- 11 6月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
CHV uses the gen8 shadow register mechanism so we shouldn't be checking the GT FIFO status. This effectively removes the posting read, so add an explicit posting read using FORCEWAKE_ACK_VLV (which is what use in vlv_forcewake_reset()). Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Skip __gen6_gt_wait_for_thread_c0() on CHV. Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Deepak S 提交于
Support to individually control Media/Render well based on the register access. Add CHV specific write function to habdle difference between registers that are sadowed vs those that need forcewake even for writes. Streamline the CHV forcewake functions just like was done for VLV. This will also fix a bug in accessing the common well registers, where we'd end up trying to wake up the wells too many times since we'd call force_wake_get/put twice per register access, with FORCEFAKE_ALL both times. v2: Drop write FIFO for CHV and add comman well forcewake (Ville) Re-factor CHV/VLV Forcewake offsets (Ben) v3: Fix for decrementing fw count in chv read/write. (Deepak) v4: Squash the patches (Mika) Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> [vsyrjala: Move the register range macros into intel_uncore.c] Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 05 6月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Barnes 提交于
We do this at runtime and later on now. Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Ville figured out that it needs a full display reset since apparently a lot more goes down than just the GT. Until that's address it's better to just diable gpu reset. Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 23 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Oscar Mateo 提交于
Up until now, contexts had one (and only one) backing object that was used by the hardware to save/restore render ring contexts (via the MI_SET_CONTEXT command). Other rings did not have or need this, so our i915_hw_context struct had a 1:1 relationship with a a real HW context. With Logical Ring Contexts and Execlists, this is not possible anymore: all rings need a backing object, and it cannot be reused. To prepare for that, rename our contexts to the more generic term intel_context. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 22 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Apparently we need to disable VCP unit clock gating around media reset on g4x. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 21 5月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Clear the reset domain after a succesful GPU reset on ilk. We already do that on gen4, so let's try to be a bit more consistent. And if ether render or media reset fails, we might use the leftover value in the register to pinpoint the culprit. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
All the other bits in the GDSR register are read-only, so we don't have to preserve them when we perform a GPU reset. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 20 5月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
We're using the reset domains bits for g4x on ilk. But on ilk those bits actually shifted by one bit. Fix it up so that we use the correct bits. We were actually always writing 0x2 to the reset domain bits, which is a reserved value. In practice it looks like the hardware ignores that value since nothing happens if I write that value when there's a 3D workload running. Writing the _correct_ render domain value actually makes the GPU stop. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
We should be waiting for the reset bit to clear, not remain set. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
There are comments in the gen4-5 reset functions stating that we can't reset render and media without also doing a display reset. But that's exactly what the code does, ie. we don't perform a display reset. Drop the bogus comments. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 10 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Media force wake get hangs the machine when the system is booted without displays attached. The assumption is that (at least some versions of) the firmware has skipped some initialization in that case. Empirical evidence suggests we need to reset the media force wake request register in addition to the render one to avoid hangs. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75895Reported-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reported-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
- 05 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
The same register exists for querying and programming eDRAM AKA eLLC. So we can simply use it. For now, use all the same defaults as we had for Haswell, since like Haswell, I have no further details. I do not actually have a part with eDRAM, so I cannot test this. Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NBrad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 02 4月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
The reg_read whitelist has a gen bitmask to code the gens we're allowing the register to be read on. Until now, it was a literal, but we can be a bit more expressive. To ease the review, a small test program: $ cat bit-range.c #include <stdio.h> #include <stdint.h> #define U32_C(x) x ## U #define GENMASK(h, l) (((U32_C(1) << ((h) - (l) + 1)) - 1) << (l)) #define GEN_RANGE(l, h) GENMASK(h, l) int main(int argc, char **argv) { printf("0x%08x\n", GEN_RANGE(1, 1)); printf("0x%08x\n", GEN_RANGE(1, 2)); printf("0x%08x\n", GEN_RANGE(4, 4)); printf("0x%08x\n", GEN_RANGE(4, 5)); printf("0x%08x\n", GEN_RANGE(1, 31)); printf("0x%08x\n", GEN_RANGE(4, 8)); return 0; } $ ./bit-range 0x00000002 0x00000006 0x00000010 0x00000030 0xfffffffe 0x000001f0 Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
These defines are only used in intel_uncore.c. Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
That function isn't used outside this file anymore. Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
To avoid WARNs when we call it. Testcase: igt/pm_pc8/reg-read-ioctl Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75693Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
So far force_wake_timer was only used by gen6_gt_force_wake_put. Since we always had balanced gen6_gt_force_wake_get/put calls, we could guarantee balanced calls to intel_runtime_pm_get/put. Commit 8232644c, "drm/i915: Convert the forcewake worker into a timer func" started scheduling the force_wake_timer at gen6_read, which resulted in an unbalanced runtime_pm refcount. So this commit just reverts to the old behavior until we can find a proper way to used delayed force_wake from the register read/write macros without leaving the runtime_pm refcounts unbalanced and without runtime suspending the driver while forcewake is active. Testcase: igt/pm_pc8/rte Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76544Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 18 3月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Without this the new drv_suspend/forcewake subtest I've created doesn't result in immediately visible failures. Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
This is a regression introduced in commit 0294ae7b Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Thu Mar 13 12:00:29 2014 +0000 drm/i915: Consolidate forcewake resetting to a single function The reordered setup sequence ended up calling del_timer_sync before the timer was set up correctly, resulting in endless hilarity when loading the driver. Compared to Ben's patch (which moved around the setup_timer call to sanitize_early) this moves the sanitize_early call around in the driver load call. This way we avoid calling setup_timer again in the resume code (where we also call sanitize_early). Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> Tested-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76242Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 14 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
We have two paths that try to reset the forcewake registers back to known good values, with slightly different semantics and levels of paranoia. Combine the two by passing a parameter to either restore the forcewake status or to clear our bookkeeping, and raise the paranoia level to max. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 13 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Now that we regularly defer the forcewake dance to a timer func, it is likely to fire after we disable the device during suspend. This generates an oops as we detect inconsistency in the hardware state. So before suspend, we want to complete the outstanding dance and generally sanitize the registers before handing back to the BIOS. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 08 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
In the upcoming patches we'll need to access the rest of the fields in the punit power gating register, so prepare for that. v2: - add doc reference for the power well subsystem IDs (Jesse) - remove IDs for non-existant DPIO_RX[23] subsystems (Jesse) Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 06 3月, 2014 12 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Kuoppala 提交于
As we now have intel_uncore_forcewake_reset() no need to do explicit put after reset. v2: rebase Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Mika Kuoppala 提交于
as they don't exists. v2: rename gen6_*_mt_* to gen7_*_mt_* as they never get called with gen6 (Chris) Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> (v1) Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Mika Kuoppala 提交于
When we get control from BIOS there might be mt forcewake bits already set. This causes us to do double mt get without proper clear/ack sequence. Fix this by clearing mt forcewake register on init, like we do with older gens. Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
It occured to me that when we're trying to wake up both render and media wells on VLV, we might end up calling the low level force_wake_get/put two times even though one call would be enough. Make that happen by figuring out which wells really need to be woken up based on the forcewake counts. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
VLV is the only platform where we increment/decrement the forcewake count around register access. Drop the inc/dec on VLV to make the forcewake code a bit more unified. The inc/dec are not necessary since we hold the uncore lock around the whole operation. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Use the render/media specific forcewake counts to properly restore the forcewake status after a GPU reset on VLV. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
I could swear this was already happening in the current code... Also, put the reads and writes in a generic place, so we don't forget it again when we add runtime PM support to new platforms. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Just to be sure... Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Because we shouldn't be runtime suspended when forcewake is supposed to be enabled. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> [danvet: Update commit message - no WARN expected since the bugfix for issues hit with this assert is already in. And resolve conflicts with the change from worker to timer for the delayed fw release.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
When we call gen6_gt_force_wake_put we don't actually put force_wake, we just schedule gen6_force_wake_work through mod_delayed_work, and that will eventually release force_wake. The problem is that we call intel_runtime_pm_put directly at gen6_gt_force_wake_put, so most of the times we put our runtime PM reference before the delayed work happens, so we may runtime suspend while force_wake is still supposed to be enabled if the graphics autosuspend_delay_ms is too small. Now the nice thing about the current code is that after it triggers the delayed work function it gets a refcount, and it only triggers the delayed work function if refcount is zero. This guarantees that when we schedule the funciton, it will run before we try to schedule it again, which simplifies the problem and allows for the current solution to work properly (hopefully!). v2: - Keep the VLV refcounts balanced (Jesse) Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
We don't want to suffer scheduling delay when turning off the GPU after waking it up to touch registers. Ideally, we only want to keep the GPU awake for the register access sequence, with a single forcewake dance on the first access and release immediately after the last. We set a timer on the first access so that we only dance once and on the next scheduler tick, we drop the forcewake again. This moves the cleanup routine from the common i915 workqueue to a timer func so that we don't anger powertop, and drop the forcewake again quicker. v2: Enable the deferred force_wake_put for regular register reads as well. v3: Beautification and make sure we disable forcewake when shutting down. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Mika Kuoppala 提交于
Sometimes generic driver code gets forcewake explicitly by gen6_gt_force_wake_get(), which check forcewake_count before accessing hardware. However the register access with gen8_write function access low level hw accessors directly, ignoring the forcewake_count. This leads to nested forcewake get from hardware, in ring init and possibly elsewhere, causing forcewake ack clear errors and/or hangs. Fix this by checking the forcewake count also in gen8_write v2: Read side doesn't care about shadowed registers, Remove __needs_put funkiness from gen8_write. (Ville) Improved commit message. References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74007Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 22 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kenneth Graunke 提交于
Nothing's changed here; we just need to bump the generation check. Signed-off-by: NKenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 18 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
We need to have the address space when reserving space for the objects. Since the address space and context are tied together, and reserve occurs before context switch (for good reason), we must lookup our context earlier in the process. This leaves some room for optimizations where we no longer need to use ctx_id in certain places. This will be addressed in a subsequent patch. Important tricky bit: Because slow relocations during execbuffer drop struct_mutex Perhaps it would be best to acquire the reference when we get the context, but I'll save that for another day (note I have written the patch before, and I found the changes required to be uglier than this). Note that since we currently access everything via context id, and not the data structure this is fine, though not desirable. The next change attempts to get the context only once via the context ID idr lookup, and as such, the following can happen: CTX-A is created, refcount = 1 CTX-A execbuf, mutex dropped close IOCTL called on CTX-A, refcount = 0 CTX-A resumes in execbuf. v2: Rebased on top of commit b6359918 Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed Oct 30 15:44:16 2013 +0200 drm/i915: add i915_get_reset_stats_ioctl v3: Rebased on top of commit 25b3dfc8 Author: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue Nov 12 11:57:30 2013 +0200 Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue Nov 26 16:14:33 2013 +0200 drm/i915: check context reset stats before relocations Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 14 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Not all registers need forcewake even if they're not shadowed. Add the missing check to gen8_writeX() to avoid needless forcewake usage when writing eg. display registers. v2: Use straight up <0x40000 check instead of NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE() Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 13 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
The BIOS or someone else might have done something bad and there might be old GT FIFO erros reported in GTFIFODBG. Clear those out in intel_uncore_early_sanitize() to make sure we don't mistake them for our problems. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-