-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMichael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Jonathan Brassow 提交于
There are two table arguments that can be given to a DM RAID target that control whether the array is forced to (re)synchronize or skip initialization: "sync" and "nosync". When "sync" is given, we set mddev->recovery_cp to 0 in order to cause the device to resynchronize. This is insufficient if there is a bitmap in use, because the array will simply look at the bitmap and see that there is no recovery necessary. The fix is to skip over the loading of the superblocks when "sync" is given, causing new superblocks to be written that will force the array to go through initialization (i.e. synchronization). Signed-off-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Jonathan Brassow 提交于
DM RAID: Fix comparison of index and quantity for "rebuild" parameter The "rebuild" parameter takes an index argument that starts counting from zero. The conditional used to validate the index was using '>' rather than '>=', leaving the door open for an index value that would be 1 too large. Reported-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Jonathan Brassow 提交于
DM RAID: Add code to validate replacement slots for RAID10 arrays RAID10 can handle 'copies - 1' failures for each mirror group. This code ensures the user has provided a valid array - one whose devices specified for rebuild do not exceed the amount of redundancy available. Signed-off-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Jonathan Brassow 提交于
DM RAID: Move chunk of code to it's own function The code that checks whether device replacements/rebuilds are possible given a specific RAID type is moved to it's own function. It will further expand when the code to check RAID10 is added. A separate function makes it easier to read. Signed-off-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Jonathan Brassow 提交于
MD RAID10: Fix a couple potential kernel panics if RAID10 is used by dm-raid When device-mapper uses the RAID10 personality through dm-raid.c, there is no 'gendisk' structure in mddev and some sysfs information is also not populated. This patch avoids touching those non-existent structures. Signed-off-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@rehdat.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Some ioctls don't need to take the mutex and doing so can cause a delay as it is held during super-block update. So move those ioctls out of the mutex and rely on rcu locking to ensure we don't access stale data. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Shaohua Li 提交于
Change the thread parameter, so the thread can carry extra info. Next patch will use it. Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
queuing writes to the md thread means that all requests go through the one processor which may not be able to keep up with very high request rates. So use the plugging infrastructure to submit all requests on unplug. If a 'schedule' is needed, we fall back on the old approach of handing the requests to the thread for it to handle. This is nearly identical to a recent patch which provided similar functionality to RAID1. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Shaohua Li 提交于
This makes md raid 10 support TRIM. If one disk supports discard and another not, or one has discard_zero_data and another not, there could be inconsistent between data from such disks. But this should not matter, discarded data is useless. This will add extra copy in rebuild though. Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Shaohua Li 提交于
This makes md raid 1 support TRIM. If one disk supports discard and another not, or one has discard_zero_data and another not, there could be inconsistent between data from such disks. But this should not matter, discarded data is useless. This will add extra copy in rebuild though. Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Shaohua Li 提交于
This makes md raid 0 support TRIM. Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Shaohua Li 提交于
This makes md linear support TRIM. Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Denis Efremov 提交于
According to the comment in linear_stop function rcu_dereference in linear_start and linear_stop functions occurs under reconfig_mutex. The patch represents this agreement in code and prevents lockdep complaint. Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org) Signed-off-by: NDenis Efremov <yefremov.denis@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
- 27 9月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
The 'enough' function is written to work with 'near' arrays only in that is implicitly assumes that the offset from one 'group' of devices to the next is the same as the number of copies. In reality it is the number of 'near' copies. So change it to make this number explicit. This bug makes it possible to run arrays without enough drives present, which is dangerous. It is appropriate for an -stable kernel, but will almost certainly need to be modified for some of them. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: NJakub Husák <jakub@gooseman.cz> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Mikulas Patocka 提交于
This patch fixes sector_t overflow checking in dm-verity. Without this patch, the code checks for overflow only if sector_t is smaller than long long, not if sector_t and long long have the same size. Signed-off-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
-
由 Mike Snitzer 提交于
The discard limits that get established for a thin-pool or thin device may be incompatible with the pool's data device. Avoid this by checking the discard limits of the pool's data device. If an incompatibility is found then the pool's 'discard passdown' feature is disabled. Change thin_io_hints to ensure that a thin device always uses the same queue limits as its pool device. Introduce requested_pf to track whether or not the table line originally contained the no_discard_passdown flag and use this directly for table output. We prepare the correct setting for discard_passdown directly in bind_control_target (called from pool_io_hints) and store it in adjusted_pf rather than waiting until we have access to pool->pf in pool_preresume. Signed-off-by: NMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJoe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
-