1. 26 11月, 2013 3 次提交
  2. 28 10月, 2013 2 次提交
  3. 19 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 11 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 26 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  6. 23 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 12 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  8. 02 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 01 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  10. 16 7月, 2013 7 次提交
  11. 20 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  12. 18 6月, 2013 2 次提交
  13. 11 6月, 2013 2 次提交
  14. 05 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  15. 04 6月, 2013 3 次提交
    • J
      cfg80211: separate internal SME implementation · ceca7b71
      Johannes Berg 提交于
      The current internal SME implementation in cfg80211 is
      very mixed up with the MLME handling, which has been
      causing issues for a long time. There are three things
      that the implementation has to provide:
       * a basic SME implementation for nl80211's connect()
         call (for drivers implementing auth/assoc, which is
         really just mac80211) and wireless extensions
       * MLME events for the userspace SME
       * SME events (connected, disconnected etc.) for all
         different SME implementation possibilities (driver,
         cfg80211 and userspace)
      
      To achieve these goals it isn't necessary to track the
      software SME's connection status outside of it's state
      (which is the part that caused many issues.) Instead,
      track it only in the SME data (wdev->conn) and in the
      general case only track whether the wdev is connected
      or not (via wdev->current_bss.)
      
      Also separate the internal implementation to not have
      callbacks from the SME events, but rather call it from
      the API functions that the driver (or rather mac80211)
      calls. This separates the code better.
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      ceca7b71
    • J
      cfg80211/mac80211: clean up cfg80211 SME APIs · 6ff57cf8
      Johannes Berg 提交于
      Do some cleanups in the cfg80211 SME APIs, which are
      only used by mac80211.
      
      Most of these functions get a frame passed, and there
      isn't really any reason to export multiple functions
      as cfg80211 can check the frame type instead, do that.
      
      Additionally, the API functions have confusing names
      like cfg80211_send_...() which was meant to indicate
      that it sends an event to userspace, but gets a bit
      confusing when there's both TX and RX and they're not
      all clearly labeled.
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      6ff57cf8
    • J
      cfg80211: take WoWLAN support information out of wiphy struct · 964dc9e2
      Johannes Berg 提交于
      There's no need to take up the space for devices that don't
      support WoWLAN, and most drivers can even make the support
      data static const (except where it's modified at runtime.)
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      964dc9e2
  16. 29 5月, 2013 2 次提交
  17. 27 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  18. 25 5月, 2013 3 次提交
  19. 17 5月, 2013 3 次提交
  20. 22 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  21. 16 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  22. 25 3月, 2013 1 次提交