- 24 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Coddington 提交于
It's possible and acceptable for NFS to attempt to add requests beyond the range of the current pgio->pg_lseg, a case which should be caught and limited by the pg_test operation. However, the current handling of this case replaces pgio->pg_lseg with a new layout segment (after a WARN) within that pg_test operation. That will cause all the previously added requests to be submitted with this new layout segment, which may not be valid for those requests. Fix this problem by only returning zero for the number of bytes to coalesce from pg_test for this case which allows any previously added requests to complete on the current layout segment. The check for requests starting out of range of the layout segment moves to pg_init, so that the replacement of pgio->pg_lseg will be done when the next request is added. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 03 5月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Consider the following deadlock: Process P1 Process P2 Process P3 ========== ========== ========== lock_page(page) lseg = pnfs_update_layout(inode) lo = NFS_I(inode)->layout pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return(lo) lock_page(page) lseg = pnfs_update_layout(inode) In this scenario, - P1 has declared the layout to be in error, but P2 holds a reference to a layout segment on that inode, so the layoutreturn is deferred. - P2 is waiting for a page lock held by P3. - P3 is asking for a new layout segment, but is blocked waiting for the layoutreturn. The fix is to ensure that pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return() does not set the NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN flag, which blocks P3. Instead, we allow the latter to call LAYOUTGET so that it can make progress and unblock P2. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In pnfs_clear_layoutreturn_info, ensure that we don't clear the layout return info if there are new segments queued for return due to, for instance, a race between a LAYOUTRETURN and a failed I/O attempt. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 29 4月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the layout is being invalidated on the server, then we must invoke nfs_commit_inode() to ensure any commits to the DS get cleared out. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the attempt to write through pNFS fails, we need to use the same failure semantics as for the read path: If the FF_FLAGS_NO_IO_THRU_MDS flag is set or we have sufficient valid DSes, then we must retry through pNFS Fixes: d67ae825 ("pnfs/flexfiles: Add the FlexFile Layout Driver") Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return needs to check that the layout is valid before calling pnfs_set_plh_return_info(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 26 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The assumption should be that if the caller returns PNFS_ATTEMPTED, then hdr has been consumed, and so we should not be testing hdr->task.tk_status. If the caller returns PNFS_TRY_AGAIN, then we need to recoalesce and free hdr. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 25 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we have a layout segment cached in pgio->pg_lseg, we should check it for validity before reusing it in a new RPC request. Otherwise, if we recoalesce, we can end up looping forever. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 21 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
They are not used outside the NFSv4 module. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 27 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
IF NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_REQUESTED is not set, then we currently exit without freeing the list of invalidated layout segments, leading to a reference leak. Reported-by: NOlga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu> Fixes: 24408f52 ("pNFS: Fix bugs in _pnfs_return_layout") Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 20 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the client holds no more writeable open state, and does not hold a write delegation, then send a layoutreturn as part of the OPEN_DOWNGRADE. We do this only for writes, since some layout drivers may require you to also hold a read layout if you are doing a R/W workload. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 06 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure we release the NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN lock when we invalidate the layout stateid, so that processes and RPC tasks that are waiting on the layout return can continue. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 04 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Add a callback to allow the flexfiles layout driver to initialise the layout private payload. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 03 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Cleanup to allow layout drivers to attach private data to layoutreturn, and manage the data. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 02 12月, 2016 20 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the layout stateid is already invalid, we have no work to do. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Address another memory leak. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure that the layout state bits are synced when we cache a layout segment for layoutreturn using an appropriate call to pnfs_set_plh_return_info. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We need to honour the NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_REQUESTED bit regardless of whether or not there are layout segments pending. Furthermore, we should ensure that we leave the plh_return_segs list empty. This patch fixes a memory leak of the layout segments on plh_return_segs. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When the layout state is invalidated, then so is the layout segment state, and hence we do need to clean up the state bits. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Amend the pnfs return on close helper functions to enable sending the layoutreturn op in CLOSE/DELEGRETURN. This closes a potential race between CLOSE/DELEGRETURN and parallel OPEN calls to the same file, and allows the client and the server to agree on whether or not there is an outstanding layout. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The layoutreturn call will take care of invalidating the layout segments once the call is successful. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
There is no change to the value of NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN, so we should not be waking up the RPC call. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Fix a potential race with CB_LAYOUTRECALL in which the server recalls the remaining layout segments while our LAYOUTRETURN is still in transit. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We may want to process and transmit layout stat information for the layout segments that are being returned, so we should defer freeing them until after the layoutreturn has completed. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Both pnfs.c and the flexfiles code have their own versions of the range intersection testing, and the "end_offset" helper. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We must put the task to sleep while holding the inode->i_lock in order to ensure atomicity with the test for NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN. Fixes: 500d701f ("NFS41: make close wait for layoutreturn") Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If there is an I/O error, we should not call LAYOUTGET until the LAYOUTRETURN that reports the error is complete. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.8+
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the server sends us a completely new stateid, and the client thinks it already holds a layout, then force a retry of the LAYOUTGET after invalidating the existing layout in order to avoid corruption due to races. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We must ensure that we don't schedule a layoutreturn if the layout stateid has been marked as invalid. Fixes: 2a59a041 ("pNFS: Fix pnfs_set_layout_stateid() to clear...") Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.8+
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we no longer hold any layout segments, we're normally expected to consider the layout stateid to be invalid. However we cannot assume this if we're about to, or in the process of sending a layoutreturn. Fixes: 334a8f37 ("pNFS: Don't forget the layout stateid if...") Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.8+
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We must not call nfs_pageio_init_read() on a new nfs_pageio_descriptor while holding a reference to a layout segment, as that can deadlock pnfs_update_layout(). Fixes: d67ae825 ("pnfs/flexfiles: Add the FlexFile Layout Driver") Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.0+
-
- 08 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
We used to check for a valid layout type id before verifying pNFS flags as an indicator for if we are using pNFS. This changed in 3132e49e with the introduction of multiple layout types, since now we are passing an array of ids instead of just one. Since then, users have been seeing a KERN_ERR printk show up whenever mounting NFS v4 without pNFS. This patch restores the original behavior of exiting set_pnfs_layoutdriver() early if we aren't using pNFS. Fixes 3132e49e ("pnfs: track multiple layout types in fsinfo structure") Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 28 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Fix the code so that we always mark the atime as invalid in nfs4_read_done(). Currently, the expectation appears to be that the pNFS drivers should always do this, with the result that most of them don't. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 20 9月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Currently, the layout driver selection code always chooses the first one from the list. That's not really ideal however, as the server can send the list of layout types in any order that it likes. It's up to the client to select the best one for its needs. This patch adds an ordered list of preferred driver types and has the selection code sort the list of available layout drivers according to it. Any unrecognized layout type is sorted to the end of the list. For now, the order of preference is hardcoded, but it should be possible to make this configurable in the future. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Current NFSv4.1/pNFS client assumes that MDS supports only one layout type. While it's true for most existing servers, nevertheless, this can be change in the near future. For now, this patch just plumbs in the ability to track a list of layouts in the fsinfo structure. The existing behavior of the client is preserved, by having it just select the first entry in the list. Signed-off-by: NTigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Reviewed-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 05 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If there are outstanding LAYOUTGET rpc calls, then we want to ensure that we keep the layout stateid around so we that don't inadvertently pick up an old/misordered sequence id. The race is as follows: Client Server ====== ====== LAYOUTGET(seqid) LAYOUTGET(seqid) return LAYOUTGET(seqid+1) return LAYOUTGET(seqid+2) process LAYOUTGET(seqid+2) forget layout process LAYOUTGET(seqid+1) If it forgets the layout stateid before processing seqid+1, then the client will not check the layout->plh_barrier, and so will set the stateid with seqid+1. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 04 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the layout was marked as invalid, we want to ensure to initialise the layout header fields correctly. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-