The buffer passed to bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd() should be initialized
to zeros.  Kernel will enforce that to guarantee we can safely extend
info structures in the future.

Making the bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd() call in libbpf perform the zeroing
is problematic, however, since some members of the info structures
may need to be initialized by the callers (for instance pointers
to buffers to which kernel is to dump translated and jited images).

Remove the zeroing and fix up the in-tree callers before any kernel
has been released with this code.

As Daniel points out this seems to be the intended operation anyway,
since commit 95b9afd3 ("bpf: Test for bpf ID") is itself setting
the buffer pointers before calling bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd().
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Add test cases in test_verifier and test_progs.
Negative tests are added in test_verifier as well.
The test in test_progs will compare the value of narrower ctx field
load result vs. the masked value of normal full-field load result,
and will fail if they are not the same.
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The selftests depend on using the shell exit code as a mean of
detecting the success or failure of test-binary executed.  The
appropiate output "[PASS]" or "[FAIL]" in generated by
tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk.

Notice that the exit code is masked with 255. Thus, be careful if
using the number of errors as the exit code, as 256 errors would be
seen as a success.

There are two standard defined exit(3) codes:
 /usr/include/stdlib.h
 #define EXIT_FAILURE    1       /* Failing exit status.  */
 #define EXIT_SUCCESS    0       /* Successful exit status.  */

Fix test_verifier.c to not use the negative value of variable
"results", but instead return EXIT_FAILURE.

Fix test_align.c and test_progs.c to actually use exit codes, before
they were always indicating success regardless of results.
Signed-off-by: NJesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

test_bpf_obj_id() should not expect a non zero jited_prog_len
to be returned by bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd() when
net.core.bpf_jit_enable is 0.

The patch checks for net.core.bpf_jit_enable and
has different expectation on jited_prog_len.

This patch also removes the pwd.h header which I forgot
to remove after making changes.

Fixes: 95b9afd3 ("bpf: Test for bpf ID")
Reported-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Add test to exercise the bpf_prog/map id generation,
bpf_(prog|map)_get_next_id(), bpf_(prog|map)_get_fd_by_id() and
bpf_get_obj_info_by_fd().
Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

With clang/llvm 4.0+, the test case is able to generate
the following pattern:
....
440: (b7) r1 = 15
441: (05) goto pc+73
515: (79) r6 = *(u64 *)(r10 -152)
516: (bf) r7 = r10
517: (07) r7 += -112
518: (bf) r2 = r7
519: (0f) r2 += r1
520: (71) r1 = *(u8 *)(r8 +0)
521: (73) *(u8 *)(r2 +45) = r1
....

commit 332270fd ("bpf: enhance verifier to understand stack
pointer arithmetic") improved verifier to handle such a pattern.
This patch adds a C test case to actually generate such a pattern.
A dummy tracepoint interface is used to load the program
into the kernel.
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Dave reported that on sparc test_progs generates buggy swapped
eth->h_proto protocol comparisons:

  10: (15) if r3 == 0xdd86 goto pc+9
   R0=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2 R1=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=14) R2=pkt_end R3=inv
   R4=pkt(id=0,off=14,r=14) R5=inv56 R10=fp

This is due to the unconditional ...

  #define htons __builtin_bswap16
  #define ntohs __builtin_bswap16

... in test_progs that causes this. Make use of asm/byteorder.h
and use __constant_htons() where possible and only perform the
bswap16 when on little endian in non-constant case.

Fixes: 6882804c ("selftests/bpf: add a test for overlapping packet range checks")
Fixes: 37821613 ("selftests/bpf: add l4 load balancer test based on sched_cls")
Reported-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

this l4lb demo is a comprehensive test case for LLVM codegen and
kernel verifier. It's using fully inlined jhash(), complex packet
parsing and multiple map lookups of different types to stress
llvm and verifier.
The map sizes, map population and test vectors are artificial to
exercise different paths through the bpf program.
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

add C test for xdp_adjust_head(), packet rewrite and map lookups
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

add simple C test case for llvm and verifier range check fix from
commit b1977682 ("bpf: improve verifier packet range checks")
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>