-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
Atm we call intel_display_power_enabled() from i915_capture_error_state() in IRQ context and then take a mutex. To fix this add a new intel_display_power_enabled_sw() which returns the domain state based on software tracking as opposed to reading the actual HW state. Since we use domain_use_count for this without locking on the reader side make sure we increase the counter only after enabling all required power wells and decrease it before disabling any of these power wells. Regression introduced in commit 1b02383464b4a915627ef3b8fd0ad7f07168c54c Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Date: Tue Sep 24 16:17:09 2013 +0300 drm/i915: support for multiple power wells Note that atm we depend on the value returned by intel_display_power_enabled_sw() in i915_capture_error_state() to avoid unclaimed register access reports. This was never guaranteed though, since another thread can disable the power concurrently. If this is a problem we need another explicit way to disable the reporting during error captures. v2: - remove barriers as the caller can't depend on the value returned from i915_capture_error_state_sw() anyway (Ville) - dump the state of pipe/transcoder power domain state (Daniel) Reported-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
ddf9c536