Just like with ctrl events, drivers may want to get called back on
listener add / remove for other event types too. Rather then special
casing all of this in subscribe / unsubscribe event it is better to
use ops for this.
Signed-off-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

It's getting confusing who is linking to what, so add an overview at
the start of the header.
Signed-off-by: NHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Thanks to Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>.
Signed-off-by: NHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

When the event queue for a subscribed event is full, then the oldest
event is dropped. It would be nice if the contents of that oldest
event could be merged with the next-oldest. That way no information is
lost, only intermediate steps are lost.

This patch adds optional replace() (called when only one kevent was allocated)
and merge() (called when more than one kevent was allocated) callbacks that
will be called to do this job.

These two callbacks are implemented for the V4L2_EVENT_CTRL event.
Signed-off-by: NHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

The driver had to decide how many events to allocate when the v4l2_fh struct
was created. It was possible to add more events afterwards, but there was no
way to ensure that you wouldn't miss important events if the event queue
would fill up for that filehandle.

In addition, once there were no more free events, any new events were simply
dropped on the floor.

For the control event in particular this made life very difficult since
control status/value changes could just be missed if the number of allocated
events and the speed at which the application read events was too low to keep
up with the number of generated events. The application would have no idea
what the latest state was for a control since it could have missed the latest
control change.

So this patch makes some major changes in how events are allocated. Instead
of allocating events per-filehandle they are now allocated when subscribing an
event. So for that particular event type N events (determined by the driver)
are allocated. Those events are reserved for that particular event type.
This ensures that you will not miss events for a particular type altogether.

In addition, if there are N events in use and a new event is raised, then
the oldest event is dropped and the new one is added. So the latest event
is always available.

This can be further improved by adding the ability to merge the state of
two events together, ensuring that no data is lost at all. This will be
added in the next patch.

This also makes it possible to allow the user to determine the number of
events that will be allocated. This is not implemented at the moment, but
would be trivial.
Signed-off-by: NHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

The v4l2_ctrl_fh struct connected v4l2_ctrl with v4l2_fh so the control
would know which filehandles subscribed to it. However, it is much easier
to use struct v4l2_subscribed_event directly for that and get rid of that
intermediate struct.
Signed-off-by: NHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Drivers that supported events used to be rare, but now that controls can also
raise events this will become much more common since almost all drivers have
controls.

This means that keeping struct v4l2_events as a separate struct make no more
sense. Merging it into struct v4l2_fh simplifies things substantially as it
is now an integral part of the filehandle struct.
Signed-off-by: NHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Whenever a control changes value or state an event is sent to anyone
that subscribed to it.

This functionality is useful for control panels but also for applications
that need to wait for (usually status) controls to change value.
Signed-off-by: NHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Add event handling backend to V4L2. The backend handles event subscription
and delivery to file handles. Event subscriptions are based on file handle.
Events may be delivered to all subscribed file handles on a device
independent of where they originate from.
Signed-off-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@maxwell.research.nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>