提交 7125397b 编写于 作者: C Chris Wilson

drm/i915: Track GGTT writes on the vma

As writes through the GTT and GGTT PTE updates do not share the same
path, they are not strictly ordered and so we must explicitly flush the
indirect writes prior to modifying the PTE. We do track outstanding GGTT
writes on the object itself, but since the object may have multiple GGTT
vma, that is overly coarse as we can track and flush individual vma as
required.

Whilst here, update the GGTT flushing behaviour for Cannonlake.

v2: Hard-code ring offset to allow use during unload (after RCS may have
been freed, or never existed!)

References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104002Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171206124914.19960-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
上级 010e3e68
......@@ -3887,6 +3887,8 @@ int __must_check i915_gem_evict_for_node(struct i915_address_space *vm,
unsigned int flags);
int i915_gem_evict_vm(struct i915_address_space *vm);
void i915_gem_flush_ggtt_writes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
/* belongs in i915_gem_gtt.h */
static inline void i915_gem_chipset_flush(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
......
......@@ -666,17 +666,13 @@ fb_write_origin(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, unsigned int domain)
obj->frontbuffer_ggtt_origin : ORIGIN_CPU);
}
static void
flush_write_domain(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, unsigned int flush_domains)
void i915_gem_flush_ggtt_writes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
if (!(obj->base.write_domain & flush_domains))
return;
/* No actual flushing is required for the GTT write domain. Writes
* to it "immediately" go to main memory as far as we know, so there's
* no chipset flush. It also doesn't land in render cache.
/*
* No actual flushing is required for the GTT write domain for reads
* from the GTT domain. Writes to it "immediately" go to main memory
* as far as we know, so there's no chipset flush. It also doesn't
* land in the GPU render cache.
*
* However, we do have to enforce the order so that all writes through
* the GTT land before any writes to the device, such as updates to
......@@ -687,22 +683,46 @@ flush_write_domain(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, unsigned int flush_domains)
* timing. This issue has only been observed when switching quickly
* between GTT writes and CPU reads from inside the kernel on recent hw,
* and it appears to only affect discrete GTT blocks (i.e. on LLC
* system agents we cannot reproduce this behaviour).
* system agents we cannot reproduce this behaviour, until Cannonlake
* that was!).
*/
wmb();
intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
POSTING_READ_FW(RING_HEAD(RENDER_RING_BASE));
spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
}
static void
flush_write_domain(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, unsigned int flush_domains)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
struct i915_vma *vma;
if (!(obj->base.write_domain & flush_domains))
return;
switch (obj->base.write_domain) {
case I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT:
if (!HAS_LLC(dev_priv)) {
intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
POSTING_READ_FW(RING_HEAD(dev_priv->engine[RCS]->mmio_base));
spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
}
i915_gem_flush_ggtt_writes(dev_priv);
intel_fb_obj_flush(obj,
fb_write_origin(obj, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT));
list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, obj_link) {
if (!i915_vma_is_ggtt(vma))
break;
if (vma->iomap)
continue;
i915_vma_unset_ggtt_write(vma);
}
break;
case I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU:
......@@ -1965,6 +1985,8 @@ int i915_gem_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
list_add(&obj->userfault_link, &dev_priv->mm.userfault_list);
GEM_BUG_ON(!obj->userfault_count);
i915_vma_set_ggtt_write(vma);
err_fence:
i915_vma_unpin_fence(vma);
err_unpin:
......
......@@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ void __iomem *i915_vma_pin_iomap(struct i915_vma *vma)
if (err)
goto err_unpin;
i915_vma_set_ggtt_write(vma);
return ptr;
err_unpin:
......@@ -330,12 +331,24 @@ void __iomem *i915_vma_pin_iomap(struct i915_vma *vma)
return IO_ERR_PTR(err);
}
void i915_vma_flush_writes(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
if (!i915_vma_has_ggtt_write(vma))
return;
i915_gem_flush_ggtt_writes(vma->vm->i915);
i915_vma_unset_ggtt_write(vma);
}
void i915_vma_unpin_iomap(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&vma->obj->base.dev->struct_mutex);
GEM_BUG_ON(vma->iomap == NULL);
i915_vma_flush_writes(vma);
i915_vma_unpin_fence(vma);
i915_vma_unpin(vma);
}
......@@ -792,6 +805,15 @@ int i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj));
if (i915_vma_is_map_and_fenceable(vma)) {
/*
* Check that we have flushed all writes through the GGTT
* before the unbind, other due to non-strict nature of those
* indirect writes they may end up referencing the GGTT PTE
* after the unbind.
*/
i915_vma_flush_writes(vma);
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_has_ggtt_write(vma));
/* release the fence reg _after_ flushing */
ret = i915_vma_put_fence(vma);
if (ret)
......
......@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ struct i915_vma {
#define I915_VMA_CLOSED BIT(10)
#define I915_VMA_USERFAULT_BIT 11
#define I915_VMA_USERFAULT BIT(I915_VMA_USERFAULT_BIT)
#define I915_VMA_GGTT_WRITE BIT(12)
unsigned int active;
struct i915_gem_active last_read[I915_NUM_ENGINES];
......@@ -138,6 +139,24 @@ static inline bool i915_vma_is_ggtt(const struct i915_vma *vma)
return vma->flags & I915_VMA_GGTT;
}
static inline bool i915_vma_has_ggtt_write(const struct i915_vma *vma)
{
return vma->flags & I915_VMA_GGTT_WRITE;
}
static inline void i915_vma_set_ggtt_write(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_vma_is_ggtt(vma));
vma->flags |= I915_VMA_GGTT_WRITE;
}
static inline void i915_vma_unset_ggtt_write(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
vma->flags &= ~I915_VMA_GGTT_WRITE;
}
void i915_vma_flush_writes(struct i915_vma *vma);
static inline bool i915_vma_is_map_and_fenceable(const struct i915_vma *vma)
{
return vma->flags & I915_VMA_CAN_FENCE;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册