- 27 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
This patch adds a new vcpu->requests bit, KVM_REQ_IMMEDIATE_EXIT. This bit requests that when next entering the guest, we should run it only for as little as possible, and exit again. We use this new option in nested VMX: When L1 launches L2, but L0 wishes L1 to continue running so it can inject an event to it, we unfortunately cannot just pretend to have run L2 for a little while - We must really launch L2, otherwise certain one-off vmcs12 parameters (namely, L1 injection into L2) will be lost. So the existing code runs L2 in this case. But L2 could potentially run for a long time until it exits, and the injection into L1 will be delayed. The new KVM_REQ_IMMEDIATE_EXIT allows us to request that L2 will be entered, as necessary, but will exit as soon as possible after entry. Our implementation of this request uses smp_send_reschedule() to send a self-IPI, with interrupts disabled. The interrupts remain disabled until the guest is entered, and then, after the entry is complete (often including processing an injection and jumping to the relevant handler), the physical interrupt is noticed and causes an exit. On recent Intel processors, we could have achieved the same goal by using MTF instead of a self-IPI. Another technique worth considering in the future is to use VM_EXIT_ACK_INTR_ON_EXIT and a highest-priority vector IPI - to slightly improve performance by avoiding the useless interrupt handler which ends up being called when smp_send_reschedule() is used. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
- 17 11月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Gleb Natapov 提交于
Signed-off-by: NGleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Gleb Natapov 提交于
Support guest/host-only profiling by switch perf msrs on a guest entry if needed. Signed-off-by: NGleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Gleb Natapov 提交于
Some cpus have special support for switching PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL msr. Add logic to detect if such support exists and works properly and extend msr switching code to use it if available. Also extend number of generic msr switching entries to 8. Signed-off-by: NGleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
- 26 9月, 2011 7 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kiszka 提交于
The use of printk_ratelimit is discouraged, replace it with pr*_ratelimited or __ratelimit. While at it, convert remaining guest-triggerable printks to rate-limited variants. Signed-off-by: NJan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Jan Kiszka 提交于
This avoids that events causing the vmexit are recorded before the actual exit reason. Signed-off-by: NJan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Kevin Tian 提交于
Instruction emulation for EOI writes can be skipped, since sane guest simply uses MOV instead of string operations. This is a nice improvement when guest doesn't support x2apic or hyper-V EOI support. a single VM bandwidth is observed with ~8% bandwidth improvement (7.4Gbps->8Gbps), by saving ~5% cycles from EOI emulation. Signed-off-by: NKevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> <Based on earlier work from>: Signed-off-by: NEddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
This patch fixes two corner cases in nested (L2) handling of TSC-related issues: 1. Somewhat suprisingly, according to the Intel spec, if L1 allows WRMSR to the TSC MSR without an exit, then this should set L1's TSC value itself - not offset by vmcs12.TSC_OFFSET (like was wrongly done in the previous code). 2. Allow L1 to disable the TSC_OFFSETING control, and then correctly ignore the vmcs12.TSC_OFFSET. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
KVM assumed in several places that reading the TSC MSR returns the value for L1. This is incorrect, because when L2 is running, the correct TSC read exit emulation is to return L2's value. We therefore add a new x86_ops function, read_l1_tsc, to use in places that specifically need to read the L1 TSC, NOT the TSC of the current level of guest. Note that one change, of one line in kvm_arch_vcpu_load, is made redundant by a different patch sent by Zachary Amsden (and not yet applied): kvm_arch_vcpu_load() should not read the guest TSC, and if it didn't, of course we didn't have to change the call of kvm_get_msr() to read_l1_tsc(). [avi: moved callback to kvm_x86_ops tsc block] Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Acked-by: NZachary Amsdem <zamsden@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Use BUG_ON(x) rather than if(x) BUG(); The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ identifier x; @@ -if (x) BUG(); +BUG_ON(x); @@ identifier x; @@ -if (!x) BUG(); +BUG_ON(!x); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Stefan Hajnoczi 提交于
The vmexit tracepoints format the exit_reason to make it human-readable. Since the exit_reason depends on the instruction set (vmx or svm), formatting is handled with ftrace_print_symbols_seq() by referring to the appropriate exit reason table. However, the ftrace_print_symbols_seq() function is not meant to be used directly in tracepoints since it does not export the formatting table which userspace tools like trace-cmd and perf use to format traces. In practice perf dies when formatting vmexit-related events and trace-cmd falls back to printing the numeric value (with extra formatting code in the kvm plugin to paper over this limitation). Other userspace consumers of vmexit-related tracepoints would be in similar trouble. To avoid significant changes to the kvm_exit tracepoint, this patch moves the vmx and svm exit reason tables into arch/x86/kvm/trace.h and selects the right table with __print_symbolic() depending on the instruction set. Note that __print_symbolic() is designed for exporting the formatting table to userspace and allows trace-cmd and perf to work. Signed-off-by: NStefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
- 24 7月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Xiao Guangrong 提交于
The idea is from Avi: | We could cache the result of a miss in an spte by using a reserved bit, and | checking the page fault error code (or seeing if we get an ept violation or | ept misconfiguration), so if we get repeated mmio on a page, we don't need to | search the slot list/tree. | (https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/22/221) When the page fault is caused by mmio, we cache the info in the shadow page table, and also set the reserved bits in the shadow page table, so if the mmio is caused again, we can quickly identify it and emulate it directly Searching mmio gfn in memslots is heavy since we need to walk all memeslots, it can be reduced by this feature, and also avoid walking guest page table for soft mmu. [jan: fix operator precedence issue] Signed-off-by: NXiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Xiao Guangrong 提交于
The idea is from Avi: | Maybe it's time to kill off bypass_guest_pf=1. It's not as effective as | it used to be, since unsync pages always use shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte, | and since we convert between the two nonpresent_ptes during sync and unsync. Signed-off-by: NXiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
- 12 7月, 2011 27 次提交
-
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
The nested VMX feature is supposed to fully emulate VMX for the guest. This (theoretically) not only allows it to run its own guests, but also also to further emulate VMX for its own guests, and allow arbitrarily deep nesting. This patch fixes a bug (discovered by Kevin Tian) in handling a VMLAUNCH by L2, which prevented deeper nesting. Deeper nesting now works (I only actually tested L3), but is currently *absurdly* slow, to the point of being unusable. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Jan Kiszka 提交于
a is unused now on CONFIG_X86_32. Signed-off-by: NJan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
Small corrections of KVM (spelling, etc.) not directly related to nested VMX. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
If the "nested" module option is enabled, add the "VMX" CPU feature to the list of CPU features KVM advertises with the KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID ioctl. Qemu uses this ioctl, and intersects KVM's list with its own list of desired cpu features (depending on the -cpu option given to qemu) to determine the final list of features presented to the guest. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
In the unlikely case that L1 does not capture MSR_IA32_TSC, L0 needs to emulate this MSR write by L2 by modifying vmcs02.tsc_offset. We also need to set vmcs12.tsc_offset, for this change to survive the next nested entry (see prepare_vmcs02()). Additionally, we also need to modify vmx_adjust_tsc_offset: The semantics of this function is that the TSC of all guests on this vcpu, L1 and possibly several L2s, need to be adjusted. To do this, we need to adjust vmcs01's tsc_offset (this offset will also apply to each L2s we enter). We can't set vmcs01 now, so we have to remember this adjustment and apply it when we later exit to L1. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
KVM's "Lazy FPU loading" means that sometimes L0 needs to set CR0.TS, even if a guest didn't set it. Moreover, L0 must also trap CR0.TS changes and NM exceptions, even if we have a guest hypervisor (L1) who didn't want these traps. And of course, conversely: If L1 wanted to trap these events, we must let it, even if L0 is not interested in them. This patch fixes some existing KVM code (in update_exception_bitmap(), vmx_fpu_activate(), vmx_fpu_deactivate()) to do the correct merging of L0's and L1's needs. Note that handle_cr() was already fixed in the above patch, and that new code in introduced in previous patches already handles CR0 correctly (see prepare_vmcs02(), prepare_vmcs12(), and nested_vmx_vmexit()). Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
When L2 tries to modify CR0 or CR4 (with mov or clts), and modifies a bit which L1 asked to shadow (via CR[04]_GUEST_HOST_MASK), we already do the right thing: we let L1 handle the trap (see nested_vmx_exit_handled_cr() in a previous patch). When L2 modifies bits that L1 doesn't care about, we let it think (via CR[04]_READ_SHADOW) that it did these modifications, while only changing (in GUEST_CR[04]) the bits that L0 doesn't shadow. This is needed for corect handling of CR0.TS for lazy FPU loading: L0 may want to leave TS on, while pretending to allow the guest to change it. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
This patch adds correct handling of IDT_VECTORING_INFO_FIELD for the nested case. When a guest exits while delivering an interrupt or exception, we get this information in IDT_VECTORING_INFO_FIELD in the VMCS. When L2 exits to L1, there's nothing we need to do, because L1 will see this field in vmcs12, and handle it itself. However, when L2 exits and L0 handles the exit itself and plans to return to L2, L0 must inject this event to L2. In the normal non-nested case, the idt_vectoring_info case is discovered after the exit, and the decision to inject (though not the injection itself) is made at that point. However, in the nested case a decision of whether to return to L2 or L1 also happens during the injection phase (see the previous patches), so in the nested case we can only decide what to do about the idt_vectoring_info right after the injection, i.e., in the beginning of vmx_vcpu_run, which is the first time we know for sure if we're staying in L2. Therefore, when we exit L2 (is_guest_mode(vcpu)), we disable the regular vmx_complete_interrupts() code which queues the idt_vectoring_info for injection on next entry - because such injection would not be appropriate if we will decide to exit to L1. Rather, we just save the idt_vectoring_info and related fields in vmcs12 (which is a convenient place to save these fields). On the next entry in vmx_vcpu_run (*after* the injection phase, potentially exiting to L1 to inject an event requested by user space), if we find ourselves in L1 we don't need to do anything with those values we saved (as explained above). But if we find that we're in L2, or rather *still* at L2 (it's not nested_run_pending, meaning that this is the first round of L2 running after L1 having just launched it), we need to inject the event saved in those fields - by writing the appropriate VMCS fields. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
Similar to the previous patch, but concerning injection of exceptions rather than external interrupts. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
The code in this patch correctly emulates external-interrupt injection while a nested guest L2 is running. Because of this code's relative un-obviousness, I include here a longer-than- usual justification for what it does - much longer than the code itself ;-) To understand how to correctly emulate interrupt injection while L2 is running, let's look first at what we need to emulate: How would things look like if the extra L0 hypervisor layer is removed, and instead of L0 injecting an interrupt, we had hardware delivering an interrupt? Now we have L1 running on bare metal with a guest L2, and the hardware generates an interrupt. Assuming that L1 set PIN_BASED_EXT_INTR_MASK to 1, and VM_EXIT_ACK_INTR_ON_EXIT to 0 (we'll revisit these assumptions below), what happens now is this: The processor exits from L2 to L1, with an external- interrupt exit reason but without an interrupt vector. L1 runs, with interrupts disabled, and it doesn't yet know what the interrupt was. Soon after, it enables interrupts and only at that moment, it gets the interrupt from the processor. when L1 is KVM, Linux handles this interrupt. Now we need exactly the same thing to happen when that L1->L2 system runs on top of L0, instead of real hardware. This is how we do this: When L0 wants to inject an interrupt, it needs to exit from L2 to L1, with external-interrupt exit reason (with an invalid interrupt vector), and run L1. Just like in the bare metal case, it likely can't deliver the interrupt to L1 now because L1 is running with interrupts disabled, in which case it turns on the interrupt window when running L1 after the exit. L1 will soon enable interrupts, and at that point L0 will gain control again and inject the interrupt to L1. Finally, there is an extra complication in the code: when nested_run_pending, we cannot return to L1 now, and must launch L2. We need to remember the interrupt we wanted to inject (and not clear it now), and do it on the next exit. The above explanation shows that the relative strangeness of the nested interrupt injection code in this patch, and the extra interrupt-window exit incurred, are in fact necessary for accurate emulation, and are not just an unoptimized implementation. Let's revisit now the two assumptions made above: If L1 turns off PIN_BASED_EXT_INTR_MASK (no hypervisor that I know does, by the way), things are simple: L0 may inject the interrupt directly to the L2 guest - using the normal code path that injects to any guest. We support this case in the code below. If L1 turns on VM_EXIT_ACK_INTR_ON_EXIT, things look very different from the description above: L1 expects to see an exit from L2 with the interrupt vector already filled in the exit information, and does not expect to be interrupted again with this interrupt. The current code does not (yet) support this case, so we do not allow the VM_EXIT_ACK_INTR_ON_EXIT exit-control to be turned on by L1. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
This patch contains the logic of whether an L2 exit should be handled by L0 and then L2 should be resumed, or whether L1 should be run to handle this exit (using the nested_vmx_vmexit() function of the previous patch). The basic idea is to let L1 handle the exit only if it actually asked to trap this sort of event. For example, when L2 exits on a change to CR0, we check L1's CR0_GUEST_HOST_MASK to see if L1 expressed interest in any bit which changed; If it did, we exit to L1. But if it didn't it means that it is we (L0) that wished to trap this event, so we handle it ourselves. The next two patches add additional logic of what to do when an interrupt or exception is injected: Does L0 need to do it, should we exit to L1 to do it, or should we resume L2 and keep the exception to be injected later. We keep a new flag, "nested_run_pending", which can override the decision of which should run next, L1 or L2. nested_run_pending=1 means that we *must* run L2 next, not L1. This is necessary in particular when L1 did a VMLAUNCH of L2 and therefore expects L2 to be run (and perhaps be injected with an event it specified, etc.). Nested_run_pending is especially intended to avoid switching to L1 in the injection decision-point described above. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
This patch adds a bunch of tests of the validity of the vmcs12 fields, according to what the VMX spec and our implementation allows. If fields we cannot (or don't want to) honor are discovered, an entry failure is emulated. According to the spec, there are two types of entry failures: If the problem was in vmcs12's host state or control fields, the VMLAUNCH instruction simply fails. But a problem is found in the guest state, the behavior is more similar to that of an exit. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
This patch implements nested_vmx_vmexit(), called when the nested L2 guest exits and we want to run its L1 parent and let it handle this exit. Note that this will not necessarily be called on every L2 exit. L0 may decide to handle a particular exit on its own, without L1's involvement; In that case, L0 will handle the exit, and resume running L2, without running L1 and without calling nested_vmx_vmexit(). The logic for deciding whether to handle a particular exit in L1 or in L0, i.e., whether to call nested_vmx_vmexit(), will appear in a separate patch below. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
Before nested VMX support, the exit handler for a guest executing a VMX instruction (vmclear, vmlaunch, vmptrld, vmptrst, vmread, vmread, vmresume, vmwrite, vmon, vmoff), was handle_vmx_insn(). This handler simply threw a #UD exception. Now that all these exit reasons are properly handled (and emulate the respective VMX instruction), nothing calls this dummy handler and it can be removed. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
Implement the VMLAUNCH and VMRESUME instructions, allowing a guest hypervisor to run its own guests. This patch does not include some of the necessary validity checks on vmcs12 fields before the entry. These will appear in a separate patch below. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
This patch contains code to prepare the VMCS which can be used to actually run the L2 guest, vmcs02. prepare_vmcs02 appropriately merges the information in vmcs12 (the vmcs that L1 built for L2) and in vmcs01 (our desires for our own guests). Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
Move some of the control field setup to common functions. These functions will also be needed for running L2 guests - L0's desires (expressed in these functions) will be appropriately merged with L1's desires. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
Move the setting of constant host-state fields (fields that do not change throughout the life of the guest) from vmx_vcpu_setup to a new common function vmx_set_constant_host_state(). This function will also be used to set the host state when running L2 guests. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
Implement the VMREAD and VMWRITE instructions. With these instructions, L1 can read and write to the VMCS it is holding. The values are read or written to the fields of the vmcs12 structure introduced in a previous patch. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
This patch implements the VMPTRST instruction. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
This patch implements the VMPTRLD instruction. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
This patch implements the VMCLEAR instruction. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
VMX instructions specify success or failure by setting certain RFLAGS bits. This patch contains common functions to do this, and they will be used in the following patches which emulate the various VMX instructions. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
In this patch we add to vmcs12 (the VMCS that L1 keeps for L2) all the standard VMCS fields. Later patches will enable L1 to read and write these fields using VMREAD/ VMWRITE, and they will be used during a VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME in preparing vmcs02, a hardware VMCS for running L2. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
We saw in a previous patch that L1 controls its L2 guest with a vcms12. L0 needs to create a real VMCS for running L2. We call that "vmcs02". A later patch will contain the code, prepare_vmcs02(), for filling the vmcs02 fields. This patch only contains code for allocating vmcs02. In this version, prepare_vmcs02() sets *all* of vmcs02's fields each time we enter from L1 to L2, so keeping just one vmcs02 for the vcpu is enough: It can be reused even when L1 runs multiple L2 guests. However, in future versions we'll probably want to add an optimization where vmcs02 fields that rarely change will not be set each time. For that, we may want to keep around several vmcs02s of L2 guests that have recently run, so that potentially we could run these L2s again more quickly because less vmwrites to vmcs02 will be needed. This patch adds to each vcpu a vmcs02 pool, vmx->nested.vmcs02_pool, which remembers the vmcs02s last used to run up to VMCS02_POOL_SIZE L2s. As explained above, in the current version we choose VMCS02_POOL_SIZE=1, I.e., one vmcs02 is allocated (and loaded onto the processor), and it is reused to enter any L2 guest. In the future, when prepare_vmcs02() is optimized not to set all fields every time, VMCS02_POOL_SIZE should be increased. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
This patch includes a utility function for decoding pointer operands of VMX instructions issued by L1 (a guest hypervisor) Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Nadav Har'El 提交于
When the guest can use VMX instructions (when the "nested" module option is on), it should also be able to read and write VMX MSRs, e.g., to query about VMX capabilities. This patch adds this support. Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-