The current code accounts for the time a task was absent from the fair
class (per ATTACH_AGE_LOAD). However it does not work correctly when a
task got migrated or moved to another cgroup while outside of the fair
class.

This patch tries to address that by aging on migration. We locklessly
read the 'last_update_time' stamp from both the old and new cfs_rq,
ages the load upto the old time, and sets it to the new time.

These timestamps should in general not be more than 1 tick apart from
one another, so there is a definite bound on things.
Signed-off-by: NByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
[ Changelog, a few edits and !SMP build fix ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1445616981-29904-2-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The comment describing migrate_task_rq_fair() says that the caller
should hold p->pi_lock. But in some cases the caller can hold
task_rq(p)->lock instead of p->pi_lock. So the comment is broken and
this patch fixes it.
Signed-off-by: NByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1447806899-20303-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

At present scheduler resets task's wait start timestamp when the task
migrates to another rq.  This misleads scheduler itself into reporting
less wait time than actual by omitting time spent for waiting prior to
migration and also more wait count than actual by counting migration as
wait end event which can be seen by trace or /proc/<pid>/sched with
CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS=y.

Carry forward migrating task's wait time prior to migration and
don't count migration as a wait end event to fix such statistics error.

In order to determine whether task is migrating mark task->on_rq with
TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING while dequeuing and enqueuing due to migration.
Signed-off-by: NJoonwoo Park <joonwoop@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: ohaugan@codeaurora.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151113033854.GA4247@codeaurora.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

There is a fundamental mismatch between the runtime based NUMA scanning
at the task level, and the wall clock time NUMA scanning at the mm level.
On a severely overloaded system, with very large processes, this mismatch
can cause the system to spend all of its time in change_prot_numa().

This can happen if the task spends at least two ticks in change_prot_numa(),
and only gets two ticks of CPU time in the real time between two scan
intervals of the mm.

This patch ensures that a task never spends more than 3% of run
time scanning PTEs. It does that by ensuring that in-between
task_numa_work() runs, the task spends at least 32x as much time on
other things than it did on task_numa_work().

This is done stochastically: if a timer tick happens, or the task
gets rescheduled during task_numa_work(), we delay a future run of
task_numa_work() until the task has spent at least 32x the amount of
CPU time doing something else, as it spent inside task_numa_work().
The longer task_numa_work() takes, the more likely it is this happens.

If task_numa_work() takes very little time, chances are low that that
code will do anything, but we will not care.
Reported-and-tested-by: NJan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1446756983-28173-3-git-send-email-riel@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Usually the tick can be stopped for an idle CPU in NOHZ. However in NOHZ_FULL
mode, a non-idle CPU's tick can also be stopped. However, update_cpu_load_nohz()
does not consider the case a non-idle CPU's tick has been stopped at all.

This patch makes the update_cpu_load_nohz() know if the calling path comes
from NOHZ_FULL or idle NOHZ.
Signed-off-by: NByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1447115762-19734-3-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

There are some cases where distance between ticks is more than one tick
while the CPU is not idle, e.g. full NOHZ.

However __update_cpu_load() assumes it is the idle tickless case if the
distance between ticks is more than 1, even though it can be the active
tickless case as well. Thus in the active tickless case, updating the CPU
load will not be performed correctly.

Where the current code assumes the load for each tick is zero, this is
(obviously) not true in non-idle tickless case. We can approximately
consider the load ~= this_rq->cpu_load[0] during tickless in non-idle
tickless case.
Signed-off-by: NByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444816056-11886-2-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Commit cd126afe ("sched/fair: Remove rq's runnable avg") got rid of
rq->avg and so there is no need to update it any more when entering or
exiting idle.

Remove the now empty functions idle_{enter|exit}_fair().
Signed-off-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1445342681-17171-1-git-send-email-dietmar.eggemann@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The NUMA balancing code implements delays in scanning by
advancing curr->node_stamp beyond curr->se.sum_exec_runtime.

With unsigned math, that creates an underflow, which results
in task_numa_work being queued all the time, even when we
don't want to.

Avoiding the math underflow makes it possible to reduce CPU
overhead in the NUMA balancing code.
Reported-and-tested-by: NJan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1446756983-28173-2-git-send-email-riel@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

When cfs_rq has cfs_rq->removed_load_avg set (when a task migrates from
this cfs_rq), we need to update its contribution to the group's load_avg.

This should not increase tg's update too much, because in most cases, the
cfs_rq has already decayed its load_avg.
Tested-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NYuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444699103-20272-2-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Commit:

  9d89c257 ("sched/fair: Rewrite runnable load and utilization average tracking")

led to an overly small weight for interactive group entities. The bad case
can be easily reproduced when a number of CPU hogs compete for the CPUs
at the same time (thanks to Mike). This is largly because the task group's
load average tracking cross CPUs lags behind the real changes.

To fix this we accelerate the group share distribution process by using
the load.weight of the cfs_rq. This may increase the entire group's
share, but we have to do so to protect the (fragile) interactive
tasks, especially from CPU hogs.
Reported-by: NMike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Tested-by: NMike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NYuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444699103-20272-1-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The parameter "int next_cpu" in the following function is unused:

  migrate_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, int next_cpu)

Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Nxiaofeng.yan <yanxiaofeng@inspur.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1442991360-31945-1-git-send-email-yanxiaofeng@inspur.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

If static branch 'sched_numa_balancing' is enabled, it should kickstart
NUMA balancing through task_tick_numa(). However the following commit:

  2a595721 ("sched/numa: Convert sched_numa_balancing to a static_branch")

erroneously disables this.

Fix this anomaly by enabling task_tick_numa() when the static branch
'sched_numa_balancing' is enabled.
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1443752305-27413-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The group_classify() function does not use the "env" parameter, so remove it.
Also unify code to always use group_classify() to calculate group's
load type.
Signed-off-by: NLeo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1442314605-14838-1-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Macro LOAD_AVG_MAX is defined far away from the precompuated tables
for decay calculation in code; So explicitly comments for this.

Also fix one typo: s/LOAD_MAX_AVG/LOAD_AVG_MAX.
Signed-off-by: NLeo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1442314657-14949-1-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Currently task_numa_work() scans up to numa_balancing_scan_size_mb worth
of memory per invocation, but only counts memory areas that have at
least one PTE that is still present and not marked for numa hint faulting.

It will skip over arbitarily large amounts of memory that are either
unused, full of swap ptes, or full of PTEs that were already marked
for NUMA hint faults but have not been faulted on yet.

This can cause excessive amounts of CPU use, due to there being
essentially no upper limit on the scan rate of very large processes
that are not yet in a phase where they are actively accessing old
memory pages (eg. they are still initializing their data).

Avoid that problem by placing an upper limit on the amount of virtual
memory that task_numa_work() scans in each invocation. This can be a
higher limit than "pages", to ensure the task still skips over unused
areas fairly quickly.

While we are here, also fix the "nr_pte_updates" logic, so it only
counts page ranges with ptes in them.
Reported-by: NAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Reported-by: NJan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150911090027.4a7987bd@annuminas.surriel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Currently the load_{sum,avg} and util_{sum,avg} tracking is asymmetric
in that load tracking gets a 2^10 unit from the weight, but util gets
no such factor.

This results in more lost bits for util scaling and asymmetric scaling
rules.

Fix this by removing shifts, such that we gain the 2^10 factor from
scaling. There is no risk of overflowing the u32 as the max value is
now LOAD_AVG_MAX << 10, which is still well below UINT_MAX.

This further entangles the assumption that both LOAD and CAPACITY
shifts are the same (and 10) so put in an assertion for that.

This fixes the math for the LOAD_RESOLUTION != 0 case.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Do not call the scaling functions in case time goes backwards or the
last update of the sched_avg structure has happened less than 1024ns
ago.
Signed-off-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc: pang.xunlei@zte.com.cn <pang.xunlei@zte.com.cn>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: sgurrappadi@nvidia.com <sgurrappadi@nvidia.com>
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/55EDA2E9.8040900@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Prior to this patch; the line:

	scaled_delta_w = (delta_w * 1024) >> 10;

which is the result of the default arch_scale_freq_capacity()
function, turns into:

    1b03:	49 89 d1             	mov    %rdx,%r9
    1b06:	49 c1 e1 0a          	shl    $0xa,%r9
    1b0a:	49 c1 e9 0a          	shr    $0xa,%r9

Which is silly; when made unsigned int, GCC recognises this as
pointless ops and fails to emit them (confirmed on 4.9.3 and 5.1.1).

Furthermore, afaict unsigned is actually the correct type for these
fields anyway, as we've explicitly ruled out negative delta's earlier
in this function.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Rename scale() to cap_scale() to better reflect its purpose, it is
after all not a general purpose scale function, it has
SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT hardcoded in it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Utilization is currently scaled by capacity_orig, but since we now have
frequency and cpu invariant cfs_rq.avg.util_avg, frequency and cpu scaling
now happens as part of the utilization tracking itself.
So cfs_rq.avg.util_avg should no longer be scaled in cpu_util().
Signed-off-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMorten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc: pang.xunlei@zte.com.cn <pang.xunlei@zte.com.cn>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: sgurrappadi@nvidia.com <sgurrappadi@nvidia.com>
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/55EDAF43.30500@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Use the advent of the per-entity load tracking rewrite to streamline the
naming of utilization related data and functions by using
{prefix_}util{_suffix} consistently. Moreover call both signals
({se,cfs}.avg.util_avg) utilization.
Signed-off-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMorten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@zte.com.cn
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: sgurrappadi@nvidia.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1439569394-11974-5-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Besides the existing frequency scale-invariance correction factor, apply
CPU scale-invariance correction factor to utilization tracking to
compensate for any differences in compute capacity. This could be due to
micro-architectural differences (i.e. instructions per seconds) between
cpus in HMP systems (e.g. big.LITTLE), and/or differences in the current
maximum frequency supported by individual cpus in SMP systems. In the
existing implementation utilization isn't comparable between cpus as it
is relative to the capacity of each individual CPU.

Each segment of the sched_avg.util_sum geometric series is now scaled
by the CPU performance factor too so the sched_avg.util_avg of each
sched entity will be invariant from the particular CPU of the HMP/SMP
system on which the sched entity is scheduled.

With this patch, the utilization of a CPU stays relative to the max CPU
performance of the fastest CPU in the system.

In contrast to utilization (sched_avg.util_sum), load
(sched_avg.load_sum) should not be scaled by compute capacity. The
utilization metric is based on running time which only makes sense when
cpus are _not_ fully utilized (utilization cannot go beyond 100% even if
more tasks are added), where load is runnable time which isn't limited
by the capacity of the CPU and therefore is a better metric for
overloaded scenarios. If we run two nice-0 busy loops on two cpus with
different compute capacity their load should be similar since their
compute demands are the same. We have to assume that the compute demand
of any task running on a fully utilized CPU (no spare cycles = 100%
utilization) is high and the same no matter of the compute capacity of
its current CPU, hence we shouldn't scale load by CPU capacity.
Signed-off-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMorten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/55CE7409.1000700@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Bring arch_scale_cpu_capacity() in line with the recent change of its
arch_scale_freq_capacity() sibling in commit dfbca41f ("sched:
Optimize freq invariant accounting") from weak function to #define to
allow inlining of the function.

While at it, remove the ARCH_CAPACITY sched_feature as well. With the
change to #define there isn't a straightforward way to allow runtime
switch between an arch implementation and the default implementation of
arch_scale_cpu_capacity() using sched_feature. The default was to use
the arch-specific implementation, but only the arm architecture provides
one and that is essentially equivalent to the default implementation.
Signed-off-by: NMorten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@zte.com.cn
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: sgurrappadi@nvidia.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1439569394-11974-3-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Apply frequency scaling correction factor to per-entity load tracking to
make it frequency invariant. Currently, load appears bigger when the CPU
is running slower which affects load-balancing decisions.

Each segment of the sched_avg.load_sum geometric series is now scaled by
the current frequency so that the sched_avg.load_avg of each sched entity
will be invariant from frequency scaling.

Moreover, cfs_rq.runnable_load_sum is scaled by the current frequency as
well.
Signed-off-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMorten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@zte.com.cn
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: sgurrappadi@nvidia.com
Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1439569394-11974-2-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Variable sched_numa_balancing toggles numa_balancing feature. Hence
moving from a simple read mostly variable to a more apt static_branch.
Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1439310261-16124-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Commit 2a1ed24c ("sched/numa: Prefer NUMA hotness over cache hotness")
sets sched feature NUMA to true. However this can enable NUMA hinting
faults on a UMA system.

This commit ensures that NUMA hinting faults occur only on a NUMA system
by setting/resetting sched_numa_balancing.

This commit:

  - Makes sched_numa_balancing common to CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG and
    !CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG. Earlier it was only in !CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG.

  - Checks for sched_numa_balancing instead of sched_feat(NUMA).
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1439290813-6683-3-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Simple rename of the 'numabalancing_enabled' variable to 'sched_numa_balancing'.
No functional changes.
Suggested-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1439290813-6683-2-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Since commit:

  d4573c3e ("sched: Improve load balancing in the presence of idle CPUs")

the ILB CPU starts with the idle load balancing of other idle CPUs and
finishes with itself in order to speed up the spread of tasks in all
idle CPUs.

The this_rq->next_balance is still used in nohz_idle_balance() as an
intermediate step to gather the shortest next balance before updating
nohz.next_balance. But the former has not been updated yet and is likely to
be set with the current jiffies. As a result, the nohz.next_balance will be
set with current jiffies instead of the real next balance date. This
generates spurious kicks of nohz ilde balance.

nohz_idle_balance() must set the nohz.next_balance without taking into
account this_rq->next_balance which is not updated yet. Then, this_rq will
update nohz.next_update with its next_balance once updated and if necessary.
Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438595750-20455-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The previous patches made the second argument go unused, remove it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

By observing that switched_from_fair() detaches from a runqueue, and
switched_to_fair() attaches to a runqueue, we can see that
task_move_group_fair() is one followed by the other with flipping the
runqueue in between.

Therefore extract all the common bits and implement all three
functions in terms of them.

This should fix a few corner cases wrt. vruntime normalization; where,
when we take a task off of a runqueue we convert to an approximation
of lag by subtracting min_vruntime, and when placing a task on the a
runqueue to the reverse.
Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
[peterz: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1440069720-27038-6-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

In case there are problems with the aging on attach, provide a debug
knob to turn it off.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Where switched_from_fair() will remove the entity's load from the
runqueue, switched_to_fair() does not currently add it back. This
means that when a task leaves the fair class for a short duration; say
because of PI; we loose its load contribution.

This can ripple forward and disturb the load tracking because other
operations (enqueue, dequeue) assume its factored in. Only once the
runqueue empties will the load tracking recover.

When we add it back in, age the per entity average to match up with
the runqueue age. This has the obvious problem that if the task leaves
the fair class for a significant time, the load will age to 0.

Employ the normal migration rule for inter-runqueue moves in
task_move_group_fair(). Again, there is the obvious problem of the
task migrating while not in the fair class.

The alternative solution would be to to omit the chunk in
attach_entity_load_avg(), which would effectively reset the timestamp
and use whatever avg there was.
Signed-off-by: NByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
[ Rewrote the changelog and comments. ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1440069720-27038-5-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Since we attach the entity load to the new runqueue, we should also
detatch the entity load from the old runqueue, otherwise load can
accumulate.
Signed-off-by: NByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
[ Rewrote the changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1440069720-27038-4-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Currently we conditionally add the entity load to the rq when moving
the task between cgroups.

This doesn't make sense as we always 'migrate' the task between
cgroups, so we should always migrate the load too.

[ The history here is that we used to only migrate the blocked load
  which was only meaningfull when !queued. ]
Signed-off-by: NByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
[ Rewrote the changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1440069720-27038-3-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Currently we open-code the addition/subtraction of the per entity load
to/from the runqueue, factor this out into helper functions.
Signed-off-by: NByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
[ Rewrote the changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1440069720-27038-2-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Give every class a set_cpus_allowed() method, this enables some small
optimization in the RT,DL implementation by avoiding a double
cpumask_weight() call.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dedekind1@gmail.com
Cc: juri.lelli@arm.com
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: riel@redhat.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150515154833.614517487@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Current code ensures that a task has a normalized vruntime when switching away
from the fair class, but it does not ensure the task has a non-normalized
vruntime when switching back to the fair class.

This is an example breaking this consistency:

  1. a task is in fair class and !queued
  2. changes its class to RT class (still !queued)
  3. changes its class to fair class again (still !queued)
Signed-off-by: NByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1439197375-27927-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

For cfs_rq, we have load.weight, runnable_load_avg, and load_avg.
Clean up how they are used:

  - First, as group sched_entity already largely uses load_avg, we now expand
    to use load_avg in all cases.

  - Second, for CPU-wide load balancing, we choose to use runnable_load_avg
    in all cases, which is the same as before this series.
Signed-off-by: NYuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: arjan@linux.intel.com
Cc: bsegall@google.com
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: fengguang.wu@intel.com
Cc: len.brown@intel.com
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1436918682-4971-8-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The cfs_rq's load_avg is composed of runnable_load_avg and blocked_load_avg.
Before this series, sometimes the runnable_load_avg is used, and sometimes
the load_avg is used. Completely replacing all uses of runnable_load_avg
with load_avg may be too big a leap, i.e., the blocked_load_avg is concerned
to result in overrated load. Therefore, we get runnable_load_avg back.

The new cfs_rq's runnable_load_avg is improved to be updated with all of the
runnable sched_eneities at the same time, so the one sched_entity updated and
the others stale problem is solved.
Signed-off-by: NYuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: arjan@linux.intel.com
Cc: bsegall@google.com
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: fengguang.wu@intel.com
Cc: len.brown@intel.com
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1436918682-4971-7-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>