-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
... not the port clock. This allows us to kill the funny semantics around pixel_target_clock. Since the dpll code still needs the real port clock, add a new port_clock field to the pipe configuration. Handling the default case for that one is a bit tricky, since encoders might not consistently overwrite it when retrying the crtc/encoder bw arbitrage step in the compute config stage. Hence we need to always clear port_clock and update it again if the encoder hasn't put in something more specific. This can't be done in one step since the encoder might want to adjust the mode first. I was a bit on the fence whether I should subsume the pixel multiplier handling into the port_clock, too. But then I decided against this since it's on an abstract level still the dotclock of the adjusted mode, and only our hw makes it a bit special due to the separate pixel mulitplier setting (which requires that the dpll runs at the non-multiplied dotclock). So after this patch the adjusted_mode accurately describes the mode we feed into the port, after the panel fitter and pixel multiplier (or line doubling, if we ever bother with that) have done their job. Since the fdi link is between the pfit and the pixel multiplier steps we need to be careful with calculating the fdi link config. v2: Fix up ilk cpu pll handling. v3: Introduce an fdi_dotclock variable in ironlake_fdi_compute_config to make it clearer that we transmit the adjusted_mode without the pixel multiplier taken into account. The old code multiplied the the available link bw with the pixel multiplier, which results in the same fdi configuration, but is much more confusing. v4: Rebase on top of Imre's is_cpu_edp removal. v5: Rebase on top of Paulo's haswell watermark fixes, which introduce a new place which looked at the pixel_clock and so needed conversion. v6: Split out prep patches as requested by Paulo Zanoni. Also rebase on top of the fdi dotclock handling fix in the fdi lanes/bw computation code. Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> (v3) Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> (v6) Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
ff9a6750