Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
12 个月 前同步成功

通知 150
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 15 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 14 2月, 2013 2 次提交
  5. 22 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 21 1月, 2013 9 次提交
  9. 20 1月, 2013 2 次提交
  11. 19 1月, 2013 7 次提交
  13. 18 1月, 2013 14 次提交
  15. 17 1月, 2013 4 次提交
    • J
      drm/i915: fix FORCEWAKE posting reads · b5144075
      由 Jani Nikula 提交于 
      We stopped reading FORCEWAKE for posting reads in

commit 8dee3eea
Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Date:   Sat Sep 1 22:59:50 2012 -0700

    drm/i915: Never read FORCEWAKE

and started using something from the same cacheline instead. On the
bug reporter's machine this broke entering rc6 states after a
suspend/resume cycle. It turns out reading ECOBUS as posting read
worked fine, while GTFIFODBG did not, preventing RC6 states after
suspend/resume per the bug report referenced below. It's not entirely
clear why, but clearly GTFIFODBG was nowhere near the same cacheline
or address range as FORCEWAKE.

Trying out various registers for posting reads showed that all tested
registers for which NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE() (in i915_drv.c) returns true
work. Conversely, most (but not quite all) registers for which
NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE() returns false do not work. Details in the referenced
bug.

Based on the above, add posting reads on ECOBUS where GTFIFODBG was
previously relied on.

In true cargo cult spirit, add posting reads for FORCEWAKE_VLV writes as
well, but instead of ECOBUS, use FORCEWAKE_ACK_VLV which is in the same
address range as FORCEWAKE_VLV.

v2: Add more details to the commit message. No functional changes.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52411Reported-and-tested-by: NAlexander Bersenev <bay@hackerdom.ru>
CC: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
[danvet: add cc: stable and make the commit message a bit clearer that
this is a regression fix and what exactly broke.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      b5144075
    • L
      Merge tag 'for-linus-v3.8-rc4' of git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs · dfdebc24
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      Pull xfs bugfixes from Ben Myers:

 - fix(es) for compound buffers

 - fix for dquot soft timer asserts due to overflow of d_blk_softlimit

 - fix for regression in dir v2 code introduced in commit 20f7e9f3
   ("xfs: factor dir2 block read operations")

* tag 'for-linus-v3.8-rc4' of git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs:
  xfs: recalculate leaf entry pointer after compacting a dir2 block
  xfs: remove int casts from debug dquot soft limit timer asserts
  xfs: fix the multi-segment log buffer format
  xfs: fix segment in xfs_buf_item_format_segment
  xfs: rename bli_format to avoid confusion with bli_formats
  xfs: use b_maps[] for discontiguous buffers
      dfdebc24
    • L
      Merge tag 'pm+acpi-for-3.8-rc4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm · 309b51e8
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      Pull ACPI and power management fixes from Rafael Wysocki:

 - cpuidle regression fix related to the initialization of state
   kobjects from Krzysztof Mazur.

 - cpuidle fix removing some not very useful code and making some
   user-visible problems go away at the same time.  From Daniel Lezcano.

 - ACPI build fix from Yinghai Lu.

* tag 'pm+acpi-for-3.8-rc4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
  cpuidle: remove the power_specified field in the driver
  ACPI / glue: Fix build with ACPI_GLUE_DEBUG set
  cpuidle: fix number of initialized/destroyed states
      309b51e8
    • E
      xfs: recalculate leaf entry pointer after compacting a dir2 block · 37f13561
      由 Eric Sandeen 提交于 
      Dave Jones hit this assert when doing a compile on recent git, with
CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG enabled:

XFS: Assertion failed: (char *)dup - (char *)hdr == be16_to_cpu(*xfs_dir2_data_unused_tag_p(dup)), file: fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_data.c, line: 828

Upon further digging, the tag found by xfs_dir2_data_unused_tag_p(dup)
contained "2" and not the proper offset, and I found that this value was
changed after the memmoves under "Use a stale leaf for our new entry."
in xfs_dir2_block_addname(), i.e.

                        memmove(&blp[mid + 1], &blp[mid],
                                (highstale - mid) * sizeof(*blp));

overwrote it.

What has happened is that the previous call to xfs_dir2_block_compact()
has rearranged things; it changes btp->count as well as the
blp array.  So after we make that call, we must recalculate the
proper pointer to the leaf entries by making another call to
xfs_dir2_block_leaf_p().

Dave provided a metadump image which led to a simple reproducer
(create a particular filename in the affected directory) and this
resolves the testcase as well as the bug on his live system.

Thanks also to dchinner for looking at this one with me.
Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
      37f13561