1. 06 11月, 2017 3 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Lock llist_del_first() vs llist_del_all() · f991c492
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      An oversight in commit 87701b4b ("drm/i915: Only free the oldest
      stale object before a fresh allocation") was that not only do we have to
      serialise concurrent users of llist_del_first(), but we also have to
      lock llist_del_first() vs llist_del_all().
      
      From llist.h,
      
       * This can be summarized as follows:
       *
       *           |   add    | del_first |  del_all
       * add       |    -     |     -     |     -
       * del_first |          |     L     |     L
       * del_all   |          |           |     -
       *
       * Where, a particular row's operation can happen concurrently with a column's
       * operation, with "-" being no lock needed, while "L" being lock is needed.
      
      This should hopefully explain:
      
      <4>[   89.287106] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
      <4>[   89.287126] Modules linked in: snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp i915 crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core r8169 mii mei_me mei snd_pcm prime_numbers i2c_hid pinctrl_geminilake pinctrl_intel
      <4>[   89.287226] CPU: 2 PID: 23 Comm: ksoftirqd/2 Tainted: G     U          4.14.0-rc8-CI-CI_DRM_3315+ #1
      <4>[   89.287247] Hardware name: Intel Corp. Geminilake/GLK RVP2 LP4SD (07), BIOS GELKRVPA.X64.0062.B30.1708222146 08/22/2017
      <4>[   89.287270] task: ffff88017ab34ec0 task.stack: ffffc90000128000
      <4>[   89.287290] RIP: 0010:llist_add_batch+0x4/0x20
      <4>[   89.287301] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000012bdb8 EFLAGS: 00010296
      <4>[   89.287314] RAX: ffffffff811017ad RBX: 6e468801a1560000 RCX: ef3e53fceecdeb81
      <4>[   89.287330] RDX: 6e468801a1566130 RSI: ffff880103d73d98 RDI: ffff880103d73d98
      <4>[   89.287346] RBP: ffffc9000012bdb8 R08: ffff88017ab35780 R09: 0000000000000000
      <4>[   89.287361] R10: ffffc9000012bd68 R11: 00000000abb18c3d R12: ffffffffa01369e0
      <4>[   89.287377] R13: ffff88017fd1b8f8 R14: ffff88017ab34ec0 R15: 000000000000000a
      <4>[   89.287393] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88017fd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      <4>[   89.287411] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
      <4>[   89.287424] CR2: 00007ff0c0755018 CR3: 000000016df9b000 CR4: 00000000003406e0
      <4>[   89.287440] Call Trace:
      <4>[   89.287511]  __i915_gem_free_object_rcu+0x20/0x40 [i915]
      <4>[   89.287527]  rcu_process_callbacks+0x27a/0x730
      <4>[   89.287544]  __do_softirq+0xc0/0x4ae
      <4>[   89.287559]  ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x2d/0x280
      <4>[   89.287571]  run_ksoftirqd+0x1f/0x70
      <4>[   89.287582]  smpboot_thread_fn+0x18a/0x280
      <4>[   89.287595]  kthread+0x114/0x150
      <4>[   89.287605]  ? sort_range+0x30/0x30
      <4>[   89.287615]  ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
      <4>[   89.287628]  ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40
      <4>[   89.287641] Code: 0d 48 83 ea 01 4c 89 c1 48 83 fa ff 74 12 48 23 0c d7 74 ed 48 c1 e2 06 48 0f bd c9 48 8d 04 0a 5d c3 90 90 90 90 90 55 48 89 e5 <48> 8b 0a 48 89 0e 48 89 c8 f0 48 0f b1 3a 48 39 c1 75 ed 48 85
      <1>[   89.287774] RIP: llist_add_batch+0x4/0x20 RSP: ffffc9000012bdb8
      <4>[   89.287826] ---[ end trace e775d15174d8ae02 ]---
      
      (Lockless lists are only easy (and lockless) when only using
      llist_add/llist_del_all!)
      
      Fixes: 87701b4b ("drm/i915: Only free the oldest stale object before
      a fresh allocation")
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171106111508.11941-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      f991c492
    • C
      drm/i915/selftests: Hide dangerous tests · 69ea47a5
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      Some tests are designed to exercise the limits of the HW and may trigger
      unintended side-effects making the machine unusable. This should not be
      executed by default, but are still useful for early platform validation.
      
      References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103453Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171025153207.9589-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
      69ea47a5
    • C
      drm/i915: Assert vma->flags are updated correctly during binding · d36caeea
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      As we bind, and unbind on error, we want to be sure that the vma->flags
      are updated to reflect the binding state so that on the next invocation
      all is well.
      
      v2: Take two.
      v3: Take three; vma-misplaced is checking map-and-fenceable so keep it
      last!
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171105124550.32715-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
      d36caeea
  2. 03 11月, 2017 3 次提交
  3. 02 11月, 2017 7 次提交
  4. 01 11月, 2017 7 次提交
  5. 31 10月, 2017 8 次提交
  6. 30 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  7. 28 10月, 2017 3 次提交
  8. 27 10月, 2017 8 次提交