- 13 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yijing Wang 提交于
No one uses pci_scan_bus_parented() any more, remove it. Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 30 5月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
David Ahern reported that d63e2e1f ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") fails to boot on sparc/T5-8: pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 0x184: can't handle BAR above 4GB (bus address 0x110204000) The problem is that sparc64 assumed that dma_addr_t only needed to hold DMA addresses, i.e., bus addresses returned via the DMA API (dma_map_single(), etc.), while the PCI core assumed dma_addr_t could hold *any* bus address, including raw BAR values. On sparc64, all DMA addresses fit in 32 bits, so dma_addr_t is a 32-bit type. However, BAR values can be 64 bits wide, so they don't fit in a dma_addr_t. d63e2e1f added new checking that tripped over this mismatch. Add pci_bus_addr_t, which is wide enough to hold any PCI bus address, including both raw BAR values and DMA addresses. This will be 64 bits on 64-bit platforms and on platforms with a 64-bit dma_addr_t. Then dma_addr_t only needs to be wide enough to hold addresses from the DMA API. [bhelgaas: changelog, bugzilla, Kconfig to ensure pci_bus_addr_t is at least as wide as dma_addr_t, documentation] Fixes: d63e2e1f ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") Fixes: 23b13bc7 ("PCI: Fail safely if we can't handle BARs larger than 4GB") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQU1gJY1LYrxs+ma5LCTEEe4xmtjRG0aXJ9K_Tsu+m9Wuw@mail.gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427857069-6789-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96231Reported-by: NDavid Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Tested-by: NDavid Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.19+
-
由 Yijing Wang 提交于
Previously we assumed that PCIe Root Ports and Downstream Ports had Links on their secondary side. That is true in most systems, but it is possible to connect a switch with either an Upstream or a Downstream Port leading downstream. Instead of relying on the component type to identify devices that have links leading downstream, use the "dev->has_secondary_link" field. [bhelgaas: changelog] Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 22 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yijing Wang 提交于
A PCIe Port is an interface to a Link. A Root Port is a PCI-PCI bridge in a Root Complex and has a Link on its secondary (downstream) side. For other Ports, the Link may be on either the upstream (closer to the Root Complex) or downstream side of the Port. The usual topology has a Root Port connected to an Upstream Port. We previously assumed this was the only possible topology, and that a Downstream Port's Link was always on its downstream side, like this: +---------------------+ +------+ | Downstream | | Root | | Upstream Port +--Link-- | Port +--Link--+ Port | +------+ | Downstream | | Port +--Link-- +---------------------+ But systems do exist (see URL below) where the Root Port is connected to a Downstream Port. In this case, a Downstream Port's Link may be on either the upstream or downstream side: +---------------------+ +------+ | Upstream | | Root | | Downstream Port +--Link-- | Port +--Link--+ Port | +------+ | Downstream | | Port +--Link-- +---------------------+ We can't use the Port type to determine which side the Link is on, so add a bit in struct pci_dev to keep track. A Root Port's Link is always on the Port's secondary side. A component (Endpoint or Port) on the other end of the Link obviously has the Link on its upstream side. If that component is a Port, it is part of a Switch or a Bridge. A Bridge has a PCI or PCI-X bus on its secondary side, not a Link. The internal bus of a Switch connects the Port to another Port whose Link is on the downstream side. [bhelgaas: changelog, comment, cache "type", use if/else] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/54EB81B2.4050904@pobox.com Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94361Suggested-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 07 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael S. Tsirkin 提交于
If we enable MSI, then kexec a new kernel, the new kernel may receive MSIs it is not prepared for. Commit d5dea7d9 ("PCI: msi: Disable msi interrupts when we initialize a pci device") prevents this, but only if the new kernel is built with CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y. Move the "disable MSI" functionality from drivers/pci/msi.c to a new pci_msi_setup_pci_dev() in drivers/pci/probe.c so we can disable MSIs when we enumerate devices even if the kernel doesn't include full MSI support. [bhelgaas: changelog, disable MSIs in pci_setup_device(), put pci_msi_setup_pci_dev() at its final destination] Signed-off-by: NMichael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 09 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ray Jui 提交于
Export the following symbols so they can be referenced by a PCI host bridge driver compiled as a kernel loadable module: pci_common_swizzle pci_create_root_bus pci_stop_root_bus pci_remove_root_bus pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources pci_fixup_irqs Signed-off-by: NRay Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
-
- 19 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yijing Wang 提交于
Previously, pci_scan_root_bus() created a root PCI bus, enumerated the devices on it, and called pci_bus_add_devices(), which made the devices available for drivers to claim them. Most callers assigned resources to devices after pci_scan_root_bus() returns, which may be after drivers have claimed the devices. This is incorrect; the PCI core should not change device resources while a driver is managing the device. Remove pci_bus_add_devices() from pci_scan_root_bus() and do it after any resource assignment in the callers. Note that ARM's pci_common_init_dev() already called pci_bus_add_devices() after pci_scan_root_bus(), so we only need to remove the first call: pci_common_init_dev pcibios_init_hw pci_scan_root_bus pci_bus_add_devices # first call pci_bus_assign_resources pci_bus_add_devices # second call [bhelgaas: changelog, drop "root_bus" var in alpha common_init_pci(), return failure earlier in mn10300, add "return" in x86 pcibios_scan_root(), return early if xtensa platform_pcibios_fixup() fails] Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> CC: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> CC: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> CC: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> CC: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> CC: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> CC: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> CC: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> CC: Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com> CC: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> CC: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> CC: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> CC: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 13 3月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Yijing Wang 提交于
Previously, pci_scan_bus() created a root PCI bus, enumerated the devices on it, and called pci_bus_add_devices(), which made the devices available for drivers to claim them. Most callers assigned resources to devices after pci_scan_bus() returns, which may be after drivers have claimed the devices. This is incorrect; the PCI core should not change device resources while a driver is managing the device. Remove pci_bus_add_devices() from pci_scan_bus() and do it after any resource assignment in the callers. [bhelgaas: changelog, check for failure in mcf_pci_init()] Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> CC: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> CC: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn> CC: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> CC: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> CC: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
-
由 Murali Karicheri 提交于
If there is a DT node available for the root bridge's parent device, use the DMA configuration from that device node. For example, Keystone PCI devices would require dma_pfn_offset to be set correctly in the device structure of the PCI device in order to have the correct DMA mask. The DT node will have dma-ranges defined for this. Also support using the DT property dma-coherent to allow coherent DMA operation by the PCI device. Use the new helper function of_pci_dma_configure() to update the device DMA configuration. This fixes DMA on systems where DMA addresses are a constant offset from CPU physical addresses. Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> (AMD Seattle) Signed-off-by: NMurali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> CC: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> CC: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
-
- 05 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Use common resource list management data structure and interfaces instead of private implementation. Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 20 11月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Myron Stowe 提交于
As a consequence of restoring the detection of invalid BARs, add a new informational printk like the following when such occurrences are encountered. pci ssss:bb:dd.f: [Firmware Bug]: reg 0xXX: invalid BAR (can't size) Reported-by: NWilliam Unruh <unruh@physics.ubc.ca> Reported-by: NMartin Lucina <martin@lucina.net> Signed-off-by: NMyron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> CC: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Aaron reported that a 32-bit x86 kernel with Physical Address Extension (PAE) support complains about bridge prefetchable memory windows above 4GB: pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x380000000000-0x383fffffffff] ... pci 0000:03:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x383fffc00000-0x383fffdfffff 64bit pref] pci 0000:03:00.0: reg 0x20: [mem 0x383fffe04000-0x383fffe07fff 64bit pref] pci 0000:03:00.1: reg 0x10: [mem 0x383fffa00000-0x383fffbfffff 64bit pref] pci 0000:03:00.1: reg 0x20: [mem 0x383fffe00000-0x383fffe03fff 64bit pref] pci 0000:00:02.2: PCI bridge to [bus 03-04] pci 0000:00:02.2: bridge window [io 0x1000-0x1fff] pci 0000:00:02.2: bridge window [mem 0x91900000-0x91cfffff] pci 0000:00:02.2: can't handle 64-bit address space for bridge In this kernel, unsigned long is 32 bits and dma_addr_t is 64 bits. Previously we used "unsigned long" to hold the bridge window address. But this is a bus address, so we should use dma_addr_t instead. Use dma_addr_t to hold the bridge window base and limit. The question of whether the CPU can actually *address* the window is separate and depends on what the physical address space of the CPU is and whether the host bridge does any address translation. [bhelgaas: fix "shift count > width of type", changelog, stable tag] Fixes: d56dbf5b ("PCI: Allocate 64-bit BARs above 4G when possible") Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88131Reported-by: NAaron Ma <mapengyu@gmail.com> Tested-by: NAaron Ma <mapengyu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.14+
-
- 14 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Previously we applied _HPX type 2 record Link Control register settings only to bridges with a subordinate bus. But it's better to apply them to all devices with a link because if the subordinate bus has not been allocated yet, we won't apply settings to the device. Use pcie_cap_has_lnkctl() to determine whether the device has a Link Control register instead of looking at dev->subordinate. [bhelgaas: changelog] Fixes: 6cd33649 ("PCI: Add pci_configure_device() during enumeration") Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 11 11月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Markus Elfring 提交于
The functions pci_dev_put(), pci_pme_wakeup_bus(), and put_device() return immediately if their argument is NULL. Thus the test before the call is not needed. Remove these unnecessary tests. This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Myron Stowe 提交于
__pci_read_base() disables decoding while sizing device BARs. We can't print while decoding is disabled, which leads to some rather messy exit logic. Coalesce the sizing logic to minimize the time decoding is disabled. This lets us print errors where they're detected. The refactoring also takes advantage of the symmetry of obtaining the BAR's extent (pci_size) and storing the result as the 'region' for both the 32-bit and 64-bit BARs, consolidating both cases. No functional change intended. [bhelgaas: move pci_size() up, per Thomas Petazzoni, Thierry Reding, Kevin Hilman] Signed-off-by: NMyron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> CC: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Myron Stowe 提交于
Commit 6ac665c6 ("PCI: rewrite PCI BAR reading code") masked off low-order bits from 'l', but not from 'sz'. Both are passed to pci_size(), which compares 'base == maxbase' to check for read-only BARs. The masking of 'l' means that comparison will never be 'true', so the check for read-only BARs no longer works. Resolve this by also masking off the low-order bits of 'sz' before passing it into pci_size() as 'maxbase'. With this change, pci_size() will once again catch the problems that have been encountered to date: - AGP aperture BAR of AMD-7xx host bridges: if the AGP window is disabled, this BAR is read-only and read as 0x00000008 [1] - BARs 0-4 of ALi IDE controllers can be non-zero and read-only [1] - Intel Sandy Bridge - Thermal Management Controller [8086:0103]; BAR 0 returning 0xfed98004 [2] - Intel Xeon E5 v3/Core i7 Power Control Unit [8086:2fc0]; Bar 0 returning 0x00001a [3] Link: [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/drivers/pci/probe.c?id=1307ef6621991f1c4bc3cec1b5a4ebd6fd3d66b9 ("PCI: probing read-only BARs" (pre-git)) Link: [2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43331 Link: [3] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85991Reported-by: NWilliam Unruh <unruh@physics.ubc.ca> Reported-by: NMartin Lucina <martin@lucina.net> Signed-off-by: NMyron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> CC: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v2.6.27+
-
- 01 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Catalin Marinas 提交于
The handling of PCI domains (or PCI segments in ACPI speak) is usually a straightforward affair but its implementation is currently left to the architectural code, with pci_domain_nr(b) querying the value of the domain associated with bus b. This patch introduces CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC as an option that can be selected if an architecture wants a simple implementation where the value of the domain associated with a bus is stored in struct pci_bus. The architectures that select CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC will then have to implement pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() as a way of setting the domain number associated with a root bus. All child buses except the root bus will inherit the domain_nr value from their parent. Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com> [Renamed pci_set_domain_nr() to pci_bus_assign_domain_nr()] Signed-off-by: NLiviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
-
- 20 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
This reverts commit 1820ffdc ("PCI: Make sure bus number resources stay within their parents bounds") because it breaks some systems with LSI Logic FC949ES Fibre Channel Adapters, apparently by exposing a defect in those adapters. Dirk tested a Tyan VX50 (B4985) with this device that worked like this prior to 1820ffdc: bus: [bus 00-7f] on node 0 link 1 ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (domain 0000 [bus 00-07]) pci 0000:00:0e.0: PCI bridge to [bus 0a] pci_bus 0000:0a: busn_res: can not insert [bus 0a] under [bus 00-07] (conflicts with (null) [bus 00-07]) pci 0000:0a:00.0: [1000:0646] type 00 class 0x0c0400 (FC adapter) Note that the root bridge [bus 00-07] aperture is wrong; this is a BIOS defect in the PCI0 _CRS method. But prior to 1820ffdc, we didn't enforce that aperture, and the FC adapter worked fine at 0a:00.0. After 1820ffdc, we notice that 00:0e.0's aperture is not contained in the root bridge's aperture, so we reconfigure it so it *is* contained: pci 0000:00:0e.0: bridge configuration invalid ([bus 0a-0a]), reconfiguring pci 0000:00:0e.0: PCI bridge to [bus 06-07] This effectively moves the FC device from 0a:00.0 to 07:00.0, which should be legal. But when we enumerate bus 06, the FC device doesn't respond, so we don't find anything. This is probably a defect in the FC device. Possible fixes (due to Yinghai): 1) Add a quirk to fix the _CRS information based on what amd_bus.c read from the hardware 2) Reset the FC device after we change its bus number 3) Revert 1820ffdc Fix 1 would be relatively easy, but it does sweep the LSI FC issue under the rug. We might want to reconfigure bus numbers in the future for some other reason, e.g., hotplug, and then we could trip over this again. For that reason, I like fix 2, but we don't know whether it actually works, and we don't have a patch for it yet. This revert is fix 3, which also sweeps the LSI FC issue under the rug. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84281Reported-by: NDirk Gouders <dirk@gouders.net> Tested-by: NDirk Gouders <dirk@gouders.net> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.15+ CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
This reverts commit fc1b2531 ("PCI: Don't scan random busses in pci_scan_bridge()") because it breaks CardBus on some machines. David tested a Dell Latitude D505 that worked like this prior to fc1b2531: pci 0000:00:1e.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01] pci 0000:01:01.0: CardBus bridge to [bus 02-05] Note that the 01:01.0 CardBus bridge has a bus number aperture of [bus 02-05], but those buses are all outside the 00:1e.0 PCI bridge bus number aperture, so accesses to buses 02-05 never reach CardBus. This is later patched up by yenta_fixup_parent_bridge(), which changes the subordinate bus number of the 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: pci_bus 0000:01: Raising subordinate bus# of parent bus (#01) from #01 to #05 With fc1b2531, pci_scan_bridge() fails immediately when it notices that we can't allocate a valid secondary bus number for the CardBus bridge, and CardBus doesn't work at all: pci 0000:01:01.0: can't allocate child bus 01 from [bus 01] I'd prefer to fix this by integrating the yenta_fixup_parent_bridge() logic into pci_scan_bridge() so we fix the bus number apertures up front. But I don't think we can do that before v3.17, so I'm going to revert this to avoid the problem while we're working on the long-term fix. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83441 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1409303414-5196-1-git-send-email-david.henningsson@canonical.comReported-by: NDavid Henningsson <david.henningsson@canonical.com> Tested-by: NDavid Henningsson <david.henningsson@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.15+
-
- 13 9月, 2014 8 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
There's not really a good way to determine whether firmware has already configured a device with _HPP/_HPX settings. On legacy systems, the BIOS has probably configured everything, but on UEFI systems it is not required to do so. Per the PCI Firmware Specification, rev 3.1, sec 3.5, if PCI_COMMAND_IO or PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY is set, we can assume firmware has set the corresponding BARs and maybe we can assume it has configured the rest of the device. And if a bridge has PCI_COMMAND_PARITY or PCI_COMMAND_SERR set, we can assume firmware has configured the bridge. But we can't tell much about devices without BARs. I think it should be safe to apply _HPP and _HPX settings anyway, even if firmware has already configured the device, so configure everything we find. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Linux manages MPS and MRRS settings to keep them consistent across the PCIe fabric. BIOS doesn't participate in this Linux management, so ignore that part of any _HPX settings it supplies. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
We currently apply _HPP settings only to: - non-bridge devices, and - PCI-to-PCI bridges i.e., we do not apply them to PCI-to-ISA bridges and the like. It has been that way since _HPP support was added by 40abb96c ("pciehp: Fix programming hotplug parameters"), but I don't think there's any reason to exclude these other bridges. Apply _HPP settings to hot-added PCI devices of any type. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Do not clear PCI_COMMAND_SERR or PCI_COMMAND_PARITY based on _HPP. The spec (ACPI rev 5.0, sec 6.2.7) says that when "Enable SERR" is set to 1, we should enable SERR in the command register. It says nothing about *disabling* SERR or PERR; in fact, the example in 6.2.7.1 says we should leave PERR alone unless "Enable PERR" is 1. For hot-added devices, this probably doesn't matter because they power up with these bits cleared. But in addition to hot-plugged devices, the spec allows the platform to use _HPP for "configuration of PCI devices not configured by the BIOS at system boot," and it may make a difference for devices present at boot. This change means that if BIOS enables SERR or PERR on a device, and it supplies _HPP or _HPX with the SERR or PERR bits *cleared*, we will now leave SERR or PERR reporting enabled on that device instead of disabling it as we previously did. See also 40abb96c ("pciehp: Fix programming hotplug parameters"), where this code was first added. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
The ACPI _HPP method was defined before PCIe existed, so its documentation only mentions PCI. The _HPX Type 0 setting record is essentially identical to _HPP, but the spec (ACPI rev 5.0, sec 6.2.8.1) says it should be applied to PCI, PCI-X, and PCIe devices, with settings being ignored if they are not applicable. Some platforms with both conventional PCI and PCIe devices provide only _HPP (not _HPX), so treat _HPP the same way as an _HPX Type 0 record and apply it to PCIe devices as well as PCI and PCI-X. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
All pci_configure_slot() uses have been removed, so remove the definition as well. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Some platforms can tell the OS how to configure PCI devices, e.g., how to set cache line size, error reporting enables, etc. ACPI defines _HPP and _HPX methods for this purpose. This configuration was previously done by some of the hotplug drivers using pci_configure_slot(). But not all hotplug drivers did this, and per the spec (ACPI rev 5.0, sec 6.2.7), we can also do it for "devices not configured by the BIOS at system boot." Move this configuration into the PCI core by adding pci_configure_device() and calling it from pci_device_add(), so we do this for all devices as we enumerate them. This is based on pci_configure_slot(), which is used by hotplug drivers. I omitted: - pcie_bus_configure_settings() because it configures MPS and MRRS, which requires global knowledge of the fabric and must be done later, and - configuration of subordinate devices; that will happen when we call pci_device_add() for those devices. Because pci_configure_slot() was only done by hotplug drivers, this initial version of pci_configure_device() only configures hot-added devices, ignoring anything added during boot. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Move pci_configure_slot() and related functions from drivers/pci/hotplug/pcihp_slot to drivers/pci/probe.c. This is to prepare for doing device configuration during the normal enumeration process instead of just after hot-add. No functional change. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 09 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rajat Jain 提交于
Per PCIe r3.0, sec 2.3.2, an endpoint may respond to a Configuration Request with a Completion with Configuration Request Retry Status (CRS). This terminates the Configuration Request. When the CRS Software Visibility feature is disabled (as it is by default), a Root Complex must handle a CRS Completion by re-issuing the Configuration Request. This is invisible to software. From the CPU's point of view, an endpoint that always responds with CRS causes a hang because the Root Complex never supplies data to complete the CPU read. When CRS Software Visibility is enabled, a Root Complex that receives a CRS Completion for a read of the Vendor ID must return data of 0x0001. The Vendor ID of 0x0001 indicates to software that the endpoint is not ready. We now have more devices that require CRS Software Visibility. For example, a PLX 8713 NT bridge may respond with CRS until it has been configured via I2C, and the I2C configuration is completely independent of PCI enumeration. Enable CRS Software Visibility if it is supported. This allows a system with such a device to work (though the PCI core times out waiting for it to become ready, and we have to rescan the bus after it is ready). This essentially reverts ad7edfe0 ("[PCI] Do not enable CRS Software Visibility by default"). The failures that led to ad7edfe0 should be addressed by 89665a6a ("PCI: Check only the Vendor ID to identify Configuration Request Retry"). [bhelgaas: changelog] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20071029061532.5d10dfc6@snowcone Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LFD.0.9999.0712271023090.21557@woody.linux-foundation.orgSigned-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net> Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <groeck@juniper.net> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Rajat Jain 提交于
Per PCIe r3.0, sec 2.3.2, if a Root Complex - has Configuration Request Retry Status Software Visibility enabled, - issues a Configuration Read of both bytes of the Vendor ID, and - receives a Completion with Configuration Request Retry Status (CRS), it must complete the request to the host by fabricating data of 0x0001 for the Vendor ID and 0xff for any additional bytes in the request. Linux issues a single config read for the four bytes containing the Vendor ID and the Device ID. Previously we checked all four bytes for 0xffff0001 to identify CRS. However, it is only the Vendor ID that really indicates CRS, because it's sufficient to read only those two bytes. Checking the Device ID verifies spec compliance but doesn't add any information. Some Root Complexes appear to indicate CRS by returning 0x0001 for the Vendor ID along with the actual the Device ID. Previously we interpreted that as a valid Vendor/Device ID pair, although 0x0001 is reserved and cannot be a valid Vendor ID. [bhelgaas: changelog] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4729FC36.3040000@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net> Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <groeck@juniper.net> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 11 6月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ryan Desfosses 提交于
Merge quoted strings that are broken across lines into a single entity. The compiler merges them anyway, but checkpatch complains about it, and merging them makes it easier to grep for strings. No functional change. [bhelgaas: changelog, do the same for everything under drivers/pci] Signed-off-by: NRyan Desfosses <ryan@desfo.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Ryan Desfosses 提交于
Fix various whitespace errors. No functional change. [bhelgaas: fix other similar problems] Signed-off-by: NRyan Desfosses <ryan@desfo.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Ryan Desfosses 提交于
Move EXPORT_SYMBOL so it immediately follows the function or variable. No functional change. [bhelgaas: squash similar changes, fix hotplug, probe, rom, search, too] Signed-off-by: NRyan Desfosses <ryan@desfo.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 29 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Williamson 提交于
The driver_override field allows us to specify the driver for a device rather than relying on the driver to provide a positive match of the device. This shortcuts the existing process of looking up the vendor and device ID, adding them to the driver new_id, binding the device, then removing the ID, but it also provides a couple advantages. First, the above existing process allows the driver to bind to any device matching the new_id for the window where it's enabled. This is often not desired, such as the case of trying to bind a single device to a meta driver like pci-stub or vfio-pci. Using driver_override we can do this deterministically using: echo pci-stub > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:03:00.0/driver_override echo 0000:03:00.0 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:03:00.0/driver/unbind echo 0000:03:00.0 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers_probe Previously we could not invoke drivers_probe after adding a device to new_id for a driver as we get non-deterministic behavior whether the driver we intend or the standard driver will claim the device. Now it becomes a deterministic process, only the driver matching driver_override will probe the device. To return the device to the standard driver, we simply clear the driver_override and reprobe the device: echo > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:03:00.0/driver_override echo 0000:03:00.0 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:03:00.0/driver/unbind echo 0000:03:00.0 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers_probe Another advantage to this approach is that we can specify a driver override to force a specific binding or prevent any binding. For instance when an IOMMU group is exposed to userspace through VFIO we require that all devices within that group are owned by VFIO. However, devices can be hot-added into an IOMMU group, in which case we want to prevent the device from binding to any driver (override driver = "none") or perhaps have it automatically bind to vfio-pci. With driver_override it's a simple matter for this field to be set internally when the device is first discovered to prevent driver matches. Signed-off-by: NAlex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 28 5月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Williamson 提交于
When a PCI-to-PCIe bridge is stacked on a PCIe-to-PCI bridge, we can have PCIe endpoints masked by a conventional PCI bus. This makes the extended config space of the PCIe endpoint inaccessible. The PCIe-to-PCI bridge is supposed to handle any type 1 configuration transactions where the extended config offset bits are non-zero as an Unsupported Request rather than forward it to the secondary interface. As noted here, there are a couple known offenders to this rule. These bridges drop the extended offset bits, resulting in the conventional config space being aliased many times across the extended config space. For Intel NICs, this alias often seems to expose a bogus SR-IOV cap. Stacking bridges may seem like an uncommon scenario, but note that any conventional PCI slot in a modern PC is already the secondary interface of an onboard PCIe-to-PCI bridge. The user need only add a PCI-to-PCIe adapter and PCIe device to encounter this problem. Signed-off-by: NAlex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Yijing Wang 提交于
Use pci_is_bridge() to simplify code. No functional change. Requires: 326c1cda PCI: Rename pci_is_bridge() to pci_has_subordinate() Requires: 1c86438c PCI: Add new pci_is_bridge() interface Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 24 5月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
For a subtractive decode bridge, we previously added and printed all resources of the primary bus, even if they were not valid. In the example below, the bridge 00:1c.3 has no windows enabled, so there are no valid resources on bus 02. But since 02:00.0 is subtractive decode bridge, we add and print all those invalid resources, which don't really make sense: pci 0000:00:1c.3: PCI bridge to [bus 02-03] pci 0000:02:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 03] (subtractive decode) pci 0000:02:00.0: bridge window [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x0] (subtractive decode) Add and print the subtractively-decoded resources only if they are valid. There's an example in the dmesg log attached to the bugzilla below (but this patch doesn't fix the bug reported there). Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73141Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
If the console is a PCI device, and we try to print to it while its decoding is disabled, the system will hang. This particular printk hasn't caused a problem yet, but it could, so this fixes it. See also 0ff9514b ("PCI: Don't print anything while decoding is disabled"). Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
If a BAR is above 4GB and our dma_addr_t is too small, don't clear the BAR to zero: that doesn't disable the BAR, and it makes it more likely that the BAR will conflict with things if we turn on the memory enable bit (as we will at "out:" if the device was already enabled at the handoff). We should also print the BAR info and its original size so we can follow the process when we try to assign space to it. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
If dma_addr_t is too small to represent the BAR value, pcibios_bus_to_resource() will fail, so just remember the BAR size directly in the resource. The resource is already marked UNSET, so we know the address isn't valid anyway. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
We can only handle BARs above 4GB if dma_addr_t (not resource_size_t) is 64 bits wide. If we have a 64-bit resource_size_t and a 32-bit dma_addr_t, we can't deal with BARs above 4GB. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-