-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
In case of JITs, each of the JIT backends compiles the BPF nospec instruction /either/ to a machine instruction which emits a speculation barrier /or/ to /no/ machine instruction in case the underlying architecture is not affected by Speculative Store Bypass or has different mitigations in place already. This covers both x86 and (implicitly) arm64: In case of x86, we use 'lfence' instruction for mitigation. In case of arm64, we rely on the firmware mitigation as controlled via the ssbd kernel parameter. Whenever the mitigation is enabled, it works for all of the kernel code with no need to provide any additional instructions here (hence only comment in arm64 JIT). Other archs can follow as needed. The BPF nospec instruction is specifically targeting Spectre v4 since i) we don't use a serialization barrier for the Spectre v1 case, and ii) mitigation instructions for v1 and v4 might be different on some archs. The BPF nospec is required for a future commit, where the BPF verifier does annotate intermediate BPF programs with speculation barriers. Co-developed-by: NPiotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: NBenedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NPiotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBenedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
f5e81d11