drm/i915: fix FORCEWAKE posting reads
We stopped reading FORCEWAKE for posting reads in commit 8dee3eea Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Date: Sat Sep 1 22:59:50 2012 -0700 drm/i915: Never read FORCEWAKE and started using something from the same cacheline instead. On the bug reporter's machine this broke entering rc6 states after a suspend/resume cycle. It turns out reading ECOBUS as posting read worked fine, while GTFIFODBG did not, preventing RC6 states after suspend/resume per the bug report referenced below. It's not entirely clear why, but clearly GTFIFODBG was nowhere near the same cacheline or address range as FORCEWAKE. Trying out various registers for posting reads showed that all tested registers for which NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE() (in i915_drv.c) returns true work. Conversely, most (but not quite all) registers for which NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE() returns false do not work. Details in the referenced bug. Based on the above, add posting reads on ECOBUS where GTFIFODBG was previously relied on. In true cargo cult spirit, add posting reads for FORCEWAKE_VLV writes as well, but instead of ECOBUS, use FORCEWAKE_ACK_VLV which is in the same address range as FORCEWAKE_VLV. v2: Add more details to the commit message. No functional changes. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52411Reported-and-tested-by: NAlexander Bersenev <bay@hackerdom.ru> CC: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [danvet: add cc: stable and make the commit message a bit clearer that this is a regression fix and what exactly broke.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录