提交 f5e81d11 编写于 作者: D Daniel Borkmann

bpf: Introduce BPF nospec instruction for mitigating Spectre v4

In case of JITs, each of the JIT backends compiles the BPF nospec instruction
/either/ to a machine instruction which emits a speculation barrier /or/ to
/no/ machine instruction in case the underlying architecture is not affected
by Speculative Store Bypass or has different mitigations in place already.

This covers both x86 and (implicitly) arm64: In case of x86, we use 'lfence'
instruction for mitigation. In case of arm64, we rely on the firmware mitigation
as controlled via the ssbd kernel parameter. Whenever the mitigation is enabled,
it works for all of the kernel code with no need to provide any additional
instructions here (hence only comment in arm64 JIT). Other archs can follow
as needed. The BPF nospec instruction is specifically targeting Spectre v4
since i) we don't use a serialization barrier for the Spectre v1 case, and
ii) mitigation instructions for v1 and v4 might be different on some archs.

The BPF nospec is required for a future commit, where the BPF verifier does
annotate intermediate BPF programs with speculation barriers.
Co-developed-by: NPiotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: NBenedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NPiotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NBenedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
上级 f1fdee33
......@@ -1602,6 +1602,9 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
rn = arm_bpf_get_reg32(src_lo, tmp2[1], ctx);
emit_ldx_r(dst, rn, off, ctx, BPF_SIZE(code));
break;
/* speculation barrier */
case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
break;
/* ST: *(size *)(dst + off) = imm */
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
......
......@@ -823,6 +823,19 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx,
return ret;
break;
/* speculation barrier */
case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
/*
* Nothing required here.
*
* In case of arm64, we rely on the firmware mitigation of
* Speculative Store Bypass as controlled via the ssbd kernel
* parameter. Whenever the mitigation is enabled, it works
* for all of the kernel code with no need to provide any
* additional instructions.
*/
break;
/* ST: *(size *)(dst + off) = imm */
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
......
......@@ -1355,6 +1355,9 @@ static int build_one_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx,
}
break;
case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC: /* speculation barrier */
break;
case BPF_ST | BPF_B | BPF_MEM:
case BPF_ST | BPF_H | BPF_MEM:
case BPF_ST | BPF_W | BPF_MEM:
......
......@@ -737,6 +737,12 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
}
break;
/*
* BPF_ST NOSPEC (speculation barrier)
*/
case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
break;
/*
* BPF_ST(X)
*/
......
......@@ -627,6 +627,12 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
}
break;
/*
* BPF_ST NOSPEC (speculation barrier)
*/
case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
break;
/*
* BPF_ST(X)
*/
......
......@@ -1251,6 +1251,10 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
return -1;
break;
/* speculation barrier */
case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
break;
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
......
......@@ -939,6 +939,10 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
emit_ld(rd, 0, RV_REG_T1, ctx);
break;
/* speculation barrier */
case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
break;
/* ST: *(size *)(dst + off) = imm */
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
emit_imm(RV_REG_T1, imm, ctx);
......
......@@ -1153,6 +1153,11 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp,
break;
}
break;
/*
* BPF_NOSPEC (speculation barrier)
*/
case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
break;
/*
* BPF_ST(X)
*/
......
......@@ -1287,6 +1287,9 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
return 1;
break;
}
/* speculation barrier */
case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
break;
/* ST: *(size *)(dst + off) = imm */
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
......
......@@ -1219,6 +1219,13 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
}
break;
/* speculation barrier */
case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XMM2))
/* Emit 'lfence' */
EMIT3(0x0F, 0xAE, 0xE8);
break;
/* ST: *(u8*)(dst_reg + off) = imm */
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
......
......@@ -1886,6 +1886,12 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
i++;
break;
}
/* speculation barrier */
case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XMM2))
/* Emit 'lfence' */
EMIT3(0x0F, 0xAE, 0xE8);
break;
/* ST: *(u8*)(dst_reg + off) = imm */
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
......
......@@ -73,6 +73,11 @@ struct ctl_table_header;
/* unused opcode to mark call to interpreter with arguments */
#define BPF_CALL_ARGS 0xe0
/* unused opcode to mark speculation barrier for mitigating
* Speculative Store Bypass
*/
#define BPF_NOSPEC 0xc0
/* As per nm, we expose JITed images as text (code) section for
* kallsyms. That way, tools like perf can find it to match
* addresses.
......@@ -390,6 +395,16 @@ static inline bool insn_is_zext(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
.off = 0, \
.imm = 0 })
/* Speculation barrier */
#define BPF_ST_NOSPEC() \
((struct bpf_insn) { \
.code = BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC, \
.dst_reg = 0, \
.src_reg = 0, \
.off = 0, \
.imm = 0 })
/* Internal classic blocks for direct assignment */
#define __BPF_STMT(CODE, K) \
......
......@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
#include <linux/extable.h>
#include <linux/log2.h>
#include <asm/barrier.h>
#include <asm/unaligned.h>
/* Registers */
......@@ -1377,6 +1379,7 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
/* Non-UAPI available opcodes. */
[BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL_ARGS] = &&JMP_CALL_ARGS,
[BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL] = &&JMP_TAIL_CALL,
[BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC] = &&ST_NOSPEC,
[BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_B] = &&LDX_PROBE_MEM_B,
[BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_H] = &&LDX_PROBE_MEM_H,
[BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_W] = &&LDX_PROBE_MEM_W,
......@@ -1621,7 +1624,21 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
COND_JMP(s, JSGE, >=)
COND_JMP(s, JSLE, <=)
#undef COND_JMP
/* STX and ST and LDX*/
/* ST, STX and LDX*/
ST_NOSPEC:
/* Speculation barrier for mitigating Speculative Store Bypass.
* In case of arm64, we rely on the firmware mitigation as
* controlled via the ssbd kernel parameter. Whenever the
* mitigation is enabled, it works for all of the kernel code
* with no need to provide any additional instructions here.
* In case of x86, we use 'lfence' insn for mitigation. We
* reuse preexisting logic from Spectre v1 mitigation that
* happens to produce the required code on x86 for v4 as well.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_X86
barrier_nospec();
#endif
CONT;
#define LDST(SIZEOP, SIZE) \
STX_MEM_##SIZEOP: \
*(SIZE *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off) = SRC; \
......
......@@ -206,15 +206,17 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs,
verbose(cbs->private_data, "BUG_%02x\n", insn->code);
}
} else if (class == BPF_ST) {
if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM) {
if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_MEM) {
verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) *(%s *)(r%d %+d) = %d\n",
insn->code,
bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3],
insn->dst_reg,
insn->off, insn->imm);
} else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == 0xc0 /* BPF_NOSPEC, no UAPI */) {
verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) nospec\n", insn->code);
} else {
verbose(cbs->private_data, "BUG_st_%02x\n", insn->code);
return;
}
verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) *(%s *)(r%d %+d) = %d\n",
insn->code,
bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3],
insn->dst_reg,
insn->off, insn->imm);
} else if (class == BPF_LDX) {
if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM) {
verbose(cbs->private_data, "BUG_ldx_%02x\n", insn->code);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册