Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 161
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 14 11月, 2018 10 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix deadlock when writing out free space caches · ea9c846f
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      commit 5ce555578e0919237fa4bda92b4670e2dd176f85 upstream.

When writing out a block group free space cache we can end deadlocking
with ourselves on an extent buffer lock resulting in a warning like the
following:

  [245043.379979] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2608 at fs/btrfs/locking.c:251 btrfs_tree_lock+0x1be/0x1d0 [btrfs]
  [245043.392792] CPU: 4 PID: 2608 Comm: btrfs-transacti Tainted: G
    W I      4.16.8 #1
  [245043.395489] RIP: 0010:btrfs_tree_lock+0x1be/0x1d0 [btrfs]
  [245043.396791] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000424b840 EFLAGS: 00010246
  [245043.398093] RAX: 0000000000000a30 RBX: ffff8807e20a3d20 RCX: 0000000000000001
  [245043.399414] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff8807e20a3d20
  [245043.400732] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffff88041f39a700 R09: ffff880000000000
  [245043.402021] R10: 0000000000000040 R11: ffff8807e20a3d20 R12: ffff8807cb220630
  [245043.403296] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8807cb220628 R15: ffff88041fbdf000
  [245043.404780] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88082fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [245043.406050] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [245043.407321] CR2: 00007fffdbdb9f10 CR3: 0000000001c09005 CR4: 00000000000206e0
  [245043.408670] Call Trace:
  [245043.409977]  btrfs_search_slot+0x761/0xa60 [btrfs]
  [245043.411278]  btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x62/0xb0 [btrfs]
  [245043.412572]  btrfs_insert_item+0x5b/0xc0 [btrfs]
  [245043.413922]  btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0xfb/0x1e0 [btrfs]
  [245043.415216]  do_chunk_alloc+0x1e5/0x2a0 [btrfs]
  [245043.416487]  find_free_extent+0xcd0/0xf60 [btrfs]
  [245043.417813]  btrfs_reserve_extent+0x96/0x1e0 [btrfs]
  [245043.419105]  btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xfb/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [245043.420378]  __btrfs_cow_block+0x127/0x550 [btrfs]
  [245043.421652]  btrfs_cow_block+0xee/0x190 [btrfs]
  [245043.422979]  btrfs_search_slot+0x227/0xa60 [btrfs]
  [245043.424279]  ? btrfs_update_inode_item+0x59/0x100 [btrfs]
  [245043.425538]  ? iput+0x72/0x1e0
  [245043.426798]  write_one_cache_group.isra.49+0x20/0x90 [btrfs]
  [245043.428131]  btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x102/0x420 [btrfs]
  [245043.429419]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x11b/0x880 [btrfs]
  [245043.430712]  ? start_transaction+0x8e/0x410 [btrfs]
  [245043.432006]  transaction_kthread+0x184/0x1a0 [btrfs]
  [245043.433341]  kthread+0xf0/0x130
  [245043.434628]  ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x4e0/0x4e0 [btrfs]
  [245043.435928]  ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40
  [245043.437236]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
  [245043.441054] ---[ end trace 15abaa2aaf36827f ]---

This is because at write_one_cache_group() when we are COWing a leaf from
the extent tree we end up allocating a new block group (chunk) and,
because we have hit a threshold on the number of bytes reserved for system
chunks, we attempt to finalize the creation of new block groups from the
current transaction, by calling btrfs_create_pending_block_groups().
However here we also need to modify the extent tree in order to insert
a block group item, and if the location for this new block group item
happens to be in the same leaf that we were COWing earlier, we deadlock
since btrfs_search_slot() tries to write lock the extent buffer that we
locked before at write_one_cache_group().

We have already hit similar cases in the past and commit d9a0540a
("Btrfs: fix deadlock when finalizing block group creation") fixed some
of those cases by delaying the creation of pending block groups at the
known specific spots that could lead to a deadlock. This change reworks
that commit to be more generic so that we don't have to add similar logic
to every possible path that can lead to a deadlock. This is done by
making __btrfs_cow_block() disallowing the creation of new block groups
(setting the transaction's can_flush_pending_bgs to false) before it
attempts to allocate a new extent buffer for either the extent, chunk or
device trees, since those are the trees that pending block creation
modifies. Once the new extent buffer is allocated, it allows creation of
pending block groups to happen again.

This change depends on a recent patch from Josef which is not yet in
Linus' tree, named "btrfs: make sure we create all new block groups" in
order to avoid occasional warnings at btrfs_trans_release_chunk_metadata().

Fixes: d9a0540a ("Btrfs: fix deadlock when finalizing block group creation")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199753
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAJtFHUTHna09ST-_EEiyWmDH6gAqS6wa=zMNMBsifj8ABu99cw@mail.gmail.com/Reported-by: NE V <eliventer@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      ea9c846f
    • J
      btrfs: make sure we create all new block groups · 1d6d4a03
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      commit 545e3366db823dc3342ca9d7fea803f829c9062f upstream.

Allocating new chunks modifies both the extent and chunk tree, which can
trigger new chunk allocations.  So instead of doing list_for_each_safe,
just do while (!list_empty()) so we make sure we don't exit with other
pending bg's still on our list.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      1d6d4a03
    • J
      btrfs: wait on caching when putting the bg cache · 2974abff
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      commit 3aa7c7a31c26321696b92841d5103461c6f3f517 upstream.

While testing my backport I noticed there was a panic if I ran
generic/416 generic/417 generic/418 all in a row.  This just happened to
uncover a race where we had outstanding IO after we destroy all of our
workqueues, and then we'd go to queue the endio work on those free'd
workqueues.

This is because we aren't waiting for the caching threads to be done
before freeing everything up, so to fix this make sure we wait on any
outstanding caching that's being done before we free up the block group,
so we're sure to be done with all IO by the time we get to
btrfs_stop_all_workers().  This fixes the panic I was seeing
consistently in testing.

------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:6112!
SMP PTI
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 27165 Comm: kworker/u4:7 Not tainted 4.16.0-02155-g3553e54a578d-dirty #875
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014
Workqueue: btrfs-cache btrfs_cache_helper
RIP: 0010:btrfs_map_bio+0x346/0x370
RSP: 0000:ffffc900061e79d0 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880071542e00 RCX: 0000000000533000
RDX: ffff88006bb74380 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff880078160000
RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffff8800781cd200 R09: 0000000000503000
R10: ffff88006cd21200 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8800781cd200 R15: ffff880071542e00
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88007fd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000000817ffc4 CR3: 0000000078314000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 btree_submit_bio_hook+0x8a/0xd0
 submit_one_bio+0x5d/0x80
 read_extent_buffer_pages+0x18a/0x320
 btree_read_extent_buffer_pages+0xbc/0x200
 ? alloc_extent_buffer+0x359/0x3e0
 read_tree_block+0x3d/0x60
 read_block_for_search.isra.30+0x1a5/0x360
 btrfs_search_slot+0x41b/0xa10
 btrfs_next_old_leaf+0x212/0x470
 caching_thread+0x323/0x490
 normal_work_helper+0xc5/0x310
 process_one_work+0x141/0x340
 worker_thread+0x44/0x3c0
 kthread+0xf8/0x130
 ? process_one_work+0x340/0x340
 ? kthread_bind+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
RIP: btrfs_map_bio+0x346/0x370 RSP: ffffc900061e79d0
---[ end trace 827eb13e50846033 ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
Kernel Offset: disabled
---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      2974abff
    • J
      btrfs: keep trim from interfering with transaction commits · 0a7f6c7e
      由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于 
      commit fee7acc361314df6561208c2d3c0882d663dd537 upstream.

Commit 499f377f (btrfs: iterate over unused chunk space in FITRIM)
fixed free space trimming, but introduced latency when it was running.
This is due to it pinning the transaction using both a incremented
refcount and holding the commit root sem for the duration of a single
trim operation.

This was to ensure safety but it's unnecessary.  We already hold the the
chunk mutex so we know that the chunk we're using can't be allocated
while we're trimming it.

In order to check against chunks allocated already in this transaction,
we need to check the pending chunks list.  To to that safely without
joining the transaction (or attaching than then having to commit it) we
need to ensure that the dev root's commit root doesn't change underneath
us and the pending chunk lists stays around until we're done with it.

We can ensure the former by holding the commit root sem and the latter
by pinning the transaction.  We do this now, but the critical section
covers the trim operation itself and we don't need to do that.

This patch moves the pinning and unpinning logic into helpers and unpins
the transaction after performing the search and check for pending
chunks.

Limiting the critical section of the transaction pinning improves the
latency substantially on slower storage (e.g. image files over NFS).

Fixes: 499f377f ("btrfs: iterate over unused chunk space in FITRIM")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      0a7f6c7e
    • J
      btrfs: don't attempt to trim devices that don't support it · 4d0dfd8f
      由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于 
      commit 0be88e367fd8fbdb45257615d691f4675dda062f upstream.

We check whether any device the file system is using supports discard in
the ioctl call, but then we attempt to trim free extents on every device
regardless of whether discard is supported.  Due to the way we mask off
EOPNOTSUPP, we can end up issuing the trim operations on each free range
on devices that don't support it, just wasting time.

Fixes: 499f377f ("btrfs: iterate over unused chunk space in FITRIM")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      4d0dfd8f
    • J
      btrfs: iterate all devices during trim, instead of fs_devices::alloc_list · 76e59a62
      由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于 
      commit d4e329de5e5e21594df2e0dd59da9acee71f133b upstream.

btrfs_trim_fs iterates over the fs_devices->alloc_list while holding the
device_list_mutex.  The problem is that ->alloc_list is protected by the
chunk mutex.  We don't want to hold the chunk mutex over the trim of the
entire file system.  Fortunately, the ->dev_list list is protected by
the dev_list mutex and while it will give us all devices, including
read-only devices, we already just skip the read-only devices.  Then we
can continue to take and release the chunk mutex while scanning each
device.

Fixes: 499f377f ("btrfs: iterate over unused chunk space in FITRIM")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      76e59a62
    • Q
      btrfs: Ensure btrfs_trim_fs can trim the whole filesystem · d147f4dc
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      commit 6ba9fc8e628becf0e3ec94083450d089b0dec5f5 upstream.

[BUG]
fstrim on some btrfs only trims the unallocated space, not trimming any
space in existing block groups.

[CAUSE]
Before fstrim_range passed to btrfs_trim_fs(), it gets truncated to
range [0, super->total_bytes).  So later btrfs_trim_fs() will only be
able to trim block groups in range [0, super->total_bytes).

While for btrfs, any bytenr aligned to sectorsize is valid, since btrfs
uses its logical address space, there is nothing limiting the location
where we put block groups.

For filesystem with frequent balance, it's quite easy to relocate all
block groups and bytenr of block groups will start beyond
super->total_bytes.

In that case, btrfs will not trim existing block groups.

[FIX]
Just remove the truncation in btrfs_ioctl_fitrim(), so btrfs_trim_fs()
can get the unmodified range, which is normally set to [0, U64_MAX].
Reported-by: NChris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Fixes: f4c697e6 ("btrfs: return EINVAL if start > total_bytes in fitrim ioctl")
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.4+
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      d147f4dc
    • Q
      btrfs: Enhance btrfs_trim_fs function to handle error better · c9ee7109
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      commit 93bba24d4b5ad1e5cd8b43f64e66ff9d6355dd20 upstream.

Function btrfs_trim_fs() doesn't handle errors in a consistent way. If
error happens when trimming existing block groups, it will skip the
remaining blocks and continue to trim unallocated space for each device.

The return value will only reflect the final error from device trimming.

This patch will fix such behavior by:

1) Recording the last error from block group or device trimming
   The return value will also reflect the last error during trimming.
   Make developer more aware of the problem.

2) Continuing trimming if possible
   If we failed to trim one block group or device, we could still try
   the next block group or device.

3) Report number of failures during block group and device trimming
   It would be less noisy, but still gives user a brief summary of
   what's going wrong.

Such behavior can avoid confusion for cases like failure to trim the
first block group and then only unallocated space is trimmed.
Reported-by: NChris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add bg_ret and dev_ret to the messages ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      c9ee7109
    • Q
      btrfs: locking: Add extra check in btrfs_init_new_buffer() to avoid deadlock · d4f56c44
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      commit b72c3aba09a53fc7c1824250d71180ca154517a7 upstream.

[BUG]
For certain crafted image, whose csum root leaf has missing backref, if
we try to trigger write with data csum, it could cause deadlock with the
following kernel WARN_ON():

  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 41 at fs/btrfs/locking.c:230 btrfs_tree_lock+0x3e2/0x400
  CPU: 1 PID: 41 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Not tainted 4.18.0-rc1+ #8
  Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_endio_write_helper
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_tree_lock+0x3e2/0x400
  Call Trace:
   btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x39f/0x770
   __btrfs_cow_block+0x285/0x9e0
   btrfs_cow_block+0x191/0x2e0
   btrfs_search_slot+0x492/0x1160
   btrfs_lookup_csum+0xec/0x280
   btrfs_csum_file_blocks+0x2be/0xa60
   add_pending_csums+0xaf/0xf0
   btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x74b/0xc90
   finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20
   normal_work_helper+0xf6/0x500
   btrfs_endio_write_helper+0x12/0x20
   process_one_work+0x302/0x770
   worker_thread+0x81/0x6d0
   kthread+0x180/0x1d0
   ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40

[CAUSE]
That crafted image has missing backref for csum tree root leaf.  And
when we try to allocate new tree block, since there is no
EXTENT/METADATA_ITEM for csum tree root, btrfs consider it's free slot
and use it.

The extent tree of the image looks like:

  Normal image                      |       This fuzzed image
  ----------------------------------+--------------------------------
  BG 29360128                       | BG 29360128
   One empty slot                   |  One empty slot
  29364224: backref to UUID tree    | 29364224: backref to UUID tree
   Two empty slots                  |  Two empty slots
  29376512: backref to CSUM tree    |  One empty slot (bad type) <<<
  29380608: backref to D_RELOC tree | 29380608: backref to D_RELOC tree
  ...                               | ...

Since bytenr 29376512 has no METADATA/EXTENT_ITEM, when btrfs try to
alloc tree block, it's an valid slot for btrfs.

And for finish_ordered_write, when we need to insert csum, we try to CoW
csum tree root.

By accident, empty slots at bytenr BG_OFFSET, BG_OFFSET + 8K,
BG_OFFSET + 12K is already used by tree block COW for other trees, the
next empty slot is BG_OFFSET + 16K, which should be the backref for CSUM
tree.

But due to the bad type, btrfs can recognize it and still consider it as
an empty slot, and will try to use it for csum tree CoW.

Then in the following call trace, we will try to lock the new tree
block, which turns out to be the old csum tree root which is already
locked:

btrfs_search_slot() called on csum tree root, which is at 29376512
|- btrfs_cow_block()
   |- btrfs_set_lock_block()
   |  |- Now locks tree block 29376512 (old csum tree root)
   |- __btrfs_cow_block()
      |- btrfs_alloc_tree_block()
         |- btrfs_reserve_extent()
            | Now it returns tree block 29376512, which extent tree
            | shows its empty slot, but it's already hold by csum tree
            |- btrfs_init_new_buffer()
               |- btrfs_tree_lock()
                  | Triggers WARN_ON(eb->lock_owner == current->pid)
                  |- wait_event()
                     Wait lock owner to release the lock, but it's
                     locked by ourself, so it will deadlock

[FIX]
This patch will do the lock_owner and current->pid check at
btrfs_init_new_buffer().
So above deadlock can be avoided.

Since such problem can only happen in crafted image, we will still
trigger kernel warning for later aborted transaction, but with a little
more meaningful warning message.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200405Reported-by: NXu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      d4f56c44
    • Q
      btrfs: Handle owner mismatch gracefully when walking up tree · 4f2a4e02
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      commit 65c6e82becec33731f48786e5a30f98662c86b16 upstream.

[BUG]
When mounting certain crafted image, btrfs will trigger kernel BUG_ON()
when trying to recover balance:

  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:8956!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
  CPU: 1 PID: 662 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.18.0-rc1-custom+ #10
  RIP: 0010:walk_up_proc+0x336/0x480 [btrfs]
  RSP: 0018:ffffb53540c9b890 EFLAGS: 00010202
  Call Trace:
   walk_up_tree+0x172/0x1f0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x3a4/0x830 [btrfs]
   merge_reloc_roots+0xe1/0x1d0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_recover_relocation+0x3ea/0x420 [btrfs]
   open_ctree+0x1af3/0x1dd0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_mount_root+0x66b/0x740 [btrfs]
   mount_fs+0x3b/0x16a
   vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x140
   btrfs_mount+0x16d/0x890 [btrfs]
   mount_fs+0x3b/0x16a
   vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x140
   do_mount+0x1fd/0xda0
   ksys_mount+0xba/0xd0
   __x64_sys_mount+0x21/0x30
   do_syscall_64+0x60/0x210
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

[CAUSE]
Extent tree corruption.  In this particular case, reloc tree root's
owner is DATA_RELOC_TREE (should be TREE_RELOC), thus its backref is
corrupted and we failed the owner check in walk_up_tree().

[FIX]
It's pretty hard to take care of every extent tree corruption, but at
least we can remove such BUG_ON() and exit more gracefully.

And since in this particular image, DATA_RELOC_TREE and TREE_RELOC share
the same root (which is obviously invalid), we needs to make
__del_reloc_root() more robust to detect such invalid sharing to avoid
possible NULL dereference as root->node can be NULL in this case.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200411Reported-by: NXu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      4f2a4e02
  3. 23 8月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 06 8月, 2018 29 次提交